"They bring in a post-wall "douchebag expert" "
I almost died laughing, brilliant
I almost died laughing, brilliant
He who dares wins - Del Boy
Quote: (10-12-2017 08:06 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:
With so many women hitting the wall and becoming utterly bitter about becoming sexually invisible it makes sense for Tinder to transition at least partially to a hate-mill.
Titanic hits iceberg? "NOW FEATURING INDOOR SWIMMING POOL!"
In time they can turn the app into a simple program that randomises alpha male suitors but there's no option to swipe right, only left, allowing these sad old hags to at least pretend that their shit is still top notch.
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:04 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 08:06 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:
With so many women hitting the wall and becoming utterly bitter about becoming sexually invisible it makes sense for Tinder to transition at least partially to a hate-mill.
Titanic hits iceberg? "NOW FEATURING INDOOR SWIMMING POOL!"
In time they can turn the app into a simple program that randomises alpha male suitors but there's no option to swipe right, only left, allowing these sad old hags to at least pretend that their shit is still top notch.
I've thought about that. It's completely pointless and unproductive that men should have to swipe at all on thousands of profiles. Men should get fed all of the "yes" swipes on them into a separate inbox where they then decide whether or not to confirm the match. Then a notification is sent to the girl if the match is confirmed. That would actually make apps worth the time for every man because they level the playing field for men with time investment. Once the initial time investment is made in building a profile, its hands off until you get any notifications.
If the girls are the only ones doing the selective swiping, then let them do all the work in screening themselves into the guy's frame. When they realize they aim too high and aren't getting any matches, maybe they will lower their standards to a more reasonable level, making the online experience better for everyone.
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:08 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:04 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 08:06 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:
With so many women hitting the wall and becoming utterly bitter about becoming sexually invisible it makes sense for Tinder to transition at least partially to a hate-mill.
Titanic hits iceberg? "NOW FEATURING INDOOR SWIMMING POOL!"
In time they can turn the app into a simple program that randomises alpha male suitors but there's no option to swipe right, only left, allowing these sad old hags to at least pretend that their shit is still top notch.
I've thought about that. It's completely pointless and unproductive that men should have to swipe at all on thousands of profiles. Men should get fed all of the "yes" swipes on them into a separate inbox where they then decide whether or not to confirm the match. Then a notification is sent to the girl if the match is confirmed. That would actually make apps worth the time for every man because they level the playing field for men with time investment. Once the initial time investment is made in building a profile, its hands off until you get any notifications.
If the girls are the only ones doing the selective swiping, then let them do all the work in screening themselves into the guy's frame. When they realize they aim too high and aren't getting any matches, maybe they will lower their standards to a more reasonable level, making the online experience better for everyone.
Isnt this kinda what bumble is?
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:22 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:08 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:04 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 08:06 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:
With so many women hitting the wall and becoming utterly bitter about becoming sexually invisible it makes sense for Tinder to transition at least partially to a hate-mill.
Titanic hits iceberg? "NOW FEATURING INDOOR SWIMMING POOL!"
In time they can turn the app into a simple program that randomises alpha male suitors but there's no option to swipe right, only left, allowing these sad old hags to at least pretend that their shit is still top notch.
I've thought about that. It's completely pointless and unproductive that men should have to swipe at all on thousands of profiles. Men should get fed all of the "yes" swipes on them into a separate inbox where they then decide whether or not to confirm the match. Then a notification is sent to the girl if the match is confirmed. That would actually make apps worth the time for every man because they level the playing field for men with time investment. Once the initial time investment is made in building a profile, its hands off until you get any notifications.
If the girls are the only ones doing the selective swiping, then let them do all the work in screening themselves into the guy's frame. When they realize they aim too high and aren't getting any matches, maybe they will lower their standards to a more reasonable level, making the online experience better for everyone.
Isnt this kinda what bumble is?
It's a better format than tinder but still not ideal IMO. Guys still have to swipe on every profile in the stack. In my idea, the guys would only see profiles when a girl swiped right on them. Otherwise they would see no profiles.
This way it also eliminates girls who are just using apps like tinder to promote their IG or snapchat for attention whoring because guys would never see their profiles in the first place unless they swiped right on the guy. I guess you could couple that with making the girl initiate within 24 hrs like bumble to further weed out some of the attention whores and self promoters.
The point is don't reward them with the dopamine hit that a match brings until the guy has done the second screen, because all these excessive matches do is gas up the girl and make 6's think they are 10's when 95% of guys are swiping right on every girl.
