[Lizard King]

(07-06-2015 01:55 PM)Bad Hussar Wrote:  

What is the current legal basis of the TV License? In this day and age it seems ridiculous. Why should the BBC get public money while other media groups get nothing? And what justification is there that "bigwigs" get bonuses if their organisation is dependent on public money. Actually not even public money, as in taxes, but money directly from the public in the form of a licence fee.

Has the licence fee ever been challenged in court in the UK? I know very well that any presiding judge would likely be chums with BBC board members, but you never know...

In any event, sounds like it was a great event. If I was anywhere in Northern Europe at the time would definitely have been there.

It should be challenged.

Laws are man-made and it has solid 'legal basis'. Neglecting to pay the TV licence can cause entry in to your property by police and legal agents of the BBC(baliffs). Watching TV without a licence can lead to prosecution and fines if found guilty, which usually happens if baliffs have entered your property and seen a TV capable of receiving broadcast TV.

A lot of people are getting wise to it though. There are numerous videos on youtube of people turning baliffs away. Some people are starting to see it as pointless.

It's possible to declare exemption, if you don't have the equipment to watch broadcast TV. I don't, and haven't done for a few years now, most of their output is shoddy, and they have obvious agendas. The BBC's law makers are catching up and trying to include internet and smart phones as devices that deserve licencing. A lot of people feel it is in its final years of existence, the current government are trying to wean it off the state.

[Kaiserfranz]

Hi guys

It was, indeed, a very good day.

I was immediately struck from what Roosh said at the beginning: "In Berlin there was gay parade in the middle of the street but WE had to hide. Same here, I had to post the venue location in the last day for fear of feminist interference."

And it was true: we were paranoid about the presence of BBC, paranoid that our meeting with the "world most famous mysoginist " might leak and ruin our lives.
Like Spi, I also took a lot of notes during the lecture and later, during a break, a guy even asked me if I was a journalist for some magazine...

I guess that now i know how does it feels to meet a cell of undercover operatives.
Anyway, I am looking forward to watch the BBC service.

Paranoia aside, the lecture was really good.
Roosh talked about game, politics, neomasculinity and many more things. I don't know if he had a speech prepared or just some guidelines, but to me he seemed at ease when talking to a large audience.
Same for the Q&A we got lots of different points of view, including two dads that asked for tips for their child.

Personally, Roosh's answers helped me understand more about neomasculinity and RoK... He is definitely a cool guy!

I have chat a lot with the audience during the "mingling" time, we were all from different backgrounds but everybody was cool, polite and with interesting opinions.
It was definitely NOT an audience of WoW basement dwellers or Mad Max style barbarians

I joined the gang for a drink in the nearby pub, but didn't stay for the evening as I had a train to catch.

Overall I had a great time and would like to thank Roosh again for organizing it (and for the picture ) and all the attendees.

For the record, I am the Italian guy with the pink shirt.

[Tokyo Joe]

Roosh, Gentlemen:

The report from the Vice butt-pirate who attended the Berlin lecture alongside the Hambeast has been published.
http://www.vice.com/de/read/der-verlotte...oosh-v-545

Here is the opening paragraph. All downhill from there.

The Fruitcake Wrote:

"Gays and women are regarded more highly. It is only a question of time before we men are sent off to re-education camps." In the wood-paneled conference room, nearly 40 guys nod mutely. I am in a luxury hotel in the posh Berlin district of Charlottenburg and am even letting the Christopher Street Day whirl past in order to endure a brainwashing for four hours. No one knows that I am gay. I have even dressed myself extra tastelessly, in order to pass as a Breeder. Which would not have been necessary, as the majority of the men appear spick and span: parted hair, plucked eyebrows, manicured fingernails. Were I not here at the "Roosh Lecture," I would think: all faggoty.

