[Alpharius]

(01-09-2018 08:06 PM)Fisto Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 05:38 PM)Alpharius Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 05:14 PM)Genghis Khan Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 01:06 PM)ElFlaco Wrote:  

I'm open to voting for Oprah (hope that's not a bannable offense)

Can you elaborate on why?

Genuinely curious. Although I've enjoyed a lot of the posts on this thread, a lot of the comments also sound eerily similar to what my liberal friends were saying about Trump ("there's no way he can win for X, Y, Z reasons").

If there are guys on this forum who would consider voting for Oprah, I think we owe it to ourselves to hear them out.

Depends entirely on her policy positions, knowledge of domestic and international affairs, if she can competently work with congress, and the content of her personal character.

Too many of you guys are hung up on her being black and a woman, like you voted for Trump simply because he is white and a man. Do intelligence, experience, skill and policies count for nothing?

Edit: I'm not saying I would vote for her, I'm saying I don't have enough information to decide.

You can’t honestly expect anyone here to believe that you don’t know enough.

I’ve noticed some leftist type posts by you, why don’t you just be straight up?

I'll freely admit to being more to the left than a lot of the guys here. That doesn't mean I'm some raging liberal by any means. That also doesn't mean I'd vote for Oprah. I haven't even watched her speech, and won't be bringing myself to do so.

All I'm saying in this thread is that I'd need to know a candidates specific position on any number of issues before I vote for them. Speculation, like this thread, without facts is usually just meaningless but funny banter.

[Rush87]

Oprah is beyond hostile to men. She is as bad if not worse than Hillary in this regard. I can't see any rational reason why any male on this website would consider even 'humoring' the idea of voting for her. Her stance is clear.

[kamoz]

(01-09-2018 10:07 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

Oprah is beyond hostile to men. She is as bad if not worse than Hillary in this regard. I can't see any rational reason why any male on this website would consider even 'humoring' the idea of voting for her. Her stance is clear.

Bingo. None of the Hillary e-mail crap ever mattered to me. Her book 'It Takes a Village' told me everything I needed to know a long time ago. Moral of the story, look back and know where they're coming from and what their ideologies are. Same goes for Trump and why we should have faith in him.

[Dragan]

Don't know who I dislike more for potential candidate for president, Oprah who literally smoked crack on the regular in the 80's, or Mark Zuckerberg who is some sort of otherworldly species.

[LowerCaseG]

As a trump supporter I would be most worried about:

1. The Rock
2. Oprah.
3. Cuban.
4. Kamala

One could make the argument that Trump's victory was due to timing and voter turnout of white men. Also poor turnout on the other side. Oprah could easily spur Obama level turnout, and I doubt policy would matter much.

There is absolutely no mainstream democrat threat. So then, if Oprah is trash, which democrat has a chance?

Otherwise we are circle jerking that nobody can beat trump.

[Pancho]

No way! So she gave a nice speech and now all of a sudden she should run for president?

What are her policies?

Walking away from that speech I have no idea is she's for Medicare for all, Free College, a living wage, ending the wars overseas, stopping NSA spying, legalizing recreational marijuana.

I have no idea if she's for or against the wall street bailout. Is she aware of the deep state? Is she aware about North Korea?

The only thing I know about Oprah is that shes against sexual assault, but everybody should.

Shell be just another Democratic Establishment Centrist person like Hillary.

At this point, Bernie Sanders is the true progressive of the Democratic party.

[TigOlBitties]

Oprah appeals to people that can't look beyond identity politics.

[Cr33pin]

#MeToo

[CynicalContrarian]

Oprah colluded with Weinstein.

She Knew.

[debeguiled]

(01-09-2018 04:13 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  

I also have gotten this feeling over the years that somehow evil is not allowed to operate 100% fully in disguise. For evil to be able to exist and operate, it must have some form of prior disclosure of its existence, modus operandi and end goal intentions.

Nice post Merc. There could very well be something to what you are saying, although because it involves the description of a spiritual law that even the most evil are compelled to follow, there is no real way to prove or disprove it.

As a speculation it rings true, and I am inclined to see truth in it until proven otherwise.

To expand on what you are saying, and I do this with my own spiritual observations as well, it can be useful to analyze the data in a purely psychological way, as an expression of the character of evil people, because it allows the atheist/skeptic to get on board with your observations without reference to anything supernatural.

Also it is practical, because if you can narrow behaviors down to psychological qualities, you have a simpler definition that can help you to identify what sort of person you are dealing with.

All this is to say, it could very well be that the reason evil people all react and signal and evade in the same way is because they share similar personal traits, and I am thinking in particular of the big one, from the Daddy of Sins, pride.

Pride on its own can explain why they act the way they do. They signal their true nature in gestures, as AB has pointed out, because they feel so superior to the rest of us, that they believe they can openly show their intentions, and we will be too dumb to figure it out on our own.

So on a deeper level, what you are saying may be true, that they are not allowed to hide completely, or openly lie, but from the perspective of each person and their own motivation, none of this may be directly in their consciousness at all.

Their own pride does all the work. Look at my super secret hand gestures that the sheeple don't understand. Ha ha.

And also, the fact that they never directly lie can be down to the plain old duper's delight, and that they are having fun playing all sorts of word game with the fools of the lower orders.

Lying is too easy for these prideful people, they want to have fun with it, and see if they can get away with a good evasion that no one is smart enough to call them on.

You are right about how consistent it is, and how it hints at something deeper, and I guess I am just thinking of ways of communicating what you are saying to people who will automatically shut down at any mention of higher realities.

