[TheMost]

(05-03-2017 05:06 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

I just wish the guys on the right would stop taking cues from the Nazis, chill and relax a bit when it comes to occasional interracial kids and embrace a more sensible view of standing up to a White nation state without getting a hissy fit whenever a White woman marries a black man.

In Canada, black men aren't the issue. And, appearances aside, China isn't the issue either. The issue is a significant percentage of young white wombs are being plundered by Indians. And it isn't like the black guys getting with the fatties; these are the slender long haired whites, who are virtue signaling based on the indoctrination that is pumped into their brains in high school. Canada has to do something fast, or it will be controlled by India in less than 10 years.

Quote:

But it does not matter what I say - the globalists prefer the races to be divided instead of joining ranks and tackling the things at hand. That way a unified rebellion is much tougher to organize when a country is comprised of very diverse groups that have a tough time to agree on a joint agenda. And that is how the Big Boys prefer things to be.

No. The globalists prefer the races be UNITED so they are easier to control. Homogenous people, homogenous politics and processes.

[Chris Brown]

^I dont understand why they say it is impossible to subjugate a pure race. As in (((they))) need to race mix to control whites. Werent they able to control Russia, Ukraine, England, America and Germany whilst they were predominantly white?

[Uruz]

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-04-2017 05:02 AM)Chris Brown Wrote:  

^I dont understand why they say it is impossible to subjugate a pure race. As in (((they))) need to race mix to control whites. Werent they able to control Russia, Ukraine, England, America and Germany whilst they were predominantly white?

Theoretically yes, but we are not in on their meetings. Sure we have the plans like Coudenhove-Kalergi in the past, that might have been enacted. Besides that you have much greater access to information now and resistance could be stronger as of today. You can even see it with the voting patterns that we have today, that nationalistic candidates in an ethnic makeup as of 1965 would be going easily for the likes of Trump. He would have won 70% of the votes without non-White immigration. The same goes for many European countries.

There is a definitive anti-White agenda out there. We can only estimate why the globalists feel that they need to do this. My take is that that Whites have a good mix of both intelligence, high development and love for freedom. You also have to remember that the next steps on the agenda are not there yet and they will be the most restrictive and brutal - Green Fascism, austerity, limited travel, living only in big cities, financial stress etc. My educated guess is that their models predicted that overwhelmingly White nation states would not go along with this at least not with the current internet knowledge out there.

Their models likely calculate that the Chinese while being more intelligent would go along with it since they are far more top-down obedient. That is my personal take.

And frankly it does not matter what sick reasons the shitheads have for this, fact is that they are doing it and fact is that it is wrong.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-04-2017 04:06 AM)TheMost Wrote:  

No. The globalists prefer the races be UNITED so they are easier to control. Homogenous people, homogenous politics and processes.

That is the final product of the serf-class (they will want to have their blondes and redheads for themselves - also they will still want to be white and tall themselves). I think that part of them think that it would be class if they could be the only tall white people left while everyone else out there is brown. If they can pull off a 30% higher IQ as well, then I guess we would have almost 2 different species.

But I don't think it will succeed.

Either way - what the end goal of theirs may look like in the year 2300 is one thing, in the meantime they want to disrupt the Western states by diversity. Obviously they are not concerned about African countries or India becoming diverse. Those places are zero danger to their system of control.

[rudebwoy]

(05-04-2017 04:06 AM)TheMost Wrote:  

(05-03-2017 05:06 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

I just wish the guys on the right would stop taking cues from the Nazis, chill and relax a bit when it comes to occasional interracial kids and embrace a more sensible view of standing up to a White nation state without getting a hissy fit whenever a White woman marries a black man.

In Canada, black men aren't the issue. And, appearances aside, China isn't the issue either. The issue is a significant percentage of young white wombs are being plundered by Indians. And it isn't like the black guys getting with the fatties; these are the slender long haired whites, who are virtue signaling based on the indoctrination that is pumped into their brains in high school. Canada has to do something fast, or it will be controlled by India in less than 10 years.

Quote:

But it does not matter what I say - the globalists prefer the races to be divided instead of joining ranks and tackling the things at hand. That way a unified rebellion is much tougher to organize when a country is comprised of very diverse groups that have a tough time to agree on a joint agenda. And that is how the Big Boys prefer things to be.

