[RawGod]

(05-27-2014 11:09 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Note the girls in this video. They're about average for your lower class aussie girl. The thing is, they don't class up much even with education: a university girl still tries to kiss you with vomit in her hair or will stop to piss in the gutter.

Trigger Warning: Australian Girls

Things could always be worse.

Yep, that's Australia. It's not even a small underclass or a backwater area of Australia, I'd say at least 50% of the population all over the country are basically like this.

[Vacancier Permanent]

That was painful to watch!
That thing in the Back of he car talking, was that a girl? Looked like something straight from Lord of the Rings! I couldn't understand what she was saying!

(05-27-2014 11:09 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Note the girls in this video. They're about average for your lower class aussie girl. The thing is, they don't class up much even with education: a university girl still tries to kiss you with vomit in her hair or will stop to piss in the gutter.

Trigger Warning: Australian Girls

Things could always be worse.

[AnonymousBosch]

(05-27-2014 11:34 PM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  

That was painful to watch!
That thing in the Back of he car talking, was that a girl? Looked like something straight from Lord of the Rings! I couldn't understand what she was saying!

The hosts are comedians, so they're exaggerating their performances and speech, but their 'performances' are spot on as the type of people they're imitating to my ears. Everyone you see in the pub is real, and that is exactly how people act here.

The short, fit lead host, who is successful enough here to have created multiple tv shows and a couple of movies? 'Gollum' is his real-life girlfriend. Think about that for a second.

[RawGod]

(05-27-2014 11:57 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

The hosts are comedians, so they're exaggerating their performances and speech, but their 'performances' are spot on as the type of people they're imitating to my ears.

There is a weird, uneasy relationship between the middle/upper classes (not that anyone in Oz would ever admit to being upper class) and the "bogans". I mean, is this TV show ironic or not? Non-bogans will laugh at watching it, but I guarantee that the biggest audience are bogans who watch it without irony. And pretty much everyone in the country is only one step removed from these people.

Class in Australia. I've yet to see it really broken down, but a very interesting topic in itself.

[Feisbook Control]

(05-27-2014 10:29 PM)draguer Wrote:  

(05-27-2014 08:36 PM)Feisbook Control Wrote:  

Then, the second moment of illumination came on the trip to the airport. In the car, my sister was bragging about her career and how she once fired eight people in one day. I realised that she's a complete manosphere caricature of a modern psycho bitch and I haven't spoken to her since. I don't even know what I would say to her anymore, because it's all about her. At this point, any interaction would be purely voyeuristic on my part.

I'm noticing more and more the traits we deride in my sister.

She is only 20 but she has a boyfriend she has walked all over and had $1000s of gifts from the past few years, while he makes a low income. He is like her pet dog, and turned down a job with huge potential in Australia to stay here where he is not progressing with anything.

The slightest bit of criticism or challenge to her position sends her into a tantrum.

She is incredibly selfish and cannot see anything from another person's perspective - narcissism. Solipsistic and with a hugely inflated sense of her own importance and how she expects people to respond to her.

I am seeing the effects of her growing up without a hint of hardship - she has never wanted for anything so when the slightest difficulty occurs it rocks her world.

I'm moving away to Europe in a month and am thinking as the years go on I will begin to have more of the thoughts you have described.

That's only going to get worse. That poor sap, if he marries your sister, is in for a life of misery. Yet I guess he already knows that, even if only at an unconscious level.

AB: Paul Fenech has just lost a lot of respect in my mind. I've seen that woman in various other productions of his, but I never even suspected that she would be his girlfriend. Grief. Maybe she looks completely different in real life. One can only hope.

RawGod: I would actually describe my own family as upper middle class or lower upper class (by wealth at least, and somewhat in terms of cultural values). I have no qualms at all about admitting that. Yet even I have some bogan tendencies at times, which you can imagine drives me crazy. I know I swear too much, for instance. I think bogan tendencies are in the DNA or something in Australia.

