Quote: (12-28-2016 04:58 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:
Quote: (12-28-2016 03:53 PM)Enigma Wrote:
Hmmm, what other group does all of their social and political activism online and tries to destroy the career of anyone who doesn't pass their purity signaling test? It somehow seems familiar.
Given that Mike seemed quite happy to doxx Baked Alaska in a couple of now deleted periscope tweets - gotta have that plausible deniability! - that are now being gleefully-shared online by both the SJW's and the Alt-Right, and that there seems to be much discussion online about him doxxing right in the past, and aiming false accusations at people with the goals of destroying them, all sides of this seem awfully-familiar.
Mike does plenty offline. He's had dozens of meetups, met many members of this forum, released multiple best-selling books, produced two films, given an extensive history of his personal life, reported live at both the Republican and Democratic convention, organized boycotts, paid reporters at NYC bombings/Milwaukee riots/ etc., broken major news stories...
Do I need to go on? Mike is one of the most visible figures to come from this side of the net. The only guy who comes close is Roosh, and I don't think he's posted nearly as much info on his personal life.
Also, who's career did he try to destroy, other than out-of-control leftists and cuckservatives? He fired an employee, who then had a meltdown on Twitter. Mike responded to the meltdown in kind.
Mike is not stalking anyone on Twitter/Periscope, leaving dozens of fake reviews on people's books, etc.
Could he have handled it better? Possibly.
But claiming he's an SJW because he "doxxed" (with information that was mostly public to begin with) some alcoholic Youtube rapper after the YEARS of value he's given to this community is an absolute and total joke.
By the way, I noticed in your last post attacking Mike that you purposely left out the link to the Forney article (despite making it a point to hyperlink the dead D&P article in the quote?).
Is it because Forney's post goes on to agree with Mike and "doxx" several people in the manosphere? Yet you just claimed that doxxing was wrong. ("For the record, I think doxxing right is a low down dog act.")
And for the record, Roosh and other people had criticized the manosphere prior to 2014.
Speaking of Forney, he and Mike are friends if I'm not mistaken, and Cernovich repeatedly declined to "disavow" Forney in an interview he did recently, just as he's always defended Roosh.
Quote:Quote:
If I wanted people with a history of dishonorable actions and who praise and sell degeneracy finger-wagging at me about what constitutes acceptable speech, well, we've already had that.
First of all, that's not even remotely what's happening.
Second of all, you're on a forum that was created to talk about flying around the world to bang as many random women as possible. I don't agree with sucking black cocks or shoving things up your ass, but I'm not going to pretend like this is a Bible study group either.
Quote:Quote:
I'm not happy seeing the first glimmer of hope against the long march of destruction the Left has achieved in my entire lifetime being co-opted by self-promoting, untrustworthy idiots selling the same old song and happy to use the threat of public shaming to remove the platform and employment of others.
Yeah, Mike Cernovich is a self-promoting, untrustworthy idiot. It's not like he was giving out free advice to guys here for years, both on the forum and on his blog
He WAS Baked Alaska's employment. He can fire him for whatever he wants to.
He GAVE Baked Alaska a significant part of his platform. He has no obligation to continue promoting him. Mike and Milo are the only reason people even know who BA is.
And it was BA that started the Twitter antics, not Mike.
Again, could he have handled this particular situation better? Maybe. But your willingness to slander someone who's been a pillar of this community because he talked shit about Baked Alaska and once posted an article you don't like makes it evident that you simply have a personal problem with him. Though you're obviously welcome to your opinion.
Quote:Quote:
Quote:Quote:
"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again: but already it was possible to say which was which."
Controversial theory: I believe the alt-lite and alt-right had fuck all to do with winning the election for Trump, and that it was most likely the out-of control left in the media, academia and entertainment; the obvious socialist denial of reality eroding any remaining appeal of the left to the moderate left; the obvious corruption of Clinton; the observable invasion of Europe; the destruction of multiple Muslim shooters and bombers; cops being shot on the streets; widespread destructive rioting; and Trump supporters being violently-attacked in public, all of this happening with government protection and everyone being lectured to check their own racism for not being cool with it. The media, particularly, was so out of control and dishonest that they created their own Hero's Journey for Trump. A predictable Preference Cascade took care of the rest, because it reached the stage that even your average unplugged Normie on the street could see the writing on the wall.
I've never met anyone in real life who has a Twitter account.
I think it's best to let these other 'spheres sperg out at each other - it's really just another example of the Left eating each other. I expect Trump to do his own thing, and us to outlast them all, simply by focusing on Neomasculinity and our own goals.
Yeah, I'm sure someone like Cernovich, who has been promoted by everyone from General Flynn to Donald Trump Jr. to Lou Dobbs, even to the detriment of their own careers, had absolutely no impact on the election. And Hillary just gave an entire speech about the Alt-Right because it was completely irrelevant.
In fact, media of all kinds has no impact. People just spend billions of dollars on it a year for no reason.
Your theory is controversial because it's objectively wrong.
Also, Neomasculinity and the Alt-Right are not even mutually exclusive. One is primary a political movement while the other is mostly cultural/social.