[Lemmo]

(10-28-2014 12:03 AM)OnlyMarryInTajikistan Wrote:  

After going through all of this, all I can say is: Who cares?

As a man, all you should think about is how you should operate in order to get the women that will actually add to your life.

I find it funny when I hear men complain about women who are cunts. If they are cunts, why do you care? What value can a cunt possibly add to your life? It is not a matter of how to game her, if she is a cunt, she should be disqualified immediately. Zoom out and leave your ego aside.

I don't give a shit about what happens to these women. Unless she is a girl that is a valuable part of my life, I don't care. Their future happiness is an irrelevant issue to me.

I agree. A lot of guys seem to have the following unhealthy thought process:
1. Women are equal to men (didn't society tell me so?)
2. I will have the same high expectations of them that I have of men, fully indulging the romantic and paternalistic instincts programmed by evolution into my male brain and expecting a similar reaction from women.
3. I will be continually disappointed as these expectations are not satisfied
4. I will become bitter and want women to be punished for their behavior (since I will still not accept their inferiority and instead attribute their failures to malevolence)

To me this seems as unreasonable as becoming bitter that your dog repeatedly refuses to respond to your attempts to initiate philosophical discussions. I see this so often. Some guys will be 20 years into a marriage and still surprised the dog isn't discussing Kirkregaard.

[TheWastelander]

(10-28-2014 09:38 AM)Lemmo Wrote:  

(10-28-2014 12:03 AM)OnlyMarryInTajikistan Wrote:  

After going through all of this, all I can say is: Who cares?

As a man, all you should think about is how you should operate in order to get the women that will actually add to your life.

I find it funny when I hear men complain about women who are cunts. If they are cunts, why do you care? What value can a cunt possibly add to your life? It is not a matter of how to game her, if she is a cunt, she should be disqualified immediately. Zoom out and leave your ego aside.

I don't give a shit about what happens to these women. Unless she is a girl that is a valuable part of my life, I don't care. Their future happiness is an irrelevant issue to me.

I agree. A lot of guys seem to have the following unhealthy thought process:
1. Women are equal to men (didn't society tell me so?)
2. I will have the same high expectations of them that I have of men, fully indulging the romantic and paternalistic instincts programmed by evolution into my male brain and expecting a similar reaction from women.
3. I will be continually disappointed as these expectations are not satisfied
4. I will become bitter and want women to be punished for their behavior (since I will still not accept their inferiority and instead attribute their failures to malevolence)

To me this seems as unreasonable as becoming bitter that your dog repeatedly refuses to respond to your attempts to initiate philosophical discussions. I see this so often. Some guys will be 20 years into a marriage and still surprised the dog isn't discussing Kirkregaard.

My dog can! NADALT!

[solo]

(05-13-2014 12:31 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-13-2014 11:02 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

Things need to get worse before they get better. We haven't hit rock bottom yet. Out of the ashes will rise a new breed of virtuous feminine women. Women need to struggle in order to be happy. The male/female relationship dynamic is cyclic. Men build societies so women can play. Women gain power and society declines. Men rebuild it again after it falls apart. Just sit back and enjoy the ride for now.

This is the truth.

Just need to keep having more and more men drop out of society. The problem is you can't make money without supporting the feminist state because income taxes are basically half of a man's income.

Yes, and following the writing of yourself and the manosphere in general, the solution would be along the lines of:

- Stop being a mass consumer (iphones, cars, expensive houses etc)
- Quit your job and sign up for welfare/unemployment benefits. Stall on paying back student loans
- Secretly start making money location independently and give money directly to charity instead of paying taxes.

Also, don't fall for anyone trying to guilt you into thinking this would somehow would be immoral.

Supporting the present system is immoral. And stupid, since it fucks us over.

[Samseau]

(10-28-2014 12:03 AM)OnlyMarryInTajikistan Wrote:  

After going through all of this, all I can say is: Who cares?

As a man, all you should think about is how you should operate in order to get the women that will actually add to your life.

I find it funny when I hear men complain about women who are cunts. If they are cunts, why do you care? What value can a cunt possibly add to your life? It is not a matter of how to game her, if she is a cunt, she should be disqualified immediately. Zoom out and leave your ego aside.

I don't give a shit about what happens to these women. Unless she is a girl that is a valuable part of my life, I don't care. Their future happiness is an irrelevant issue to me.

Well not everyone is as selfish as you, and actually care about their neighbors.

