The Rationalization is very strong in this thread
"You either build or destroy,where you come from?"
Quote: (08-29-2016 10:13 AM)Repo Wrote:
How can you not be sure with how OP intended to use it when you read the entirety of the thread title? "Expected outcome"… what else could he be imlying here? He is literally saying that if you date interacially you will get fucked, and you are debating his true intention? Even without the use of the term "coalburning", the title would read "White woman dates black man, expected outcome". Still racist.
Quote: (08-29-2016 10:56 AM)Fortis Wrote:
Thoughtgypsy, why do you and others persist in saying "well black people do it too!?"
That has nothing to do with this thread. Rev, Sidney and Nomad can't seem to get off that bit, but I wasn't expecting you to jump on that as well.
I will state this plainly for everyone because no matter how many times I've said it everyone seems to gloss over it and bring it up again:
Of course, Blacks, Asians, and other people are racist.
Who is denying that? This isn't some SJW haven where we say dumb shit like "only people in power can be racist" or some other manner of feminist bullshit.
The real world has idiots, but that isn't how RVF is; we don't kowtow to that sort of behavior. I'd get kicked out of here fast if I said, "you white boys need to lay off our black women." I also don't really give a fuck what you guys do.
You will rarely see black membership on RVF hating on white guys trying to swoop black girls. I've gone out with Asian and White guys from this great forum and seen them hit on Black chicks. I'm all for it. Sure, some idiot outside may not like it, but assuming that we are all complicit in the black anti-Interracial shit is retarded.
That'd be like me assuming all the white guys here tacitly agree with some outlandish race nonsense (like Enfield's thread title choice).
The only reason I took offense to this thread and its title is because guys were coming in here saying that we (black guys) were wrong to be insulted by Enfield's stupid thread title choice. You can point out a man's game without referring to the activity as "coalburning." That sort of thing is cowardly. I don't know if Enfield has bone to pick with black guys and I won't speculate.
It is VERY easy for non-blacks to say "guys, I just said 'nigger' why are you guys getting so angry? It isn't a big deal." but, like Excelsior said, don't expect for shit to be cool between you and the black man in question after something like that.
TG, I've talked to you a lot outside of this forum, so don't take it personally, but I think you're missing the point of why the black membership of RVF is annoyed in the first place.
This isn't to say that we have the final say on anything, but was it really worth it for Enfield to use "coalburning" in his thread title?
Just seems like crass nonsense from an otherwise OK forum member.
Quote: (08-29-2016 09:57 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
So, race is always going to be a contentious topic for different groups for different reasons. The tension that many people hold privately gets wound up, and when these topics are breached that resentment boils to the forefront. On these issues we're often coming from completely different perspectives, and it's difficult to reconcile and understand each other. These threads almost never end well, but when they come up, we should do our best to stay as dispassionate as possible and read too much into what could be minor details. It will only create wider rifts.
Quote: (08-29-2016 09:57 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
First, it's a bad idea to use words that are sure to anger others or earn you a punch in the face if you were to say them in public. The internet anonymity allows people the ability to act more brazenly than they otherwise would. It also makes it easier to forget all of those who will read whatever you write.
...
It was in bad taste to use the word coalburner, and I can see where you guys are coming from in pointing out the extremely negative connotations it could be interpreted with. But I'm not sure OP used it with the intention of vitriol that's being attributed to him.
...
I can understand the conflict these threads create. Race is a hot button topic in America. While nearly all peoples have been subject to slavery, Black people are still dealing with the scars of a socioeconomic and political system that keeps them mired in a lack of opportunity. Our educational system and media reinforces racial boundaries through constant reminders of historical grievances and couching racial undertones in every issue.
Quote: (08-29-2016 11:10 AM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:
The Rationalization is very strong in this thread
Quote: (08-29-2016 11:55 AM)Red_Pillage Wrote:
I'm not sure which thread contributes less to the overall dialogue of RVF. This, or "Taylor Swift is a 6".
Both =
Quote: (08-29-2016 06:52 AM)Il Bersagliere Wrote:
I suspect we'll be waiting a while to see specific excerpts from that thread he was referring to.
Quote:Quote:
That's what I disgust about you lot the most.
Once again, to all of those who support and promote this kind of bullshit: Fuck you, your ilk, and the hole you lot crawled out of.