I actually don't laugh at TV shows like that. I find them horrendous, shocking even, despite having had lots of exposure to such people. Maybe that's why. I've worked in some schools (both in Melbourne's outer southeast and also in the countryside) where 90%+ of the student body (and many of the teachers!) are just like people in that video. On a number of occasions, I actually had high school students ask me if I were Australian because they couldn't recognise 1) my accent, 2) my vocabulary. Seriously, they did not believe we were from the same country! All of them flat out refused to believe that I do not support a football team and assumed that my team must have been bottom of the ladder at the time. You can imagine that I got on like a house on fire at those schools!

[Zengling]

Actually game/prostitution can help save the western society.

Think about it. The current situation is that the girls can ride "alpha's" stream of cock, take no responsibilities for not developing any useful skills to the society, get all used up sexually, still marry some "white knight", sap all those cash that he'll spend on her, cheat on him with the help of botox and other cosmetics product with other "alphas" behind his back, still have a child, create some marriage problems, cause a divorce, receiving alimony from the "white knights" and still banging "alpha's" dicks.

If enough people learned how to become the "alphas" to bang those chicks AND prostitution help to augment the aesthetic department of the girls, there wouldn't be men that want to settle down with a girl. So the women will no longer have the option of settling down with a "white knight" anymore as that "white knights" will be out there banging chicks with game or paying for sex. Then women will begin to think long and hard about their actions. They will think that "Huh, maybe I shouldn't be a complete untitled bitch to the nice guys anymore if I want to live a happy life after a certain age."

So no, game and prostitution legalization (and btw if prostitute were legalized, there will be facilities to screen for STDs/AIDS and report from whorehouses in order to make sure that everything is clean for all parties involved so you don't need to worry about any diseases) can definitely help the current society.

[draguer]

@Feisbook Control

It seems like he has accepted his fate. He's a quiet introverted type and I don't think he'd have the balls to rock the boat in any way. I see him when she's being unreasonable and my Dad or I will call her out, he has a look where he knows it's' BS but he can't find his balls to say anything.

One other thing I've noticed is she can't make a connection between working for something and the actual reward. She seems to think that the travelling and academic success I have had in the past few years is just something that happened to me through luck, when in fact I've busted my ass to make it happen.

Sorry for venting at you haha, your comment just prompted a few thoughts!

[solo]

(05-27-2014 08:44 PM)LeBeau Wrote:  

(05-27-2014 04:52 PM)solo Wrote:  

I've said this before but I know of a guy who has a notch count of 1500+. That's over 1500 guys who can't get a girl on the account of only one man. Most of his girls are 8s and above too. This guy is at the top of the top of the pyramid and his presence in the SMP has a negative trickle-down effect on almost everyone else. I am absolutely not hating on him though, just stating the obvious.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who would be interested in a breakdown of this guy's history and lifestyle development.

Outside of guys with a huge amount of fame game, I haven't heard those kind of numbers claimed (1000+) since G Manifesto.

Not calling you out or anything, I'm just curious to hear more.

There is not so much to break down. He is a model so he's got the looks, money, social connections and lifestyle of the 0,1% or whatever. Add to this a constant aggressive pursuit of new girls (when he isn't approached himself - which I suppose is rare) and you've basically got the recipe. His life is basically a one-man orgy all the time.

Guys at the bottom don't comprehend how good the guys at the top have it. And guys at the top don't understand how bad guys at the bottom have it. This is why you have people like us with some game shaking our heads at the thirst of so many guys nowadays when we now girls put out more easily than ever. But they only put out to certain select guys.

(05-27-2014 11:09 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Note the girls in this video. They're about average for your lower class aussie girl. The thing is, they don't class up much even with education: a university girl still tries to kiss you with vomit in her hair or will stop to piss in the gutter.

Trigger Warning: Australian Girls

Things could always be worse.

I shouldn't make generalizations about a whole country of girls based on a very limited sample size. But let me just put it this way. White Australian girls are probably at the bottom of my list.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

The only positive thing about Australian women is that some of them are immigrants.

[AnonymousBosch]

Prostitution isn't the answer.

Prostitution has been legalised in my state since before Nirvana recorded their first album.

Now watch that Australian Girls video again.

[la_mode]

It may not be the "answer", but it would definitely infuriate the feminists. So, it can only be a good thing.

