[Jackreacher]

Hahaha explain to a woman

[Roosh]

[url=https://twitter.com/FifnIsForNobody/status/828247432882507776][/url]

[MongolianAbroad]

(02-04-2017 06:12 PM)Genghis Khan Wrote:  

In 20-30 years we're going to see the huge effect of the current sexual marketplace. A lot of betas are dropping out and giving up. The gaps are going to be filled by airheaded MBAs with questionable ethics. This is going to hit society real badly. I myself have a strong engineering background and I've noticed that as I've shifted my focus towards game my professional career has taken a backseat. As I moved forward in life, I'm having to think about how my career choices affect my ability to game girls - I'm moving away from opportunities in the middle of nowhere (that would be amazing career-wise) to focus on crappier opportunities in big cities, just so I can get laid more often. It's a variable that quite frankly should not have to a factor.

So true, man, ever since my travels abroad about two years ago or so allowed me to see firsthand the the shit sandwich America is in regards to this, my sole focus has been on how to become location independent. I achieved it, and I should be able to bounce towards the end of the year, but I haven't worked a 9 to 5 in years now, when I might have if I had a good girl and a family.

These social changes are going to have massive impacts down the line.

Also, I wouldn't call family men betas, being a family man doesn't correlate with being beta. You can be a beta family guy, but you can also be an alpha family guy.

[John Michael Kane]

(02-05-2017 03:19 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/FifnIsForNobody/status/828247432882507776][/url]

Lady, it isn't just what you've done, it is what you've failed to do; Be a feminine woman!

When you view nothing but cat videos all day long while working at your corporate job, Youtube's code must have determined she needed a little Roosh as an antidote. Hilarious.

[JWLZG]

The definition of this idea needs to be clarified — it's only in affluent 21st century Western societies that we can equate "education" with "higher education", something which less than 10% of society, and less than 1% of people who have ever lived, have undertaken.

Obviously, "education" in its rawest sense encompasses more than that; it can be as rudimentary as a teacher sitting on a tree stump in a Papua New Guinean village teaching the alphabet. Quite a far cry from the Ivy League Marxist indoctrination camps we have in mind.

What would the manosphere define as "education" in proposing that women be proscribed from it? Would it be a hard line — i.e. barring women from not just any formal schooling, but also the chance to learn how to read, write, count, and understand how the wider world works? Or a much softer approach on the other end — Being OK with them finishing secondary education, but disincentivising university, let alone the ambition to want to become doctors, pioneering scientists, etc.

And even if there are multiple grounds for such a hard-line stance, while that might have sufficed for housewife material in days gone by, some form of literacy and mechanical reasoning will be required to operate household appliances and cook (unless we go back to the days when recipes were passed down by word of mouth).

[weambulance]

I'm not ready to address the substance of the video, but to answer the OP's question...

I've talked to many women about the bill of goods they're being sold by feminism. Almost all of them reject the notion that they're being brainwashed into giving up happiness, and bringing it up is a really good way to make sure you don't bang the girl in question because you'll get her all pissed off if you don't run perfect game in the process.

It's playing with fire, basically. If you do it too much, especially if it's with girls who know each other, you're just going to fuck yourself over and cultivate your own individual pussy desert.

---------

As to the video presentation, I really like these youtube videos compared with periscope. Periscope is janky as fuck.

[[email protected]]

Education is framed as a benefit for all people but really who is receiving the benefits and who is losing out? Women are spending their peak reproductive years learning useless material or things men do better and more productively. Men are losing out in jobs and becoming increasingly subjected to higher scrutiny from hypergamous women thus leading us to where we are now where only the top 10-20% men get everything and the rest gets the scraps or nothing. Educational attainment is just another shit test designed to cock block men and we're all cucked into paying for it.

[John Michael Kane]

(02-05-2017 07:29 PM)[email protected] Wrote:  

Education is framed as a benefit for all people but really who is receiving the benefits and who is losing out? Women are spending their peak reproductive years learning useless material or things men do better and more productively. Men are losing out in jobs and becoming increasingly subjected to higher scrutiny from hypergamous women thus leading us to where we are now where only the top 10-20% men get everything and the rest gets the scraps or nothing. Educational attainment is just another shit test designed to cock block men and we're all cucked into paying for it.

Women's education certainly feeds into hypergamy and higher cock counts. This is especially true for fields like being a lawyer or doctor. The long hours and 7+ years of education required to become a professional of that level is a massive waste of time and money when most of them eventually become wives and all that cost and education is gone to waste when it would have been better for her husband to get that slot (or another man). For top-notch fields requiring massive dedication, they should be run by men, no doubt.