[The Father]

(10-27-2014 11:05 PM)kazz Wrote:  

Father; next time you encounter one ask them what gluten is, then sit back watch there face go red.... ....Its um, er much more healthy, full of vitamins, I think non-gluten products are super foods!

When a woman tells me she doesn't eat gluten, I tell her "ME TOO!! I can't stand the idea of someone shooting a little baby gluten!"

Usually, they just say nothing in reply...

[ball dont lie]

(10-28-2014 09:59 AM)solo Wrote:  

(05-13-2014 12:31 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-13-2014 11:02 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

Things need to get worse before they get better. We haven't hit rock bottom yet. Out of the ashes will rise a new breed of virtuous feminine women. Women need to struggle in order to be happy. The male/female relationship dynamic is cyclic. Men build societies so women can play. Women gain power and society declines. Men rebuild it again after it falls apart. Just sit back and enjoy the ride for now.

This is the truth.

Just need to keep having more and more men drop out of society. The problem is you can't make money without supporting the feminist state because income taxes are basically half of a man's income.

Yes, and following the writing of yourself and the manosphere in general, the solution would be along the lines of:

- Stop being a mass consumer (iphones, cars, expensive houses etc)
- Quit your job and sign up for welfare/unemployment benefits. Stall on paying back student loans
- Secretly start making money location independently and give money directly to charity instead of paying taxes.

Also, don't fall for anyone trying to guilt you into thinking this would somehow would be immoral.

Supporting the present system is immoral. And stupid, since it fucks us over.

I have plans in place to do just that. The only person who at all understands that is my childhood friend. Its hard that so few people "get it".

[N°6]

(03-14-2014 11:13 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

^ Some good points.

I'm on the older side and I'm seeing girls (well, they are my age so let's call them middle-aged women) completely alone and struggling.

Some of them were actually pleasant and decent. They just didn't have the sense to know that the party was about to end.

In a way, I view women as as much (and in some way) bigger victims of feminism than men.

We men can start over in our 30s. It might be hard and we might have an alimony/child support hole to get out of. But we can do it.

A woman can't do the same thing. If they screw up and listen to feminist lies, their lives are pretty much over.

When this stuff starts happening to girls you grew up with/went to college/grad school with and you had good interactions with (and knew that they weren't bitches), you might even find the situation somewhat sad.

The Morpheus in my life who gave me my first red pill was a French older woman I had a relationship with in my late-20s. Because of the age difference and her greater experience, we were not in competition with each other and she told me everything about women's tactics and their self-deluding rationalisations. She represents the lionesses who used to keep society together before they were chased out by the hyenas who are over represented in academia, media and politics.

She knew why I was attracted to her. She is an ex-stage model for Le Tour de France who was in effect a classic sports car I could afford. I could not afford the new top models of women as they were either on the cock carousel or in relationships with older men. They were often loving demonstrating that they could find pussy easier than most men too. So my choice at this time of my life was an economy new car (4s to 6s) or a classic car 8 who was a safe 9 back in the day.

My point is that feminists hate these type of 'lionesses'. She told me that men can have several new lives in their lifespans. Women can only have one and that young women were stupid to believe that their careers and qualifications are more valuable than their ovaries which have such a short shelf-life. She used to say that if women didn't find a man at university but chose to use her temporary high position in the dating market for meaningless sex, she'd see the men she ignored with younger women in a decade.

All this has come to pass in my life. I've since been with younger women with women my age alluding to the 'age appropriate' slur. I enjoy telling them that I had an enriching relationship with an older woman when they were probably going from man to man in their 20s. This shows them that I see the Matrix.

Aptly, the first woman I had a fling with after I moved back to the UK was a London lawyer of my age who was literally a wannabe Sex in the City retirée. The thing is while I was single and struggling in the dating game during my 20s, and in relationships, the lawyer had partied and drank herself into infertility. Her ovaries must have been pickled in alcohol.

This is not a men v women thing as the hyenas are more blood thirsty against the few lionesses left.

[Off The Reservation]

(03-07-2015 02:02 AM)N°6 Wrote:  

(03-14-2014 11:13 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

^ Some good points.

I'm on the older side and I'm seeing girls (well, they are my age so let's call them middle-aged women) completely alone and struggling.

Some of them were actually pleasant and decent. They just didn't have the sense to know that the party was about to end.

In a way, I view women as as much (and in some way) bigger victims of feminism than men.

