Roosh recently penned No One Would Have Died If PUAHate Killer Elliot Rodger Learned Game, and I would just like to point out that the premise of the article is fundamentally incorrect.
Of course, I say this with no hate or animosity towards my brother Roosh. I am merely arguing that he is mistaken and I would like to explain why.
Roosh assumes that if Elliot had game, he would have been able to get laid, get validation, and then not have the stress which led to his mass shooting.
However, had Elliot gotten laid, it just would have meant that one other guy would have not gotten laid. Thus the total amount of frustrated betas would remain unchanged.
Likewise, I see guys arguing prostitution would have solved Elliots problems, but Elliot was (like hundreds of thousands of other betas are) seeking validation in addition to sex. Prostitution does nothing for a man seeking to validate himself upon the glowing affections of a hot woman draped across his body in the warm afterglow of sex that he had conquered with his own efforts.
Thus, the "game" is zero-sum. Every time one man gets some pussy, it means some other guy isn't getting pussy. And the more men learn game, the more competitive the market becomes which makes the cost to the pussy-market even higher for young-men entering the dating pool. This creates yet even more frustrated betas.
When a man scores an attractive woman, it means he beat out roughly 1-3 men who would have also banged that woman. We know there are more available men than women because a man's sexual shelf-life is longer and the obesity epidemic has shrunk the amount of fuckable women drastically.
To give a personal ancedote to this analysis, just recently I picked up a woman on non-weekend night and banged her the same night. The condom broke during sex and I shot a big load into her. She developed urinary tract infection as a result. Later that week, she went out on a weekend night and met another man that managed to get back inside of her apartment, but he did not get to have sex with her because she was in pain due to the infection. Because I had struck first with laser tight game, it meant another guy went home with nothing.
So how can game alleviate the frustrations of beta males? More men learning game does not translate into more loving pussy for men.
The current situation is impossible. Trying to use game to save our culture is like using a band-aid for a deep flesh-wound. The bleeding continues regardless.
The only thing that works are traditional sex roles. One woman per man. Any deviation from traditional sex roles means that in the long run, there will be many leftover men without suitable partners.
This is why polygamous societies of Islam have failed. It's why our soft-polygamy of the Western world will also fail. We know these betas will drop out, dope out, or fight-it-out, when confronted with their permanent incelibacy.
So when Roosh says,
In fact we do not know if any amount of lives would have been saved. If Eliot had learned game and gotten laid, it would have meant some other guy would have lost out on whatever pussy Elliot got. And that man could have been just as, if not more, violent.
Thus there is no solution to the modern world of "dating." That which cannot continue, cannot continue. It's obvious to see why our decadent society will die just like many other decadent societies have in the past, and it's not because of a lack of knowledge. It's because of a lack of love shared equitably between the sexes.
Of course, I say this with no hate or animosity towards my brother Roosh. I am merely arguing that he is mistaken and I would like to explain why.
Roosh assumes that if Elliot had game, he would have been able to get laid, get validation, and then not have the stress which led to his mass shooting.
However, had Elliot gotten laid, it just would have meant that one other guy would have not gotten laid. Thus the total amount of frustrated betas would remain unchanged.
Likewise, I see guys arguing prostitution would have solved Elliots problems, but Elliot was (like hundreds of thousands of other betas are) seeking validation in addition to sex. Prostitution does nothing for a man seeking to validate himself upon the glowing affections of a hot woman draped across his body in the warm afterglow of sex that he had conquered with his own efforts.
Thus, the "game" is zero-sum. Every time one man gets some pussy, it means some other guy isn't getting pussy. And the more men learn game, the more competitive the market becomes which makes the cost to the pussy-market even higher for young-men entering the dating pool. This creates yet even more frustrated betas.
When a man scores an attractive woman, it means he beat out roughly 1-3 men who would have also banged that woman. We know there are more available men than women because a man's sexual shelf-life is longer and the obesity epidemic has shrunk the amount of fuckable women drastically.
To give a personal ancedote to this analysis, just recently I picked up a woman on non-weekend night and banged her the same night. The condom broke during sex and I shot a big load into her. She developed urinary tract infection as a result. Later that week, she went out on a weekend night and met another man that managed to get back inside of her apartment, but he did not get to have sex with her because she was in pain due to the infection. Because I had struck first with laser tight game, it meant another guy went home with nothing.
So how can game alleviate the frustrations of beta males? More men learning game does not translate into more loving pussy for men.
The current situation is impossible. Trying to use game to save our culture is like using a band-aid for a deep flesh-wound. The bleeding continues regardless.
The only thing that works are traditional sex roles. One woman per man. Any deviation from traditional sex roles means that in the long run, there will be many leftover men without suitable partners.
This is why polygamous societies of Islam have failed. It's why our soft-polygamy of the Western world will also fail. We know these betas will drop out, dope out, or fight-it-out, when confronted with their permanent incelibacy.
So when Roosh says,
Quote:Quote:
Six lives would have been saved if there was a societal mechanism to steer sexually frustrated males like Rodger into learning self-improvement, game, and masculinity, the very values that are taught here and on many other manosphere sites that inexplicably have been attacked, disparaged, and even sought for eradication by the American media and blogosphere, men’s rights activists, “PUA haters”, and progressive organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center. All these groups are complicit for creating a cultural environment that allowed this massacre to occur. It is them who must accept responsibility for these seven deaths and make the moral change to their ideologies in order to prevent such an act from happening again.
In fact we do not know if any amount of lives would have been saved. If Eliot had learned game and gotten laid, it would have meant some other guy would have lost out on whatever pussy Elliot got. And that man could have been just as, if not more, violent.
Thus there is no solution to the modern world of "dating." That which cannot continue, cannot continue. It's obvious to see why our decadent society will die just like many other decadent societies have in the past, and it's not because of a lack of knowledge. It's because of a lack of love shared equitably between the sexes.
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.