Quote: (03-14-2018 05:23 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
I am not bothered by that black Jesus if some black folk want to depict him that way.
This Chinese Jesus took steroids and obviously spent many of his formative years lifting rocks:
"Do you even lift?" is a moot question.
The difference between the examples here is that our current globo-homo team is changing historical accounts or even destroying stories for the sake of a feminist, anti-Western, pro-globalist message. It is a malicious undertaking.
A black or Asian Jesus just depicts a religious figure in a way that people can relate to wanting to make that religion their own.
However the globalists are attempting to make Greek, British, German and US history disappear. It's as if we put a 30% White and Asian cast into a movie about the Zulus or did the same with the ancient Japanese samurai. A black Samurai from 1650 as the main hero of Japan would be weird as fuck, but Europeans have got to swallow that dildo - and we have to like it.
I can confirm this. Jesus is represented as a black guy in Senegal, which is a country where christian people (3-4 % of the general population) are EXTREMELY religious. We even got someone given the cardinalship position by Paul XVI, another one by Benedict XVI (thanks to that religiousity), and have an annual christian pilgrimage in Popenguine (with lots of pictures of Jesus and Mary as black) (roughly 100000 people come every year, if you are interested).
In the end, I don't think it really matters, since the faith is basically the same as everywhere else (with maybe a few pagan beliefs mixed in, that occur also in Senegalese Islam anyway)