Asian SJW blames racism for being repeatedly pumped and dumped by white guys
07-18-2016, 02:53 AM
The interesting thing about abusive people is that they're also the most likely to be abused. Why? Because they're assholes, and they attract it.
Like so many young Western SJWs, the author strikes me as suffering from some type of personality disorder. No matter how nasty they get, no how many derogatory, pejorative terms they use to describe their male subjects in articles like this: "whiteboys", "fuckboys", etc. they really do see themselves as the perpetual victim. "Stop kicking me!" they shout, as they're kicking you.
And in their furor at having their egos wounded, they often don't even notice when they openly admit to flagrant acts of abuse they themselves have committed, such as the quite plausible incident of sexual assault we have here. Like the ending of "A Few Good Men", get 'em riled up enough and they'll happily tell you that they "gave the order", not understanding that they slit their own throats. "But...those were just other people who got hurt!"
Look, it's clear to me that the author didn't think very highly of those "fucking white boys" even before this latest incident. There's no law that says a person you sleep with on a first date has to sign on for a LTR. Ain't no law says they have to. And it doesn't at all mean that they're "bad" people if they find themselves lukewarm about the budding relationship.
She went for the "quick sex and then hope the guy signs on for the long term" strategy, and once again it didn't work. Those are the breaks. There's also no law that says you can't tell a guy that you want to take it slow and get to know each other before sex...but she realizes that they're probably going to be out the door if she hits them with that line. That's finally a consequence of feminism and the sexual revolution: women want access to quick and available sex, and sometimes that's all they want. And other times they want the guy to stick around, and he sometimes doesn't. But that's an unacceptable option, because it means she didn't get what she wanted.
Yep. See, all the information is there and readily available. Even so, if things don't play out the way she wants, it's anyone else's fault but her own.
I've seen a fair number of articles about relationships and "hook up culture" written by feminists and SJWs by this point. From a "red pill" perspective, they're all totally transparent. It's simply hundreds of words of bloviation by a narcissist which when boiled down could simply be written as:
"I didn't get what I wanted." "I didn't get what I wanted." "I didn't get what I wanted..."
Reputable news organizations would refuse to publish this fashion of ranting, defamatory, content-less material.
Like so many young Western SJWs, the author strikes me as suffering from some type of personality disorder. No matter how nasty they get, no how many derogatory, pejorative terms they use to describe their male subjects in articles like this: "whiteboys", "fuckboys", etc. they really do see themselves as the perpetual victim. "Stop kicking me!" they shout, as they're kicking you.
And in their furor at having their egos wounded, they often don't even notice when they openly admit to flagrant acts of abuse they themselves have committed, such as the quite plausible incident of sexual assault we have here. Like the ending of "A Few Good Men", get 'em riled up enough and they'll happily tell you that they "gave the order", not understanding that they slit their own throats. "But...those were just other people who got hurt!"
Look, it's clear to me that the author didn't think very highly of those "fucking white boys" even before this latest incident. There's no law that says a person you sleep with on a first date has to sign on for a LTR. Ain't no law says they have to. And it doesn't at all mean that they're "bad" people if they find themselves lukewarm about the budding relationship.
She went for the "quick sex and then hope the guy signs on for the long term" strategy, and once again it didn't work. Those are the breaks. There's also no law that says you can't tell a guy that you want to take it slow and get to know each other before sex...but she realizes that they're probably going to be out the door if she hits them with that line. That's finally a consequence of feminism and the sexual revolution: women want access to quick and available sex, and sometimes that's all they want. And other times they want the guy to stick around, and he sometimes doesn't. But that's an unacceptable option, because it means she didn't get what she wanted.
Quote:Quote:
Although we were both warned by our friends that he had a history of being shitty to girls...
Yep. See, all the information is there and readily available. Even so, if things don't play out the way she wants, it's anyone else's fault but her own.
I've seen a fair number of articles about relationships and "hook up culture" written by feminists and SJWs by this point. From a "red pill" perspective, they're all totally transparent. It's simply hundreds of words of bloviation by a narcissist which when boiled down could simply be written as:
"I didn't get what I wanted." "I didn't get what I wanted." "I didn't get what I wanted..."
Reputable news organizations would refuse to publish this fashion of ranting, defamatory, content-less material.