[TigerMandingo]

Apparently circumcision greatly reduces the risk of contracting STDs. So there's that..... and it kinda looks better too

[Transsimian]

(12-05-2017 06:54 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

Tonsils, appendices, foreskins...God or evolution put all the parts on for a reason(s). Arbitrarily removing them (or any other body parts) without medical cause is likely a mistake

On the other hand, American trannies struggle with making a passable fake vagina since they've removed a lot of excess skin.

It's still incredibly stupid, but the above is a benefit.

[Teep]

Quote:

The Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135–1204) insisted that faith should be the only reason for circumcision. He recognised that it was "a very hard thing" to have done to oneself but that it was done to "quell all the impulses of matter" and "perfect what is defective morally." Sages at the time had recognised that the foreskin heightened sexual pleasure. Maimonides reasoned that the bleeding and loss of protective covering rendered the penis weakened and in so doing had the effect of reducing a man's lustful thoughts and making sex less pleasurable. He also warned that it is "hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him."[33][34][35][36]

A 13th-century French disciple of Maimonides, Isaac ben Yediah claimed that circumcision was an effective way of reducing a woman's sexual desire. With a non-circumcised man, he said, she always orgasms first and so her sexual appetite is never fulfilled, but with a circumcised man she receives no pleasure and hardly ever orgasms "because of the great heat and fire burning in her."[37][38]

As an intact man, I have to say this echoes my experience. Women love the uncut salami.

Edit: Actually this kind of makes me wonder...you read about all these women not being able to orgasm vaginally. Maybe that's a circumcised thing. I've never had a girl that didn't cum a lot vaginally.

[WalterBlack]

(12-08-2017 08:50 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Apparently circumcision greatly reduces the risk of contracting STDs. So there's that..... and it kinda looks better too

I remember a Muslim guy telling me the same thing - I then asked him if he would raw dog a woman with AIDS. You can guess his answer...

I have foreskin - I'm a British-Indian. My family is Hindu and in India only Muslims and the tiny Jewish population are circumcised. I was told that when there was Hindu/Muslim violence in 1947 gangs would verify a guy's religion by checking if he was circumcised. It would be a death sentence if he was found by the wrong gang.

I've literally never had a woman mention it to me ever, and I've banged women of all races and religions. Then again, when you're hard women can't tell. The foreskin is there to protect your dick - why else would we have it?

Regarding hygiene, I simply pull back the skin and wash in the shower every day. It takes 10 seconds.

[spokepoker]

It don't even take 10 seconds. In the normal process of washing your dick, it gets washed too, simple as that. In this day and age, it's a fairly unnecessary procedure. If it needs to be done (phimosis), then that can be determined later in life. If done for religious reasons, then so be it.

I ain't gettin it done on my kids.

Personally, I always thought it was a conspiracy that the jews hefted onto the global medical community post ww2, so that in case of another holocaust they can't get spotted from their (((circumcisions))).
edited to add (((flair))).

[deuce]

(12-04-2017 10:00 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 01:40 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  

I read somewhere that circumcision used to be popular among 19th century Christians in the USA because they thought it made the penis less sensitive and boys would be less prone to masturbation.

Is there any evidence that circumcision actually makes a male less tempted to masturbate or makes masturbation less pleasurable ?

It's easier to fap with foreskin; you need need lotion, and your baby batter doesn't fly all over the place.

Well that's no fun!

[Waqqle]

It's only mutilation if you do it to women.

[RatInTheWoods]

I was trolling a womans forum when there was a thread about cut dicks.

It was American so all the women were complaining about how gross an uncut dick was and they wouldn't bang a milk bottle top.

I said "yeah me too, I think woman's genitals look much better after mutilation, and much tighter... I wouldn't fuck one unless its had FGM"

I got banned, but it was worth it to so the hypocrisy and send a few hamsters in the wheel.

