[WalterBlack]

(03-14-2018 05:23 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

A black Samurai from 1650 as the main hero of Japan would be weird as fuck, but Europeans have got to swallow that dildo - and we have to like it.

Quoting myself from another thread:

(07-09-2015 12:39 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

There was a black African samurai in 16th Century Japan

Quote:

Though his time as a warrior was brief, the man named Yasuke has a special place in Japanese history as the first and only black samurai.
…
Taken from his home somewhere in central or western Africa, Yasuke was sold to a Jesuit priest by the name of Alessandro Valignano. In 1579, Father Valignano went on a missionary trip to Japan, taking Yasuke along for help, and when the slave arrived in the Land of the Rising Sun, he caused quite a stir. After all, it’s said Yasuke stood over 2 meters (6 ft) tall, and he stood out a little bit among the homogeneous Japanese population.

Several years later, word of the newcomer reached Oda Nobunaga, a powerful figure who was responsible for the eventual unification of Japan. Curious to meet this celebrity, Nobunaga invited Valignano and Yasuke to visit him in 1581. When the warlord finally met the 26- or 27-year-old slave, he was quite impressed by his looks and stature. Later, he even claimed Yasuke was stronger than 10 men. The two were even able to converse, as Yasuke had learned quite a bit of Japanese during the past few years. However, Nobunaga wasn’t quite convinced that Yasuke’s skin color was genuine and had him stripped and washed just to make sure. When his servants failed to scrub away Yasuke’s blackness, Oda declared Yasuke would be his vassal and dubbed him with the Japanese name we all know him by today.

As Nobunaga’s retainer, Yasuke found more freedom than he’d had in years. Technically, he was still a servant, but now he was eating at a table with his peers and earning money for his work. Sometimes he even ate with Nobunaga himself, something that never would’ve happened with a European master. However, his service to Nobunaga didn’t last very long. Eventually, the warlord was betrayed by one his best generals, a man by the name of Akechi Mitsuhide. After Nobunaga’s death, Yasuke joined his son, Oda Nobutada and helped defend a castle against Mitsuhide’s forces. Unfortunately, the fortress was eventually overrun, and Yasuke had to surrender his katana to the enemy. However, Mitsuhide didn’t consider this “beast” to be a real samurai. Instead of giving him a warrior’s death, he sent him to a Jesuit church in Kyoto . . . where Yasuke mysteriously disappears. No one knows what happened next to the African samurai, but perhaps he spent the rest of his days wandering Japan as a black ronin, fighting villains and righting wrongs.

This is Sir Bedivere from the 2017 movie King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword:

[Aurini]

(03-15-2018 01:34 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Seeing as everyone is dropping their Jesus theories.

Jesus Christ was born in Galilee, which was of the Tribe of Dan and the Dan were Greeks.

Jesus = Greek.

Does that mean that the Tuatha De Danann were an offshoot of the noble Greeks, and that the filthy Irish stole Ierne from them? Is that why the Druids were part of the Pythagorean cult? Did Jesus study under them, and carpenter is just a metaphor for Tree Cultist?

[Paracelsus]

(03-15-2018 11:31 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(03-15-2018 01:34 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Seeing as everyone is dropping their Jesus theories.

Jesus Christ was born in Galilee, which was of the Tribe of Dan and the Dan were Greeks.

Jesus = Greek.

Does that mean that the Tuatha De Danann were an offshoot of the noble Greeks, and that the filthy Irish stole Ierne from them? Is that why the Druids were part of the Pythagorean cult? Did Jesus study under them, and carpenter is just a metaphor for Tree Cultist?

No, what it basically means is that Jesus = Greek = Levantine = Cypriot = Maltese = Mediterranean, as opposed to back country Arab.