No. The globalists prefer the races be UNITED so they are easier to control. Homogenous people, homogenous politics and processes.

Not sure where you live in Canada, but I don't see this.

I did ask the question before about white women not having children, which no one wants to address.

China seems to have very strong interests in Canada.

China holds the national debt of America. so this is not only a Canadian problem.

The Globalists have a wet dream of reducing the global population from 7 billion to 500 million. A smaller population will make the world more manageable in their eyes, it won't matter what colour you are at that point.

[Uruz]

(05-04-2017 01:02 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

I did ask the question before about white women not having children, which no one wants to address.

The Globalists have a wet dream of reducing the global population from 7 billion to 500 million. A smaller population will make the world more manageable in their eyes, it won't matter what colour you are at that point.

I think in the way, if you did not have massive immigration it would not be a problem, just look at Europe, its so densely populated. It's not really a problem that the birth rate is smaller. I think this is one of the leftist bullshit that right took as their own, world is extremely overpopulated. And to the part that nobody wants to address it, I would disagree, I think that it's one of the main topics that people talk about. It's the retarded scam that people started to believe "Ooo, we don't make enough babies so let's import refugees and stuff." - Bullshit, we don't need more workers.

Reducing population? I am all in. Civilisation without eugenics is just a playground for weak, before the unsuitable would die off early, now we keep them artificially alive and it's wrong, we don't breed quality anymore.

[Uruz]

Just curious, lot of guys here seems to be upset by Globalists. My question would be, do you do something, think that you do or plan to do, that would go against them? (personal or "movement" level) Just if you thought about action besides writing essays about jews here, whites there, immigrants here.

- Memes and votes don't count.

[rudebwoy]

@Uruz - having a low birth rate and one below replacement level means your group will die out.

Are you in agreement with that?

The immigration drivel I won't even go there, I assume you are not talking about skilled workers that move to different countries to fill a void.

[Uruz]

From 1960 to 2015 the population of Germany went from 72M to 81M, France 46M to 66M, UK 52m to 65M.

I assume that not all of it are non-european immigrants. There is shitload of us, we will not die out, we might get mixed out. There is no such thing as birth rate below replacement level if you kick out all the non-natives.

There is not less of us, but more, if there was some war as they usually were the population would decrease and increase after, it's normal. I don't see any problem there.

But of course, women should get married young and have children, but I don't exactly feel like there is less and less people in Europe, maybe just more of those that don't belong there.

Immigration - I heard many times from people that because birth rate is low we need to import people who will work for the ageing population, which is crap, it's easy to solve, strip women of their useless rights and fuck them, what they are going to do, right? But I don't think there is a need for more workers either way. By the way, it does not matter if it's a Iraqi garbage man or Indian doctor, we are good enough, don't need anybody else, I will be a good boy and let them keep their own skilled as well as those not skilled.

[zigZag]

(05-04-2017 01:38 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

From 1960 to 2015 the population of Germany went from 72M to 81M, France 46M to 66M, UK 52m to 65M.

I assume that not all of it are non-european immigrants. There is shitload of us, we will not die out, we might get mixed out. There is no such thing as birth rate below replacement level if you kick out all the non-natives.

There is not less of us, but more, if there was some war as they usually were the population would decrease and increase after, it's normal. I don't see any problem there.

But of course, women should get married young and have children, but I don't exactly feel like there is less and less people in Europe, maybe just more of those that don't belong there.

Immigration - I heard many times from people that because birth rate is low we need to import people who will work for the ageing population, which is crap, it's easy to solve, strip women of their useless rights and fuck them, what they are going to do, right? But I don't think there is a need for more workers either way. By the way, it does not matter if it's a Iraqi garbage man or Indian doctor, we are good enough, don't need anybody else, I will be a good boy and let them keep their own skilled as well as those not skilled.

This is where you're wrong. Our entire welfare model and economic model is built on population growth. The reality is that people will never vote to abolish the welfare state. That's the whole point of population growth... you need young bodies to come in and work, consume and pay taxes. Even if they come in and they are on welfare then they need services to maintain them and that grows GDP. It's all about economics. If whites are having any children (They aren't) Then the population growth will come from immigration. This welfare state needs to be constantly fed or it will collapse. Right now from what i understand it used to be 17 workers to 1 person on welfare for Social security. Now it's down to 3 to 1 and 1 of those people are on welfare.