[Aszhaeleos]

It was an easy way to identify crypto Jews. After ww2 a lot of Jews emigrated to America.
It is easier to hide amongst a population that may hold ‘anti semetic’ Attitudes if you convince them to get the snip too and embed it into their culture.
Now that the Jews hold a privileged and protected position in America the populace being circumcised like them is not really important anymore. It’s not like they’re going to be rounded up and expelled.

[Waqqle]

One minute and a half. Worth watching.

[Waqqle]

(01-06-2019 05:05 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

I was trolling a womans forum when there was a thread about cut dicks.

It was American so all the women were complaining about how gross an uncut dick was and they wouldn't bang a milk bottle top.

I said "yeah me too, I think woman's genitals look much better after mutilation, and much tighter... I wouldn't fuck one unless its had FGM"

I got banned, but it was worth it to so the hypocrisy and send a few hamsters in the wheel.

Women will never genuinely care about mens' issues. If like in the US has taught me nothing else, it has taught me that.

[BaatumMania]

(01-06-2019 05:13 AM)Waqqle Wrote:  

(01-06-2019 05:05 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

I was trolling a womans forum when there was a thread about cut dicks.

It was American so all the women were complaining about how gross an uncut dick was and they wouldn't bang a milk bottle top.

I said "yeah me too, I think woman's genitals look much better after mutilation, and much tighter... I wouldn't fuck one unless its had FGM"

I got banned, but it was worth it to so the hypocrisy and send a few hamsters in the wheel.

Women will never genuinely care about mens' issues. If like in the US has taught me nothing else, it has taught me that.

And Feminism relies on a distortion of history as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhfnLoEOTyk

This was from 1961, which feminists claim was an awful time for women, and yet practically every man in the video said yes to the idea of husbands helping with the housework.

I honestly don't know if there was truly a time where being a woman was worse than being a man. Men were always being forced to fight in wars, were indiscriminately killed by invaders (while their wife would go on and remarry one of the invaders), turned into Eunuchs in the Middle East / China and so on and so forth. There's some damning studies regarding DNA inheritance I remember it saying like almost every women gets to reproduce but less than half of men did in ancient times?

[mkunduwanyani]

where i come from you aint a man until you get your schlong cut. girls wont even touch you if you are uncut.

[Trumpian]

(01-06-2019 05:50 AM)mkunduwanyani Wrote:  

where i come from you aint a man until you get your schlong cut. girls wont even touch you if you are uncut.

I'm guessing that place is a sub-saharan shithole with broads like these walking around.

[Chrome]

/ Would bang the one with Forest Whitaker titties

[Waqqle]

(01-06-2019 05:38 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  

I honestly don't know if there was truly a time where being a woman was worse than being a man. Men were always being forced to fight in wars, were indiscriminately killed by invaders (while their wife would go on and remarry one of the invaders), turned into Eunuchs in the Middle East / China and so on and so forth. There's some damning studies regarding DNA inheritance I remember it saying like almost every women gets to reproduce but less than half of men did in ancient times?

The stat is that everyone currently living has roughly twice as many female genetic ancestors as male ones because only about 40% of males were ever able to reproduce whereas around 80% of women were able to. The other 60% were:

- Shut out of the mating game (80% of women desire 20% of men and that 20% will usually take more than one woman if they can)
- Sterilized (see the Arab slave trade for one example), died before they were able to reproduce (work, war, and disease)
- Cucked or married a divorced/widowed woman who had already had all the kids she was going to (even now, some estimate that around 25% of American fathers are unknowingly raising children who are not biologically theirs - cucking and stepfathering)
- Taken into the clergy or monastic life or
- Have had all of their genetic lines die out by now ("Women and children first!").

Meanwhile, those males who were able to reproduce often did so with more than one female, such as in polygamous situations, prostitution (when the babies were not aborted or thrown on the pile to die like in ancient Rome), affairs, or when a man's first wife died in childbirth or something and he remarried to keep breeding with another woman. Thus, if a man had children with 2 females, the children and descendants of both of those women would carry the man's DNA but they would only carry the DNA of their own mother. Hence, twice as many female ancestors as male. There were also a number of prolific breeders among male warlords, aristocracy, and soldiery and these men skew the stats significantly.

