I think most of you aren't seeing that Hefner and Gloria Steinem are two sides of the same coin. Other than maybe Kinsey, very few people were as instrumental in destroying the foundation of traditional western society: the family. Actually it is no surprise that Steinem and Hefner are closely connected, she's worked for him, and both have links to the deep state.
Steinem was brainwashing women, telling them that the family was an inherently oppressive patriarchal scheme, that men were scum, and that they would only be truly fulfilled as careerist single women.
She's basically telling them to live like lesbians.
Hefner was telling young men that they should be playboys, men fullfilled by the hedonistic pursuit of notches, as opposed to "tied down" by marriage, and the outdated role of household heads and fathers dedicated to taking care of their wife and raising children.
He's basically telling them to live like homosexuals.
Do you see the parallels here??
Quote: (09-28-2017 02:30 AM)Disco_Volante Wrote:
Quote: (09-28-2017 01:42 AM)Aurini Wrote:
No legacy - no love - just endless hedonism which is never as good as the first time.
Yea I'm sure he was jealous of married people. Not everyone is wired for monogamy.
The "wiring" of people is in large part determined by cultural drivers. Far fewer men and women are wired for monogamy
today, and there is no doubt that modern social engineering is the reason for this radical and destructive cultural shift.
One of Henry Makow's best columns ever was on the subject of Hefner and his nefarious influence on society, everyone should read the full post linked below:
"What kind of man is [the Playboy man]?
He is fastidious about his appearance, his home and his possessions. He wants as much sex as possible and chooses sexual partners mostly on the basis of appearance.
He is self-absorbed and doesn't want emotional involvement or commitment. He thinks a woman would stifle him and children would be a burden.
Does this sound like many gays? It is also the masculine ideal purveyed by Playboy magazine to men since the 1950's.
The essence of manhood is to lead and support a family. But in 1972, 3 out of 4 male college students got their ideas about masculinity from Playboy, at an incalculable price to themselves, women, children and society.
The similarity between the Playboy and homosexual ideal is no coincidence. "The Kinsey Report" (1948) shaped current mainstream attitudes to sex. It championed unfettered sexual expression and became the manifesto of the counterculture. It inspired Hugh Hefner to start Playboy in 1953.
Essentially "The Kinsey Report" said that aberrant sexual behavior was so common as to be normal. Thanks to psychologist Dr. Judith Reisman, we now know that Alfred Kinsey was a homosexual and the "Kinsley Report" was a fraud.
...
Hugh Hefner said the Kinsey Report "produced a tremendous sexual awakening, largely because of media attention..." This shows how the elite orchestrates social change using media hype. (See Reisman, Kinsey, p.307)
With messianic fervor, Playboy took its gospel of sexual freedom to the American male who in the 1950's-1960's still consecrated sex for marriage. Playboy's aim, the aim of all pornographers, was to hook men on the glossy fantasy. To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage.
In Reisman's words,
"Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men's fears of women and family commitment. Playboy offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous heterosexual love." (Judith Reisman, "Soft Porn Plays Hardball," p 47)
Thus sworn enemies, Playboy and radical feminists, found common ground in hatred of the nuclear family. As a result, society now suffers from epidemics of family breakdown, pornography, impotence, child sexual abuse, sadosexual violence, teen pregnancy, a cocktail of STD's and, of course, AIDS. The birthrate has plummeted by 50% since 1960 and is barely at replacement level.
...
Gay and feminist activists think traditional morality was invented to perpetuate an unjust status quo. In fact, morality is the accumulated wisdom of mankind regarding what is healthy and ultimately fulfilling. Perversion is deviation from what is healthy.
Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it is healthy and human. It ensures that the most profound and intimate physical act between two people expresses a commensurate emotional-spiritual bond. Promiscuous sex is a desperate plea for love. Love and marriage answer that call and provide for the natural and necessary outcome of sex, children.
With Hugh Hefner's help, Alfred Kinsey detached sex from love and procreation. He reduced it to another physical function like urinating. Homosexual activists champion anonymous sex: a majority of gays have 10s-100s of partners each year. In less extreme form, heterosexuals have adopted this model. Recently a social columnist enviously described straight friends whose relationships have ended: "they're out partying, having the time and the sex, it seems of their lives."
In conclusion, the "sexual revolution" was really a triumph of an elite program of arrested development. See also "The CIA, Homosexuality and Underdevelopment." The elite agenda is to redefine healthy as deviant and vice-versa and they have succeeded. In 40 short years, almost all sexual constraints have dissolved and heterosexual society is reeling. The cultural and social breakdown will only get worse unless there is a counterrevolution."
https://www.savethemales.ca/000165.html