Ratios in the US are bad. The average woman is eligible to step in the ring with Riddick Bowe in most of the US. Fat women wouldn't get nearly as much attention if it were legalized as well. Regular guys who chase them as nothing more than a last resort - might not anymore.

[AnonymousBosch]

(05-28-2014 02:24 AM)la_mode Wrote:  

It may not be the "answer", but it would definitely infuriate the feminists. So, it can only be a good thing.

Feminist thought down here is 'Sex-worker' positive. 'Prostitution' is considered a disrespectful phrase because it minimises the woman's freedom of choice to exchange sex for money. They're 'owning' their sexuality and are 'powerful' by financially-exploiting men and condemning them is a form of slut shaming.

Or the women are being exploited, objectified, sexualised and abused by the patriarchy.

It really depends on which feminist you ask and the time of day.

[El Chinito loco]

(05-28-2014 02:46 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-28-2014 02:24 AM)la_mode Wrote:  

It may not be the "answer", but it would definitely infuriate the feminists. So, it can only be a good thing.

Feminist thought down here is 'Sex-worker' positive. 'Prostitution' is considered a disrespectful phrase because it minimises the woman's freedom of choice to exchange sex for money. They're 'owning' their sexuality and are 'powerful' by financially-exploiting men and condemning them is a form of slut shaming.

Or the women are being exploited, objectified, sexualised and abused by the patriarchy.

It really depends on which feminist you ask and the time of day.

The reason why the definition changes is that there are many different types of self proclaimed feminists and they will all espouse views that contradict each other. When you call them out on all the fallacies or contradictions they will use a "no true scotsman" type of reasoning to explain away what real feminism actually is. Or they won't have a discussion like an adult and will start hurling insults, sarcastic one liners like "mansplainin", or rolling eyes if it's on the internet.

In other words they don't even really know what it is. Feminism just roughly means "pro-woman" in their minds which could be anything and is basically interpreted as "whatever comes out of my mouth as a woman makes it just." That's why feminism as a movement is such bullshit and the hardest pushers of it are the ones who have the least to complain about.

[AnonymousBosch]

(05-28-2014 03:00 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

The reason why the definition changes is that there are many different types of self proclaimed feminists and they will all espouse views that contradict each other.

This is why I always laugh when girls say "If women ran the world, there'd be no more wars." Jesus, don't they remember High School?

[cooledcannon]

Honestly, living in NZ, I thought feminist/liberal views were legalizing prostitution was a good thing. It blew my mind when I discovered american feminists wanted it to remain illegal..

(Of course, the southern hemisphere feminists are more right than the northern ones)

[It_is_my_time]

(05-28-2014 04:46 AM)cooledcannon Wrote:  

Honestly, living in NZ, I thought feminist/liberal views were legalizing prostitution was a good thing. It blew my mind when I discovered american feminists wanted it to remain illegal..

(Of course, the southern hemisphere feminists are more right than the northern ones)

Yea, I know the guys in Canada, UK, NZ and Aussie have legit complaints about the women there and the system. It is nearly as bad as the situation in the USA.

But like I said, in the USA you not only have all the problems you guys have, we have no prostitution, and we have police wasting millions of tax payer dollars a year to set up prostitution stings.

Also they are trying to put strip clubs out of business through various taxes, regulations, and rules, such as men cannot touch the strippers and no nudity.

[Biologist]

(05-28-2014 04:49 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(05-28-2014 04:46 AM)cooledcannon Wrote:  

Honestly, living in NZ, I thought feminist/liberal views were legalizing prostitution was a good thing. It blew my mind when I discovered american feminists wanted it to remain illegal..

(Of course, the southern hemisphere feminists are more right than the northern ones)

Yea, I know the guys in Canada, UK, NZ and Aussie have legit complaints about the women there and the system. It is nearly as bad as the situation in the USA.

But like I said, in the USA you not only have all the problems you guys have, we have no prostitution, and we have police wasting millions of tax payer dollars a year to set up prostitution stings.

Also they are trying to put strip clubs out of business through various taxes, regulations, and rules, such as men cannot touch the strippers and no nudity.

When you say it like that, I really feel for you guys in the US.

It sounds like the women in the US have successfully created a joyless and sexless society for men.

How can they honestly believe that this will benefit the country in the long run? It's incredible.