Quote:

Although “White” Supremacists like to be antisemitic, here is something Hitler would have hated: Ancient Greeks were genetically as close to Ancient Levantines as they were to the so called “Aryans”. It just happened that Ancient Greeks spoke an Indo-European language while Ancient Levantines spoke a Semitic one. Ancient Greeks, it turns out, have an Anatolian origin (and Levantines are mostly Anatolian and Iranian). This was shown in recent paper, Lazaridis et al. (2017) who looked at Bronze Age and modern Greeks. And modern Greeks descend mostly from Bronze Age Greeks. In other words, if you want to see how ancient Greeks looked like, go no further than your local diner in Astoria, Queens.

So, if white supremacists want to claim a genetic link to ancient civilizations in order to get some “lettres de noblesse” and improve the “European” pedigree, they need another route. They would either need to abandon their link to Western Civilization or abandon their antisemitism. You, simply, cannot have both.

A recent paper showed that modern Lebanese are genetically very close to Ancient Canaanites. Further, in spite of claims in history books (e.g. Salibi), Lebanon experienced hardly any gene flow from the Arabian Peninsula. The presence of J1e haplogroup is less than 3%, a tenth of what is found in Syrians and Jordanians, and a fifth of what is found in Palestinians (the overall J1 is about half). This applies to all Lebanese ethnoreligious groups.

Note that a recent account in National Geographic that went viral, showing that Lebanese are partly Arabs is highly… unscientific.

Further, the distance between today’s Lebanese and modern Greeks is minimal, much closer than that between them and nonLevantine members of the Arab League.



Sources
Lazaridis, Iosif, Alissa Mittnik, Nick Patterson, Swapan Mallick, Nadin Rohland, Saskia Pfrengle, Anja Furtwängler et al. “Genetic origins of the Minoans and Mycenaeans.” Nature (2017).
Marc Haber, Claude Doumet-Serhal, Christiana Scheib, Yali Xue, Petr Danecek, Massimo Mezzavilla, Sonia Youhanna, Rui Martiniano, Javier Prado-Martinez, Michał Szpak, Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith, Holger Schutkowski, Richard Mikulski, Pierre Zalloua, Toomas Kivisild, Chris Tyler-Smith, 2017. Continuity and admixture in the last five millennia of Levantine history from ancient Canaanite and present-day Lebanese genome sequences.The American Journal of Human Genetics doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.013
Data by Pierre Zalloua

On the other hand, this also renders most of identity politics on the Left pretty stupid as well. The bluehaired terriers all keep foaming at the mouth about "white culture" including the ancient Greek philosophers -- from Thales to Thucydides to Aristotle to Plato -- as supposedly "white". This material clearly suggests otherwise; it's not white culture at all, so shut the fuck up already.

And the point about Mediterranean versus back-country is significant: it often took less time to go from Alexandria to Athens than it did to a rural area. Mediterranean, absent racially segregated quarters in some cities, is a genotype all in itself, and shared heavily at least around the eastern end of the Mediterranean if not further.

[Tex Cruise]

Quote:

Further, the distance between today’s Lebanese and modern Greeks is minimal,

Why do we need all that DNA data to prove this? Isn't it obvious enough from their fully sick rims?

[Paracelsus]

(03-16-2018 01:32 AM)Tex Cruise Wrote:  

Quote:

Further, the distance between today’s Lebanese and modern Greeks is minimal,

Why do we need all that DNA data to prove this? Isn't it obvious enough from their fully sick rims?

Saints Peter and Paul, bro:

[Simeon_Strangelight]

The entire Game of Thrones series was strongly adapted and changed to appeal to feminism and social justice.

The most major changes:


Sand Snake and the entire story arc of their kingdom was utterly changed, great warriors of theirs were not shown and made to look like wimps only to make it more "bad-ass" empowered.


That one was made into some kind of "best knight in the kingdom" while in the books she was at best a rare woman who could fight with some men - not beat the best warriors.


Even that ice-cold bitch was changed in the series to make her appear more as the doting mother - which she wasn't in the books. She was far more evil and ice-cold like some women actually are.

