[FireStarter]

(06-28-2016 04:35 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

(06-28-2016 04:33 PM)germanico Wrote:  

Why bother?

It would be hilarious.

Excluding the morbidly obese, someone who is that ugly is most likely the victim of unfortunate circumstances, usually beyond their control.

There's nothing hilarious about the extreme misfortune of someone who didn't deserve it.

[Gpx90210]

This forum is going to be on the fucking news. Lmao. Last time someone made fun of that chick it was a federal case, shes facebook famous actually.

Yeah, dude shes a 1. But it's for medical reasons through no fault of her own. Really sucks for her.

A true 1? Would be a fat chick, I can't stand bitches that weigh more than me. In general. Fat bitches are unattractive and I'm unable to nut.

[Pride male]

Girls below 7 are invisible to true playas.

[Uhondo]

Does anyone else also wonder how these so called "ugly" women end up siring offspring?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, my friends.

NATURE GIVES NO FCUKS when it comes to sex and reproduction.

[Gpx90210]

(06-29-2016 03:16 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

Girls below 7 are invisible to true playas.

Pussy is pussy my friend. 5 and above its just a hole.

When you're talking 8 and above, I agree with you. But between 5-8 its just pussy. I wouldn't fuck anything below a 5 personally, although I have fucked a few 3-4s, but I felt bad for the chick and she covered her fat REALLY well.

[Latan]

I don't understand anybody's need to make fun of 1s.
At this stage of physical unattractiveness, they're fully aware of their value.
It's not like 5s who believe they're 10s.

Ego issues?

[Mercenary]

OP, you have started quite a lot of strange threads including:

How to fuck trash?
thread-49269.html

Men using the Urinals versus Women
thread-51069.html

"Being Gay used to be fun"
thread-51406.html

Getting your airgasm, having sex while skydiving
thread-51508.html




Are you sure you are in the right forum ?

[Suits]

(06-28-2016 11:45 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

Finally a woman who isn't obese! WB, enthusiastically!

[Comte De St. Germain]

We're not savages here man fuck. The Would You Hit It thread is bad enough as it is, and even that's tame now. Bet your sorry ass Mech and Suits are crying over the high quality in that thread now.

We are lovers here and fans of everything from plain janes to beauties. Let's keep it that way......faggot

[Recovering Beta]

There's nothing cool or funny about ridiculing or shaming people who have no control over aspects of their lives. That poor woman with the protruding teeth has a genetic disorder. She has to overcome a lot of adversity. There's enough cruelty and stupidity in this world; let's not add to it.

[Pride male]

(06-29-2016 03:48 AM)Gpx90210 Wrote:  

(06-29-2016 03:16 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

Girls below 7 are invisible to true playas.

Pussy is pussy my friend. 5 and above its just a hole.

When you're talking 8 and above, I agree with you. But between 5-8 its just pussy. I wouldn't fuck anything below a 5 personally, although I have fucked a few 3-4s, but I felt bad for the chick and she covered her fat REALLY well.

To super alphas like Dicaprio anything below 7 barely registers.

[j.archer]

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

[XPQ22]

The true measure of a man is how we treat the smallest (numbers) among us, not how we are treated by the largest.

A thread like this doesn't treat the smallest very well, or show much respect for their courage.

An "ugliest girls I could find" thread contains no useful information, and is about the equivalent of a "did you see the creepy thing a guy texted me" thread on Facebook, i.e. for someone who posts BS all day like woman.

[Starstriker]

Ridiculing those who have been dealt a bad hand in terms of appearance is poor form.

[HOD]

A Fat Feminist.

[Suits]

(06-28-2016 11:45 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

I don't get it. She sees a video online describing her as the ugliest woman in the world. She reads one comment suggesting that she kill herself and starts crying. She spends the next one hour reading more comments.

I don't understand women.

That being said, I'd like to meet her. I can't say that I'd date her, but she's got a charming personality and is an excellent conversationalist.

Would buy her dinner and she can have as many appetizers as she wants.

[PolymathGuru]

(06-29-2016 01:53 AM)FireStarter Wrote:  

(06-28-2016 04:35 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

(06-28-2016 04:33 PM)germanico Wrote:  

Why bother?

It would be hilarious.

Excluding the morbidly obese, someone who is that ugly is most likely the victim of unfortunate circumstances, usually beyond their control.

There's nothing hilarious about the extreme misfortune of someone who didn't deserve it.

