Ah, Rollo Tomassi. If I recall correctly, Rollo was the first manosphere blogger I stumbled upon after discovering the red pill. At first I found his ideas interesting, but after a while I lost interest in his writing.
If I had to describe his writing in just one word, I'd call it sterile. Reading his blog made me wonder if the guy has any fun in life, some of his articles are that depressive. Just look at
this article. I would definitely not recommend something like this to a newcomer to the red pill.
Also, his writing is extremely complicated and full of psychology technobabble. I'm not a native English speaker and my English is not perfect, but I do feel my argument is valid as I occasionally have to read scientific papers in physics for work, and I don't have any problems reading that. I do have problems when reading The Rational Male, however. Two examples from his latest article:
Quote:Quote:
It was irony, it was juxtaposition to expose a counter point
Quote:Quote:
It was an essay in exposing the duplicity of women’s hypoagency
What the fuck are
juxtaposition and
hypoagency? When I read someone's work, I don't want to be forced to grab a dictionary every time the author tries to make a point. Words and phrases like this are completely redundant, as he can easily make a point and convey his message without them. Because of this I have an impression Rollo has some kind of a complex, forcing him to overcompensate in this matter to make himself seem more scientific and educated.
It's a shame, as he did have some good ideas and concepts.