rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Julian Assange thread
#76

Julian Assange thread

If Sam Harris isn't "left" then I'm obviously so confused that I've lost all reference of chirality

You don't get there till you get there
Reply
#77

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-17-2016 04:55 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

Quote: (10-17-2016 04:50 AM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

A few bottles of wine and you can say you fucked Pamela Anderson (minus the hep). What's not to like?

The hep.

And her face. She isn't 25 anymore.

Wow, I just checked, she is 49 now. I would have guessed 60 at a minimum. The wall is not friendly. Or pretty.

edit, jeez she really was stunning 25 years ago.

Things I learnt on RVF today:

1. I look better than Pamela Anderson

2. A Muslim girl who wears the hijab has a notch count of 12 at a US college and therefore has more notches than most White men under 30 years of age.

Strange times.
Reply
#78

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-18-2016 10:35 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

The Left's silence on the suppression and silencing of Julian Assange is deafening.

It is not silent, it has thrown him under the bus.

Quote:Quote:

Julian Assange is no hero of the left – after years evading justice, he’s now buddying up with Donald Trump

As he faces questioning in London, the liberal left must accept the significant role the WikiLeaks founder is playing in Trump’s presidential campaign

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/juli...65911.html
Reply
#79

Julian Assange thread

Looks like the dead man's switch has activated on Assange,

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-18...nd-unencry

Many new files open on the site:

https://file.wikileaks.org/file

Contributor at Return of Kings.  I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.

Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
Reply
#80

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-18-2016 02:20 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

Quote: (10-18-2016 10:35 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

The Left's silence on the suppression and silencing of Julian Assange is deafening.

It is not silent, it has thrown him under the bus.

Quote:Quote:

Julian Assange is no hero of the left – after years evading justice, he’s now buddying up with Donald Trump

As he faces questioning in London, the liberal left must accept the significant role the WikiLeaks founder is playing in Trump’s presidential campaign

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/juli...65911.html

[Image: wink.gif]

The same crowd supporting Killary and backing the jihadists fighting against a secular government that is ideologically firmly in the Left camp, i.e. Syria.

Some poster said a few posts back that I am old school CCCP, damn fucking right I am. And proud.
Reply
#81

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-18-2016 03:04 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Looks like the dead man's switch has activated on Assange,

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-18...nd-unencry

Many new files open on the site:

https://file.wikileaks.org/file

Might be automatic due to not logging in for x time. I don't think the globalists would KILL him before the election. That comes after.
Reply
#82

Julian Assange thread

It should be clear now, that many people are using "The Left", to refer to supporters of the Democrats, people who voted Remain, SJWs, various media 'personalities', and so on.

I've noticed a lot of confusion here when we're discussing who are the actors and who is being acted upon within the right/left and nationalist/globalist frameworks.

The way I see it is like this: There is no Right-Left at the top of society. The people at the top are generally Globalist. The Right-Left divide is at the lower end of the pyramid. The Left generally parrot the Globalist's narratives and rhetoric(diversity is our strength, everyone is equal, etc). The Right usually want national sovereignty and governance that is not under the Globalist yoke; The Left calls them racist, xenophobic and brainwashed if the person is from a minority group("Why would a black person want a civic nationalist to run America", The Left can't get their head around this). There are very few Nationalists at the top of the pyramid, they're trying to use the political process and support from below to move up.

The political and ideological arena of today seems to be more polarised than it has ever been. I wonder if it is what happens before revolution(fundamental structural change). Today there is next to no middle-ground in where you stand politically and ideologically. It seems to be you either think feminism is bullshit and nations should be sovereign, or everyone is equal and global government is the way forward.

