Posts: 7,843
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
121
R.I.P. London
01-25-2016, 08:56 PM
Let me get this clear, you want to ban all Muslims from entering the USA.
You are voting for Trump and he will save the day.
What does this have to do with London!
Posts: 2,633
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
R.I.P. London
01-25-2016, 10:23 PM
I posted this thought on another thread, but I find it funny that most of the guys on here getting whipped into a frenzy about the Muslim invasion of Europe, don't even live in Europe. Most of them are probably living somewhere in the suburbs of the Mid-West.
Posts: 7,843
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
121
R.I.P. London
01-25-2016, 10:28 PM
^ But yet they want to argue with people who have spent alot of time there and with people who are living there, who aren't really complaining.
My friend just returned from France last week, sure they hate Muslims there but he said there is alot of opportunity to game women. My friend is Oriental, if that matters.
Posts: 394
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
8
R.I.P. London
01-25-2016, 11:13 PM
Trump is playing chess while Soros is playing checkers, and the other cucks are off playing Candyland at Jeb's house. - iop890
Posts: 1,165
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
29
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 04:58 AM
London has been like this for a while, if anything in terms of crime it was previously worse. Back in the late 90s/early 00s a lot of areas, which are now gentrified where virtually no go areas. Brixton was able to compete with the Watts District in Los Angeles, after having three unrelated shootings taking place in one day.
London is a city for the rich, I genuinely don't think this is a place that you can easily make money if you are just starting out. Unless you already come from a family who has contacts or you have a substantial funds on you already.
Posts: 89
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2015
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 06:22 AM
The issue here is not the current rate of crime. The crime rates will go through the roof overnight if the situation on the ground changes (or if the free internet porn becomes unavailable, whatever happens first.) In fact, if there's too much disbalance, and the banks/capital have to flee and all those overrated houses and terraces of Knigtsbridge/Mayfair/Belgravia are abandoned, London is in for some nasty power grab street-level style. The white Brits will not be in this war, having fled to the country side (other countries), but it will be a war between latest migrants from Eastern Europe (Polish/Romanians/Bulgarians) and others who are not. And the losers will be those who are lesser in numbers, and whose hearts are not really in it.
The issue is also not how many exotic sluts you can bang (get hold of yourself for a minute.)
The issue is displacement (and ultimately destruction) of white British people from their own ancestral land. When Brits went to India their goal was never to displace natives from Mumbai/Calcutta/Delhi. Compare that to the larger strategy of the joish masterminds for the past 70 years to abolish nation states, open borders and muddy waters.
Because London was home to white Brits forever, forgive us if we take five minutes to mourn their passing. I'm sure you can understand the feeling.
London is just the first city on their British path, but you just know that other British cities will end up the same. Manchester, Liverpool, Edinburgh, etc. Everything that is or could possibly be white will be phased out as such and replaced with multicult. The same blueprint is in place for other western cities: Paris, Brussels, Toronto and Vancouver are already lost. New York is in cross-hairs. Large German and Scandinavian cities are to follow. Vienna, Amsterdam, you bet. When those are fucked up, Madrid, Rome, Milan, Lisboa, Zurich, will be next. After those are exhausted, the relentless tide will go to Warsaw, Budapest, Moscow, etc. etc.
The ultimate end goal of this strategy is a creation of a global "flat world" populated with identity-less individuals who are removed from their own "background story" so to speak, and as such unable to mount any form of meaningful resistance. This world will be managed and governed by way of various regional and global power consortiums. The future world citizens will be highly indebted and highly brainwashed individuals who will toil in serf-like conditions for the benefits of the elite. Their own lives will be relatively valuable only insofar that they are useful to this system (young and stupid will take blatant precedence over old and smart/or sick and unhealthy all who will be disposed via occasional systemic purges whether through regional wars/upheavals, through new bio-forms, through denial of proper medicine/care, or through some other as of yet not invented means) which will ensure that the world population is kept only in highly productive numbers.
The elites will continue to elite, move capital around at the click of a button, and live in their secure private island compounds. Should it become feasible, the future elites will also colonize Mars and/or other planets or extraterrestrial man-made objects (think of module-like mini cities made up of large space stations) to ensure their own continuous survival.
If you think that we are already half-way there it's because we are.
Posts: 4,464
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2014
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 08:55 AM
Democracy, bitches.