We men can start over in our 30s. It might be hard and we might have an alimony/child support hole to get out of. But we can do it.

A woman can't do the same thing. If they screw up and listen to feminist lies, their lives are pretty much over.

When this stuff starts happening to girls you grew up with/went to college/grad school with and you had good interactions with (and knew that they weren't bitches), you might even find the situation somewhat sad.

The Morpheus in my life who gave me my first red pill was a French older woman I had a relationship with in my late-20s. Because of the age difference and her greater experience, we were not in competition with each other and she told me everything about women's tactics and their self-deluding rationalisations. She represents the lionesses who used to keep society together before they were chased out by the hyenas who are over represented in academia, media and politics.

She knew why I was attracted to her. She is an ex-stage model for Le Tour de France who was in effect a classic sports car I could afford. I could not afford the new top models of women as they were either on the cock carousel or in relationships with older men. They were often loving demonstrating that they could find pussy easier than most men too. So my choice at this time of my life was an economy new car (4s to 6s) or a classic car 8 who was a safe 9 back in the day.

My point is that feminists hate these type of 'lionesses'. She told me that men can have several new lives in their lifespans. Women can only have one and that young women were stupid to believe that their careers and qualifications are more valuable than their ovaries which have such a short shelf-life. She used to say that if women didn't find a man at university but chose to use her temporary high position in the dating market for meaningless sex, she'd see the men she ignored with younger women in a decade.

All this has come to pass in my life. I've since been with younger women with women my age alluding to the 'age appropriate' slur. I enjoy telling them that I had an enriching relationship with an older woman when they were probably going from man to man in their 20s. This shows them that I see the Matrix.

Aptly, the first woman I had a fling with after I moved back to the UK was a London lawyer of my age who was literally a wannabe Sex in the City retirée. The thing is while I was single and struggling in the dating game during my 20s, and in relationships, the lawyer had partied and drank herself into infertility. Her ovaries must have been pickled in alcohol.

This is not a men v women thing as the hyenas are more blood thirsty against the few lionesses left.

Had this conversation with a friend of mine's gf yesterday right in front of both of them, in their late 20's I told her most women who wait to have a family later regret it. She had just spent an hour talking about some stupid office politics. Basically I was surprised how receptive she was when I asked her what she is really accomplishing at that job.

[R_Niko]

Here's the story of a woman I fucked occasionally over the course of several years (2011-2014).

When she was in her mid-20s she was a stunner, tall blonde skinny etc. 8.5/10. She got a job working <ahem> directly under a prominent politician, then parlayed that into a cushy gov't job, then parlayed THAT into a cushy private sector sales gig that involved entertaining/coercing a lot of powerful men. She married in her early 30s, some total beta chump, and carried on her wild ways--travel with clients, champagne limo rides, cocaine, etc. I met her when she was in her mid 30s, still pretty hot. We became each other's thing on the side, but were also good friends. She's a genuinely bright, witty, compassionate person who is fucked w/r/t men for all the usual reasons plus some childhood trauma.

The last couple times we hooked up, it was apparent she'd hit the wall. The makeup and exercising couldn't hide it. She even *smelled* different. Not bad, just the phereomonal attraction wasn't there anymore. Her snatch kinda conked out too, and it wasn't exactly fresh when I first got there. Around this time she quit her job in favor of a lower profile, lower paying administrative job at a non profit. She still makes good money, and I'm sure she'll be fine, but gone are the days of six figures, an expense account, and golf weekends with married executives. Everything that defined her is gone, now she's left with her bullshit yet comfy job and marriage.

Note that I consider this woman basically a best case scenario, in light of the amount of carousel riding she's done. She probably could divorce her husband and trade "up" to an old dumbass with money but she's too prideful for that. She got exactly what she asked for. Oh, and she doesn't have kids, in case that wasn't obvious.

[samsamsam]

(05-01-2016 09:50 PM)R_Niko Wrote:  

She's a genuinely bright, witty, compassionate person who is fucked w/r/t men for all the usual reasons plus some childhood trauma.

Compassionate to everyone but her husband...I don't give a shit either way.

It just caught my eye considering all you were describing is her collision with the wall and her infidelity.

And not judging you at all, I get it this is what women do.

[R_Niko]

(05-01-2016 10:02 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 09:50 PM)R_Niko Wrote:  

She's a genuinely bright, witty, compassionate person who is fucked w/r/t men for all the usual reasons plus some childhood trauma.

