Quote:Quote:

Victoria Comrie Cullen (39) was brutally stabbed 18 times and found with her throat cut, her nose broken, her face badly beaten and her clothes soaked in blood.

Cullen is shown shivering underneath an emergency blanket with puffy eyes and stab wounds as he looks at an iPhone filming his confession, just metres away from his estranged wife's dead body.

"We went to court today regarding a civil matter.

"We were talking and she started taunting me with her sex life and I lost control and we had a fight. That's it."

He adds: "I just didn't want to live no more after that."

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/n...76755.html

I didn't know your face could blow up like a balloon because of a punctured lung. Strange how the body works.

It can be awfully difficult to keep your cool when women get nasty and play on your emotions, especially if they're throwing their adultery in your face.

I wasn't planning to get married at all.

I wonder how many guys discovered that they had a temper after getting married.

Quote: (06-04-2015 01:38 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

I didn't know your face could blow up like a balloon because of a punctured lung. Strange how the body works.

It can be awfully difficult to keep your cool when women get nasty and play on your emotions, especially if they're throwing their adultery in your face.

Women often say to men what men would never say to another man without the likelihood of receiving a ferocious beating.

Has any here been 'taunted' by a harlot of a wife over her returning to the carousel as a richer married woman?

What's the choices in the era of no fault divorce?

Accept the cuckoldry to keep the divorce lawyer away and try not to think of your wife telling her friends of her extramarital life?

Divorce on principle and take the financial hit that will render you relatively unattractive to women for the rest of your life?

I hope no one here will ever be so overwhelmed with rage that he takes the man in the OP's option.

Quote:Quote:

Divorce on principle and take the financial hit that will render you relatively unattractive to women for the rest of your life?

I think you have to choose divorce. Living as a cuckold to a never-ending series of random cocks will kill your soul.

Plus, you're only still in the marriage at her mercy -- she can walk away with half+ anytime she wants. And all she has to do is pretend that you have a temper to make your life a living hell.

Take the financial hit and get out of there was some shred of self-respect. Restart and rebuild, but live to fuck another day.

Recording the conversation to make her guilty during the divorce settlement, and a simple backhand would have sufficed.

Yeah I'd walk away in a heartbeat and never look back. What's the point of living out my life with an aging hamster if I can't even expect some loyalty in return? Not taking cock on the side is literally the least she could do for me. I don't care what the financial hit would be. I'd rather live in a shoebox than stay tied to someone who doesn't have any respect for me.

Quote: (06-04-2015 02:20 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

Has any here been 'taunted' by a harlot of a wife over her returning to the carousel as a richer married woman?

What's the choices in the era of no fault divorce?

Accept the cuckoldry to keep the divorce lawyer away and try not to think of your wife telling her friends of her extramarital life?

Divorce on principle and take the financial hit that will render you relatively unattractive to women for the rest of your life?

I hope no one here will ever be so overwhelmed with rage that he takes the man in the OP's option.

Imagine if marriage contracts were more legally binding as opposed to being almost arbitrary. Imagine if you could serve jail time for adultery or any other serious breach of marriage contract? I know a lot of the players here who believe in fucking around while married would of course nay say but I think it would be a great deterrent for getting fucked around on.

I'm not saying this should be the case as I believe the law should have far less to do with your personal life, not more, but it's an interesting perspective.

If that were the case, I think even less men will marry to keep his fuck options legally open. Whether this will be detremental to women, I actually have no idea. On the one hand, they'll just continue ridin' dirty, but on the other, there would be even less options once they reach the wall.

Quote: (06-04-2015 02:35 PM)Nightwing Wrote:  

Recording the conversation to make her guilty during the divorce settlement, and a simple backhand would have sufficed.

Can't imagine a woman who cheats regularly, or even once, will feel very guilty.

Quote: (06-04-2015 02:36 PM)Socrates Wrote:  

Yeah I'd walk away in a heartbeat and never look back. What's the point of living out my life with an aging hamster if I can't even expect some loyalty in return? Not taking cock on the side is literally the least she could do for me. I don't care what the financial hit would be. I'd rather live in a shoebox than stay tied to someone who doesn't have any respect for me.

This is a great point, especially if someone has a temper. If someone is prone to explosive, hulk like anger, the longer they are in a conflict that doesn't resolve the more likely they are to fuck up or get fucked over with a mistake. Most chicks can fight dirty and calmly for the long haul...like a marital siege. If a dude is married and has the personality where he has to punch things when a ref makes a bad call his best bet is to get out of a bad marriage as quickly as possible.

Its similar to sparring or actual fighting, if an explosive rage fighter can't crush his opponent in the first few seconds of a fight its likely his opponent can stay calm and collected enough to exploit his opponents anger over the subsequent rounds when he starts to flame out.

Quote: (06-04-2015 03:51 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Quote: (06-04-2015 02:35 PM)Nightwing Wrote:  

Recording the conversation to make her guilty during the divorce settlement, and a simple backhand would have sufficed.

Can't imagine a woman who cheats regularly, or even once, will feel very guilty.

It won't matter when she's left penniless for her slutiness with the help of evidence, and a private investigator.

Nightwing, I thought the no fault divorces no judge gives a shit about infidelity. Maybe I misheard.

PI or no, her slutlording is all his fault dont'cha know. He was emotionaly unavilable and pushed her to it.
Poor thing.

Reminds me of a line from an old song:

We split it half and half.
She got the gold mine.
I got the shaft.

Samsamsam, of course I'm just basing this off of my experience with Murder Mystery, but according to this lawyer here, we should aim for a 'For fault divorce' when dealing with a cheating wench, it's more expensive, but at least she gets no alimony.

