Quote: (06-04-2016 09:34 AM)Sonoma Wrote:
My point perhaps as it relates to the topic:
Houston has poor logistics but more conservative women.
The Bay Area has better logistics, slightly poorer quality women and isn't a humid Texas nversio of LA with toll roads galore.
I've grown up in the Bay Area, never had a shortage of women and there's plenty of traditional Asian girls available for relationships. Also, endless cool/free places to go on a date in Northern California/Bay Area.
I'm gonna have to stop you right there. You clearly aren't right in the head or aren't pulling quality if you can make these kind of comparisons. The quality and type of dykes I was seeing in North Cal(not even counting the hellhole known as Berkeley that my friends had to leave for L.A. out of utter disgust with the kind of woman that frequented that area).
The quality isn't "poorer" in general. It's absolutely abysmal. The amount of times I had to gag walking down a street in some parts of SF outside of college campuses was too many to count.
Quote: (06-03-2016 09:34 PM)Sonoma Wrote:
Having been in both extensively, Houston is good, but suffers due to its size. Your logistics are terrible if she lives on the other side of town, or if you have a 30 minute drive back to your place. SF is at least a 5 Nile Uber tops.
Also, Houston kind of blows in general. Flat, hot, sucks. You really have to get a plane ticket to go somewhere nice, unless the drive out to Galveston is really that appealing. SF Bay area has cheap flights to Vegas, short drives to Santa Cruz, wine tasting up North and Tahoe a few hours away.
Houston has gators to the south and NOLA on a couple hour flight east, and Austin if you want the Bay Area pt2, but generally speaking, it's just ugly.
The only point I have to concede is logistics(until you step out to Silicon Valley or anywhere outside of SF proper) and the shittiest beach area in the world Galveston. Yes logistics are bad here possibly worse than L.A. All that means is improvise.
But yea she lives 30 minutes away sure that's cool, but the thing is there are technically 3 different clubbing districts to make up for it. Midtown for the college girls. The Heights for the Yuppies. Galleria private events area for truly rich. Odds are if she's partying in X place at max it's 20 minutes. The problems come in with Suburban chicks. So yes logistics issues, but only with a subset of women.
Flat, hot, sucks. Care to elaborate? All I see is an excuse to see more girls in booty shorts and it's going to be cold out at night regardless of what time of year it is.
And it's just ugly? Please elaborate more you're making no sense.
Austin still has gorgeous UT babes(Now the number one party school in the States). The Bay Area comparatively has nothing to compare. So Austin>Santa Cruz. And unlike Houston logistics are extremely convenient from 6th. You don't have even a comparative bar scene compared to 6th in North Cal.
On wine tasting you just roll into the Heights. I think Cattle Rustler himself trolled the various wine bars and events when he's in for MILFS. And cheap flights to Vegas pfftttt? Really come on man. Anyone can fly out to Vegas but how long is the drive? Most people here are more than happy to drive out to NOLA and/or fly out to Vegas.
Also Tahoe is good for snowboarding and skiing, but the majority of the various lakes here in Texas blow it out of the water otherwise for everything else.
All I see is you making generalizations about my area then trying to compare it to one of the worst parts of the States to party in so:
Let me also guess you don't run any night game?
"Until the day when God shall deign to reveal the future to man, all human wisdom is summed up in these two words,— 'Wait and hope'."- Alexander Dumas, "The Count of Monte Cristo"
Fashion/Style Lounge
Social Circle Game
Team Skinny Girls with Pretty Faces
King of Sockpuppets
Sockpuppet List