Compassionate to everyone but her husband...I don't give a shit either way.

It just caught my eye considering all you were describing is her collision with the wall and her infidelity.

And not judging you at all, I get it this is what women do.

Good point. Theirs is surely a complicated relationship. I can tell you that I met him once, with me then-gf, and he was all over her. So, I think they have some kind of arrangement. He gets to be with a women three levels above him, and she gets to do what she wants without being questioned. And he accepts this but of course is insecure hence him hitting on my gf.

[samsamsam]

(05-01-2016 10:11 PM)R_Niko Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 10:02 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(05-01-2016 09:50 PM)R_Niko Wrote:  

She's a genuinely bright, witty, compassionate person who is fucked w/r/t men for all the usual reasons plus some childhood trauma.

Compassionate to everyone but her husband...I don't give a shit either way.

It just caught my eye considering all you were describing is her collision with the wall and her infidelity.

And not judging you at all, I get it this is what women do.

Good point. Theirs is surely a complicated relationship. I can tell you that I met him once, with me then-gf, and he was all over her. So, I think they have some kind of arrangement. He gets to be with a women three levels above him, and she gets to do what she wants without being questioned. And he accepts this but of course is insecure hence him hitting on my gf.

Oh if they have a deal, then ignore my comments

[pharao]

Look at how much coverage Lena Dunham gets, even if she admiutted to sexually assaulting her small sister:

[[email protected]]

Samseau makes a pretty convincing case that most of us already acknowledge. People are going to nitpick semantics but it's true in the anglosphere that women are shielded from consequences at levels never seen before in history and their freedom/hypergamy/licentiousness is at record levels. There are consequences but from what I'm reading the brunt of it carried by men/children/state.

As mentioned this is being exported to EE and many other places. The window of opportunity for a wife and family in these places is closing sooner than you think. I've also decided to learn Russian and make a play for it while I still can.

Everything is a rigged system for us. The marriage/divorce laws are rigged to enslave men. My solution is marry and have kids outside the jurisdiction of these rigged states. Women in the West are sluts with a high probability of initiating divorce against you. Therefore I have to find a young girl overseas with notch count of 1 or less. Voting with your feet or going Galt is the only thing you can do as an individual. We cannot unring the bell on all the destructive social experiments brought forth, we can only do our best in avoiding these pitfalls the best we can.

Everything is rigged to limit men and give women all the options. Reproductive rights are given to women and men have none. Men are limited by affirmative action from the best professions and jobs to give women quotas to fill. I'm sure we can name countless other examples.

Recently I actually read about how Thailand changed their laws so that only Thai couples could get surrogate babies. It was in response to a wealthy Japanese business man who had 16 surrogate babies. I imagine other developing countries will follow this social arrangement in the coming years. When the external womb is finally 3D printed and harvested as a viable alternative I imagine it will be banned from use except for couples that cannot conceive. Women will be able to go to the sperm bank but men will be forbidden to do the functional equivalent. Again, the options and choice will be for women, never for men.

I am not expecting any real consequences for women in the West. We will nitpick about unhappiness and how many of them will choose not having kids but at the end of the day they wont be homeless, cucked, sexless, maimed in wars or commit suicide in disproportionate numbers.

[R_Niko]

Getting back to the OP's point: Will Western women suffer for their choices? Yes, the suffering is inevitable when they lives they build based on their SMV start to sag along with their tits and faces. Will they realize why they're suffering? No, this would require an honest accounting of one's own choices, and women are for the mostpart not capable of this. They'll blame men/society/their employers, etc.

The wall is still there, even if having money and not having kids means women won't hit it til 45.

[kazz]

I want to go into this at a deeper level. The current state of affairs have consequences for men and women who should be able to live normal happy lives (granted there are still alot that do). Know one knows what there position is nowadays, men acting like women, women acting like men. The fact of the matter is this; Throughout history and as much today, any team, enterprise, country etc can only have one leader, just one, who has the ultimate say. The same goes in what should be a 'team', a relationship with a woman, you are both on the same side, not competing, and there can only be ONE leader. This leader has, and was always meant to be the man. The role reversals we have seen over what is a very small time in history have and will continue to create terrible consequences for men and women. Can you imagine in the days of the cave men if the women went out hunting and were responsible for the protection of the tribe from other tribes and wild animals, and the men were inside the caves raising the children, basket weaving and collecting berries and sea shells to decorate the cave with. We wouldn't even be around today, we would have become extinct. Yet this is exactly the role reversals we are seeing today and it makes for a miserable life for everyone. Feminism is the seething plague of our time.