Quote: (08-28-2016 11:43 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:
People like Excelsior, mikado, Fortis, etc are calmly and rationally laying out the case for race-neutral respect & unity here in the forum and are maintaining their cool and staying on point even in the face of the usual goal-posting moving, squid ink-style tactics, and evidence-free argument-by-assertion gambits deployed by their ostensible adversaries.
Quote: (05-19-2016 12:01 PM)Giovonny Wrote:
If I talk to 100 19 year old girls, at least one of them is getting fucked!
Quote:WestIndianArchie Wrote:
Am I reacting to her? No pussy, all problems
Or
Is she reacting to me? All pussy, no problems
Quote:Quote:
Travesty
Reputation: 88
Quote: (05-19-2016 12:01 PM)Giovonny Wrote:
If I talk to 100 19 year old girls, at least one of them is getting fucked!
Quote:WestIndianArchie Wrote:
Am I reacting to her? No pussy, all problems
Or
Is she reacting to me? All pussy, no problems
Quote: (08-28-2016 07:59 AM)JacksonRev Wrote:
I expect pushback from any community where I'm banging their women. That's just life. Everything is about women. Expecting a high five for banging another group's women is so retarded I can't even understand how a guy would flip shit over that.
Quote: (08-29-2016 01:37 PM)Enigma Wrote:
Trust me, I have a very good memory. Excelsior and Fortis struggle with being rejected by black women for not being "black" enough, yet attack white guys for struggling with white women who reject them for black men.
Quote: (08-29-2016 05:46 PM)Fortis Wrote:
Quote: (08-29-2016 01:37 PM)Enigma Wrote:
Trust me, I have a very good memory. Excelsior and Fortis struggle with being rejected by black women for not being "black" enough, yet attack white guys for struggling with white women who reject them for black men.
Where did I attack white guys for struggling with white women who reject them for black men.
So by saying "hey guys, we shouldn't use coalburner" I am attacking white men who struggle with white women who reject them for black men?
Didn't realize I was denying your struggle by not liking it when you equate fucking a black man to burning coal or other low-class shit.
Enigma, don't bullshit me either.
Quote:Quote:
Either we all show each other respect as men, or there's nothing to talk about.
Quote: (08-27-2016 12:28 PM)Aurini Wrote:
Hmm... I wonder why that is?
This is just speculation - feel free to disagree with me - but it fits the pattern of modern doublethink: "Big Brother is Ungood." Anything white and/or male can be criticized, but anything going in the opposite direction is verboten. In this case, Blacks and women are near the top of the privilege hierarchy, so "coal burning" is crime think because it criticizes both groups. Yellow fever, on the other hand, ridicules White men and Asian women, who are acceptable targets for ridicule.
Quote: (08-27-2016 03:03 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:
Quote: (08-27-2016 02:51 PM)Aurini Wrote:@Aurini:
I was doing nothing of the sort. I do not think that White men are the ultimate victims - I merely note that, according to the SJW Victim Hierarchy, they're the group that's utterly safe to criticize, and the vehemence of the reaction against OP caused me to raise an eyebrow.
If OP had posted an unflattering stereotype about Whites - EG: Betas who get played by semi-pros in Asia - would that have received such a visceral reaction? Would that have been decried as race baiting? I doubt it. But as soon as he points out an unflattering stereotype about one of the SJW protected groups, the response was - at least in my eyes - immediate, excessive, and knee-jerk.
Now that said, I do think OP could have been far less inflammatory. I try and do my best to walk the fine line between stating blunt truths, while avoiding language that does more to alienate than elucidate, but it's one heck of a balancing act. Clearly OP tipped over into one side, but that really merit such levels of vitriol?
The reason I pointed it out wasn't due to some sense of ethnic grievance mongering. I pointed it out because I think the men of this forum are better than this.
Beta is a group of men, men of all races are and can be beta. If someone has said "Weak Cracker" or "White Trash Beta who got played by semi-pros in Asia" then yeah, that would be race baiting against white people and should be called out equally. It has in the past. There's a difference between pointing out the facts and name calling in hopes of getting a reaction. What does the adjective "coal burning" add of value to the story?
In other news, I'm just waiting for someone to say "No!!! You're the real racist!!!"
