Thanks, Men.
It's less that than, well... look, for all her power and privilege she heads off to University and - let's give her the benefit of the doubt - works damn hard to get her degree in her chosen field. Does she respond to this educational opportunity and the privilege of been given personal power over a Philosophy Journal with a brilliant, unique personal insight into said field, or does she simply churn out the same Basic Bitch Marxist Deconstruction of the Dominant Culture that 70+ years of Leftist Thought Leaders have already hammered into the ground before her, adding absolutely nothing of value?
Functionally, I've already heard everything she could ever write - 'Dominant Culture BAD!' - from the mouths of the 1970's infestation of Lefty Dyke Primary School teachers, and they didn't come from money and power.
All that changed is pre-'85 they tried to drive Revolution-Inspiring Ressentiment via Social Class and Sex, and post-'85 they switched to Race and Sex. Minorities should look at the venomous contempt Marxists now drip for the Working Classes to see their eventual-and-entirely-predictable -future, come the revolution, where they will never, ever be allowed to hold actual power. The breaking of chains will be entirely-illusory.
As such, what real use is Mark Zuckerberg's sister, or her 'educated thought'? It's entirely fungible with 10,000 other Goyim Typists.
Note that she doesn't give up her position as Editor to an actual underprivileged minority: she must stand as the gatekeeper of allowed thought. Nothing will change after the revolution, except there will be less people capable of challenging the Marxist Tribe.
I'm starting to think Marxism is now crumbling purely-due to everyone being bored shitless by endless repetition.
Quote: (12-18-2016 06:34 PM)scorpion Wrote:
A thread about a female typist who needs to be taken down a few notches is practically the AnonymousBosch bat signal.
It's less that than, well... look, for all her power and privilege she heads off to University and - let's give her the benefit of the doubt - works damn hard to get her degree in her chosen field. Does she respond to this educational opportunity and the privilege of been given personal power over a Philosophy Journal with a brilliant, unique personal insight into said field, or does she simply churn out the same Basic Bitch Marxist Deconstruction of the Dominant Culture that 70+ years of Leftist Thought Leaders have already hammered into the ground before her, adding absolutely nothing of value?
Functionally, I've already heard everything she could ever write - 'Dominant Culture BAD!' - from the mouths of the 1970's infestation of Lefty Dyke Primary School teachers, and they didn't come from money and power.
All that changed is pre-'85 they tried to drive Revolution-Inspiring Ressentiment via Social Class and Sex, and post-'85 they switched to Race and Sex. Minorities should look at the venomous contempt Marxists now drip for the Working Classes to see their eventual-and-entirely-predictable -future, come the revolution, where they will never, ever be allowed to hold actual power. The breaking of chains will be entirely-illusory.
As such, what real use is Mark Zuckerberg's sister, or her 'educated thought'? It's entirely fungible with 10,000 other Goyim Typists.
Note that she doesn't give up her position as Editor to an actual underprivileged minority: she must stand as the gatekeeper of allowed thought. Nothing will change after the revolution, except there will be less people capable of challenging the Marxist Tribe.
I'm starting to think Marxism is now crumbling purely-due to everyone being bored shitless by endless repetition.