Quote: (10-12-2017 06:37 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 06:08 PM)Delta Wrote:
Some women have something like this where as they get older the skin on their face tightens and their body shrinks in a gross way.
Perfect example:
WAIT
before you scroll down and find out who this is. . . how would you rate based just on looks alone?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Now:
Sorry Natalie Portman fans. . . she isn't far behind:
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:08 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:
It's completely pointless and unproductive that men should have to swipe at all on thousands of profiles. Men should get fed all of the "yes" swipes on them into a separate inbox where they then decide whether or not to confirm the match.
Quote: (10-12-2017 11:06 PM)Scoundrel Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:08 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:
It's completely pointless and unproductive that men should have to swipe at all on thousands of profiles. Men should get fed all of the "yes" swipes on them into a separate inbox where they then decide whether or not to confirm the match.
There used to be third-party apps that would allow you to automatically mass right-wipe, and the end result was essentially what you describe. I believe all such third-party apps have been squashed by Tinder.
I used to get some decent results with Tinder. Lately it has become a complete waste of time, along with all the other similar apps. Right-swiping only gets you a few matches here and there, and usually the quality is in the toilet. Super Liking was once a fairly guaranteed way of getting matches, but now I think most girls accept the validation of a Super Like, but don't bother to match with the man who sent it.
I saw the first of the new Tinder ads a few days ago. As the women discuss "douchey" behavior from men, one of them laments that the last guy she dated had calf implants. I'm sure I'm not the only one who saw that and thought of how many women get implants in various part of their bodies. Is this douchebag behavior (or its equivalent) on the part of women?
In another ad, they have a guy hooked up to a machine designed to make him more "chivalrous." Chivalry is a controversial topic — some women complain because men lack it, but others find it patronizing and demeaning. So is he a douchebag because he isn't chivalrous, or is his lack of chivalry because he respects women as equals?
This is the inherent problem in women criticizing & condemning specific male behavior traits. Some women roll their eyes at guys who are hardcore bodybuilders, while others love the type. A white girl films herself walking through a ghetto area to expose the horrible men who catcall her. But the women who live in those neighborhoods would be disappointed if they didn't hear random complements as they walk down the street.
It's like women who decry "fuckboys," but they can't agree on what a fuckboy is. He's just something . . . bad. You'll know him when you meet him, I guess.
Also — Wikipedia says Whitney Cummings is 35? Give me a break. The woman in that Getty Images photo looks at least 47.
Quote:Quote:
(1) "overqualified" at work, (2) tips poorly, ... (4) is late
Quote: (10-12-2017 09:22 PM)Razor Beast Wrote:
In my idea, the guys would only see profiles when a girl swiped right on them. Otherwise they would see no profiles.
Quote: (10-13-2017 08:46 AM)Vill@in Wrote:
Isn't that dude from Jersey Shore? The poster boy for douchebags?
Quote: (10-13-2017 10:27 AM)Truth Tiger Wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the IAC group owning multiple routes to encourage male thirst and inflate women's already gigantic egos. I feel Cattle Rustler's frame control post on NOT having a strong online presence is gold. Build your life, be a man of value and distinction who has no fucking *time* or interest to be e-diddling the e-clits of hordes of post wall hags and low quality women. For the rare gems you find you're feeding the engine of third and fourth wave feminism.
These apps are addictive, destructive time sinks that poison your mind. It's porn without the nudity - at least with porn once you come you can go on with your day. Tinder et al doesn't give that release.
"I'm a man playing with an app that feeds female egos and deflated my self-esteem just with the hope to get laid. Jeez is that really what I'm about?!"
Look yourself in the mirror and ask that question. If you are, then good luck. If you can't agree then as the Michael Jordan clip says - "Stop it. Get some help."
Just
Say
No
To Tindrugs!
Quote: (10-13-2017 10:32 AM)scrambled Wrote:
Quote: (10-12-2017 08:58 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:
"They bring in a post-wall "douchebag expert" "
I almost died laughing, brilliant
I can't wait for the old guy "slut expert" to be hired on this forum
Quote: (10-13-2017 12:37 PM)Mochihunter Wrote:
Did anyone notice notice that one of the criteria for being a douche bag is, "doesn't introduce to friends and family." If I knew how to insert gifs I would insert the Heston laughing gif. It's 2017, there is all this basic info on game available, and chicks still don't realize they're wife material. The hamster is a powerful thing friends.
Roosh maybe on to something about BLM launching a crusade against Tinder. For whatever reason the White God Factor is very alive on Tinder.