Quote: (08-27-2016 12:28 PM)Aurini Wrote:
Patterns are patterns. I'm sorry if this hurts anyone's feelings, but we've all made a point of recognizing patterns when it comes to women - and there's a pattern here that's worth noticing....
...Recognizing this pattern doesn't mean I'm defending racial vitriol. The sort of person who sees a White woman married to a successful Black man whom she met at church - and who screams "Mud shark coal burner!" - is just a sad and pathetic human being, motivated by envy. Nobody wants to hang out with that loser.
But that's not what we're seeing here.
White woman fetishizes an impoverished Black man; Black man is sexually aggressive and manipulative with a White woman who's about to get married (is buying a woman an engagement ring under false pretenses "Game" now?). Black man exploits her financially before abandoning her, with revelations that he's been cheating on her since day one.
Are we, or are we not, allowed to notice that this is a recurrent pattern in today's society?
Quote: (12-19-2015 05:05 PM)NomadofEU Wrote:
Corny lines, bad acting, worse writing, and a fumbling pace make for a predictable rehash. I'll give it a generous 6/10 for neat visuals and a solid soundtrack.
None of the characters had any depth and their development is typical of a J.J. Abrams film... in that it is virtually non-existent.
Kylo Ren turned out to be a hipster wearing a helmet and I'd be willing to bet that Rey is gonna go Mudshark with Finn at some point.
Quote: (08-28-2016 07:59 AM)JacksonRev Wrote:
Lol.
I've banged more black women than white women. You might not care, but a whole lot of black people do. Actually banged a beautiful 21 year old mixed girl last week, light skin and legs that went for miles. Anytime I'm out with a black girl, I get shit and she gets shit.
"Why you with that white boy?" "Fucking honky" "You miss a rodeo?"
It is what is. What I'm not doing is making whole threads about it.
The entire thread on how to get black women as a white guy: Go talk to her. Don't be a pussy. It helps to have a good sized dick for repeat fucks. The end.
I'm not whining that someone said something mean to me. I'm not bitching that other men made it hard for me to get laid, which obviously only happened because of my race.
I expect pushback from any community where I'm banging their women. That's just life. Everything is about women. Expecting a high five for banging another group's women is so retarded I can't even understand how a guy would flip shit over that.
Any time you step out of your group, you're going to get more shit from everyone. Your own tribe, and especially the tribe you walked in to. Does that mean if you walked in with pure intentions, that you're looking for a wife and kids, that you can make it work? You can, but you still have to be one tough mother to deal with the shit.
And if you're going into someone else's community to just find em, fuck em and flee? You better be a straight up bad ass to make it in and out.
If you can't handle the game, just settle down, make some kids, and move on.
Quote: (08-28-2016 09:06 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:
I'm reading the black man game thread to see what the fuss is about and some of you guys probably should tone it down a bit with the hysterics, considering there's a lot of 'white boy' and 'white priviledge' just in the first 2 pages I read. Not considering the entire premise in most of those discussions which is that whites actively discriminate blacks in nightlife, when a lot of black clubs a white man probably gets jumped or worse.
There's a seething undercurrent in that thread and it's not exactly colorblind.
Quote: (08-29-2016 09:57 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
It was in bad taste to use the word coalburner, and I can see where you guys are coming from in pointing out the extremely negative connotations it could be interpreted with. But I'm not sure OP used it with the intention of vitriol that's being attributed to him.
To be honest, I don't know many people that use the word, but I can't see it being used to paint an entire race in a negative light.
Quote:Quote:
When people use words like that, they're often attempting to come up with a simple generalization a stereotype. But for most of the people who would use it, I think race is a secondary issue.
Quote:Quote:
Like Aurini said, you don't see educated White women who date Black professionals being labeled negatively, except for maybe among an extreme minority of low class Whites.
Quote:Quote:
It's most likely used more to describe a specific type of White woman who goes for a specific type of Black man. It's more of a stereotype for the cliche of the overweight tatted White 5 who goes for the unemployed gangbanger with domestic issues.
Quote:Quote:
It's a not-so-uncommon pattern that people came up with a word for it. It's not an attack on Black people as a race, just a specific subset. It's like the word White trash, a word I'll use fairly often. When I say White trash, I'm not talking about all White people. I'm talking about a specific group of low class Whites who live in trailer parks, drink bud light and smoke meth.