This woman practically faulted herself.

Some judges go with the womyn's point of view however.

Quote: (06-04-2015 05:57 PM)Nightwing Wrote:  

Samsamsam, of course I'm just basing this off of my experience with Murder Mystery, but according to this lawyer here, we should aim for a 'For fault divorce' when dealing with a cheating wench, it's more expensive, but at least she gets no alimony.

This woman practically faulted herself.

Some judges go with the womyn's point of view however.

Nightwing,

I had a female judge. Their was no doubt about my exes adultery. She admitted it. Do you know what the judge said?

"Counselor, I'm not going to punish her for her bad behavior."

Welcome to no fault divorce.

Quote: (06-04-2015 06:10 PM)Caractacus Potts Wrote:  

Quote: (06-04-2015 05:57 PM)Nightwing Wrote:  

Samsamsam, of course I'm just basing this off of my experience with Murder Mystery, but according to this lawyer here, we should aim for a 'For fault divorce' when dealing with a cheating wench, it's more expensive, but at least she gets no alimony.

This woman practically faulted herself.

Some judges go with the womyn's point of view however.

Nightwing,

I had a female judge. Their was no doubt about my exes adultery. She admitted it. Do you know what the judge said?

"Counselor, I'm not going to punish her for her bad behavior."

Welcome to no fault divorce.

Wow, I feel bad, you have tried and tested this 'system', only to have reaped suffering from it. I can only imagine what you went through.`

I will post something equally as graphic to quell your prior traumas, and portray how I feel after receiving this information.

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18n1zleo...iginal.gif

Now I realize that only 'no fault' divorce exists in the West.

Almost all divorces happen because of adultery, domestic violence, or both. The mere fact that a divorce is pending means that at least one of those two things most likely happened. Where I am, judges couldn't care less about adultery and domestic violence is often viewed with skepticism. Hiring a private investigator is usually a complete waste of time and money and being bitter and angry is completely stupid and unhelpful. The smartest move is to stay positive, focus on self improvement and take any and all steps to avoid having the same thing ever happen again. What percentage of guys going through a divorce are smart enough to understand that? No more than 5%. Maybe even far less than 5%

This is the primary reason why I will never, ever give in to a woman's demand to be her 'live-in' boyfriend in MY house.

Once in, they are like vampires. Impossible to get rid of.

Isn't the Philippines the country where if a foreigner marries a filipina and later divorces, SHE gets his house?

Quote: (06-04-2015 02:39 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

Quote: (06-04-2015 02:20 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

Has any here been 'taunted' by a harlot of a wife over her returning to the carousel as a richer married woman?

What's the choices in the era of no fault divorce?

Accept the cuckoldry to keep the divorce lawyer away and try not to think of your wife telling her friends of her extramarital life?

Divorce on principle and take the financial hit that will render you relatively unattractive to women for the rest of your life?

I hope no one here will ever be so overwhelmed with rage that he takes the man in the OP's option.

Imagine if marriage contracts were more legally binding as opposed to being almost arbitrary. Imagine if you could serve jail time for adultery or any other serious breach of marriage contract? I know a lot of the players here who believe in fucking around while married would of course nay say but I think it would be a great deterrent for getting fucked around on.

I'm not saying this should be the case as I believe the law should have far less to do with your personal life, not more, but it's an interesting perspective.

There used to be a great common law tort called alienation of affections. It was often the husband who brought the action- not against the wife, but against any guy who seduced her. So some guy fucks your wife and then you collect money from him.

Along with the other "for fault" provisions of marriage, it was a protection and incentive for beta males to marry. I would support bringing it back. It kept the alphas fucking the unmarried women and the sluts. If you wanted to screw married women, you know that you might have to pay up.

Quote: (06-04-2015 08:23 PM)Soothesayer Wrote:  

This is the primary reason why I will never, ever give in to a woman's demand to be her 'live-in' boyfriend in MY house.

Once in, they are like vampires. Impossible to get rid of.

Isn't the Philippines the country where if a foreigner marries a filipina and later divorces, SHE gets his house?

Filipino ownership law usually prioritizes its citizens first, and the gender is a red herring in the situation you presented.

I should know: being Filipino myself, we did have a history where the American government turned my greatgrandfathers into living embodiments of sexual thirst.

I hate to say this but, cheat first. Get it out of the way. Then if and when she cheats it doesnt hurt that bad. Use if as blackmail that you will tell her mother, sisters whoever that she cheated with a broke ass dumb shit while you were succeeding and being a good provider.

Quote: (06-04-2015 05:57 PM)Nightwing Wrote:  

Samsamsam, of course I'm just basing this off of my experience with Murder Mystery, but according to this lawyer here, we should aim for a 'For fault divorce' when dealing with a cheating wench, it's more expensive, but at least she gets no alimony.

This woman practically faulted herself.

Some judges go with the womyn's point of view however.

I have very recent experience with this. My attorney told me that if it came to a court trial, he could not ask her under oath if she'd committed adultery. Maybe that varies by state, but where I live, no fault means just that. It's not "some judges", the evidence is not admissible and it seems to me that you'd be wasting your money on a PI. The article you linked to was written by a guy in Atlanta, and Georgia offers a fault option.

If you're in a place with pure no-fault, you have no choice. The best option is to figure out early what you want and pursue that goal.

Finally, for anyone reading this, I would be very careful about how you collect your evidence, particularly from electronic devices. If you think she's cheating and you absolutely must know, then it pays to hire a PI because they know how to do it legally.