In the past the good guy like Clint Eastwood was taking women left, right and center - sometimes even with some resistance. It was not even viewed as rape, since sane men see the interest of women even if they make the appearance of resistance.

Now the women and insane idiots get upset when the actress wears something sexy in a bloody movie that is set in a virtual world:



The current Tomb Raider movie got a costume change because they were afraid of the feminazi mob:



They should not have, since Jumanji made as much as it did partly because of skimpy outfits.

These are some dark times of pearl-clutching puritanism coupled with fake empowered girl-powerism that will sooner or later make any decent movie absolutely impossible. Comedies will be impossible, romance movies will be unwatchable and all action movies will have to be led by some women. You won't be able to show history either, since it is not diverse enough.

[nomadbrah]

(03-15-2018 11:31 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(03-15-2018 01:34 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Seeing as everyone is dropping their Jesus theories.

Jesus Christ was born in Galilee, which was of the Tribe of Dan and the Dan were Greeks.

Jesus = Greek.

Does that mean that the Tuatha De Danann were an offshoot of the noble Greeks, and that the filthy Irish stole Ierne from them? Is that why the Druids were part of the Pythagorean cult? Did Jesus study under them, and carpenter is just a metaphor for Tree Cultist?

It's possible certainly.

There's also that country Denmark (i.e. Dan-mark), which has a founding myth that Odin came from Troy and settled there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prologue_(Prose_Edda)

Quote:

"Odin had second sight, and his wife also; and from their foreknowledge he found that his name should be exalted in the northern part of the world and glorified above the fame of all other kings. Therefore, he made ready to journey out of Turkland [...] They made no end to their journeying till they were come north into the land that is now called Saxland"

The gods in Asgaard are called Aser, meaning literally "Asians" and the region of Syria et al, was called Asia-Minor at the time.

The lost tribes of Israel = the Dans.

Nordics = we wuz jews.

[nomadbrah]

(03-15-2018 11:48 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

On the other hand, this also renders most of identity politics on the Left pretty stupid as well. The bluehaired terriers all keep foaming at the mouth about "white culture" including the ancient Greek philosophers -- from Thales to Thucydides to Aristotle to Plato -- as supposedly "white". This material clearly suggests otherwise; it's not white culture at all, so shut the fuck up already.

This is too simplified.

There is no doubt the original Greek Minoan culture, which had strong links to Egypt and Levant, had it's origins in Anatolia, however they were most certainly white as I showed in another thread. The current closest population to the ancient Minoans are todays Sardinians and even Scandinavians from the bronze age.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22527821

Quote:

The ancient Minoan DNA was most similar to populations from western and northern Europe. The population showed particular genetic affinities with Bronze Age populations from Sardinia and Iberia and Neolithic samples from Scandinavia and France.

Sardinians range in appearance, but they are definitely quite typical white, this isn't Sicily. You can google Sardinians for yourself.

[Goldin Boy]

Abraham Whistler from the "Blade" films.

Totally invented for the movies. Blade did have a mentor in the comics but he was an older Black vampire hunter. Blade met him after they killed a vampire together: The Black guy was impress he took Blade in and made him his protege. That's the complete opposite of how Whistler describes meeting Blade in the film: He says he found mindlessly feeding on the homeless, completely overwhelmed by his bloodlust, and then he took him in and trained him.

Also Blade made the serum to suppress his desire to drink blood in the comics he didn't rely on Whistler(or anyone else) to make it for him.

[Ogunn]

This thread is proof that "Confirmation Bias" and "Cognitive Dissonance" are real.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(03-17-2018 02:10 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

Abraham Whistler from the "Blade" films.

Totally invented for the movies. Blade did have a mentor in the comics but he was an older Black vampire hunter. Blade met him after they killed a vampire together: The Black guy was impress he took Blade in and made him his protege. That's the complete opposite of how Whistler describes meeting Blade in the film: He says he found mindlessly feeding on the homeless, completely overwhelmed by his bloodlust, and then he took him in and trained him.