[Bazzwaldo]

Evolution of humans requires investment from both sexes, one hunts, the other gathers, nothing has changed in terms of contemporary living in regards to our genetic makeup, it has though through social conditioning
Feminism is a cultural marxist movement intent on causing disharmony between sexes...women who believe in feminism lack the self control to see that they are the target and are being played for a higher purpose
The global elite needed to access more labour so broke the family unit, this had two beneficial outcomes, cheap domestic labour and disharmony between sexes, the latter giving the state massive intervention oportunities and legal remedies furthering the devision
A woman's role is synergistic to men's when one applies the hunter gatherer roles that evolution forged, no amount of socialisation will alter that

[Panokko]

Getting a higher education for women, plays perfectly into their hypergamous tendencies: They are attracted to high value (read well educated) men. And the colleges and universities are the places where they go and look for these men. Ask any college educated women what kind of partner she wants, and the answer will always include a higher education.

[John Michael Kane]

(02-05-2017 11:23 PM)Panokko Wrote:  

Getting a higher education for women, plays perfectly into their hypergamous tendencies: They are attracted to high value (read well educated) men. And the colleges and universities are the places where they go and look for these men. Ask any college educated women what kind of partner she wants, and the answer will always include a higher education.

Women used to go to college to find a college-educated man, that way she could get her MRS. degree. Now women are attending to get a career, and then mayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyybe a husband 10 years later. Their priorities and timeline don't line up. It is especially leaving working class men and women in the dust. They are barely marrying at all. Tons of kids out of wedlock.

Too many people competing for jobs now that men and women are attempting to enter the workforce in massive numbers, pitting men against women. The only solution is to quietly encourage male managers to hire mostly men, very few women, to avoid lawsuits but make a dent.

[Panokko]

(02-05-2017 11:29 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

Women used to go to college to find a college-educated man, that way she could get her MRS. degree. Now women are attending to get a career, and then mayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyybe a husband 10 years later. Their priorities and timeline don't line up.

Sad thing is: the smart women know that they have an expiration date and that they need to find their man before the age of 25. It is the not-so-smart ones that get the useless education (in their unfocused manner), ride the college cock-carousel, and end up barren and alone with low paying wage-slave jobs. If I look around in my own social circle I see way to many 'educated' women alone.

[eskimobobseal]

Women in the workforce accomplished the following:

-Reduced wages by overpopulating the job market.

-Lead women to attain "higher education" (college degrees) in environments that promote homosexuality, feminism and other degenerate behaviors/ideologies, where they ride the cock carousel for a while before getting a career and waiting until they've hit the wall to think about settling down.

-Lowered the birth rate in Western civilization which perpetuates the globalist depopulation agenda pushed by elites like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds.

-Divided the sexes, destroyed the bond between men and women who are supposed to be partners rather than competitors (according to nature, and if you're a Christian - Biblical gender roles), this forced the sexes to compete with each other for job opportunities. Divorce rates have since skyrocketed.

-Destroyed the nuclear family unit. With mommy working in a cubicle for a mega corporation, children have been left to be raised by the state.

In an ideal world, women would only take up jobs that utilize their feminine, nurturing qualities (baby sitter, nurse, etc) to add supplemental income for a family if it is needed while most of them choose motherhood as a "career".

[John Michael Kane]

(02-06-2017 12:24 AM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  

Women in the workforce accomplished the following:

-Reduced wages by overpopulating the job market.

-Lead women to attain "higher education" (college degrees) in environments that promote homosexuality, feminism and other degenerate behaviors/ideologies, where they ride the cock carousel for a while before getting a career and waiting until they've hit the wall to think about settling down.

-Lowered the birth rate in Western civilization which perpetuates the globalist depopulation agenda pushed by elites like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds.

-Divided the sexes, destroyed the bond between men and women who are supposed to be partners rather than competitors (according to nature, and if you're a Christian - Biblical gender roles), this forced the sexes to compete with each other for job opportunities. Divorce rates have since skyrocketed.

-Destroyed the nuclear family unit. With mommy working in a cubicle for a mega corporation, children have been left to be raised by the state.

In an ideal world, women would only take up jobs that utilize their feminine, nurturing qualities (baby sitter, nurse, etc) to add supplemental income for a family if it is needed while most of them choose motherhood as a "career".

[TigerTim]

Woman no longer need a provider, since they can provide themselves.. they can take care of their own children and work, kind of speak against the nature of early humans..but well everything changes with time..

[Elster]

(02-06-2017 06:15 AM)TigerTim Wrote:  

Woman no longer need a provider, since they can provide themselves.. they can take care of their own children and work, kind of speak against the nature of early humans..but well everything changes with time..

Not neccesarily when it is actually someone else(the state/divorce/pension.etc) doing the providing. Should this/these provider/s fail. What would happen?Or rather, what is happening?

Raising offspring requires providing and nurturing, a single individual is very unlikely to be able to provide both at the same time. Nature has a way of dividing the workforce of biology.
Let's say we have the proverbial "provider"-man or woman- , how can he/she be effective in his/her provision duties if he/she doesnt get enough rest from one activity in order to perform effectively the following day when the factor of having also carry on the nurturing divides and impedes him/her from fully focusing on the task?