Also to your other point you need to give up the idea that women will suddenly want to give up their rights to vote..etc. That will never happen as well. This is why i can never take WN seriously. You see a bunch of guys running around talking about white genocide and then you ask them how many white kids they have and it's usually 0. It's like when i hear feminists running around talking about lack of women in engineering programs while they are getting a degree in gender studies or sociology or something like that.

[Uruz]

Yea, if you ask me, I would not mind if the whole system collapsed. Maybe I was wrong if you look at it as "what jews need to keep their human farms working".

And of course I did never say anything about women doing something willingly, they are women why should I ask them if they want this right or not?

And yes, "WN" guys are a joke.

[rudebwoy]

(05-04-2017 01:38 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

Immigration - I heard many times from people that because birth rate is low we need to import people who will work for the ageing population, which is crap, it's easy to solve, strip women of their useless rights and fuck them, what they are going to do, right? But I don't think there is a need for more workers either way. By the way, it does not matter if it's a Iraqi garbage man or Indian doctor, we are good enough, don't need anybody else, I will be a good boy and let them keep their own skilled as well as those not skilled.

LOL

You are one sad deluded individual.

[zigZag]

(05-04-2017 02:01 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

Yea, if you ask me, I would not mind if the whole system collapsed. Maybe I was wrong if you look at it as "what jews need to keep their human farms working".

And of course I did never say anything about women doing something willingly, they are women why should I ask them if they want this right or not?

And yes, "WN" guys are a joke.

Have you actually thought about what the "System collapsing" Would look like? It would make somalia a JOKE. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say this... There are even less people who want the system to collapse and end up in anarchy than there are Trannies in the world. The point... be honest with yourself. If the system did collapse, could you survive? Where would your food come from? Where would your water? can you farm? Can you make any tools? Can you make Weapons? That's what the world is gonna be about.

Then to strip away the rights of women you're going to have to convince enough men to do that and then you're going to have to do it violently with the men who are willing to resort to violence to subjugate women and against women and men who don't want it... Good luck with that. This is the war of ideas and you have to convince people of yours otherwise you're just one crazy guy rambling on and on.

[Chevy Woonsocket]

(05-04-2017 01:57 PM)zigZag Wrote:  

This is where you're wrong. Our entire welfare model and economic model is built on population growth. The reality is that people will never vote to abolish the welfare state. That's the whole point of population growth... you need young bodies to come in and work, consume and pay taxes. Even if they come in and they are on welfare then they need services to maintain them and that grows GDP. It's all about economics. If whites are having any children (They aren't) Then the population growth will come from immigration. This welfare state needs to be constantly fed or it will collapse. Right now from what i understand it used to be 17 workers to 1 person on welfare for Social security. Now it's down to 3 to 1 and 1 of those people are on welfare.

The reality is voting doesn't matter, nor will people's attitudes towards welfare have any effect on it not collapsing. It's coming whether we like it or not, and adding 100 million unassimilable foreigners isn't going to stop it.

The people and cultures that will survive and form the future will be the ones best equipped to live in an age of privation, who can easily make substitutions to advance themselves. This will be a high stress situation for all involved. The problem is, we're compounding the stress by adding people to the population that the natives have almost nothing in common with other than an expectation of affluence.

[Uruz]

(05-04-2017 03:01 PM)zigZag Wrote:  

Have you actually thought about what the "System collapsing" Would look like? It would make somalia a JOKE. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say this... There are even less people who want the system to collapse and end up in anarchy than there are Trannies in the world. The point... be honest with yourself. If the system did collapse, could you survive? Where would your food come from? Where would your water? can you farm? Can you make any tools? Can you make Weapons? That's what the world is gonna be about.

Then to strip away the rights of women you're going to have to convince enough men to do that and then you're going to have to do it violently with the men who are willing to resort to violence to subjugate women and against women and men who don't want it... Good luck with that. This is the war of ideas and you have to convince people of yours otherwise you're just one crazy guy rambling on and on.

