I'm having a lot of trouble finding any new movie or television series that doesn't lionise female participation in anything to the extent where it's completely unwatchable.

The Last Ship was good until they slotted in some botox bitch who could do espionage AND wet work with the best of them.

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:14 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

The Last Ship was good until they slotted in some botox bitch who could do espionage AND wet work with the best of them.

True, but the half-Asian helicopter pilot was sexy as hell. Far better than the African chick on the most recent season who just happens to be wearing a bikini under her tac gear so that she can avoid appearing on camera wearing legitimately intimate bra and panties.

Fake as fuck.

The sad thing is that I don't mind women being placed in roles where it's at least vaguely feasible that they could do the job. Helicopter pilot. Getaway driver. Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room. Being the person that repeats the captain's orders, only a bit louder.

Those are things women can do. Leave it at that, please, for fucks sake.

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room.

There's actually no such thing as a judo-kick.

Judo is a fighting sport composed of throws, takedowns and groundwork, including chokes, arm-bars and pins, but there is no striking.

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:37 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room.

There's actually no such thing as a judo-kick.

Judo is a fighting sport composed of throws, takedowns and groundwork, including chokes, arm-bars and pins, but there is no striking.

No, I'm pretty sure you're confusing it with kung-fu, which is a basic derivative of karate.

Not fictional but I even hate the new tomb raider movie. And the recent uncharted DLC (I think)

Both feature girls barely 120 pounds dominating men who are ATLEAST 180...most of which are trained also....

I wouldn’t mind if they bulk them up

Having a skinny “bad ass” woman is the same as having a obese “kick ass” man....either make sense.

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:46 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:37 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room.

There's actually no such thing as a judo-kick.

Judo is a fighting sport composed of throws, takedowns and groundwork, including chokes, arm-bars and pins, but there is no striking.

No, I'm pretty sure you're confusing it with kung-fu, which is a basic derivative of karate.

Kung fu is just a term for Chinese traditional martial arts, not a specific form of MA.

I'm pretty sure that Kung Fu was developed in Vietnam. You're thinking of Muay Thai.

You are all wrong - all martial arts are invented by blacks and Jews. Mostly by black Jews. Black Jew females. As a fact it is well documented that the inventor of Judo was a lesbian and a fighter for female rights who invented that path to fight against the oppressive an patriarchal striking techniques like Karate. There will be a movie made about it soon, so you will be able to watch it and see that I am right.

Kung Fu as a Chinese martial arts term is some 6000 years old.

----

While we are at Asian Whitewashing in Hollywood movies - the funny part is that the globalists gladly replace Asian and white characters with black men, but also needlessly have Asian characters be changed to white women:



The original cast in the anime was sort of a mix of Japanese and European bodies.



And the world would not have minded to see a cute hot Asian girl.

In Dr. Strange they gender- and race-swapped the cool Asian master:





They come up with a bunch of stupid excuses, but the reality is that that Hollywood is all about the girl-power and they don't mind destroying even story arcs or discriminating against Asians. Does not matter if it would make the story cooler and more true to the source - let us have a white fake-bald androgynous woman into that role. Women must always be better.


That bloke would be more believable.

Quote: (03-13-2018 09:00 PM)RedPillUK Wrote:  

You guys still watch films and tv series? Why?

First season of a show is usually good.

Then by season 2 it goes to shit.

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:37 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room.

There's actually no such thing as a judo-kick.

Judo is a fighting sport composed of throws, takedowns and groundwork, including chokes, arm-bars and pins, but there is no striking.

Leonard D Neubache was obviously making a very dry and subtle joke. The fake woman is so fake even her kick is fake judo martial art.

Quote: (03-14-2018 09:36 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:37 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room.

There's actually no such thing as a judo-kick.

Judo is a fighting sport composed of throws, takedowns and groundwork, including chokes, arm-bars and pins, but there is no striking.

Leonard D Neubache was obviously making a very dry and subtle joke. The fake woman is so fake even her kick is fake judo martial art.

I disagree.

Let's settle this with a kendo boxing match in the ring.