How does biology determine which gender is better suited for respective tasks?
--->Which gender has a body designed to incubate and posteriorly feed the offspring?
Which Gender is more physiologically inclined to competition-dealing and receiving damage, pursuing an objective single-mindedly?
Which Gender has on the contrary, a more cooperative and comunitarian psychological predisposition towards its species?

Lets translate this into the "education" field.
Let's say education is a tool that helps the species achieve its goals/perform its duties.
Which of these two genders would benefit or better reap the benefits of this tool?
If everyone is doing the same task,what about the OTHER tasks that while not as visible are still required for the machinery to work properly? (think of the trash services in a city for example)


There's mavericks everywhere but a single or a handful of mavericks a society do not make...

[scotian]

I'm fortunate enough to work in an industry that is about 95% men: NO SNATCH IN THE OIL PATCH!

[John Michael Kane]

I'll bet the remaining 5% are all hard core lesbians.

[scotian]

(02-06-2017 05:38 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

I'll bet the remaining 5% are all hard core lesbians.

Female welders, pipefitters and boilermakers are definitely a rough bunch, not the type you'd take home to mom!

[John Michael Kane]

Good friends to have if you need to have some fabrication done, but not exactly intoxicating femininity that's says... I want this to be the mother of my future children.

[kavi]

I thought this subject was closed...

(12-09-2016 09:28 PM)kavi Wrote:  

An educated woman is an oxy-moron.

[Mr. Wolf]

(02-05-2017 07:54 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

. This is especially true for fields like being a lawyer or doctor. The long hours and 7+ years of education required to become a professional of that level is a massive waste of time and money when most of them eventually become wives and all that cost and education is gone to waste when it would have been better for her husband to get that slot (or another man). For top-notch fields requiring massive dedication, they should be run by men, no doubt.

That is spot-on. Very few hetero women want to work. Instead, they want to live off their husband's earnings. They claim to want to compete in the work world, and I think some actually believe it while they are relatively young. But by their late 30s or early 40s almost no woman sticks with work if her husband earns enough for them to live comfortably. Even the ones without children will end up concocting some scheme to quit work and live off their man. That's what my wife did.

All that said, don't say any of this stuff during a date, no good can come of it.

[Thomas the Rhymer]

I think American women are different from the kinds of girls that I know that have gone on to study... I've met plenty of student girls who can really focus and and I've met plenty of student guys who can't focus at all and blame everyone and everything except themselves for their poor focus.

So that was an odd video to watch, because it's not been what I've experienced.

That said, a lot of education is indeed useless, but why blame women when the system is at fault?

I personally think that a woman with a small amount of education is going to be a better mother and wife than someone who can only read, write, count. If a wife has a small side business to help tide over the bad times in a husband's career, or can do her husband's bookkeeping, or can teach their children a different language, or can encourage a child's creativity through art appreciation, or whatever, this seems better to me than a woman who is only interested in making babies, cooking, and watching dumb stuff on television.

I believe that education can lend a lot of grace to feminine woman, although I agree that it is sad when chooses anything as a priority over family raising. But education doesn't have to take away from family rearing, I've seen plenty of girls fall pregnant in university and they just carried on. One girl in med school even gave birth on a Saturday and was back doing clinical rounds on the Monday. This is a bit extreme and it's a pity that a newborn baby had to be deprived of its mother so soon, but learning doesn't have to fit a rigid schedule and part-time and home-study options are always available; education is not a barrier to raising a family, although many women choose to use education as an excuse to not start one.

Even if a woman chooses to first have kids then get further education, I think that's a great example to the children that studying and learning isn't just something forced on them in school, but that it's a part of adult life as well.

Again, while men definitely, on average, have greater focus than women, I've met too many exceptions to declare this as an iron rule of biology and that we must build up an entire society around the idea that man = focus and woman = adhd.

[Kaizen]

I deal with a lot of 20 something women at my work. I now always refer to this video in my head.

The truth is really plain as day.

Why waste prime fertile years, to have a kid in your 30s. (or 40s for that matter here in the west)

[robreke]

(02-05-2017 06:00 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

I'm not ready to address the substance of the video, but to answer the OP's question...

I've talked to many women about the bill of goods they're being sold by feminism. Almost all of them reject the notion that they're being brainwashed into giving up happiness, and bringing it up is a really good way to make sure you don't bang the girl in question because you'll get her all pissed off if you don't run perfect game in the process.

It's playing with fire, basically. If you do it too much, especially if it's with girls who know each other, you're just going to fuck yourself over and cultivate your own individual pussy desert.

---------

As to the video presentation, I really like these youtube videos compared with periscope. Periscope is janky as fuck.

They're not interested in the truth. It's too overt. Too offensive.

It causes discomfort because it's not in line with how they've been raised and acculturated.

Then again, that shouldn't be a surprise. As we all know, being truthful with young, attractive, modern-day Western women leads to loneliness:

e.g. "You look beautiful." "I missed you" "I like you" - any poor sap who runs this kind of "truth game" will ruin attraction and be friend zoned faster than a spittle evaporating off heated oven coils.