[EuphoricWizard]

Anti Gamergate forums like Gamerghazi had been discussing you there and you're still on their frontpage. Mostly the usual snark, clickbait (Your thread is titled "admitted rapist roosh"), and lies we've come to expect from SJWs. They've talked about finding the venues so they could disrupt them. Wouldn't be suprised if hambeast is from that clique. Aurini is also pretty popular topic there.

[Lucky]

(07-07-2015 03:17 PM)Tokyo Joe Wrote:  

The Fruitcake Wrote:

"Gays and women are regarded more highly. It is only a question of time before we men are sent off to re-education camps." In the wood-paneled conference room, nearly 40 guys nod mutely. I am in a luxury hotel in the posh Berlin district of Charlottenburg and am even letting the Christopher Street Day whirl past in order to endure a brainwashing for four hours. No one knows that I am gay. I have even dressed myself extra tastelessly, in order to pass as a Breeder. Which would not have been necessary, as the majority of the men appear spick and span: parted hair, plucked eyebrows, manicured fingernails. Were I not here at the "Roosh Lecture," I would think: all faggoty.

Ironically every one seemed to know that this guy was gay right away.

Interesting that he chose to dress like shit-- that's how he thinks of straight guys. And yet the guys at the event were dressed like pros, though I don't know who the fuck had plucked eyebrows and manicured nails. This guy might have mistaken us with the fags prancing nude in the street that day.

[Barron]

(06-28-2015 02:11 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:

Roosh if you stir things up like Warren Farrell (or worse)

I'm not going to provoke the enemy or stir anything up. What's most important to me is to successfully have the event, not to attract controversy or a bigger crowd.

Roosh, I wasn't implying you would take any opportunity to provoke them. I was suggesting that your mere announced presence would "trigger" the opposition and possibly provoke some type of planned disturbance/demonstration.

You're no longer a humble author but a face at the forefront of a movement approaching critical mass which stands against mainstream thought. Now with BBC coverage (how quickly will they release the segment?) it's likely that your next tour stops will attract more haters. All I'm saying is be prepared.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Meh - the report is lukewarm.

But here the highlights:

+ he dressed without taste supposedly to pass for a "Hete" - it's a new slang word for heterosexual - actually it feels more of a curse word which is no surprise. It was only a matter of time before the oh so liberal gay propaganda turned on every heterosexual man as perverse.

+ he described Roosh as good-looking, with a nice smile - really cute until he opened his mouth. Heh - so he finds Roosh attractive - at least he does not deny the possibility like some feminists, that other women might find him appealing.

+ he states that Roosh was pulling punches because a woman was present, he claims that Roosh would have been more extreme if only men were present - I doubt that

Aside from that it's the usual stuff of mixing Roosh with MRAs, PUAs, Meninistis, Masculinists.

Don't know if Roosh said anything like that:

Quote:

"If I had a gun-oh man. I have no weapon, but believe me, the time will come when we can no longer stand idly by, "this is the blunt advertising for Roosh Army. And he has 40 volunteers right here. "

I don't know if he made that quote up. Personally I wouldn't say anything like that in public - not even remotely. That can backfire in our system.

So he ends his short report painting us as extremists who are only one step away from becoming Eliott Rodgers.

[Roosh]

Quote:

No one knows that I am gay.

I knew he was a faggot from the jump, and so did others. To think that a ham planet and a pole smoker could successfully disguise themselves shows the depth of their insanity.

[Lucky]

Inner dialogue:

Fat gay guy "My plan is working perfectly-- no one suspects 8 minutes ago I blew a dude dressed as the tooth fairy at the parade."

Rest of the room "Who's that fat homo and his fag hag? Hm. Roosh's readership must be growing."

[Roosh]

Quote:

If I had a gun-oh man. I have no weapon, but believe me, the time will come when we can no longer stand idly by

He's lying. We talked about the Kings Battalion April Fools joke and he misquoted for his own ends.