This is partly due to more people being low-information, but thinking they're high-information because they've mangled their thinking with perverse ideologies. Being Left in today's world is about status and signalling, and has very little to do with understanding politics and society. A sense of status and virtue is derived from proclaiming one's political position:"I vote Green because I care about our future, you don't vote like me because you're <insert pejorative>", "Jeremy Corbyn is a great leader because he travels on public transport to virtue-signal make a statement about how bad our privitised train system is". In the affluent areas of where I live, nearly every house has a Green or a Labour sign outside during local elections. Lot of them also have "rapefugees welcome" posters in their windows. Sad.

People like Traktor are a total anomaly! And not really within our definition of "Leftist".
Reply
#83

Julian Assange thread

I think this was a great "psyop" play on behalf fo the Ecuadorean govt and Julian Assange. Assange doesn't need their internet access to communicate with people. He has at his disposal many means of communicating(hi tech as well as lo tech) with whoever does the publishing which is why you will not see leaks stopping, but possibly increasing. In the meantime, the powers that be will think they've scored a victory and won't be breathing down Ecuador's back. Great play by Assange.
Reply
#84

Julian Assange thread

Weaponized Autism keeps getting kills.

[Image: nzh0j0ym1dsx.jpg]
Reply
#85

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-18-2016 02:12 PM)N°6 Wrote:  

Quote: (10-17-2016 04:55 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

Quote: (10-17-2016 04:50 AM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

A few bottles of wine and you can say you fucked Pamela Anderson (minus the hep). What's not to like?

The hep.

And her face. She isn't 25 anymore.

Wow, I just checked, she is 49 now. I would have guessed 60 at a minimum. The wall is not friendly. Or pretty.

edit, jeez she really was stunning 25 years ago.

Things I learnt on RVF today:

1. I look better than Pamela Anderson

2. A Muslim girl who wears the hijab has a notch count of 12 at a US college and therefore has more notches than most White men under 30 years of age.

Strange times.

Anderson was born a Canuck and got too much SoCal sun (and not enough 'work' done, ie, to her face).

NOW you understand.

“There is no global anthem, no global currency, no certificate of global citizenship. We pledge allegiance to one flag, and that flag is the American flag!” -DJT
Reply
#86

Julian Assange thread

Why is that when Julian Assange Wikileaks leaked thousands of info on George Bush's Afghanistan war, it wasn't viewed that serious as Wikileaks anticipating to release emails which could indict Hillary Clinton, a white feminist woman?

What does feminist Hilary Clinton have to hide that makes it appear more sinister than George Bush Afghanistan -Iraq war racket?

One thing for sure is that feminists don't really like to be exposed.
Reply
#87

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-19-2016 05:41 AM)RBerkley Wrote:  

Why is that when Julian Assange Wikileaks leaked thousands of info on George Bush's Afghanistan war, it wasn't viewed that serious as Wikileaks anticipating to release emails which could indict Hillary Clinton, a white feminist woman?

What does feminist Hilary Clinton have to hide that makes it appear more sinister than George Bush Afghanistan -Iraq war racket?

One thing for sure is that feminists don't really like to be exposed.

Liberals/globalists currently own:
  • The federal government
  • The schools
  • The unversities
  • The media
  • Most corporations
  • Many local governments
The level of brainwashing is so high that to acknowledge that people have been duped for so long results in cognitive dissonance that cannot be dealt with head-on by the weak-willed.

Just finding a small piece of truth out there is a hate fact. It conflicts with everything they've been told for decades, and they cannot handle it without rage.

[Image: 12cO77CLmhvDGw.gif]
Reply
#88

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-19-2016 05:41 AM)RBerkley Wrote:  

....
One thing for sure is that feminists don't really like to be exposed.

Maybe that's for the best...

[Image: barf.gif]

The public will judge a man by what he lifts, but those close to him will judge him by what he carries.
Reply
#89

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-19-2016 12:34 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

Weaponized Autism keeps getting kills.

That was a good catch. Explains a few things. Even for a man that could be a little rough with grown women, jumping down to a full blown pedophile is a huge leap. Not hebephile, but a pedophile.

The wild story of how he allegedly came into contact with this 8 year old, sounded like some bullshit plot from CW Network show.