We have twice as many female ancestors than male ancestors.

The Missing Men in Your Family Tree

[Teedub]

As someone who was circumcised (for medical reasons) well into my twenties I can attest sex (and masturbation if anyone cares) is worse afterwards. Why wouldn't it be, you've lost thousands of nerve endings. Evolution gave us a foreskin for a reason... it made reproduction more pleasurable and therefore more likely to occur. Moreover, it's not only less pleasurable, it's actually a different feeling. It's more about 'pressure', I can't really describe what I mean in words, guys who've had sex both intact and cut will know what I mean. It's my pet theory as to why American men are more into anal than Europeans, as it's all about a hole as tight as possible. You also have to relearn to masturbate as it's a different experience, and for me at least, I had to almost rewire my brain to find sex pleasurable again as again, it's just very different. Others might report differently.

Blowjobs are way better when you're circumcised though. Before, I never really cared for them apart from the whole dominance aspect. Now, I have that and a more physically pleasurable experience. And, it's definitely cleaner. Even if you wash there daily, it just is and you notice the difference immediately. Trust me. Anyway, my two cents. If I was American and had a son, I wouldn't get him cut.

[redpillage]

I got circumcised when I was 1 year old due to an infection and in the country where I was born it is NOT customary. And of course you can imagine the ridicule I had to endure in great school and high school. Felt extremely ashamed to to hit the showers after gym class due to me feeling like a mutilated outcast. May not have been reality but you know how easy it is as a kid to have a complex about being different.

All that changed when I moved to the U.S. in the 1990s. Quickly figured out that almost everyone was circumcised and finally Mr. Happy fit in with all the others. I have to say though: even in Europe none of the girls I banged in my youth ever complained or made me feel weird about it. Must have been mostly in my head.

As to which way feels better: this is one I cannot answer as circumcised is normal to me. I seem to be able to last longer than uncut guys plus from what I was able to gather HIV transmission is less likely as well.

[bortimer]

It's total fucking bullshit. If I ever have a son, no way I'm letting some sick, sadistic butcher harvest his dick to sell to aging Hollywood hags for face cream. It should be illegal.

[Waqqle]

redpillage Wrote:

As to which way feels better: this is one I cannot answer as circumcised is normal to me. I seem to be able to last longer than uncut guys plus from what I was able to gather HIV transmission is less likely as well.

The primary benefit does appear to be a decrease in the prevalence of bacterial infections, HPV, HIV/AIDS, etc. as well as typically being able to last longer which would seem to go along with the decreased sensitivity. Not sure how much proper hygiene and using protection would effect the first things and the question of whether a guy would rather last longer or feel more is up to him, though babies don't choose. I was circumcised at birth so I've only ever known it one way and will never know what having a foreskin feels like unless mine is restored to me in the hereafter (virgins and foreskins for all).

I have had at least a couple of girls tell me specifically and without provocation that I have a great-looking dick so at least the surgeon was skilled and I have symmetrical features I suppose. I don't think I want my kids to be circumcised, especially as it can go wrong, but, in my own case, there is no use crying over spilt milk.

[porscheguy]

But how was it going through a circumcision as an adult? I’ve heard they’re not fun.

[Teedub]

You're asleep during process itself. Once you're home, it hurts when you have an erection mid-sleep, so you wake up. Healing takes about 2 weeks.

[Waqqle]

porscheguy Wrote:

But how was it going through a circumcision as an adult? I’ve heard they’re not fun.

I knew a Papua New Guinean guy back when I was in college and he went and got himself circumcised for aesthetic reasons. The next day, he was slouching a bit and walking funny like a bow-legged cowboy and I think it was a couple of weeks before he was totally fine again. According to him, he elected to do it purely for cosmetic reasons but it did seem to be painful, if not the procedure itself (due to anesthesia), then at least the recovery process.

[Horus]

Teedub, did you find that you lasted longer during sex after being circumcised?

[Saweeep]

Circumcision is child abuse.