Quote: (05-27-2014 12:23 AM)bacan Wrote:
Women like to feel loved, cared for, and special.. Like in your eyes they are the only girl in the world..
That's what women
say they want.
I've been formulating this theory lately, early days yet. I'll ponder it some more:
What women want is men who offer them
absolute destruction of their personality.
The first aspect:
- allowing themselves to become a subservient extension of the man's will, which the man in question being dominant, masculine, and enviable by other women, whilst the girl never being entirely sure how he feels for her because sometimes he's nice to her and other times he seems self-interested.
If she's attracted enough, you will never meet a happier woman than one being guided by and attending to a strong, socially-dominant man.
Women who get offended at this concept are stuck in relationships with men they don't respect and are slightly-repulsed by, and always have a suspicion they're settling and could do better. (Hell, any Players know what girls will do for us sexually that they'd be repulsed at doing to their boyfriends).
The second aspect:
- surrendering to wild, animalistic emotion. They want to exist outside themselves, not having to temper or control what they're feeling. They want to not feel, but
become fury, passion, jealousy, excitement, hysteria, sex.
For example: girls aren't screaming and crying over boy bands out of actual love for the band, but because it gives them excuse to become pure screaming, crying emotion in a socially-acceptable context, normalised by their friends. They get to exist outside themselves. Hate Reading is a similar concept - I was shocked to realise that the Jezebel crowd are self-aware about it, and know that it's unproductive and destructive, but do it anyway.
The third aspect:
Debasement. If you offer a woman a choice between a good, stable man who could honour her and lead her to grace, or a self-interested man who can offer her ruination, she'll always choose the latter. No girl wants stability - it's 'boring'. And no girl wants to be good. Some may try, but they all lack the willpower to do so. Giving in to their emotions over common sense is a foregone conclusion. Deep down, I suspect they loathe the very concept of virtue because the effort it requires is beyond them, and women crave what is easy. Therefore, they ache to debase and destroy every trace of virtue within themselves with a man they're attracted to.
You can see this reflected by women's current choices in society: strip mall tatts, eating disorders, piercings, fat acceptance, cock carousel riding, acting like men, cutting off their long hair when a guy hurts them. Self-destruction rules the day.
Understanding all that, what makes an attractive man to women then?
A man they can recognise as possessing the power to destroy.
Either meaning:
- their self-destruction, (Junkie, Biker, Bad Boy, Musician, Drug Dealer, Frat Jock, Physically Violent, Criminal).
- being powerful enough to destroy others.
A physically-fit, muscular man is strong enough to harm her enemies, or protect her from reprisal when she seeks to harm others.
A mentally-tough, stoic man won't break or back down under pressure, so can be relied upon to serve his function.
A socially-powerful man, who can use connections, personality and influence to enact her will.
A financially-wealthy man, who can provide her the means to enact her will.
Why do you think some girls suddenly decided, like they always do, that this Rodgers shooter is surprisingly-cute? Destructive capacity. She gets to imagine what a guy who is prepared to kill for his beliefs (read: raw emotion) could do for her...
Only rough conjecture at this point. I'm still turning this theory over in my head, so it's probably a bit raggy, but, I've always been aware women seem more attracted to me when I'm scowly than smiling. (I have a black eye and stiches at the moment from a fight scene where a baton hit my retina and split my eyebrow, and it's been a day game pussy magnet. Yeah, yeah, before you run out and hit yourself - I have a blood blister behind my cornea that might require surgery after three months, if it doesn't go down by itself).
Still, my theory could explain why women always fail at building anything of substance in society, because they're really attracted to tearing things down in a fury of raw emotion the moment things get hard: abandoning struggling businesses; disbanding movements due to infighting; viciously attacking their besties; divorcing husbands they're no longer attracted to; murdering children in their wombs.