Quote:Quote:
I can understand the conflict these threads create. Race is a hot button topic in America. While nearly all peoples have been subject to slavery, Black people are still dealing with the scars of a socioeconomic and political system that keeps them mired in a lack of opportunity. Our educational system and media reinforces racial boundaries through constant reminders of historical grievances and couching racial undertones in every issue.
Many Whites are also sick and tired of being bombarded with White guilt for crimes committed before they were born. It gets annoying being told that your whole race is uniquely evil and you should apologize for simply existing. Kind of like how it gets tiring for men to be told that all men are rapists.
There are double standards when it comes to race. Black comics are allowed to say things that Whites aren't. If Black Lives Matter were to have a White counterpart, I'm pretty sure all members would have been indicted for domestic terrorism, treason, RICO, or something similar. There are certainly White race baiters, but they're not given a mainstream national platform like other groups.
I was kind of surprised that, in at least in one thread, the general consensus among people who aren't White on the forum is that White people should be barred from being allowed to express their cultural identity while every other race or group shouldn't. It's an attitude that I believe will only encourage alienation between groups.
So, race is always going to be a contentious topic for different groups for different reasons. The tension that many people hold privately gets wound up, and when these topics are breached that resentment boils to the forefront. On these issues we're often coming from completely different perspectives, and it's difficult to reconcile and understand each other. These threads almost never end well, but when they come up, we should do our best to stay as dispassionate as possible and read too much into what could be minor details. It will only create wider rifts.
Quote: (08-27-2016 01:40 PM)Enigma Wrote:
None of this is exclusive to white and black American relations though, nor is it limited to modern times.
Men of all cultures during all time periods have shunned their women from dating outside of their tribe. Men in Asia will literally call the girl a slut while you're standing right there. It's part of human nature.
Quote:Quote:
We even had an African poster on the forum recently who celebrated the Tutsi's practice of only dating other Tutsi to preserve their bloodline. But I didn't see anyone calling him racist.
Quote:Quote:
I agree that coal burning is a term that shouldn't be used on the forum, and that many of the posters here are too reactionary and take "race realism" too far. Lord knows I've gone to bat countless times for non-whites on this forum.
But at the same time, damn if I'm not tired of being called a racist simply for having an identity or doing the same things every other race does.
I actually had one of my closest friends from growing up post a HuffPost article on FB recently that basically said all whites are inherently racist and we need to learn to treat blacks better.
That legitimately hurt me, though my personality isn't usually one to admit that.
This is someone that used to be at my house everyday as kids, and that my parents not only treated with the utmost respect but as part of the family.
But according to one of Huffington Post's thousands of freelance bloggers, I'm a racist now. And he's someone who's well-educated and came from a decent background. Both he and his sister's have PhDs.
Their views are nothing compared to what many lower class blacks in America currently express about whites on a daily basis.
And don't even get me started on how many people consider me a racist just because of the candidate I support for president, someone who has been an icon in the hip hop community for years and yet is suddenly "literally Hitler" and apparently tarnishes everyone that associates with him.
Meanwhile people like Herschel Walker or Mike Tyson -- who talk about how generous and supportive Trump was towards them throughout difficult times in their life -- are greeted with an endless stream of "coon", "Uncle Tom", "house negro", etc. and have their character attacks and livelihood threatened ad infinitum.
Black people are harassed at work, shot in bar, etc. all for having an opinion. Yet it's Trump supporters who are supposedly the real racists.
On the other hand, notice how most of the Trump supporters on this forum support nationalism for Japan, nationalism for the Philippines, nationalism for Russia.
Yet god forbid we don't let millions of people illegally flood into the US. We all "owe" non-whites a "debt" for "slavery" and "colonialism" that we'll never be able to repay, regardless of the fact that this is all completely ahistorical when put into the proper perspective and relies on the retarded American version of race where the entire world is split up into white, black, Asian, Arab, and Latino, which completely falls apart under even the smallest of scrutiny.
I've lived in all-black hoods, white suburbs, and the third-world, smoked weed with Jamaican dope boys and talked politics with upper class Filipinos. I've seen firsthand who is living how and who is doing what. The okey-doke doesn't work on me.