Also Blade made the serum to suppress his desire to drink blood in the comics he didn't rely on Whistler(or anyone else) to make it for him.

That's a worse story for Blade frankly. Blade was a movie created in times of little propaganda. The character of Blade did not have to ooze "blackness". He could have been Asian, Italian or Nordic looking. Snipes was cool in it.

In addition the noble Vampire houses were of all kinds of races - Blacks, Asians, Whites.

Or do you mean that they changed the character of Blade, because they wanted to depict the black vampire as unable to tame his blood-lust on his own wandering the town like an animal? Doubtful that such a vampire could be "trained", but I guess that is the logic of the leftists who assume that you can take kids from the projects, give them world-class schools and get Harvard alumni out of them.

Either way - the original story-line was more logical. A disciplined strong-willed Blade just became more effective working with another man.

[questor70]

(03-15-2018 11:02 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(03-15-2018 09:54 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  

Lachman gives serious 'uncanny valley' vibes.

Maybe its how her eyes are so high up her face.

More like 'gelfling' vibes.

[Leonard D Neubache]

It doesn't matter whether the Blade story was better or worse for having a white dude play Whistler.

Turn around is fair play.

[Goldin Boy]

(03-17-2018 03:56 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 02:10 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

Abraham Whistler from the "Blade" films.

Totally invented for the movies. Blade did have a mentor in the comics but he was an older Black vampire hunter. Blade met him after they killed a vampire together: snip.

That's a worse story for Blade frankly. Blade was a movie created in times of little propaganda. The character of Blade did not have to ooze "blackness". He could have been Asian, Italian or Nordic looking. Snipes was cool in it.

In addition the noble Vampire houses were of all kinds of races - Blacks, Asians, Whites.

Or do you mean that they changed the character of Blade, because they wanted to depict the black vampire as unable to tame his blood-lust on his own wandering the town like an animal? Doubtful that such a vampire could be "trained", but I guess that is the logic of the leftists who assume that you can take kids from the projects, give them world-class schools and get Harvard alumni out of them.

Either way - the original story-line was more logical. A disciplined strong-willed Blade just became more effective working with another man.

I don't think it was a subtle suggestion of anything. The thread asked for examples of race and gender changes. Kristofferson and Snipes worked very well and a had a very convincing rapport a la Batman and Alfred Pennyworth, in the first two films.

Here are two more:

1) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: In addition to toning down the violence from the late 80's comics, every form of TMNT media in the '90 until the most recent movie portrayed Baxter Stockman as a White man when he was originally a Black guy.

2) Spiderman Homecoming: Flash Tompson was White in the comics and is portrayed by a Hispanic in the movie(contrary to popular belief that kid is Guatamalan and nothing in the film states that's he's a convience-store Indian).

(03-17-2018 02:11 PM)Ogunn Wrote:  

This thread is proof that "Confirmation Bias" and "Cognitive Dissonance" are real.

People see what they want to see.

If the forum was majority-Black you'd hear more about issues Black people face, real and imaginary. Race is a highly emotional and personal topic to nearly all so I expect to see the objective reasoning go out the window and hear hyperbole to a degree when it's being discussed. I lost several Black friend, even to today, after explaining why I think Michael Brown's shooting was justified based on the evidence presented. Here is no different than anywhere else so I tend to tiptoe around race discussions since no one's really open to changing their opinion anyway.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(03-17-2018 08:40 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

It doesn't matter whether the Blade story was better or worse for having a white dude play Whistler.

Turn around is fair play.

I agree - Blade is an example of a race swap that did not matter.

The same goes for Red in Shawshank Redemption:



It was meant to be played by Paul Newman making more sense within the original story of a redheaded man. But ultimately the part was played well by Morgan Freeman.

