George Bush was accepted into Harvard Business School, this is the same guy that was not even good enough to get into U of T business school.
Carly Fiorina was a stupid liberal art major, accepted into some fancy MIT graduate program.
In fact, if you look at MIT incoming student body ratio, it is roughly 50/50 men and women all the way, for the last decade or so. Which means the number of qualified men are trimmed down to bump the number of women to achieve a roughly 50/50 gender ratio.
I just dug up the info from MIT webpage itself:
http://web.mit.edu/ir/cds/index.html
Take a look at 2014/2015:
http://web.mit.edu/ir/cds/2015/c.html
(Men that applied: 12,765; Men accepted: 740
(Women that applied: 5,591; Women accepted: 707)
Take a look at 2013/2014.
http://web.mit.edu/ir/cds/2014/c.html
(Men that applied: 13,380; Men accepted: 808
(Women that applied: 5,609; Women accepted: 740 )
Take a look at 2012/2013.
http://web.mit.edu/ir/cds/2013/c.html
(Men that applied: 12,718 ; Men accepted: 834
(Women that applied:5,391 ; Women accepted: 786 )
On and on and on like that.... you can take a look at the data here since 2003.
http://web.mit.edu/ir/cds/index.html
It is very clear and obvious, that the number of highly qualified young men in honors and AP classes completely outstrips girls; and the number applying to MIT completely outstrips girls. But miraculously, the number admitted seems to be almost 50/50 everytime. That is just bullshit.
Which means the males will be very competitive, while the females not soo much. Who do you think is carrying these females through their class work? The males. I am also sure, there are special programs in place whining about the number of women graduating at MIT, so they will want to have a 50/50 gender ratio graduation rate. Basically, garbage in, garbage out all in the name of liberalism.
It isn't all about merit.
Who knows, with LGBT37$##^?. They too will start demanding affirmative action, then will need to have equal number of men, women, trans, etc to balance everything evenly.
Quote: (06-29-2016 09:12 AM)bk19xsa Wrote:
...... Just look at the latest example and this might deserve a thread of its own: Harvard Business School enrolls Banned Female Athlete Maria Sharapova.
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/29/tennis...index.html
This is pathetic stuff from HBS. A school where many prospective candidates worked hard right since their undergrad and later at work with the dream to get in. In comes Sharapova and takes the spot of one of these deserving candidates, whose ambitions get crushed. That too by a banned athlete.What did she do to get in ? Did she even write the GMAT? And what the fuck will she do there? She already has the network and brand name to promote her business. If she really needs some business education then she can just lookup stuff online.
Also, if Sharapova was a male banned athlete, liberal media would have gone berserk and people would have been up in arms against Harvard's decision. Harvard itself would have never taken in a banned male athlete.
Now the media get to spin their narrative and paint both Harvard and Sharapova in a positive light. Harvard benefits. Sharapova benefits.Liberal Agenda and Media benefits. The Hardworking and deserving people don't. The Country sure as hell doesn't.