If I can't even have an identity or express any concern for my own interests or the issues that affect me, you're right, we're not brothers. I respect you a lot as a poster, but if that's how you feel, that's how you feel.
Quote: (08-29-2016 01:37 PM)Enigma Wrote:
People are saying we're talking about things that are "outside the forum", yet no one said anything when Excelsior brought up how white girls ignore black guys on internet dating because of white guys' views on interracial dating.
What does THAT have to do with anyone on this forum?
Quote:Quote:
But don't sit here and get mad because white guys want to talk about white guy issues. Yes, it's a bigger topic here -- because we're the majority.
Quote:Quote:
Sorry. What do you want me to do about it? Should we just start banning white members to make black members feel more comfortable?
If you want people to see things from your perspective, then SHARE your perspective. That's why people love guys like TravelerKai and Anabasis (RIP) -- they engage the rest of the forum and give their point of view.
If no black guys are willing to share their opinion or speak up when something bothers them, how are we supposed to know? Do you think we can read your mind through the internet and tell when we've offended you?
Quote:Quote:
I've read through some of the "black guy game thread". Many of the black members struggle with their identity, including some of the ones posting in this thread. I've listened to many of the podcasts. Many of the black members do not have stereotypically "black" voices or vocal patterns.
Do you think white guys don't have similar struggles with our identity?
OMG I said "black guys do it too!!!!!"
That's not pointing fingers. It's pointing out our common ground.
Many of the white guys on this forum are fairly young. Many of us have been exposed to years of brainwashing. Many of us didn't have strong male role models in our lives. Many of us are exploring new ideas and ideologies and philosophies.
We're trying to figure things out. Many of us have been made to feel ashamed of our race for so long that we overcorrect in the other direction. Just because we say something you find offensive doesn't mean there's malicious intent about it, and just because we say something you find offensive doesn't mean it's wrong.
If you're struggling with your own identity and race, don't come in here and try to lecture other people on how wrong they are. Explain yourself, let them explain themselves, and maybe you'll both learn something.
"We don't say anything about white guys dating black girls"
First of all, most white guys on this forum haven't said anything about black guys on this forum dating outside their race.
Second of all, how many times does rudebwoy, Archie, etc. have to tell guys in the BGGT to stop bashing black women?
Trust me, I have a very good memory. Excelsior and Fortis struggle with being rejected by black women for not being "black" enough, yet attack white guys for struggling with white women who reject them for black men.
Do you not see the parallels there?
Quote:Quote:
But don't bullshit me. Either we all show each other respect as men, or there's nothing to talk about.
Quote: (08-29-2016 06:47 PM)Excelsior Wrote:
The term "coal burner" (or mudshark or its variants) is specifically designed to imply that a white woman who engages in romantic contact with any black male is dirty, damaged, ruined, or otherwise deformed by virtue of said contact. The term as it is typically used applies generally to such contact and makes no exceptions or allowances for the character, disposition, or other personal traits associated with the black male in question. It is designed to shame white women who engage in romantic contact with such men by impressing upon them that they will be viewed as dirty, broken women for doing so. This belief is quite widespread in the United States, hence the general stigma surrounding these relationships and the prevalence of terms like "coal burner".
The term "yellow fever" merely describes a white male with a strong attraction to Asian women. The term does not imply that said men are dirty, damaged, or otherwise deformed by virtue of this attraction and the contact resulting from it. It does not imply and is not commonly used to imply that the woman who engages in such contact with said white male is dirty, damaged, ruined, or otherwise deformed by such contact. It does not imply that the male in question is deformed for having an attraction to said women or acting on that attraction. This is reflective of the fact that there is not such a widely held belief in this society that men and women who engage in white male/asian female unions are dirty, broken, ruined, or otherwise defective and inferior in any way. (A sister term, "jungle fever", functions in pretty much exactly the same way with regard to white male attraction to black women - similarly, stigmas surrounding those involved in such unions are lacking and neither party is widely considered "dirty" or "ruined" for having acted upon their attraction).
Quote: (05-19-2016 12:01 PM)Giovonny Wrote:
If I talk to 100 19 year old girls, at least one of them is getting fucked!
Quote:WestIndianArchie Wrote:
Am I reacting to her? No pussy, all problems
Or
Is she reacting to me? All pussy, no problems