Sure, I might not survive. I am pretty sure that I know more than 95% of consumers around, but of course, there is a high chance that I would die. But I think I will make it pretty much ok for myself before I turn 30.

I did not say, that it will happen, or that I am trying to push it. I don't believe in political solutions. If there was some country that would make changes big enough to screw with globalist plan, it would be nuked, just remember how Germany looked like in 46.

I know well that my opinions are not applicable in todays society, but it does not mean that I will change them.

[2Wycked]

(05-04-2017 01:38 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

Immigration - I heard many times from people that because birth rate is low we need to import people who will work for the ageing population, which is crap, it's easy to solve, strip women of their useless rights and fuck them, what they are going to do, right? But I don't think there is a need for more workers either way. By the way, it does not matter if it's a Iraqi garbage man or Indian doctor, we are good enough, don't need anybody else, I will be a good boy and let them keep their own skilled as well as those not skilled.

Have you lost your damn mind? Because I will help you find it.

1. Stripping women of their rights (and giving them to whom? The hated federal government? Or keyboard warriors alpha like yourself?) is ridiculous. I have no idea what that problems such a stark legal regression like that would entail, but I can tell you that if you think women are a problem now, just wait for when they can't even sign a contract without their husband's approval. Imagine how annoying it would be that your wife can't e-sign a clickwrap agreement for the Instagram app without your approval. Think!

2. Praying for collapse might be the only time I will invoke the largely useless but sometimes very relevant idea of "privilege." There is absolutely no way you grew up hungry, alone or desperate if you would "not mind" if society collapsed. Little chance you grew up in a war-torn country, know what it's like to be persecuted for your religious beliefs or have faced any sort of serious personal demon. That sort of bullshit talk is nothing more than the braying of a privileged buffoon.

3. My only piece of advice: stop being you.

I feel dirty for biting just this little bit on your comments.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-04-2017 01:38 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

From 1960 to 2015 the population of Germany went from 72M to 81M, France 46M to 66M, UK 52m to 65M.

I assume that not all of it are non-european immigrants. There is shitload of us, we will not die out, we might get mixed out. There is no such thing as birth rate below replacement level if you kick out all the non-natives.

There is not less of us, but more, if there was some war as they usually were the population would decrease and increase after, it's normal. I don't see any problem there.

But of course, women should get married young and have children, but I don't exactly feel like there is less and less people in Europe, maybe just more of those that don't belong there.

Immigration - I heard many times from people that because birth rate is low we need to import people who will work for the ageing population, which is crap, it's easy to solve, strip women of their useless rights and fuck them, what they are going to do, right? But I don't think there is a need for more workers either way. By the way, it does not matter if it's a Iraqi garbage man or Indian doctor, we are good enough, don't need anybody else, I will be a good boy and let them keep their own skilled as well as those not skilled.

That is absolutely correct - Japan will still be Japan even with 50 mio. left. Germany however will not be Germany with 140 mio. - 80 mio. of which will be young Arab and African migrants.

The globalists claim that universal basic income must come because there is not enough work even with zero population growth:

http://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/u...-Work_.pdf

https://www.technocracy.news/index.html/2...ic-income/
http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk...017-2?IR=T

So if there is not enough work for the locals, then what makes anyone think that there will be work for far less qualified (on average) immigrants?

Uruz is right here - we don't need any menial workers and we don't need any doctors. We are covered on all thank you.

You can send in some 10 million women from Belarus, Ukraine and Russia and we will let everyone know whether we need any more violent low IQ Muslim men, but currently we are covered on that front as well.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-04-2017 03:28 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

2. Praying for collapse might be the only time I will invoke the largely useless but sometimes very relevant idea of "privilege." There is absolutely no way you grew up hungry, alone or desperate if you would "not mind" if society collapsed. Little chance you grew up in a war-torn country, know what it's like to be persecuted for you religious beliefs or have faced any sort of serious personal demon. That sort of bullshit talk is nothing more than the braying of a privileged buffoon.

3. My only piece of advice: stop being you.

I feel dirty for biting just this little bit on your comments.

I must ask you myself:



Sure - stripping women of their basic rights is too radical. But Swiss regions had given women voting rights only in the 1990s. We can strip them of the voting rights - that would be a good start.

