Quote: (07-06-2018 08:49 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:
Quote: (03-23-2018 05:17 PM)pitt Wrote:
Have you been to Africa before? I presume you haven't. Most countries in Africa are way safer than most Latin American countries or even some US cities. I was in Cape Verde not too long ago and I felt safer there than I felt when I was in New York. You assume African countries have mostly black population so therefore they are way more dangerous and that's clearly not the case. Africans tend to have a stronger family sense and thieves are highly tortured once caught committing crimes, you are literally asking for a life of pain and torture if you decide to become a criminal in Africa. Gang culture is literally non existent in most places in Africa. Funny enough, one of the most dangerous places in Africa (if not the most dangerous), is South Africa. Not trying to get racist here but blacks seem to become more criminal minded once they are living in places with high white population.
I agree that crime statistics in Africa may not be fully reliable but recently I had access to crime statistics from 2017 christmas/New Years from an African country and compared it to a South American country and the latter had way more homicides around that time of the year. If you have been to both places you would actually feel way safer in Africa than you would in South America/caribbean countries.
A lot of the homicides in the americas (south america, Caribbean, US black cities) are usually from people involved in the drug business. The use of drugs in Africa is frowned upon, therefore consumption of drugs is way less common and there are not many murders that originate from drugs business.
The problem with Africa is their judicial system. Criminals tend to serve very small sentences and because corruption is rampant, their families pay a small cash and they are allowed to go free. If africans poured more money into their prison systems and tried their best to eliminate corruption, their crime rates would be comparable to European nordic countries. It's a small number of people there committing the same crimes.
Another thing, if you ever meet an African guy, ask him if he knows anybody who has been murdered and then ask the same question to a South American or Caribbean guy and that literally should give you an idea of where is the most dangerous place.
You are somehow blaming the crime stats of blacks on Whites - whenever they start living next to Whites.
I have been to Africa and due to my spiritual path I meet lots of African folk from a wide range of countries. We also get compiled various life experience stories. Only our African brothers and sisters get the experiences of dangerous violent crimes, kidnappings, lucky escapes in muggings. The official stats are not even realistic - they are rather a PR job. Only our African religious members get to tell stories of being a doctor, then getting kidnapped and almost gang-raped and killed - and no - it's not in South Africa.
Pitt- with all due respect - you are a full anti-White racist who finds fault with Whites over ancient often overblown deeds while ignoring all the violent shortcomings of blacks happening right now. Then you add group-guilt over it as if I am responsible for what some Belgian might have done in Congo, but you are innocent of a gang-rape and murder of a 3yo white girl in South Africa. Of course we both are innocent of that, but somehow you think that Whites are responsible for that.
Guess the White devils are inciting all that violence and once it's blacks only around, then crime goes down?
Also I noted that you have a story to tell about barely getting away with your life in the DR? Doesn't that point to the fact that the stats are not only concerned only when Whites are around? And what kind of theory is that frankly?
Lol what kind of a garbage argument is this? Someone disagrees with your belief that more black people = more crime, and they automatically hate white people? This is literally the same black-and-white logic that an SJW uses -- disagree with the party line, and you're a bad person. An SJW will call me an Islamophobe for disagreeing that Islam is a perfectly tolerant religion of peace. You'll call Pitt an anti-white racist for daring to disagree with idea that blacks are not, in fact, murderous savages who are not capable of creating functional civilization.
You and an open-borders shrilling libtard are in the same place mentally, you're just using different terms.
Africa is a massive continent and the black diaspora has extended all over the world. Yeah there are basket cases like Haiti and the DRC -- there are also relatively prosperous countries like the Bahamas, Botswana, and even Rwanda. Yeah, they're not as prosperous as South Korea or the UAE, but they're still not the murderous shitholes that you seem to think black people are solely capable of creating. I've also travelled widely in North Africa and Middle Eastern countries. Jordan, Morocco, Algeria, and the Gulf are incredibly safe on a day to day basis, crime is rare beyond occasional petty theft. The only countries in the region that are real shitholes have either been bombed into the ground by Israel/America, or Salafi hell holes that we have financed from top to bottom (Saudi).
Yeah large parts of Africa are in a horrible state at the moment -- I can recall a multitude of times in history when Europeans were being ravaged by disease, suffering under the totalitarian control of the Catholic church, or slaughtering each other en masse for religious reasons. I also recall millennia in history when black and brown Africans were creating civilizations (ancient Egypt, Kush, Ethiopia) while most of Europe was living a hunter-gatherer existence. I'm sure pointing this out is going to incite more crying and bitching about how I'm "anti-white", but I really don't care. You've been vomiting out nine posts of SJW-esque bull shit per day and it deserves to be called out.