[Barron]

A nice comment on Fag Hag's Article - http://www.vice.com/de/read/als-frau-auf...berlin-888

Brought to You by Google Translate:

Quote:

Thank you for your contribution.

I have, unfortunately, made for reasons of time not to Berlin, the more amused me your coverage.

The article title could not be more lurid, but as you get readers nowadays, is not it? If one takes the trouble and the video looks, it is obvious that Roosh not endorsed Rape, but is against the current rape hysteria in the United States.

Let us has attained to cases like Emma Sulkowicz which world prominence, thanks to lies on the cost of an innocent man. I suppose you know the conversations between Facebook Emma and the students, in which Emma begging him for anal sex.

Thank goodness we are not so far in Europe.

I allow myself a few points from your article remove:

1. "all in one only one thing: you have money getting paid to see their idol."
How much has the fun cost? I think there were around 40 USD. A reasonable amount for a Saturday afternoon, if you ask me.

2. "... However, the program would be solely and tailored solely to heterosexual men ..."
And what should be it bad? Everyone has a target audience and also heterosexual men deserve a platform.

3. "structure their entire life thereafter to optimize themselves to learn several languages, to move to other countries"
Sounds to me like an attractive man. He goes to the fitness center, speaks several languages ​​and has discovered the world. Do you want a man blamed for this negative? We both know you can not. These are good attributes.

4. Thanks for the list respect Neomasculinity. For what the term stands was new to me, as probably the most here.

When I go through the list of what should be wrong with that? Go the points times objectively and impartially by. Of course you can discuss one or two points. But considered coarse, these are good values ​​for a man.

I prefer same such a man, like a man who the evening comes home frustrated, a frozen pizza in the oven pushes open a beer and can end the day with a porn.

5. "One need not be a hardcore feminist to the whining of probably the most privileged group in human history"
Men were privileged in the past? Yes. If they are still in the year 2015? Definitely not. I do not know what world you live. But with all the artificial woman funding, of the discrimination against women can not talk. Wake up, the war is over.

Here you follow in your article rather a political agenda, as objectively report on a topic.

But I hope that one or the other man reads this article and once studied even at Google for http://www.rooshv.com, http://www.DangerandPlay.com or http://www.Mannbibel.com.

In this sense, I wish you a nice weekend.

[Samseau]

^ See, even negative publicity gets more men to join the cause. Banning the reporters, even though they are shills, will prevent more men from finding out about us. Real men see through the lies quite easily and then discover your site, forum, ROK, and the rest of the manosphere.

Ultimately as soldiers in this fight the media abuse seems to be worth it. It sucks you have to be a punching bag Roosh but you know we've got your back.

NYC is going to be a shit show. Let them come, but banning any recording device is a must.

[Roosh]

Quote:

NYC is going to be a shit show.

Yeah it's going to be a larger crowd than London. I'm hiring two hostesses.

The media hasn't reached out, so if they show up, they will be incognito. Maybe we can play a game of "spot the journalist."

[Menace]

AS SEEN ON DR.OZ!!@@!

SUNDAY SUNDAY SUNDAY. MONSTER PUA RAPIST WILL BE TAKING ON BIG BUTTTTTT.

ALL AGES WELCOME. TICKETS AT THE DOOR.

[CH-Toronto]

(07-07-2015 04:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

^ See, even negative publicity gets more men to join the cause. Banning the reporters, even though they are shills, will prevent more men from finding out about us. Real men see through the lies quite easily and then discover your site, forum, ROK, and the rest of the manosphere.

Samseau is right. The articles/press that gain the most controversy usually results in you gaining more followers.

[YoungArt]

I just read the 2 reports by vice about the Berlin lecture. I attended the lecture myself and I loved it. However, reading the vice reports is making me really angry. I can´t believe what this fat b*** and this f* faggot wrote about us. I didn´t expect the German media would be so hateful towards the manosphere and the community. In fact, there aren´t many people who know about the community/manosphere or game in Germany, but still it gets soo much hate. Pretty mind blowing to see how strong faminism is in action in Germany.
So glad I found this place.
Edit: Actually it is good that the fat feminist attended as well, because now I can see first hand how messed up their agenda really is.