It is lucky for us on this forum, that see things as they are with such clarity, as we know what to do to avoid the pitfalls of our current culture and society. For me I know exactly what I must do to lead a happy and full life. There are most certainly consequences for women at this stage in history, because at the root of it all falling back to basics, they will never be truly happy pretending to be men, its biology, its cant be controlled no matter how much feminists would like to think it can.

[Valentine]

Relevant new thread:

First baby drop-off box for unwanted newborns installed in Indiana

Even if a woman get knocked up and at any point single-mom-with-child-support life isn't good enough for her, she can always check out at any moment.

[TravelerKai]

Fresh off the press, today's BLM Trash getting pussy passes.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/02/us/new-yor...index.html

N.Y. college students accused of fabricating racially motivated attack

Quote:

Three New York college students who said they were targets of a racially motivated attack face multiple charges for what prosecutors are calling a false claim.

A grand jury on Monday indicted Ariel Agudio, Asha Burwell and Alexis Briggs, all 20, each on a charge of third-degree assault and multiple counts of falsely reporting an incident, the Albany District Attorney's Office said.
Agudio and Burwell also face charges of harassment. Agudio also was charged with two counts of attempted assault.
The State University of New York at Albany rallied behind the students, who are black, when they came forward with claims that a group of white men and women attacked them on January 30 in a confrontation on a city bus. Students held a rally and university President Robert J. Jones said in a letter to students and faculty that he was "deeply concerned, saddened and angry about this incident."
Others came to their defense on social media using the hashtag #DefendBlackGirlsUAlbany. The People of Color Caucus issued a letter in support of them.
But university police said an investigation revealed that no one used racial epithets against the women. Instead, they assaulted another passenger and falsely reported the incident.
"What happened on the bus was not a 'hate crime,'" University Police Chief Frank Wiley said in February. "The only person we heard uttering racial epithets was one of the defendants."
Attorneys for the three women did not return CNN's calls requesting comment Monday afternoon.
The three women pleaded not guilty in February to charges of assault and harassment. Two of them also pleaded not guilty to charges of falsely reporting the incident.
Agudio's lawyer, Mark Mishler, said in February the charges were unwarranted.
"It is also unfortunate that some in the media and public appear to have reached a conclusion as to what occurred in this incident without actually having the information needed in order to reach such a conclusion," Misher said in the statement.
"Ms. Agudio, an exemplary young woman and an excellent student who has never previously been in legal trouble, asks that people not rush to judgment in this matter."
The defendants' arraignment on the grand jury charges is scheduled for Wednesday in Albany County Court.
CNN's Laura Ly, Sarah Jorgensen, Lauren del Valle, Ray Sanchez, and Haimy Assefa contributed to this report.

Third degree assault charges are misdemeanor charges in NY from what I can find. That is essentially a slap on the wrist. Only if a future employer bothers to Google any of these losers, will they find the ugly truth and throw their resume in the garbage, will there be any real justice.

The Pussy Pass is still alive and there is no consequence for bad behavior. I wonder if a rally will be held on campus to support them like there was when everyone thought they were the victims?

I won't hold my breath for it.

[The Great Slaughterer]

(10-27-2014 12:39 AM)blacknwhitespade Wrote:  

(03-16-2014 01:43 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(03-16-2014 01:38 AM)Captain Gh Wrote:  

Now I'm just laughing at these broads since I can see their painful futures hehe!!

Not only do they not have a painful future ahead of them, but even if you tried to explain to a modern woman why college is a waste of her time, she won't believe you. And if you explain to an older woman that she wasted her youth, there's only a small chance she'll be honest enough to admit her mistakes.

Even women who fuck up royally usually invent 100 lies and excuses to avoid any personal responsibility, and as long as they were obedient little worker slaves they will have enough money for themselves until they die.

No punishment, no consequences, total denial.

Fact is... most women don't give a shit about the future. As long as they have money, they don't care at all.

Women may face no consequences in terms of laws or social stigmas, however, many are ultimately suffering big time in the dating market. If you can't find any examples around you, do a simple google search, the internet is loaded with stories. Even mainstream publications are commenting on the dilemma modern women face in dating/marriage: Why Women Can't Find a Good Man. There are statistically not enough single, employed/educated men to go around for upper-middle class women. Dalrock illustrated this beautifully here: More Grim News for Carousellers. This is the course many women are running in America these days and it's becoming almost comical.