Quote: (03-14-2018 09:21 AM)MY DETROIT PLAYAS Wrote:  

The "Black Jesus" phenomenon really pisses me off. It completely misses the whole point of his existence, and infests it with ugly racial politics. Christians are specifically instructed to drop petty arguments between believers, and while I can't find the specific passage this early in the morning, simply reading the passages about arguments give the gist of how a Christian is supposed to behave:

I suppose, in light of that, I should clarify something: I'm not angry with those who have the Black Jesus painting in their house, I'm angry with those who manufactured such a divisive image in the first place. To channel a bit of J.B. Peterson, each of us experiences a sort of suffering that's unique to our station in life. We are not here to dwell on that suffering, to compare it to others, and to sow divisions between groups. We are here to carry our own cross, and love our neighbours.

All of this racial agitation makes that increasingly difficult with each day that goes by. Damn the fomenters of discord.

Quote: (03-14-2018 09:40 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 09:36 AM)eljeffster Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:37 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 07:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Someone who kills dudes by getting close to them and shooting them point blank rather than judo-kicking them across the room.

There's actually no such thing as a judo-kick.

Judo is a fighting sport composed of throws, takedowns and groundwork, including chokes, arm-bars and pins, but there is no striking.

Leonard D Neubache was obviously making a very dry and subtle joke. The fake woman is so fake even her kick is fake judo martial art.

I disagree.

Let's settle this with a kendo boxing match in the ring.

Actually this is an interesting way to settle manly beefs with only one caveat. You thought that the retard you were having a dispute with was just a basement-dwelling troll. Then he shows up in real life:



Even a well-seasoned amateur version of him is bad news and you should have realized that he agreed too quickly to a beef-fight.


(those are pro Russian fencers by the way)

There was a good reason for the European governments to ban dueling completely. Anyone who became excellent at fencing or shooting could insult, steal and fuck his way across society while leaving a heap of bodies behind him.

Quote: (03-14-2018 10:16 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 09:21 AM)MY DETROIT PLAYAS Wrote:  

The "Black Jesus" phenomenon really pisses me off. It completely misses the whole point of his existence, and infests it with ugly racial politics. Christians are specifically instructed to drop petty arguments between believers, and while I can't find the specific passage this early in the morning, simply reading the passages about arguments give the gist of how a Christian is supposed to behave:

I suppose, in light of that, I should clarify something: I'm not angry with those who have the Black Jesus painting in their house, I'm angry with those who manufactured such a divisive image in the first place. To channel a bit of J.B. Peterson, each of us experiences a sort of suffering that's unique to our station in life. We are not here to dwell on that suffering, to compare it to others, and to sow divisions between groups. We are here to carry our own cross, and love our neighbours.

All of this racial agitation makes that increasingly difficult with each day that goes by. Damn the fomenters of discord.

Aurini, you know I love you, but this is the non sequitur of the century.

MDP was making the point, in a humorous and gentle way, that there was a lot of racial mischaracterization for reasons opposite to diversity.

In fact, it has been the norm only forever, and the recent diversity bonanza is exactly that, recent.

How did that get turned into the scourge of the Black Jesus?

I have never even seen a picture of a black Jesus except on the internet. Is this some sort of new mass practice for the purposes of divisiveness that I have somehow missed?

Anyway, Jesus belongs to everyone, and everyone seems to draw him as if he were a member of their own race. This kind of artistic license seems to me to be perfectly acceptable because it makes the point that Jesus belongs to everyone.

The ratings for the new Troy series produced as a joint venture between the BBC and Netflix(and funded by British tax dollars)are already circling the drain.

Did they ever stop to think that maybe normal people don’t want to see homosexual interracial threesomes?

https://squawker.org/culture-wars/troyflops/

You are being too anthrocentric

Here is the earliest known depiction of Jesus Christ.



Shameless humans stealing a donkey's legacy.

Quote: (03-14-2018 11:07 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Aurini, you know I love you, but this is the non sequitur of the century.

MDP was making the point, in a humorous and gentle way, that there was a lot of racial mischaracterization for reasons opposite to diversity.

In fact, it has been the norm only forever, and the recent diversity bonanza is exactly that, recent.

How did that get turned into the scourge of the Black Jesus?

I have never even seen a picture of a black Jesus except on the internet. Is this some sort of new mass practice for the purposes of divisiveness that I have somehow missed?

Anyway, Jesus belongs to everyone, and everyone seems to draw him as if he were a member of their own race. This kind of artistic license seems to me to be perfectly acceptable because it makes the point that Jesus belongs to everyone.