That is left to the taste of the poster to figure whether they should post or not. I've thought about things I've wanted to post but decided not to.

Keep in mind talking about a person's ugliness was half of what what we do. Consider the following:
Post-wall: A women who is no longer fertile or well past her prime, ultimately translates to becoming ugly.
The fact that we have terms WB, WNB and a scaling system to filter to people out.

Keep in mind we have an entire thread dedicated to posting pictures about fat people.

Getting some cheap thrills on this forum isn't something out of bad taste. It is part of what we do.

(06-29-2016 04:54 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  




OP, you have started quite a lot of strange threads including:

How to fuck trash?
thread-49269.html

Men using the Urinals versus Women
thread-51069.html

"Being Gay used to be fun"
thread-51406.html

Getting your airgasm, having sex while skydiving
thread-51508.html




Are you sure you are in the right forum ?

There has been crazier shit on this forum than what I have posted.

(06-29-2016 05:24 AM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

We're not savages here man fuck. The Would You Hit It thread is bad enough as it is, and even that's tame now. Bet your sorry ass Mech and Suits are crying over the high quality in that thread now.

We are lovers here and fans of everything from plain janes to beauties. Let's keep it that way......faggot

Some of us have standards, I'm not interested in banging every body with a pulse that walks by.

(06-29-2016 03:16 AM)Pride male Wrote:  

Girls below 7 are invisible to true playas.

So do you end bumping into a lot of invisible walls for some reason?

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

Alright, "dude." Since this is an "educational" forum, I am going to "educate" you on the basics of English grammar and spelling. While I am not an expert by any means, I was able to well enough to pass the first grade. Keep in mind textspeak and low quality posts are not allowed here on this "educational" forum.

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum

The first problem is the character 'g' in the word "go". It needs to be capitalized because it is the beginning letter in a sentence. The word "isnt" requires an apostrophe because it is a contraction of the words "is" and "not". You should also add a question mark at the end of the word "forum" despite the fact that you asked a rhetorical question.

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

You decided not to use a punctuation mark in your previous statement of this forum's status as an educational forum, but the first person singular subject pronoun always needs to be capitalized. The word "dont" requires an apostrophe. The word "tread" is incorrect. On a forum, you cannot create a "tread" but a "thread". Also, replace the emboldened period with a comma to make the statement proceeding it a continuation of the statement before the period. You can only use a reflexive pronoun against a subject pronoun. Therefore, the emboldened reflexive pronoun "yourself" should be replaced with you.

[Mercenary]

(06-30-2016 11:09 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

Alright, "dude." Since this is an "educational" forum, I am going to "educate" you on the basics of English grammar and spelling. While I am not an expert by any means, I was able to well enough to pass the first grade. Keep in mind textspeak and low quality posts are not allowed here on this "educational" forum.

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum

The first problem is the character 'g' in the word "go". It needs to be capitalized because it is the beginning letter in a sentence. The word "isnt" requires an apostrophe because it is a contraction of the words "is" and "not". You should also add a question mark at the end of the word "forum" despite the fact that you asked a rhetorical question.

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

You decided not to use a punctuation mark in your previous statement of this forum's status as an educational forum, but the first person singular subject pronoun always needs to be capitalized. The word "dont" requires an apostrophe. The word "tread" is incorrect. On a forum, you cannot create a "tread" but a "thread". Also, replace the emboldened period with a comma to make the statement proceeding it a continuation of the statement before the period. You can only use a reflexive pronoun against a subject pronoun. Therefore, the emboldened reflexive pronoun "yourself" should be replaced with you.

PolymathGuru overcoming LMR

[PolymathGuru]

(07-01-2016 03:32 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 11:09 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

Alright, "dude." Since this is an "educational" forum, I am going to "educate" you on the basics of English grammar and spelling. While I am not an expert by any means, I was able to well enough to pass the first grade. Keep in mind textspeak and low quality posts are not allowed here on this "educational" forum.

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

go on facebook with your immature posts dude, isnt this a educational forum

The first problem is the character 'g' in the word "go". It needs to be capitalized because it is the beginning letter in a sentence. The word "isnt" requires an apostrophe because it is a contraction of the words "is" and "not". You should also add a question mark at the end of the word "forum" despite the fact that you asked a rhetorical question.

(06-29-2016 07:54 AM)j.archer Wrote:  

i dont see any value on making this tread . Unless to make yourself feel better about yourself.