First post here, so please don't hate. Just posted this to laugh the fuck out of that Indian girl's reddit post. BTW I'm Indian myself.

LOL @ "I just wanted to make things clear I didn't 'sleep around.' Most of my relationships have been long term I have only been with 18 guys and I have been sexually active since I was 17 years old."

Whatever helps you sleep at night, snowflake.

[Kid Twist]

(03-07-2015 02:02 AM)N°6 Wrote:  

The Morpheus in my life who gave me my first red pill was a French older woman I had a relationship with in my late-20s. Because of the age difference and her greater experience, we were not in competition with each other and she told me everything about women's tactics and their self-deluding rationalisations. She represents the lionesses who used to keep society together before they were chased out by the hyenas who are over represented in academia, media and politics.

She knew why I was attracted to her. She is an ex-stage model for Le Tour de France who was in effect a classic sports car I could afford. I could not afford the new top models of women as they were either on the cock carousel or in relationships with older men. They were often loving demonstrating that they could find pussy easier than most men too. So my choice at this time of my life was an economy new car (4s to 6s) or a classic car 8 who was a safe 9 back in the day.

My point is that feminists hate these type of 'lionesses'. She told me that men can have several new lives in their lifespans. Women can only have one and that young women were stupid to believe that their careers and qualifications are more valuable than their ovaries which have such a short shelf-life. She used to say that if women didn't find a man at university but chose to use her temporary high position in the dating market for meaningless sex, she'd see the men she ignored with younger women in a decade.

All this has come to pass in my life. I've since been with younger women with women my age alluding to the 'age appropriate' slur. I enjoy telling them that I had an enriching relationship with an older woman when they were probably going from man to man in their 20s. This shows them that I see the Matrix.

Aptly, the first woman I had a fling with after I moved back to the UK was a London lawyer of my age who was literally a wannabe Sex in the City retirée. The thing is while I was single and struggling in the dating game during my 20s, and in relationships, the lawyer had partied and drank herself into infertility. Her ovaries must have been pickled in alcohol.

This is not a men v women thing as the hyenas are more blood thirsty against the few lionesses left.

I'm quoting this again because it's a must read for everyone.

"She used to say that if women didn't find a man at university but chose to use her temporary high position in the dating market for meaningless sex, she'd see the men she ignored with younger women in a decade."

Thank you, #6.

[Dalaran1991]

(11-23-2016 12:40 PM)Kid Twist Wrote:  

"She used to say that if women didn't find a man at university but chose to use her temporary high position in the dating market for meaningless sex, she'd see the men she ignored with younger women in a decade."

Thank you, #6.

Just rehash everything already said here: This changes very little in regard to what Samseau originally said however.

Those same women after riding the cock carousels would very easily find another man who will happily settle for her. Sure, she might not get you and me or other RVF, but she will definitely get someone, someone far better than she deserves, and she will still bitch about it. She will then produce children who would be miserable, and continue the circle.

That’s what Samseau was talking about. In the past these kinds of women would be condemned or be forced to repent their way. Now not only are they not punished they are even encouraged to do so, and ruin others’ lives in the process.

You have to remember, for every warpig with bottom low SMV, there’s always at least a couple of men with higher SMV than her who would be willing to swoop her up. Because never before in history has men SMV been this low. Look around your city and see how many cunty land whales are with children and boyfriend.

That’s not to say there’s absolutely no retribution however. It is in the form of female unhappiness. Females have never been as unhappy in history as now. Because suddenly at 40s they realize that a career, a house and a dozen cats do not make her happy, and that while she can easily get dozens of men, she can never get the men she actually wants. There s this itching and scratching in her soul, like the voice of a demon taunting and torturing her, but she cant recognize it for what it is – the hollowness in her heart and soul. So she indulges herself further in debauchery to hide from it. This is why so many women have mental disorder today.

I see it every time I go salsa dancing. There’s a battalion of 40-50s women without wedding rings and dressing in crazy color as if they were in a college party. They are extremely rude to the men, yet they fawn over the young and good dancers, then get suddenly mad when they prefer to dance with the young and nubile ladies. It is sickening. Best part? They can continue doing this and feels “good” about it until maybe 70s. Because younger men would still tell them "you are so beautiful / sexy!" Makes my stomach churns.