As for immigration - what the fuck are you talking about privilege?
Why does the West or Japan (which has taken in 13 refugees last year) owe anything to anyone? The West can help 20 times more people by investing the same money in fully functioning mini-cities in the middle East or Africa.

When Europe was war-torn in the past, did anyone open their borders for them en masse, give them welfare and housing?

Privileged buffoon anyone? Sure - let in 1 billion into the West and another billion to Europe. We will see how much "privilege" you will have to open your heart like Captain Sweden who is opening his butthole for everyone to run a train on him.

Seriously - you are the one who is wrong on that topic.

[zigZag]

(05-04-2017 03:16 PM)Chevy Woonsocket Wrote:  

(05-04-2017 01:57 PM)zigZag Wrote:  

This is where you're wrong. Our entire welfare model and economic model is built on population growth. The reality is that people will never vote to abolish the welfare state. That's the whole point of population growth... you need young bodies to come in and work, consume and pay taxes. Even if they come in and they are on welfare then they need services to maintain them and that grows GDP. It's all about economics. If whites are having any children (They aren't) Then the population growth will come from immigration. This welfare state needs to be constantly fed or it will collapse. Right now from what i understand it used to be 17 workers to 1 person on welfare for Social security. Now it's down to 3 to 1 and 1 of those people are on welfare.

The reality is voting doesn't matter, nor will people's attitudes towards welfare have any effect on it not collapsing. It's coming whether we like it or not, and adding 100 million unassimilable foreigners isn't going to stop it.

The people and cultures that will survive and form the future will be the ones best equipped to live in an age of privation, who can easily make substitutions to advance themselves. This will be a high stress situation for all involved. The problem is, we're compounding the stress by adding people to the population that the natives have almost nothing in common with other than an expectation of affluence.

It won't... that's the beauty of FIAT currency.. there is nothing backing it. What happens like always is that we print a bunch of money when shit goes bad and the rich guys buy up stocks and assets at rock bottom prices then eventually things balance themselves out and the rich guys have more stuff and poor guys have less. There will never be a total system wide crash unless there is some sort of major disaster like a nuclear bomb going up or something and even then the survivors will recompose themselves and bring the system back up. The system is here to stay.. unfortunately.

If you are really bothered by government importing a bunch of foreigners.. Then hit the sack and start creating kids. Create so many kids that the economics work out without immigration... That's the system you've built. Ironically enough this is the white man's burden. Create babies or have the government import more bodies to keep the GDP and consumption going...

[TigOlBitties]

Delete. Just realized I can't talk about politics yet.

[zigZag]

(05-04-2017 03:29 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(05-04-2017 01:38 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

From 1960 to 2015 the population of Germany went from 72M to 81M, France 46M to 66M, UK 52m to 65M.

I assume that not all of it are non-european immigrants. There is shitload of us, we will not die out, we might get mixed out. There is no such thing as birth rate below replacement level if you kick out all the non-natives.

There is not less of us, but more, if there was some war as they usually were the population would decrease and increase after, it's normal. I don't see any problem there.

But of course, women should get married young and have children, but I don't exactly feel like there is less and less people in Europe, maybe just more of those that don't belong there.

Immigration - I heard many times from people that because birth rate is low we need to import people who will work for the ageing population, which is crap, it's easy to solve, strip women of their useless rights and fuck them, what they are going to do, right? But I don't think there is a need for more workers either way. By the way, it does not matter if it's a Iraqi garbage man or Indian doctor, we are good enough, don't need anybody else, I will be a good boy and let them keep their own skilled as well as those not skilled.

That is absolutely correct - Japan will still be Japan even with 50 mio. left. Germany however will not be Germany with 140 mio. - 80 mio. of which will be young Arab and African migrants.

The globalists claim that universal basic income must come because there is not enough work even with zero population growth:

http://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/u...-Work_.pdf

https://www.technocracy.news/index.html/2...ic-income/
http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk...017-2?IR=T

So if there is not enough work for the locals, then what makes anyone think that there will be work for far less qualified (on average) immigrants?

Uruz is right here - we don't need any menial workers and we don't need any doctors. We are covered on all thank you.