When I was a political activist in the 90's, the people we were going up against were either corporations or mainstream politicians, and at first, I felt like we had no hope, because they were bigger, stronger, better funded, and more organized than we were. What chance would we have against them?

But as I read up on them, I found that almost without exception, these people always ended up bragging, in writing or an interview, about exactly the thing I wanted to prove.

It made me somewhat hopeful.

I didn't have to go after them with dueling statistics and theories.

They could be attacked using their own words.

It is an extremely odd phenomenon.

[MKDAWUSS]

Oprah running for President would ruin Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama.

[sterling_archer]

Debeguiled nailed it. It's all about pride and branding. When you are part of the something that if on top of the "food chain" for hundreds of years, you flaunt it. You are proud of your work and the work of your ancestors. Keep in mind that their sense of morality disappeared a long time ago and all that is left is pure ambition and egoism. Satanic/Luciferian/other term intent goes hand in hand with this worldview.

It's pretty much obvious how these old families still keep their heraldy and openly present it everywhere. They know they are the true royalty and even though feudal system is officially disbanded, it's just became corporatism where corporations play the role of kings and queens of old.



Rothchild coat of arms: Harmony, Integrity, Industry

[CynicalContrarian]

"Harmony, integrity, industry."

That's some rather Orwellian shite right there...

[El Chinito loco]

(01-09-2018 10:07 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

Oprah is beyond hostile to men. She is as bad if not worse than Hillary in this regard. I can't see any rational reason why any male on this website would consider even 'humoring' the idea of voting for her. Her stance is clear.

The general impression I get of Oprah over the years is that she's an extreme narcissist and probably buys into her own cult of personality as this great female guru. The sociopath meter readings are probably off the chart which is why she's also not bad at acting.

She can lock down two distinct and gullible demographics at the same time with her cult.

I don't think she hates men as much as she's pro Oprah Winfrey above all else.

She's perfectly willing to hock lots of fraudulent bullshit (fake stories, the secret, etc..) to her millions of idiot women followers. If she "loves" women she has a funny way of showing it.

[JayR]

[Rush87]

If anyone wants an idea of what would happen if Oprah ran, check out Seals twitter. I'm on my mob and can'rlt embed tweets but it reads:

"Oh I forgot, that's right... You heard the rumours but you had no idea he was sexually assaulting starry eyed actresses who in turn had no idea what they were getting into. My bad".

#sanctimonioushollywood

[Conscious Pirate]

Except Heidi’s Project Runway was a Weinstein Production.

#heknewtoo

[Conscious Pirate]

And while we are at it. Marky Mark Wahlberg also knew. They wrote in “Harvey Weingard” into that male Sex In The City crap.

These people are all tainted & they can all go fuck themselves with their virtue signalling, shallow existence.

[Akwesi]

I'm a bit worried about Oprah because I remember the utter devotion of some of my American exes to her. Before social media especially, talk show hosts were like the imaginary best friends of some people, and Oprah was like a second mother to some of these confused women (now 35+). This type of woman can be described as lower middle class "conservatives" (anti-abortion, etc.) who nevertheless embrace all the New Age bullshit and of course love handouts more than anything. Oprah is like the fucking horse whisperer when it comes to communicating with this type of post-wall basic bitch. The fact that everything that comes out of her mouth is inane pablum is less interesting than her raw emotional appeal. However, I would have to question why any real man would be inclined to support this lesbo bullshit artist.

[TravelerKai]

(01-10-2018 10:10 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

If anyone wants an idea of what would happen if Oprah ran, check out Seals twitter. I'm on my mob and can'rlt embed tweets but it reads:

"Oh I forgot, that's right... You heard the rumours but you had no idea he was sexually assaulting starry eyed actresses who in turn had no idea what they were getting into. My bad".

#sanctimonioushollywood

Yep!

Did not take very long now, did it? A famous liberal black man took a huge swing at her and it made headline news.

That's just a taste of what she is in for, should she continue to flirt with running for office.

She picked the wrong time to bother testing the waters. She could have at least waited until the Harvey heat died out some. Funny how we talked about Hillary's Harvey connections, but Oprah is about 1000 times more tied to the hip with Harvey than he and Hillary are. Trump knows both of them very well enough to be super confident in his answer that he would beat her.

[scotian]

I wonder if Oprah inhaled or not when she took a hit off the C pipe?

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(01-08-2018 06:36 PM)Alpharius Wrote:  

What would her platform be? What policies would she want to enact? Would every day in an Oprah administration be a clusterfuck of a news cycle or would she run a tight ship? Could she handle both domestic and international policies? Would some dudes on this forum quit life if a black woman was elected president of the most powerful nation on Earth? Would she work with the House and Senate to pass meaningful legislation that benefits the country and its people? What are her ideas on nuclear proliferation, climate change, global counter-terrorism efforts, the achievement gap, gun control, civil liberties, the war on drugs, religious freedom, and agriculture subsidies?

Lots of questions need to be answered before I could weigh in on her candidacy.

Oprah would run on the Obama-on-steroids platform of inciting racial divisions 24/7 and adding male hatred to the mix. I think that she would be something akin to Hillary with a constant pussy-hat being worn.

And I would like to add - they are likely both active lesbians, so they have this in common as well.

[DamienCasanova]

Based Seal

[nomadbrah]

Oprah looks like she is pimping a teen girl to a customer in that pic.

[C-Note]

He appears to have deleted the tweet because I can't find it on his feed.