Quote: (02-02-2014 02:07 PM)eastwest Wrote:
That she writes this 20 years on lends it more credit in my opinion. What does she stand to gain? What does her brother - Allen's own son - stand to gain. These are grown adults, I find it less likely that they are still under some spell of their mother.
We will see what, if anything, comes off this.
I think you raise some valid points. My impression is the "the spell" you mention are fake memories in the daughter, and understandable sympathy from the brother burnt in by harpies when they were about 7, and the mythology has continued "How tragic he was never prosecuted"
Farrow, AND the daughter still believe this shit was real, because they HAD to justify why a perfect, world-renowned woman was ditched.
I directly work with feminist mental health harpies, some are so stupid I can't believe they managed to pass the licensing tests. And this is after a decade or more of debunking "recovered memories" stuff. I heard one Harvard psychiatry professor argue that any memory from before 5 is completely unreliably. Recovered memories is totally fringe in the mental health field now.
Especially egregious is the extreme emotional reasoning these "clinicians" suffer from-- thinking something must be true because they "feel" it must be true or that in a "just world" it must be true.
Think about what's physically real and documented in 1993:
(1) medical exam found no evidence. Presumably no bruising, signs of abnormal sex.
(2) Psych exam says "victim" says first yes , then no. Experienced clinicians on the scene soon after the "events" or the coaching say something like she appears "coached." I think they used that specific word.
THAT'S Occam's razor stuff, not the claims of hysterical women, and a son who was subject to the same brainwashing that might have gone on.
OCCAM sez: When physical reality says one thing, and hysterical women say another, simplest explanation is to believe physical reality.
Say Allen gave his 2,3, or 5 year old daughter baths. Was he suppose to not wash her genital and anal area? Well if he did, now there's the fodder for this crap.
"Did Daddy ever touch you here?"
Of course I could be wrong, but this seems like the gyrations of a fanatically puritanical, feminist society that shrieks at the idea of sex.
Unless it's an age-appropriate woman with her billionaire Christian Grey so she can brag to her friends.