At the very best one could call this clever good propaganda, but I could live with that.

[Tex Cruise]

(03-17-2018 04:04 PM)questor70 Wrote:  

More like 'gelfling' vibes.

Relevant-ish.

[Paracelsus]

(03-18-2018 09:43 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 08:40 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

It doesn't matter whether the Blade story was better or worse for having a white dude play Whistler.

Turn around is fair play.

I agree - Blade is an example of a race swap that did not matter.

The same goes for Red in Shawshank Redemption:



It was meant to be played by Paul Newman making more sense within the original story of a redheaded man. But ultimately the part was played well by Morgan Freeman.

At the very best one could call this clever good propaganda, but I could live with that.

They also at least addressed the point in two parts:
(1) When Andy asks Red why he's called that, he replies with a grin that it's "Must be because I'm Irish."
(2) When there's a mail call later on, Freeman's character is called out by the name "Otis Redding."

[RedPillUK]

The real question is why anyone here subjects themselves to any modern films and tv shows knowing it's most likely full of feminist, marxist and communist propaganda.

I already asked this, but after four pages no one actually posted one good reason why they watch this crap.

Do you think films will actually start getting better anytime soon?

Why are you willingly letting (((them))) infiltrate your brain? It's the most valuable thing you have and when you watch a film you're just letting that film implant images and stories into it forever. You think you're smart enough to notice the obvious propaganda, therefore it won't affect you? Wrong. You will notice a lot of it but it will still affect you anyway. Don't just passively let shit into your brain just so you can waste time on your own or with a girl

Also, why are you voluntarily giving your time and money to support an industry full of child rape and prostitution? If you spend money on this shit you're helping these sick fucks become rich and famous celebrities who then use that power and money to promote their politics even more.

Sure, everyone needs to relax and not use their time productively, but isn't there something you could do that doesn't fill your brain with bullshit communist fantasy stories?

I don't bother with any of it anymore and my life is better, the only time it has bothered me was when I was seeing a girl who liked films and she wanted me to waste my time with her watching them. She didn't seem to care that I would never think of taking her to something that she considered boring or a waste of time. I would just tell her I don't like them and to go with someone else and not go too much into the reasons why (lol).

Edit: And they're all like 3 hours long these days! And I don't want to even think about how many hours a TV series like Game of Thrones will take out of your life.

[Paracelsus]

^^^^^

About the best and simplest argument I've heard for just turning off the fucking Internet already.

Nassim Taleb likes this same logic, too, on two grounds:

(1) We know from most statistics that the "information" life gives us via the media is essentially noise. Literally noise. There's perhaps 5% of it that has importance and the rest is nothing but information which is useless. That would include the retreading of story that current film and TV are giving us. It's literally bullshit, it's lighting up your neurons for nothing and you're pouring literally decades of your life into something that is never going to get above beginners-to-low-journeyman quality information. That's all the Internet essentially is, because anything more dangerous or more valuable than that they arrest you for putting up or pay you handsomely to take down. So turn the shit off. Your back catalogue of reading material and viewing material is now decades in length, I think it might well be entirely possible for a 20 year old to get through the rest of his "viewing" life without seeing a single damn film or TV series made after the year 2000 or so, and in going back and getting comprehensive you might actually find something interesting in other countries.

