Quote: (05-27-2014 08:18 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Again, the idea that everyone can be alpha makes as much sense as saying everyone can be rich.
Alpha/beta are relative terms just like rich/poor are relative terms. You cannot make a world of alpha males anymore than you can make a Marxist paradise where everyone is rich.
Not everyone can be Alpha of course, but the majority - yes, if they are encouraged to be as masculine as possible - from society, media and schooling. The others can be Red Pill & Game aware - that can be taught. Currently there are countries in the world with significantly higher levels of Alphas than others.
And no - everyone can be rich in a technologically advanced society without money. Simple resource allocation and automated lifestyles can easily give every family on earth a house and a garden or luxurious appartment. But that is a topic for a different thread and needs more elaboration.
And I don't see these terms as relative - Alpha is absolute and so is Beta in regards to a relationship and his general character. The term itself is of course more versatile, since no one is 100% Alpha all the time.
The same goes for rich or poor. If every "poor" person has a house/luxurious appartment, needed utilities and travelling freedom a couple of times a year, then he is rich and content enough - most humans would see it that way except for a few who always like to rule over others. A society without money and super-high technology should be the goal of humanity, but again - off topic.