Quote: (08-21-2016 03:50 AM)Enigma Wrote:
Quote: (08-21-2016 03:19 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:
Quote: (08-20-2016 06:17 PM)Enigma Wrote:
Quote: (08-20-2016 03:05 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:
I don't want to pop anyone's bubble, but I worked at a Target when I was in high school.
We had our fair share of crazies who walked in. Some more interesting than others:
1. One woman shat all over the woman's bathroom. Apparently got shit onto the light fixtures. I thankfully avoided that cleanup.
2. Another threw a temper tantrum in front of custom service. Legit flailing on the ground like a three year old. Police took her away.
3. One person drove her car into the registers of the garden center.
There were a group of regulars always in the store at the exact same time each day hanging out in the cafe. Shoplifters galore weekly. Loss prevention did an excellent job keeping theft down too.
It doesn't matter the store, you get trash everywhere. Walmart just so happens to be the target of this click bait article because everyone thinks fat hicks go there.
Newsflash: Target, Walmart, Kmart, whatever have the exact same crazies in each store.
It's obvious from your comment that you didn't read the article.
Thanks for the snark, but i did take a look at the article and disagree with its assumptions.
We had the same goofs coming into our store that came from the Walmart the was on the other side of the road. We had 2 LP guys who worked opposite shifts from one another.
From what my LP buddy said, they had the state troopers come in about the same amount of time as wally world across the street.
This token Walmart must be in a ghetto. NAWALT (Not all walmarts are like that).
How is it snark? My comment was direct, based on fact, and not in any way sarcastic.
The article's assumption is that Walmart has a crime problem because it does not properly staff or provide security for their stores, not because of the clientele it attracts.
What you're saying does not address that at all, which is why I assumed you did not read the article. If you want to disagree, that's fine, but disagree with the actual argument put forth by the article -- not whatever assumptions you made through glancing at the title.
Not only that, every single one of your points is based on anecdotal fallacy. Whereas the article actually puts forth hard, objective statistics.
Walmart does not properly staff their stores. That is a well-known fact.
If you want to argue that Walmart isn't responsible to do so, great. Let's hear it.
Come on Enigma!
You're taking an article from (((Bloomberg))), a MSM outlet which has been exposed as an establishment mouthpiece for monied liberal elites. You don't think there isn't an agenda they're trying to push here? Specifically, that WalMart attracts a white trash clientele?
The article comes off as Walmart bashing plain and simple. All of the major retailers have problems with theft and crime which is the point I was trying to make. Some are better than others simply on the basis of the locations that they serve. The Target I worked at had cops coming by every other week for various incidences. Did we rely on them? No, we just served a large area that brought different groups of people in.
I'm willing to bet that there's probably an understaffed Target or Kmart out there with the exact same problem.
I'll take my anecdotal experiences over something some two bit journalism major stuck together any day. Frankly, my experience with Trump, the 2016 February meetups, and Roosh's World Tour have me pretty much sceptical of
all of the news coming out of any major news network these days.
You really can't trust any story from any major news outlet. At best, you have a rough idea of what is going on, at worst a complete fabrication.
Let's not forget some other great headlines from Bloomberg that graced this article and yet we're supposed to take this one as 100% accurate because they cited facts and figures. Which somehow make their points more valid than mine. You kidding me with that one Enigma?
Here are some other lovely articles from Bloomberg:
1. Did Donald Trump's executives violate the Cuban Embargo?
2. A Future in which Stockbrokers Turn to Mugging
3. Elizabeth Warren on Donald Trump and TPP
4. What it takes to build a Mosque in New Hampshire
Come on bud, the Trump thread is loaded with thousands examples of poorly spun facts and figures to prove liberal talking points, yet in your view the collective anecdotal experience of thousands of people don't matter over the facts given by some presstitute.
We're somewhere in between both of those two points I mentioned previously . There most likely isn't an "out of control" crime problem at WalMart stores any more than there's an out of control crime problem at JCPenny's or Kmart.