This Washington Post article provides some very good illustrations of the
human hatred I described earlier in the thread which is animating the outpouring of "grief" and "outrage" over the "murder" of this gorilla:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morn...o-outrage/
Quote:Quote:
‘Shooting an endangered animal is worse than murder’: Grief over gorilla’s death turns to outrage
The killing of an endangered gorilla at the Cincinnati Zoo to rescue a boy who fell into a dangerous enclosure unleashed an outpouring of grief over the holiday weekend.
Within hours, that grief had turned to fury as critics questioned the zoo’s decision to kill the endangered 17-year-old gorilla, named Harambe, and called for the boy’s parents to be punished for not adequately supervising their child.
A Facebook page called “Justice for Harambe” received more than 41,000 “likes” within hours of its creation. The page’s description says it was created to “raise awareness of Harambe’s murder” and includes YouTube tributes and memes celebrating the western lowland gorilla and admonishing zoo officials.
“Shooting an endangered animal is worse than murder,” a commenter from Denmark named Per Serensen wrote on the page. “Soooo angry.”
Lt. Steve Saunders, a spokesman for the Cincinnati Police Department, told the Cincinnati Enquirer that they have no plans to charge the child’s parents.
That news didn’t stop tens of thousands from signing multiple online petitions calling for Cincinnati Child Protective Services to investigate the boy’s parents — who have not been identified — for negligence.
“I’m signing because a beautiful critically endangered animal was killed as a direct result of her failure to supervise her child,” one signee wrote. “I don’t blame the zoo staff for the decision they made, I’m sure they’re heartbroken.”
...
Beautiful animals sadly paying for utter human stupidity and negligence with their lives.#Harambe #CincinnatiZoo pic.twitter.com/4wnkYH1TWn
— Chris Dusauchoit (@DusauchoitChris) May 29, 2016
...
The next day, zoo officials raced to quell mounting outrage by posting a lengthy statement on Facebook detailing the decision to kill Harambe.
...
The statement has been shared more than 11,000 times and unleashed more than 10,000 comments on the zoo’s Facebook page, many of which call for the child’s parents to be severely punished.
“That child’s parents should be responsible for the financial loss of that Gorilla,” Rob Young wrote, receiving 11,000 “likes.” “And any associated costs seeing that they couldn’t adequately supervise their own child and now a magical animal lost his life because of their error.”
Note the parts above that I bolded and underlined. The animal is "celebrated" (even by specially created videos and memes) and described as not only "endangered" but "beautiful" and indeed "magical". And killing it, to save the life of a human child, was not only "murder", but -- according to Per Sorensen from Denmark -- "worse than murder".
Now please stop and ask yourself: what is it that makes this gorilla so great? Why is it "beautiful", "magical" and worthy of celebration -- unlike the human beings surrounding it which are at best stupid and careless, and at worst cruel and malicious? Why is its death an unspeakable outrage that is not only "murder" but even somehow "worse than murder"?
Did this gorilla prove even a small part of Fermat's last theorem, I mean even like a really secondary lemma? Did it compose Van Halen's "Panama", hell, did it even compose a Sammy Hagar based Van Halen song? How many memes starring Pepe the Frog did it put together? Did it maybe post a datasheet on making money from focus groups?
Nope. In the eyes of fanatical
nihilists and
human haters, the animal is privileged because it is an "innocent" creature that -- unlike us humans -- has no awareness of the fact that it lives in a world which is
known to be "meaningless" all the way down the line. This imagined innocence is what must be celebrated and
protected because for the creature aware of "meaninglessness" -- the human being -- to inflict harm and pain on the innocent creature that is unaware of it is
adding insult to injury, and this cannot be tolerated.
Here is what is particularly terrible: the human being wants to love the world and it wants to celebrate itself and its sentience -- but under nihilism, it knows it cannot do so because it is the being that has become aware of "meaninglessness" all the way to the end. So the only way for it to express its creativity and love for the world is to
displace it towards subjects that seem removed and protected from this knowledge.
So, in this case, you see the creation of memes and videos -- an expression of our uniquely human creativity -- directed towards the celebration of something that is different in kind from us, because at least it does not share what the religion of nihilism considers to be our eternally fallen state. This is also the reason why in the art of the past couple of decades or so, the greatest outpouring of love and creativity has occurred in the context of animation, with shows like "Family Guy", "The Simpsons", "King of the Hill" and others retaining all the freedom and warmth that could once be seen in movies. The eye under nihilism can no longer rest too directly on the human face, so it needs that face to be displaced and de-literalized in the way that happens in these cartoons to be liberated to express the love and warmth that it craves. There can be a special glow and pathos in these shows because they are among the only refuges of free and loving artistic expression in a landscape evacuated by the harsh dictates of nihilism.
The reaction to the killing of this gorilla is so interesting because it shows the human hatred and the sentimentalization of the "innocent" that are characteristic of late stage nihilism in a very distilled form. I would encourage guys who found this post to be of interest to look at the online comments on this event and think about the true feelings expressed in these comments and the ideas that underlie them. There is a lot to learn there.