Quote: (01-23-2016 01:41 PM)Samseau Wrote:
This is unbelievable.
Don't make me laugh
Quote: (01-23-2016 01:41 PM)Samseau Wrote:
But is the royal family pozzed as the rest of 'em? Or can they pull a Trump-style takeover?
This is the question. Can the next king stand up and say, "that's enough"? Can he say "I'll refuse assent to anything presented to me until it's a pre-1911 constitution restoration bill"?.
Only one real question exists though. Do the English just rot away, leaving England a giant slum-ridden brutal 3rd world hell hole? Or do they stand up, in ranks, with their king, and do what their ancestors did before them, to secure the existence of their posterity on this earth?
Naturally, they will start by putting leftists in their proper place in society. They will have detailed name records on their sides.
Posts: 6,656
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
27
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 09:08 AM
You're seriously overestimating the power of the Royal family.
All they are now is a tourist attraction and pomp thrown in, nothing more. Whilst the queen is a valuable head of state politically, she has no power to overcome the government, we had wars over this and the government won.
If they were to even attempt anything of a political coup like they do in Thailand every now and then, the government will merely adopt a way to write them out of the law and all of their power is lost. They could then gut them financially and destroy it as an institution.
Posts: 4,464
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2014
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 10:45 AM
Quote: (01-26-2016 09:08 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:
You're seriously overestimating the power of the Royal family.
All they are now is a tourist attraction and pomp thrown in, nothing more. Whilst the queen is a valuable head of state politically, she has no power to overcome the government, we had wars over this and the government won.
Is/ought.
Also you mean 'parliament' not government. There is also no such thing as a final war. People have too much deference to the status quo, as though the current form of government is always some invincible entity. The question is, if the local slaves revolt, who's will will prevail? That of the welfare parasites, feminists, multiculturalist hippy doucebags? Or the ranks of angry marginalized British male serfs, fighting for their right to life, liberty, and happiness?
I hope to see. And preferably sooner rather than later.
Posts: 7,843
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
121
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 11:20 AM
The definition of Capitalism:
an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.
Posts: 3,541
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 01:02 PM
Quote: (01-26-2016 12:13 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:
London has always been grimy. Even when I was growing up there I knew it was grimy, dirty, downtrodden. The English can be just as grimy as the migrants that are coming to replace/supplant them. Maybe not rural village in Pakistan level of grit, but certainly I saw little distinguishing characteristics between the Londonders on the East end, and the ones in Brixton other than skin colour.
London has had slums up to the 1950s. Im surprised they haven't fully made a return yet. Classist societies always suffer from these issues, they're not going away. England is as classist as they come, and has had no shortage of the tensions that arise as a result.
London at the end of the 19th century/early 20th
Brixton Riots 1981
The Miner's Strike in 1984 (2 decades before mass migration, this is when the white working class Brits started losing out to globalization)
The more things change...
This argument sounds eerily similar to the "Christians did bad things in the past so Islam is fine" argument.
Let's get one thing absolutely, abundantly clear. The British working class of the post-war 1950s may have been poor. They may have been ill-educted. They may have been ignorant by today's standards.
But they were proud, fiercely patriotic people who rebuilt their communities and cities after the visits from our German friends in the sky.
They were people who looked after their homes and their surroundings to the best of their abilities and who were proud of their communities and neighbourhoods.
These were the people that contributed their fathers and sons by the millions to die for their country in the Great War and WW2.
Let alone inaccurate, to call where they lived slums is downright unfair and rude.
Comparing them to the filthy Pakistani peasants that have ghettoised our cities now, in the 21st Century, with all that the modern world has to offer, is offensive.
Posts: 3,541
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 01:31 PM
Quote: (01-26-2016 01:25 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:
While England did bad things in the past doesn't mean they should be punished, especially the working class who had little decision making powers.
London is grimy, can't say I miss it.
Good riddance to you.
Don't come back.
Posts: 7,843
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
121
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 01:34 PM
^Dude you are getting a bit sensitive, comments like that aren't really needed.
Posts: 4,464
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2014
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 01:45 PM
Chill bro
Posts: 3,541
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
R.I.P. London
01-26-2016, 01:47 PM
The thing is, it's so easy to take take take from a country.
Then criticise it and its history, despite all it has given, after you've gone.
It's a common theme amongst expatriates. It makes me sick.