If a man fucks up this bad, he is DONE for good, and no one would help him instead would demean him further. Women? You go girl!

Understanding this premise Samseau talks about is crucial in dealing with women, because instead of trying to change / coach them you would simply let it go and find another girl. Once you realize that there is no incentive for her to be pleasant and free pass for every unpleasant behavior, you develop a radar for cunty girls miles away.

This applies for us men too. If you find a naturally pleasant and feminine girl who loves you, and if you are in a position to do so, settle down and produce healthy children and families that would make this world sane, instead of participating in the decline of society. (Or you can help speed up the decline, whatever)

[Leonard D Neubache]

(05-03-2016 01:52 PM)Valentine Wrote:  

Relevant new thread:

First baby drop-off box for unwanted newborns installed in Indiana

Even if a woman get knocked up and at any point single-mom-with-child-support life isn't good enough for her, she can always check out at any moment.

I think if I became obscenely wealthy I would hire some seriously red pill men to run a chain of orphanages.

Children suffering this terrible fate should not be raised with any liberal sympathies for their slut mothers that abandoned them.

[Rob Banks]

In response to the original post:

I agree that Western societies today are doing everything they can to try and shield women from consequences of their actions. Everything from crusades against so-called "slut-shaming" to no-fault divorce and child support laws proves this is the case. However, I do not think women (or anybody, for that matter) truly don't have consequences for their actions.

If there were a way to truly avoid all consequences of vice and sin (i.e. if there were a way to truly subvert God's will), I'm sure nobody would have a problem with it. But there isn't. God's will (i.e. truth, natural law, etc.) cannot be subverted or circumvented. The women who believe they can ride the carousel, divorce their husbands, raise their children as single mothers, etc., and not suffer any consequences, are sorely mistaken. They will face God's judgment eventually, one way or another.

[Haig]

If you want to destroy society, you weaponise natural female instinct and desires until they become a distorted mirror image. So a home builder becomes a wrecking ball, a mother becomes a harlot and loyal wife becomes a rabid dog.

There's not going to be any consequences for women in the near future, because society still has to hit rock bottom. Paedophillia is still to be normalised and that will be brought about by women. I'll guarantee that in the next few years there will be a special on Oprah talking about how a grown women fell in love and had gotten pregnant by a 12 year old.

By the end of the show, folk will be sticking up for that said woman. Because love is love right?!

[RBerkley]

(11-24-2016 01:40 PM)Haig Wrote:  

If you want to destroy society, you weaponise natural female instinct and desires until they become a distorted mirror image. So a home builder becomes a wrecking ball, a mother becomes a harlot and loyal wife becomes a rabid dog.

There's not going to be any consequences for women in the near future, because society still has to hit rock bottom. Paedophillia is still to be normalised and that will be brought about by women. I'll guarantee that in the next few years there will be a special on Oprah talking about how a grown women fell in love and had gotten pregnant by a 12 year old.

By the end of the show, folk will be sticking up for that said woman. Because love is love right?!

Dr. PHIL SHOW already interviews female teachers who fuck under-15 students on his show. On his YouTube channel, he conveniently blocks all comments when he uploads such shows on YouTube.

Sooner or later, just criticizing that a female teacher is undertaking enemas before the end of the school day to get fucked in the ass by the Grade Six Junior Football Team will be considered "Hate Speech" and punishable by prison time which will be harsher than someone advocating for murdering an entire race or religion.

Meanwhile, the feminazis will continue to promote false rape, more insane Sex Crime laws and more police state tyranny against heterosexual people.

There will come a time when a female Anglo teacher in the Western world will be permitted to suck some 12-year-old's boy weiner while getting fucked in the ass by the Junior high school football team during class as a form of "Sexual Diversity",

and when a mangina student complains that Dimitri the Lover's 17-year-old son is "catcalling/street hawassment" the nearby college campus female students just for asking where the pet shop is, that same female teacher will call the police, and later on, the police will step inside the classroom while the teacher is still fucking, but the police will be more interested in using militarized weapons against "stweet hawassment of womyn"

A female yoga teacher in Arizona already got acquitted for engaging in a mass-sexual orgy with under -16 males at a Bar Mitzvah because she claimed that she was "drunk", therefore she did not consent, and that the boys were the rapists who should have been charged.

#BRAVENEWWORLD.