[Number one bummer]

(02-18-2017 09:14 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

(02-18-2017 02:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Triggered:

Don't even listen to her, just watch her on mute... is that the face of a happy person?

That chick needs to lose 15 pounds, hit the gym to do some squats, and stop sneering all the time before she gets permanent wrinkles from it. Maybe she can still save herself; the raw material is there, if education didn't blend her mind too much to come back from.

Also, she spelled feminism wrong on her chalkboard wall. Better luck next time.

I watched it on mute and tried to guess what she was saying. I tried to imagine that I didn't know what the video was about or who Roosh was.

Based on her body language and facial expressions, I can only concur that Roosh kidnapped her family and released a ransom video. Her video was simply a plea to save their lives.

I did enjoy the part where she stated Roosh wanted to "legalize the rape omg." Then cried that she wished that the article was satire

[StrikeBack]

(02-14-2017 01:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Are you guys meeting girls like this in cities? This type of girl is elusive to me.

My wife is like that, and I met her in a very feminist city, although she's from a small town. She's transitioned from working full time to part time now with a new home business, because she's much happier taking care of me and making money for our family than for someone else. When we have children, which would be pretty soon, she will be a full time stay-at-home wife and mother.

She was doing a degree when I met her, but dropped out because the teaching was rubbish (among many things, they replaced good teachers with cheap Indian ones who can barely explain anything) and she was already working in her field with higher skills than the instructors she had at univeristy. The studying was also taking a lot of time and she couldn't stand being away from me for that much time during the week. Instead of paying more for university (luckily we have a better system than America, so not much debt) I taught her to use the money to invest in a home business.

I don't really meet girls like her in the cities. Elusive would be the right word, which is why I married her. Her friends from the same small town aren't like her either, even though they generally got married in their early to mid 20s, to church betas around their age or younger that they can boss around. They are career first all the way, with the expectation that their husband is their helper, just not as outwardly nasty as your typical city feminist.

[Roosh]

My original rant is now in drawing form:

[Simeon_Strangelight]

I think we should encourage every woman to get a Masters in that field here:

https://news.tnaflix.com/featured/trends...eal-thing/



Not all education is useless for a woman.

[Jean Valjean]

From the Slate article "About That Overpopulation Problem":

Slate Wrote:

We know how to dampen excessive population growth—just educate girls. The other problem has proved much more intractable: No one’s figured out how to boost fertility in countries where it has imploded. . . . .

One of the first things that countries do when they start to develop is educate their young people, including girls. That dramatically improves the size and quality of the workforce. But it also introduces an opportunity cost for having babies. “Women with more schooling tend to have fewer children,” says William Butz, a senior research scholar at IIASA. . . . .

Most of our friends have just one or two kids, too, and like us they regard the prospect of having three or four kids the way most people look at ultramarathoning or transoceanic sailing—admirable pursuits, but only for the very committed.

That attitude could do for Homo sapiens what that giant asteroid did for the dinosaurs. If humanity is going to sustain itself, then the number of couples deciding to have three or four kids will consistently have to exceed the number opting to raise one or zero.

[Conquerer7]

Saw something that made me watch this again. It is so damn true.