The more they keep trying the more mistakes they make. This is great.

Someone posted the embassy's statement on why they cut off his access, in the Trump thread.

[Image: attachment.jpg33987]

You can tell it took a long time to write up that statement. It sounded good and read exceptionally well.

Still smells like bullshit though. I know others in RVF think Ecuador's govt. is some Hillary friendly ultra leftist sympathizer that wanted Julian to stop messing with her, but that isn't correct at all. They hate Obama, Kerry, and both Clintons. Like I stated in another post, the American govt. has been flooding their country with guns and disrupting it's stability for decades now. Obama actually made it worse with Fast and the Furious. I highly doubt Hillary would depart from that course.

If you read this press release they actually lay out a good case for why they did it. The same exact reason I slammed Julian for weeks ago. He is stepping out of the Journalist box, and becoming a Non-State Actor. Twitter fighting, holding scoops, video conferences, personal spats, and grandstanding on balconies, is NOT journalism!!! He was acting like a guerilla force from inside another country's territory. ISIS, Somali Pirates, etc. all hold this distinction. They were basically harboring a Digital Terrorist for a few months.

Give Ecuador some credit. They have some smart enough folks in their government to identify that. By letting him peacock inside the embassy, he was giving Foreign State Actors (US, UK, etc.), a sort of cassus belli (legitimate or legal cause for war)/green light to conduct an operation that could have caused deaths in the form of an attack or strike.

They know that Wikileaks can still do it's journalistic work without Julian peacocking, and in that letter, they made sure to point that out.

Also, like I called earlier, they made sure to note they were not moved by Kerry threats. He cannot possibly make their lives or country worse than they already is. If they were smart they would wait and see if Trump gets in. If he does, kick out Julian and let him find another place to live. Trump would not waste precious political capital trying to extradite or catch him. Trump will have his hands full with a shitload of reforms and investigations. If you are not evil, Julian has nothing to report on you in the first place.

Dating Guide for Mainland China Datasheet
TravelerKai's Martial Arts Datasheet
1 John 4:20 - If anyone says, I love God, and hates (detests, abominates) his brother [in Christ], he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, Whom he has not seen.
Reply
#90

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-19-2016 08:44 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

You can tell it took a long time to write up that statement. It sounded good and read exceptionally well.

Still smells like bullshit though. I know others in RVF think Ecuador's govt. is some Hillary friendly ultra leftist sympathizer that wanted Julian to stop messing with her, but that isn't correct at all. They hate Obama, Kerry, and both Clintons. Like I stated in another post, the American govt. has been flooding their country with guns and disrupting it's stability for decades now. Obama actually made it worse with Fast and the Furious. I highly doubt Hillary would depart from that course.

False. This is what they "claim" and what they "say". It is not the reality. Classic Ecuadorian government under Correa. They say one thing, and do another, and people buy into the BS because this guy a world class manipulators along with a world class verbal ability.

Just like they say that they hate Chevron and what they really were doing was getting money under the table for PetroEcuador and making sleazy contracts for the higher ups.

Just like they claim they are "environmentally conscious" and want to "preserve nature" and what they are currently doing is exploiting the oil found in the jungle/yasuni, and killing high ranking officials of the indigenous tribes. Funny thing is that in the constitution they say any crime against nature will be punished, yet look at what's happening.

Just like they claim that there is no anti government censorship, but if one of their own starts challenging their ideas they are immediately fired/ridule, and kick out of high government positions.

Just like they say they have build "amazing roads" and bridges/infrastructure, but in reality the majority of those projects were done with bad material, and a lot of the stuff is breaking down as we speak because of massive corruption and those in charge of the projects got a huge chunk of the money.

The crime rate has spike during his administration due to the facts of the extreme gun control happening in the country. And if I'm not mistaken any crime of stealing less than 500 dollars is not punishable with absolutely nothing. In fact, he mention it in some of his weekly speeches if somebody steals from you, then let them steal. To top it off, the police force is a complete joke. They shouldn't even be called police more like clowns.