(2) There is a single reason to recommend the classics more than anything else: because, just like wine, coffee, and water, humans are still using them more than a thousand years after they were first invented, and therefore the odds are in favour of the stuff being good for you or at least doing no harm. Longevity is the most powerful indicator that a piece of literature is good for you, mainly because, again, in the vast wash of literary noise over the centuries, Shakespeare has stuck it out. And Le Morte D'Arthur. And Beowulf. And Homer (Iliad and Odyssey). And the Bible. And on. These works do not live by literary professors alone, especially now when the West seems determined to institute a pogrom on the Western canon, they live because they had enduring things to say about the human experience. Shakespeare in particular is acknowledged as the greatest author of all time in the West at least, and virtually no one knows his work at all. (Yes, virtually no one knows him, even in the West. Lots of people know of him, especially the liberal ones who go along to the odd Shakespeare in the Park and lose track of the story around Act 2 or so, especially ones who didn't get the hilarious irony when they recently played up Trump as Julius Caesar and missed the fact that in Shakespeare's play those who murdered Caesar came to very bad ends and introduced a monster even more dangerous: Augustus. This sort of idiot nods respectfully at mentions of Shakespeare, but don't know whether he played for Arsenal or Chelsea.)

One more reason in favour of shutting off your tap and hiking upriver to find the source, where the river's water is still cold snowmelt off the mountains. So it's got a little birdshit in it and it's hard going to find the source. Would you rather cold, clean water that's hard to find, or our daily litres: processed, flavoured, tainted with heavy metals and fluoridated at the base of the dam wall where the flow's gone regular and stagnant and brown?

Either way, this last reason comes from the Last Psychiatrist: by reading the classics, you will by definition be reading something that was not produced for an audience composed of the dumbest generation of narcissists in history. The more time you are away from the poisoned well, the more time your body's got to flush those poisons out. You'll not be reading the books your father read, you'll be reading the books he should have read and should have passed on to you.

[Richard Turpin]

(03-19-2018 09:54 AM)RedPillUK Wrote:  

The real question is why anyone here subjects themselves to any modern films and tv shows knowing it's most likely full of feminist, marxist and communist propaganda.

I already asked this, but after four pages no one actually posted one good reason why they watch this crap.

Do you think films will actually start getting better anytime soon?

Why are you willingly letting (((them))) infiltrate your brain? It's the most valuable thing you have and when you watch a film you're just letting that film implant images and stories into it forever. You think you're smart enough to notice the obvious propaganda, therefore it won't affect you? Wrong. Of course it will still affect you anyway. Don't just passively let shit into your brain just so you can waste time on your own or with a girl

Also, why are you voluntarily giving your time and money to support an industry full of child rape and prostitution? If you spend money on this shit you're helping these sick fucks become rich and famous celebrities who then use that power and money to promote their politics even more.

Sure, everyone needs to relax and not use their time productively, but isn't there something you could do that doesn't fill your brain with bullshit communist fantasy stories?

I don't bother with any of it anymore and my life is better, the only time it has bothered me was when I was seeing a girl who liked films and she wanted me to waste my time with her watching them. She didn't seem to care that I would never think of taking her to something that she considered boring or a waste of time. I would just tell her I don't like them and to go with someone else and not go too much into the reasons why (lol).

Edit: And they're all like 3 hours long these days! And I don't want to even think about how many hours a TV series like Game of Thrones will take out of your life.

Yep, I can't disagree with any of that. Other than the fact that it's kind of annoying that you suddenly have to withdraw from watching something you previously enjoyed just cos the cucks now run the show. I like a good film, but unfortunately, they just aren't making good films anymore. And as you said, the people making them are scumbags.

Perhaps the only way to win this particular game is not to participate. With myself, it's happening naturally anyway I've noticed. I rarely visit the cinema (Last Jedi was my last film, and before that I can't remember), I don't buy dvd's/blu-rays/box-sets anymore. The only films I stop and watch when channel-surfing are 'old' ones, sometimes the older the better. I still have Netflix, but like that it has no adverts and I at least get to choose what propaganda to watch (and can even 'rate' it afterwards! Thanks Overlords!!).

[Simeon_Strangelight]

The classics are no longer being taught in universities.

Every major movie now has to include some major plot points of agenda and indoctrination. All movies have to include massive indoctrination and agendas.

And I would not say that the movies work on you if you are fully aware of all those things - I sometimes watch those things. But the downside is that you don't enjoy that kind of fiction anymore.