You decided not to use a punctuation mark in your previous statement of this forum's status as an educational forum, but the first person singular subject pronoun always needs to be capitalized. The word "dont" requires an apostrophe. The word "tread" is incorrect. On a forum, you cannot create a "tread" but a "thread". Also, replace the emboldened period with a comma to make the statement proceeding it a continuation of the statement before the period. You can only use a reflexive pronoun against a subject pronoun. Therefore, the emboldened reflexive pronoun "yourself" should be replaced with you.

PolymathGuru overcoming LMR

If the guy wants to shit on people about what should be posted on an "educational" forum, he should use English appropriate for an "educational" forum.

Last time I checked, this forum started off as a locker room for men and is transitioning to Roosh's tool for defeating globalist interest.

[Phoenix]

^ Polymath, first, best leave the grammar policing up to Tuth. It's his taken-upon responsibility to maintain grammar quality. Second, if you don't like the politics, just stay out of the Everything Else section. You don't need to leave the locker room if you don't want to. Third, I recall once you posted a goals list. How is that going? Shouldn't you be more focused on that?

People just don't like this thread. The fat people thread is one thing -- they make themselves fat. But ugly people have just lucked out, and mocking it, as many others have pointed out, is small. Let it drop.

[AboveAverageJoe]

Being disgusted by fat people is a natural reaction, they did that to themselves and their appearance speaks volumes about their lack of willpower, self-discipline, and activity/eating levels. Fat people impose themselves on the rest of us economically and spatially. On top of that, they assault are eyes with their rolls and assault are ears with that-Biggie Smalls, fat person breathing sound. Sometimes even are olfactory senses are assaulted, like an uppercut by Mike Tyson, with that "fat people funk-something around here smells like sour milk."

Pointing out the flaws of someone physically deformed or just very genetically unfortunate is not an activity that a player schooled in the art of seduction and game partakes in. It screams neediness and insecurity. In general putting someone else down to appear mightier in stature is a dick move and poorly recieved in most healthy social circles.

Big difference being disgusted by fat people and teasing the challenged.

[Pride male]

This thread is a 1. Would not post.

[Guitarman]

(06-28-2016 04:54 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

(06-28-2016 04:38 PM)Guitarman Wrote:  

You are talking about the hideously deformed and possibly even terminally ill, they are that unhealthy.

Explain this one for me.



Fat, greasy hair, poorly applied makeup. There are a lot of things she can do to improve herself.

That's a man!

[Gas]

(06-30-2016 11:09 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

Keep in mind talking about a person's ugliness was half of what what we do. Consider the following:
Post-wall: A women who is no longer fertile or well past her prime, ultimately translates to becoming ugly.
The fact that we have terms WB, WNB and a scaling system to filter to people out.

Keep in mind we have an entire thread dedicated to posting pictures about fat people.

Getting some cheap thrills on this forum isn't something out of bad taste. It is part of what we do.

That's bullshit.

We make fun of post-wall women who slutted it up and are alone because they are in denial about their post-wallness. Nobody here makes fun of grandmothers enjoying their life with loving families and a ton of grandkids. And we make fun of fat chicks because they're lazy and still want to be considered hot. We don't make fun of amputees or cancer patients who have gotten fat. And if anyone does I think they will get called out pretty quick.

Making fun of people with disabilities is not what we do. If anybody is a 1 they are likely to be ill in some capacity mentally or otherwise, so you can leave it unsaid. Getting 'cheap thrills' out of someone in that girl's position is fucking sad. I admire that girl. Half of the mega alpha kids on this forum wouldn't be able to handle what she goes through.

[XPQ22]

(07-15-2016 04:04 AM)Gas Wrote:  

Making fun of people with disabilities is not what we do. If anybody is a 1 they are likely to be ill in some capacity mentally or otherwise, so you can leave it unsaid. Getting 'cheap thrills' out of someone in that girl's position is fucking sad. I admire that girl. Half of the mega alpha kids on this forum wouldn't be able to handle what she goes through.

I think a line needs to be drawn between the emulation of certain "dark triad" characteristics that women find attractive, and actually being a sociopath.

Am I an asshole around the girls I'm in a relationship with or gaming? Yeah, I am sometimes. I tease them, sure...and they often give it right back as it seems to be in their nature.

But the careful observer will note that I try to never directly hit them with putdowns, insults, or snide remarks. IMO that's for guys who are frustrated that women aren't what they want them to be, who don't try at "abundance mentality", and think that type of manipulation will get the girl to change.

It never will. So what's the purpose?