Quote: (04-23-2016 01:27 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:
Quote: (04-22-2016 09:02 PM)renotime Wrote:
How does a chick get PTSD?
She was a Corporal in the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit, served two combat tours in Iraq. It's certainly plausible, and unfortunate. Doesn't excuse her crimes of course.
![[Image: 071128-m-7696m-648.jpg]](http://northshorejournal.org/LinkedImages/2007/11/071128-m-7696m-648.jpg)
![[Image: 319A6A7D00000578-0-image-a-99_1456552542606.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/02/27/05/319A6A7D00000578-0-image-a-99_1456552542606.jpg)
WHB. Would have banged, back then. Pre-PTSD.
Seriously, though, and if true:
it changes the background of this story... Suddenly, the "evil murderous useless-to-society woman", turns out to be
an ex-petty officer having served in the field (apparently, and as a field nurse: respect) in war-torn Irak! I was not that wrong then in my earlier post, to have doubts about who's what, in this story
![[Image: dodgy.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
... What if the seed of the thought of killing her ex-husband, was indeed planted by the strange, unstable, having-brought-shame-to-the-unit,
attention-whore ex-sniper? I am saying, both things are possible: she might have started all, he might have started all by spurring her on.
All I'm saying is, let's wait for the investigators to unearth more details on this case.
Too early to judge.
As to the recordings... please: When A entraps B, knowing that a mike is recording all, A will restrain from saying anything incriminating, and carefully steer the discussion so as to entrap B.
The recordings do not clear A from guilt, given that A was aware of the mike.
And I do suspect the ex-sniper to be a male attention-whore (some males apparently can become that): urinating on dead corpses and taking pics of the deed, and circulating them pics (
thus harming his unit for no intel gain at all) - selling strange and ugly urine-themed tee-shirts on the side of the roads
![[Image: dodgy.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
... -
calling the cops to unleash a media-frenzy hell on his pregnant girlfriend
And even if what he said is mostly true, here is what his soon-to-be-born son or daughter will tell him in 15 years: "
Dad, why is mom in jail for life without parole? When she first talked about murdering this dude, couldn't you have just slapped some sense in her? was it necessary to send her in for life? was there really no other line of action, to straighten my mother?"
Disclaimer: if the child is
not his, then it changes everything and my sympathy goes back to the ex-sniper. But, if it is his child indeed, he should have found another way... bringing the mother to another state or even country, enlisting her to a mental clinic...?
Note: at some point in my life, I wore the uniform of my country's military, which allows me to state that, personally: Between a military in-the-field nurse (if this is indeed what she was, if she was
not just a public-relation thing), and a crazed sniper who urinates on corpses to upload the pics on the internet (thus breaking the Rules of War, for no gain at all), my sympathy goes to the military nurse first.
Disclaimer 2: yes, I advocate here for waterboarding terrorists, which probably breaks the Geneva Convention and all, but it's very different: it's to gain an immediate
intel edge and save lives... Urinating on dead enemies brings no strategic gain. Just infuriates a whole nation (or 2), and for what? 2 minutes of (ugly) lol?
Also, note that the ex-sniper stated that he would do it again (attention-whoring, again!): "'I didn't see anything wrong with it. I would do it again. It wasn't like we had some random Afghans laying there. They were insurgents, they had weapons and they were trying to kill us,' Chamblin told the Military Times.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...riend.html
"
And, any military personnel would understand the danger presented by these "urine" pics. Imagine, if a US or Western soldier had been captured a few weeks or months after these pictures got public... He would have received an even worse treatment from his captors, because of these pics.
(Waterboarding is not a problem regarding this: all soldiers understand the necessity of an energetic questioning of prisoners, to get urgently needed military data, but no soldier would understand the point in urinating on the corpses of dead enemies. Very different situations.)