[It_is_my_time]

(05-28-2014 06:57 AM)Biologist Wrote:  

(05-28-2014 04:49 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(05-28-2014 04:46 AM)cooledcannon Wrote:  

Honestly, living in NZ, I thought feminist/liberal views were legalizing prostitution was a good thing. It blew my mind when I discovered american feminists wanted it to remain illegal..

(Of course, the southern hemisphere feminists are more right than the northern ones)

Yea, I know the guys in Canada, UK, NZ and Aussie have legit complaints about the women there and the system. It is nearly as bad as the situation in the USA.

But like I said, in the USA you not only have all the problems you guys have, we have no prostitution, and we have police wasting millions of tax payer dollars a year to set up prostitution stings.

Also they are trying to put strip clubs out of business through various taxes, regulations, and rules, such as men cannot touch the strippers and no nudity.

When you say it like that, I really feel for you guys in the US.

It sounds like the women in the US have successfully created a joyless and sexless society for men.

How can they honestly believe that this will benefit the country in the long run? It's incredible.

Yea, the write ups on Toronto sounds pretty bad, but it sounds FAR better than most of the cities in the USA. Rather than Toronto being our terrible future, IMO, the cities in the USA are Toronto's terrible future.

I know there are American men who will spend $1,000+ just to go to Vancouver or Toronto just for a chance to get with a prostitute. Even in Las Vegas prostitution is illegal, but in other smaller areas in Nevada it is legal.

There is a reason many call the USA a "sex prison". I don't believe anyone who "thinks" believes not allowing prostitution is good for the country in the long run. But a majority of voters don't think. You have...

Over 50% of voters are women, and by keeping prostitution illegal they can be completely worthless and terrible people and have good guys fighting over them.

Angry bitter blue pill married males who are angry at their choices and want to make sure other men don't experience happiness either.

Blue pill males who are liberal and want things like gun control and more feminism because they think it will help them get laid by kissing women's asses.

I am working my life away just to move out of the USA. Because working around the clock is better than trying to find any enjoyment in life in the USA. That is what attracted me to Roosh, not the PUA aspect, the traveling overseas and the use of PUA tactics on women in other countries where it is worth while.

[El Chinito loco]

(05-28-2014 07:09 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

There is a reason many call the USA a "sex prison". I don't believe anyone who "thinks" believes not allowing prostitution is good for the country in the long run. But a majority of voters don't think. You have...

The religious right's sway is more substantial than any of the other groups you mentioned. It just so happens that the liberal left and the religious right both agree on making prostitution illegal. It will never happen in America there simply isn't any kind of constructive dialogue when it comes to these harmless vices.

Quote:

I am working my life away just to move out of the USA. Because working around the clock is better than trying to find any enjoyment in life in the USA. That is what attracted me to Roosh, not the PUA aspect, the traveling overseas and the use of PUA tactics on women in other countries where it is worth while.

There are some positive things about America and i'd count the passport and ease at earning money with hard work as two major positives. Having lived away from the U.S. for a decade now I do find it increasingly ironic that the best thing about being a U.S. citizen is being able to live abroad, earn money from a business in the U.S., and say you're American.

I feel sorry for the poor sobs who are tied down in menial jobs unable or unwilling to see what it's like overseas though.

[Sp5]

What? There's plenty of prostitution in the USA. And 75% of it is ignored by law enforcement. Escorts are de facto legal.

With very very few exceptions, the only prostitutes and johns who get busted are the ones out on the street. That's because street prostitution is a public nuisance.

In my years in court, I saw hundreds of arrested street walkers, only one escort that for some reason the police decided to run a sting on.

You have to be an idiot not to be able to find a discreet escort in any sizeable town. Craigslist, other websites, local weekly newspapers and even the Yellow Pages.

[It_is_my_time]

(05-28-2014 09:13 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

What? There's plenty of prostitution in the USA. And 75% of it is ignored by law enforcement. Escorts are de facto legal.

With very very few exceptions, the only prostitutes and johns who get busted are the ones out on the street. That's because street prostitution is a public nuisance.

In my years in court, I saw hundreds of arrested street walkers, only one escort that for some reason the police decided to run a sting on.