Just like he claims past government were shit and couldn't do anything right. But right now Ecuador is sitting on a dept on over 40 billion (remember when they defaulted in the early 2000's with a measly 3 billion). Basically they are owned by the Chinese. Ecuador now has the dollar, and things are twice as expensive as in the US including food, but the national average wage is barely 500 dollars.

And the list goes on on the double standards happening in the country. This is barely the tip of the iceberg. Don't even get me started on the "war on drugs" thing going on.

Quote: (10-19-2016 08:44 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

Give Ecuador some credit. They have some smart enough folks in their government to identify that. By letting him peacock inside the embassy, he was giving Foreign State Actors (US, UK, etc.), a sort of cassus belli (legitimate or legal cause for war)/green light to conduct an operation that could have caused deaths in the form of an attack or strike.

They know that Wikileaks can still do it's journalistic work without Julian peacocking, and in that letter, they made sure to point that out.

Also, like I called earlier, they made sure to note they were not moved by Kerry threats. He cannot possibly make their lives or country worse than they already is. If they were smart they would wait and see if Trump gets in. If he does, kick out Julian and let him find another place to live. Trump would not waste precious political capital trying to extradite or catch him. Trump will have his hands full with a shitload of reforms and investigations. If you are not evil, Julian has nothing to report on you in the first place.

Like I said earlier, the government currently in Ecuador is a world class bulshitter. I personally believe that Correa is a controlled opposition/spy of the globalist. But then again he does erratic things from time to time that makes me question his motives like hosting Assange. Then again he could just be a crazy power hungry egomaniac individual like that time when the earthquake happen and he came to visit a town, and people were screaming to him "help", "water", "food", and then some people started crying....he got all angry and told them "don't cry!! Anybody that cries I will arrest them!!" lol
Reply
#91

Julian Assange thread

Quote: (10-19-2016 11:39 AM)ChemicalFreezer Wrote:  

Quote: (10-19-2016 08:44 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

You can tell it took a long time to write up that statement. It sounded good and read exceptionally well.

Still smells like bullshit though. I know others in RVF think Ecuador's govt. is some Hillary friendly ultra leftist sympathizer that wanted Julian to stop messing with her, but that isn't correct at all. They hate Obama, Kerry, and both Clintons. Like I stated in another post, the American govt. has been flooding their country with guns and disrupting it's stability for decades now. Obama actually made it worse with Fast and the Furious. I highly doubt Hillary would depart from that course.

False. This is what they "claim" and what they "say". It is not the reality. Classic Ecuadorian government under Correa. They say one thing, and do another, and people buy into the BS because this guy a world class manipulators along with a world class verbal ability.

Just like they say that they hate Chevron and what they really were doing was getting money under the table for PetroEcuador and making sleazy contracts for the higher ups.

Just like they claim they are "environmentally conscious" and want to "preserve nature" and what they are currently doing is exploiting the oil found in the jungle/yasuni, and killing high ranking officials of the indigenous tribes. Funny thing is that in the constitution they say any crime against nature will be punished, yet look at what's happening.

Just like they claim that there is no anti government censorship, but if one of their own starts challenging their ideas they are immediately fired/ridule, and kick out of high government positions.

Just like they say they have build "amazing roads" and bridges/infrastructure, but in reality the majority of those projects were done with bad material, and a lot of the stuff is breaking down as we speak because of massive corruption and those in charge of the projects got a huge chunk of the money.

The crime rate has spike during his administration due to the facts of the extreme gun control happening in the country. And if I'm not mistaken any crime of stealing less than 500 dollars is not punishable with absolutely nothing. In fact, he mention it in some of his weekly speeches if somebody steals from you, then let them steal. To top it off, the police force is a complete joke. They shouldn't even be called police more like clowns.