[samsamsam]

Those Berlin intruders are delusional.

The guy thought he was Eddie Murphy in that Saturday Night Live skit where he successfully infiltrates white people world.


But really it was


Obviously not calling any one a girl here, just couldn't find a pic of a bunch successful, good looking guys and a fat slob pic.

And I hope the two of them are reading this thread. I bet they are salivating at the mouth when the click on the thread hoping for some butt hurt reactions and then burst into tears since people couldn't give a fuck.

[Quintus Curtius]

(07-07-2015 04:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

^ See, even negative publicity gets more men to join the cause. Banning the reporters, even though they are shills, will prevent more men from finding out about us. Real men see through the lies quite easily and then discover your site, forum, ROK, and the rest of the manosphere.

Ultimately as soldiers in this fight the media abuse seems to be worth it. It sucks you have to be a punching bag Roosh but you know we've got your back.

NYC is going to be a shit show. Let them come, but banning any recording device is a must.

Samulus, are you going to be at the NYC lecture?

[HighSpeed_LowDrag]

(07-07-2015 04:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

NYC is going to be a shit show......

..... let alone Toronto. That one will be a riot (and potentially not just in the metaphorical sense.) After all, it appears that efforts by the SJWs to disrupt/ban the Tour are starting to pick up steam.

[Tengen]

The Fruitcake Wrote:

No one knows that I am gay. I have even dressed myself extra tastelessly, in order to pass as a Breeder.

[Roosh]

(07-07-2015 08:25 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  

(07-07-2015 04:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

NYC is going to be a shit show......

..... let alone Toronto. That one will be a riot (and potentially not just in the metaphorical sense.) After all, it appears that efforts by the SJWs to disrupt/ban the Tour are starting to pick up steam.

Toronto and Montreal may be the two smallest shows (around 30-40 people each). They're looking to be quite calm.

[Nascimento]

I'm upset I won't be able to make neither the Toronto or Montreal meet-ups this time. I guess I'll have to catch Roosh around some other day.

I hope those are an overwhelming success. I've talked to a couple guys here outside the forum who will be attending and are very excited about it.

[Foolsgo1d]

Hmm, when a gay guy refers to straight people as breeders he normally took a dose of mental illness along the way. They're not above secret filming of people attending. Personally I wouldn't let them attend.

[GlobalMan]

(07-07-2015 04:33 PM)NomadofEU Wrote:  

A nice comment on Fag Hag's Article - http://www.vice.com/de/read/als-frau-auf...berlin-888

Brought to You by Google Translate:

Quote:

Thank you for your contribution.

2. "... However, the program would be solely and tailored solely to heterosexual men ..."
And what should be it bad? Everyone has a target audience and also heterosexual men deserve a platform.

Sadly thats what these degenerates really feel, that because white males (all males really) have so much "privilege" according to them we don't deserve and absolutely should not have any kind of platform to advocate our ideals. We are not allowed to have any grievances or try to spread our message, because we aren't transgender-afro-minority-homeless-Somolians

[Ray Carlton]

(07-07-2015 04:33 PM)NomadofEU Wrote:  

A nice comment on Fag Hag's Article - http://www.vice.com/de/read/als-frau-auf...berlin-888

Thank you for quoting my comment here. The translation in Google Translate is horrible, however I suppose it is still possible to get my points.

I just added a comment to the article of the homosexual.

His article is even worse than the first one. I really wonder what kind of man reads that article and agrees with it.

However, bad publicity is still better than none.

The manosphere is still a quite untouched topic in Germany, so this hate article might inspire some men to do their own research and actually figure out on their own for what the manosphere and Roosh stand.

Ray