You have to be an idiot not to be able to find a discreet escort in any sizeable town. Craigslist, other websites, local weekly newspapers and even the Yellow Pages.

I don't know if this is true or not. But I know I am certainly not risking have my name come up in a Google search and be linked back to paying for prostitution any time I go for a job interview or for any other purposes.

At least not with the Puritan outlook on prostitution in the USA.

What you say is probably true, but certainly not worth the risks in the least. You just simply learn to live without women, or take other risks that IMO are far too great, at least for my appetite, if you live in the USA.

[Samseau]

(05-28-2014 12:35 AM)Zengling Wrote:  

Actually game/prostitution can help save the western society.

Think about it. The current situation is that the girls can ride "alpha's" stream of cock, take no responsibilities for not developing any useful skills to the society, get all used up sexually, still marry some "white knight", sap all those cash that he'll spend on her, cheat on him with the help of botox and other cosmetics product with other "alphas" behind his back, still have a child, create some marriage problems, cause a divorce, receiving alimony from the "white knights" and still banging "alpha's" dicks.

If enough people learned how to become the "alphas" to bang those chicks AND prostitution help to augment the aesthetic department of the girls, there wouldn't be men that want to settle down with a girl. So the women will no longer have the option of settling down with a "white knight" anymore as that "white knights" will be out there banging chicks with game or paying for sex. Then women will begin to think long and hard about their actions. They will think that "Huh, maybe I shouldn't be a complete untitled bitch to the nice guys anymore if I want to live a happy life after a certain age."

So no, game and prostitution legalization (and btw if prostitute were legalized, there will be facilities to screen for STDs/AIDS and report from whorehouses in order to make sure that everything is clean for all parties involved so you don't need to worry about any diseases) can definitely help the current society.

If what you said happens, and men merely reject their women en masse, then that's not saving anything. There will insufficient offspring to replace the current members and the resulting population loss will kill the culture.

[Zengling]

(05-28-2014 03:59 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-28-2014 12:35 AM)Zengling Wrote:  

Actually game/prostitution can help save the western society.

Think about it. The current situation is that the girls can ride "alpha's" stream of cock, take no responsibilities for not developing any useful skills to the society, get all used up sexually, still marry some "white knight", sap all those cash that he'll spend on her, cheat on him with the help of botox and other cosmetics product with other "alphas" behind his back, still have a child, create some marriage problems, cause a divorce, receiving alimony from the "white knights" and still banging "alpha's" dicks.

If enough people learned how to become the "alphas" to bang those chicks AND prostitution help to augment the aesthetic department of the girls, there wouldn't be men that want to settle down with a girl. So the women will no longer have the option of settling down with a "white knight" anymore as that "white knights" will be out there banging chicks with game or paying for sex. Then women will begin to think long and hard about their actions. They will think that "Huh, maybe I shouldn't be a complete untitled bitch to the nice guys anymore if I want to live a happy life after a certain age."

So no, game and prostitution legalization (and btw if prostitute were legalized, there will be facilities to screen for STDs/AIDS and report from whorehouses in order to make sure that everything is clean for all parties involved so you don't need to worry about any diseases) can definitely help the current society.

If what you said happens, and men merely reject their women en masse, then that's not saving anything. There will insufficient offspring to replace the current members and the resulting population loss will kill the culture.

Not reject women en mass, you can still date them, have kids with a women, but do not under any circumstance marry her. She won't get any material gains from a men. If all men decide to suddenly grow spines and begin to only reward submissive women and not marry them so they can take advantage of the system, then all women will begin to lose weight and become submissive.

The only problem is that there are still white knights out there rewarding those women for the bad decisions they've made, that's why there are still girls with fattitude out there.

[Samseau]

(05-27-2014 10:25 AM)JJ Roberts Wrote:  

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Property is an artificial human invention? In fact, all mammals have a sense of property, and that's why they fight to protect their territory against others of their species.

Monkeys fight other monkeys for land. Lions fight other lions. Wolves fight other wolves. Birds also mark territory. Property is hardly a human invention and seems entirely biological in origins.

You are confusing property and territoriality. All species will fight over survival resources in the face of scarcity or perceived scarcity. Does not matter whether that resource is food or mating opportunities.