You can send in some 10 million women from Belarus, Ukraine and Russia and we will let everyone know whether we need any more violent low IQ Muslim men, but currently we are covered on that front as well.

The people coming in aren't coming in to work. That's where you guys are looking at it wrong. You have to look at it from the perspective of the people who actually have power. They are coming in to consume. The guy who owns a business wants to keep expanding and if the current market is saturated then he needs more people coming it to keep growing. It doesnt matter if the people who come in, come in and get on welfare... because they end up spending money on services that corporations (businessmen) provide. That's what this is about at the end of the day.

You can't stop it because frankly you have no power or control (not you specificallly but the average citizen who isnt a big industry player).

Japan will still be japanese but it will be a country with negative growth with capital flight and a severely damaged economy and credit rating... People in power will NEVER let that happen. I guarantee you that japan will start taking in immigrants before that happens because at the end of the day MONEY and WEALTH is all that matters. The immigrants may not be from africa or muslim countries.. it could be from asian countries around but it will happen before japan has to contend with shit hitting the fan economically.

Germany is fucked I've been there enough times to realize that germans prefer dogs to babies and they will simply get outbred. Such is the law of nature... so sad though since its a really beautiful place with super friendly people and i enjoy going there.

[Uruz]

(05-04-2017 03:28 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

2. Praying for collapse might be the only time I will invoke the largely useless but sometimes very relevant idea of "privilege." There is absolutely no way you grew up hungry, alone or desperate if you would "not mind" if society collapsed. Little chance you grew up in a war-torn country, know what it's like to be persecuted for you religious beliefs or have faced any sort of serious personal demon. That sort of bullshit talk is nothing more than the braying of a privileged buffoon.

3. My only piece of advice: stop being you.

I feel dirty for biting just this little bit on your comments.

Well we were war-torn so many times that all I need to do is to go and ask a grandpa. Nothing new. And yea, persecuted for beliefs, sorta "juvenile institution" because of a school work, I guess that not exactly like they would rape me, but it might still count in your book. :-D And dozen of other things. You know, I am not one of the guys that was like "Eee I don't like the idea that my son would be trans, so I will be with these guys from now on.".

But I don't think you are exactly right, more like - have you ever wondered how mind of those people that are so determined about something and are usually called "fanatics" looks like? Welcome to my world.

[rudebwoy]

@ZigZag - you understand the big picture, sadly Japan has already been hit with the Muslim "invasion".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistanis_in_Japan

[zigZag]

(05-04-2017 03:50 PM)Uruz Wrote:  

(05-04-2017 03:28 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

2. Praying for collapse might be the only time I will invoke the largely useless but sometimes very relevant idea of "privilege." There is absolutely no way you grew up hungry, alone or desperate if you would "not mind" if society collapsed. Little chance you grew up in a war-torn country, know what it's like to be persecuted for you religious beliefs or have faced any sort of serious personal demon. That sort of bullshit talk is nothing more than the braying of a privileged buffoon.

3. My only piece of advice: stop being you.

I feel dirty for biting just this little bit on your comments.

Well we were war-torn so many times that all I need to do is to go and ask a grandpa. Nothing new. And yea, persecuted for beliefs, sorta "juvenile institution" because of a school work, I guess that not exactly like they would rape me, but it might still count in your book. :-D And dozen of other things. You know, I am not one of the guys that was like "Eee I don't like the idea that my son would be trans, so I will be with these guys from now on.".

But I don't think you are exactly right, more like - have you ever wondered how mind of those people that are so determined about something and are usually called "fanatics" looks like? Welcome to my world.

I'm going to take a different route than insulting you...

However i will agree with parts of what was written there in terms of your survival skills. There is a big difference between being able to ask grandpa and doing it in real life. I would suggest you watch a few episodes of naked and afraid to get an idea of what things will be like when the "total collapse" comes... Unless you want to become one of those doomsday prepper guys (not a bad thing actually) If you truly believe in those things then you should practice survival skills like friction fire... building shelter, hunting, trapping etc... and you should probably have non perishable food stored and even things like a water filter and makeshift tent or something...

Well frankly what you're doing is mental masterbation.. unless you're going to preach the gospel and convert people to your way of thinking you're essentially wasting brain cycles jerking off to something that will never become a reality... essentially wasting your life.