Just like he claims past government were shit and couldn't do anything right. But right now Ecuador is sitting on a dept on over 40 billion (remember when they defaulted in the early 2000's with a measly 3 billion). Basically they are owned by the Chinese. Ecuador now has the dollar, and things are twice as expensive as in the US including food, but the national average wage is barely 500 dollars.

And the list goes on on the double standards happening in the country. This is barely the tip of the iceberg. Don't even get me started on the "war on drugs" thing going on.

Quote: (10-19-2016 08:44 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

Give Ecuador some credit. They have some smart enough folks in their government to identify that. By letting him peacock inside the embassy, he was giving Foreign State Actors (US, UK, etc.), a sort of cassus belli (legitimate or legal cause for war)/green light to conduct an operation that could have caused deaths in the form of an attack or strike.

They know that Wikileaks can still do it's journalistic work without Julian peacocking, and in that letter, they made sure to point that out.

Also, like I called earlier, they made sure to note they were not moved by Kerry threats. He cannot possibly make their lives or country worse than they already is. If they were smart they would wait and see if Trump gets in. If he does, kick out Julian and let him find another place to live. Trump would not waste precious political capital trying to extradite or catch him. Trump will have his hands full with a shitload of reforms and investigations. If you are not evil, Julian has nothing to report on you in the first place.

Like I said earlier, the government currently in Ecuador is a world class bulshitter. I personally believe that Correa is a controlled opposition/spy of the globalist. But then again he does erratic things from time to time that makes me question his motives like hosting Assange. Then again he could just be a crazy power hungry egomaniac individual like that time when the earthquake happen and he came to visit a town, and people were screaming to him "help", "water", "food", and then some people started crying....he got all angry and told them "don't cry!! Anybody that cries I will arrest them!!" lol

Nothing I said was false. You can hate someone and still use them at the same time. Those are not mutually exclusive concepts.

What do you mean, like you said earlier? Are you a troll account of someone else? Your post count is way too low to be in here.

You should go back to lurking and learn how to correctly form proper arguments. Cherry picking a sentence of someone, calling them wrong completely out of context, to form a rant of how much you personally think Ecuador's leaders are bullshitters, is absurd.

Dating Guide for Mainland China Datasheet
TravelerKai's Martial Arts Datasheet
1 John 4:20 - If anyone says, I love God, and hates (detests, abominates) his brother [in Christ], he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, Whom he has not seen.
Reply
#92

Julian Assange thread

^^^This is some of the dirtiest shit I could imagine. It is hard for me to even believe it is real.
Reply
#93

Julian Assange thread

Remember Kim Dotcom?

Wonder what he's holding?

[Image: lFOIjGr.jpg]
Reply
#94

Julian Assange thread

Many are claiming Assange is dead or held captive on the grounds of his tweets since the incident taking on a completely different tone.

If you're going to try, go all the way. There is no other feeling like that. You will be alone with the gods, and the nights will flame with fire. You will ride life straight to perfect laughter. It's the only good fight there is.

Disable "Click here to Continue"

My Testosterone Adventure: Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V

Quote:Quote:
if it happened to you it’s your fault, I got no sympathy and I don’t believe your version of events.
Reply
#95

Julian Assange thread

Can anyone get on twitter right now?
Reply
#96

Julian Assange thread

^

I've had twitter open since I got up, it's working fine for me but there is less activity than normal and a number of links are dead.
Reply
#97

Julian Assange thread

It's down or loading only some parts of the page here in London. [Image: dodgy.gif]

[Image: attachment.jpg34056]   
Reply
#98

Julian Assange thread

Twitter has apparently been down for an hour.

We broke the system.

You don't get there till you get there
Reply
#99

Julian Assange thread

Any chance Twitter is down in an effort to thwart WikiLeaks from uploading new stuff?
Reply

Julian Assange thread

Maybe the powers that be are doing it in order to push the Russian hacker threat angle.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)