Property is nothing more than a natural extension of this.

Quote:

Don't confuse animals competing for survival resource with the concept of property.

Nothing to confuse. They are the same thing and what evidence do you have they aren't?

Quote:

Take two bulls, put them in a field with one cow and they will compete over her and not because they think that they "own" her.

Put the exact same bulls in a field with 200 cows and they are not going to be very interested in fighting. They will simply follow their sexual imperative and mate with each female in turn.

Take two human men, put them in a room of 200 virgins and they aren't going to fight each other over anything. They will fuck each of them just as the bulls would.

Now, take 200 bulls and put them in a room of just two cows. Watch the bulls tear each other apart.

Quote:

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Moreover, males fight each other for females in every single mammal species. 98% of mammalian species on the planet has hypergamous females and alpha/beta male dichotomy. Thus women are inherently property of the male sex, of which males must compete for, and have competed for over millions of years.

Hypergamy is define as "marrying up" is most definitions you will find and human beings are the only species with a concept of marriage.

I don't care what most dictionaries say, that's not hypergamy in the philosophically rigorous sense we use in the manosphere.

Hypergamy is the preference of women to prefer the best men, even if it means sharing these men with lots of other females. This pattern is true in virtually all mammalian species and you've done nothing to disprove this.

Quote:

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Human sexuality comes from evolution and has always worked the same way.

Human sexuality stopped following human nature about 10,000 years ago with the introduction of the "normal" plane of human sexuality and the Sex 2.0 schism.

If human sexuality simply followed human nature there would be no set of social imperatives to dictate behavior in this regard, there would be no relationship duress in any form and there would be no concept of marriage.

Do people have children in your world? Who raises the children while the Dad's and Mom's are swinging it with everyone else?

Your deranged world produces Elliot Rodger's because there won't be enough parental investment.

Quote:

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

This isn't the forum to deny human nature, which is easily observable in almost all mammals.

Human nature is only observable in humans.

A ridiculous statement. Do you deny evolution? Do you deny that we inherit our previous traits from common ancestors?

[JJ Roberts]

(05-28-2014 04:25 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Property is nothing more than a natural extension of this.

Property is normal (for human beings), not natural. There is no property in nature.

(05-28-2014 04:25 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Nothing to confuse. They are the same thing and what evidence do you have they aren't?

8.7 million species on the planet (or which we are only one). We are the only one that has any concept of property. Outvoted on this issue by 8.7 million to one. Bit of a landslide vote.

(05-28-2014 04:25 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Take two human men, put them in a room of 200 virgins and they aren't going to fight each other over anything. They will fuck each of them just as the bulls would.

Until one of them finds one (or more than one) that he wants to marry.

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I don't care what most dictionaries say, that's not hypergamy in the philosophically rigorous sense we use in the manosphere.

I am not part of the manosphere.

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Hypergamy is the preference of women to prefer the best men, even if it means sharing these men with lots of other females. This pattern is true in virtually all mammalian species and you've done nothing to disprove this.

Yes I have. Human beings are the only ones that marry and hypergamy is defined as marrying up.

If you want to redefine hypergamy as trading up as opposed to marrying up, hypergamy is still related to human and not other mammals because no other mammals play the sexual marketplace as a zero sum game. If you are alpha and a chimp you dont get exclusive mating access, you just get your turn first and the rest of the males have to wait their turn or wait until your back is turned.

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Do people have children in your world? Who raises the children while the Dad's and Mom's are swinging it with everyone else?

Number of offspring born per mating for human beings is the lowest of all species on the planet thanks to the fact that we know sex leads to babies (and most animals dont), the pill, condoms, abortions etc.

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Your deranged world produces Elliot Rodger's because there won't be enough parental investment.

It is notable that he was produced by a Sex 2.0 world in which sex is designed as a zero sum game.

3.0 ain't zero sum.

(05-26-2014 10:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

A ridiculous statement. Do you deny evolution? Do you deny that we inherit our previous traits from common ancestors?

All my work is based on evolution. Sex 2.0 is at a dead end and is the process of being replaced. Drastically falling marriage states and increasing divorce stats would back that up.