[RedPillUK]

(03-19-2018 10:48 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

And I would not say that the movies work on you if you are fully aware of all those things - I sometimes watch those things. But the downside is that you don't enjoy that kind of fiction anymore.

How do you know though? You can only notice the propaganda that you notice. There might be some more subtle stuff in there that you don't even realise has an effect on your thoughts and feelings.

If you know something has hardly any positive benefits and a lot of negatives, do the risk/reward calculation and you realise it's high risk/low reward and not worth it.

You're letting them inflict their psychological warfare on you, just to entertain yourself for a few hours.

Not being able to enjoy something because of it's message isn't the only downside.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(03-19-2018 11:37 AM)RedPillUK Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 10:48 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

And I would not say that the movies work on you if you are fully aware of all those things - I sometimes watch those things. But the downside is that you don't enjoy that kind of fiction anymore.

How do you know though? You can only notice the propaganda that you notice. There might be some more subtle stuff in there that you don't even realise has an effect on your thoughts and feelings.

If you know something has hardly any positive benefits and a lot of negatives, do the risk/reward calculation and you realise it's high risk/low reward and not worth it.

You're letting them inflict their psychological warfare on you, just to entertain yourself for a few hours.

Not being able to enjoy something because of it's message isn't the only downside.

At this stage of immersion the main stuff I miss must be subliminal. The globalists are not some kind of super-humans. Most of the stuff has only a few elements embedded in it. The old system of propaganda was to add only very small elements and not destroy the story. Now it's in your fucking face distorting story-lines, creating idiotic characters.

A good example would be this episode of Stranger Things:



It's like an Antifa spot with a Pakistani girl chosen as the main character's "sister". Fuck her real family - this one girl she had barely a contact with and her Antifa buddies are the real deal.

Even the way they are casting female characters has become shitty - I can imagine that they deliberately picked a less attractive girl to show the patriarchy the middle finger:



I think that even at ideal levels of achievements of my life, that I would like to take a look at what is popular once every few months in order to take a look what they are currently pushing and how much shit the serfs have gotten used to swallow while loving it.

Most people neither care nor even notice blatant propaganda in movies even like the latest Thor (forced diversity, anti-imperialism "you did not build it - you stole it all", overpowered female characters and sisters pulled out of their mythological ass) or Black Panther (infantile view of a high-IQ black society and constant anti-White rhetoric). Heck - in our times I am truly shocked to see the people react like morons to movies like The Farce Awakens with great enthusiasm while lambasting the Star Wars prequels which had close to zero propaganda in it. As error-prone as parts of the prequels were, they were clean movies in terms of globalist indoctrination. In contrast the Farce Awakens had plenty of it and the Last Jedi was a propaganda shit-show of epic proportions.

But I agree that it's not worth it to follow current-day fiction even if it does not work on you to any meaningful degree. Still funny to see the latest Vikings series where I took a look recently and see a 30% female fighting force running down professional male soldiers in their prime by the dozens - because shield maidens are bad-ass!

The only thing that amuses me is that one day all of that bullshit might be viewed by Chinese societies as a guide-line of how the West eliminated itself - a study of their anti-Western fiction would be a wonderful case-study of what not to repeat if you do not want to descend into a violent shithole.

[rudebwoy]

Lone Ranger

Kung Fu - they didn't want to cast Bruce Lee, so they used David Carradine.

Tonto - portrayed by Johnny Depp.

Cleopatra - portrayed by Elizabeth Taylor

Genghis Khan - portrayed by John Wayne

[debeguiled]

(03-24-2018 12:44 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

Lone Ranger

Kung Fu - they didn't want to cast Bruce Lee, so they used David Carradine.

Tonto - portrayed by Johnny Depp.

Cleopatra - portrayed by Elizabeth Taylor

Genghis Khan - portrayed by John Wayne

These were invented for homogeneity reasons.