I've had it shoved in my face a few times; given your response, I must be overgeneralizing from anecdotal experience. In that case - glad to hear it.

I also get really, really, autistically annoyed when people are objectively wrong about things. Large knowledge base + low agreeableness. I usually bite my tongue, but it drives me up the wall.

For the record, none of those images bother me, but at this point in history we do know what he looked like.

Jesus is a figure slightly shifted by every race towards their own people. I am sure that ancient Egyptian Coptic Christians, ancient African Abyssinians and Chinese Christians all had their own perception of Jesus. The original Jesus was ancient Hebrew - all depicted as quite light-skinned compared to the Egyptians. Making him blond and blue-eyed vs more Italian looking isn't that much of a stretch. Also the - full nordic version came much later.

-----------------

Of course the critics love the Troy blackwashing, but the people are getting pissed.

And they are likely waiting until season 2 to start putting in 20% of soldiers as women.

Comments:

Quote:Quote:

20% black because, not racist. That's why Black Panther was 20% white, oh sorry, only works one way. Don't look forward to the next remake of Shaka zulu to find 20% of the tribe is white, Perhaps Shaka Zulu himself, that would be absurd, right?

Quote:Quote:

I think we need more transgender, disabled, homosexual Africans playing Greeks next time bbc. I am offended that you forgot to include the chinese zeus and aboriginal athena ffs

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5103758/

Troy has a 2.9 rating at IMDB with 2900 comments given.

I think that the UK is attempting to out-cuck Sweden and Canada fully intending to commit cultural suicide before the other cucks out there.

Black Judas in Jesus Christ Superstar.

[img]via Imgflip Meme Generator[/img]

I am not bothered by that black Jesus if some black folk want to depict him that way.

This Chinese Jesus took steroids and obviously spent many of his formative years lifting rocks:


"Do you even lift?" is a moot question.



The difference between the examples here is that our current globo-homo team is changing historical accounts or even destroying stories for the sake of a feminist, anti-Western, pro-globalist message. It is a malicious undertaking.

A black or Asian Jesus just depicts a religious figure in a way that people can relate to wanting to make that religion their own.

However the globalists are attempting to make Greek, British, German and US history disappear. It's as if we put a 30% White and Asian cast into a movie about the Zulus or did the same with the ancient Japanese samurai. A black Samurai from 1650 as the main hero of Japan would be weird as fuck, but Europeans have got to swallow that dildo - and we have to like it.

Quote: (03-14-2018 11:07 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 10:16 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

Quote: (03-14-2018 09:21 AM)MY DETROIT PLAYAS Wrote:  

The "Black Jesus" phenomenon really pisses me off. It completely misses the whole point of his existence, and infests it with ugly racial politics. Christians are specifically instructed to drop petty arguments between believers, and while I can't find the specific passage this early in the morning, simply reading the passages about arguments give the gist of how a Christian is supposed to behave:

I suppose, in light of that, I should clarify something: I'm not angry with those who have the Black Jesus painting in their house, I'm angry with those who manufactured such a divisive image in the first place. To channel a bit of J.B. Peterson, each of us experiences a sort of suffering that's unique to our station in life. We are not here to dwell on that suffering, to compare it to others, and to sow divisions between groups. We are here to carry our own cross, and love our neighbours.

All of this racial agitation makes that increasingly difficult with each day that goes by. Damn the fomenters of discord.

Aurini, you know I love you, but this is the non sequitur of the century.

MDP was making the point, in a humorous and gentle way, that there was a lot of racial mischaracterization for reasons opposite to diversity.

In fact, it has been the norm only forever, and the recent diversity bonanza is exactly that, recent.

How did that get turned into the scourge of the Black Jesus?

I have never even seen a picture of a black Jesus except on the internet. Is this some sort of new mass practice for the purposes of divisiveness that I have somehow missed?

Anyway, Jesus belongs to everyone, and everyone seems to draw him as if he were a member of their own race. This kind of artistic license seems to me to be perfectly acceptable because it makes the point that Jesus belongs to everyone.

The Bible doesn't provide a racial description but judging by the area and time He was born in with his lineage he probably looked like this:

I'm not against folk depictions of Christ but I am against trying to claim it is an authentic representation of what He looked like.