![[Image: 81-Elements.jpg]](http://i0.wp.com/joedubs.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/81-Elements.jpg)
![[Image: 19-Saros.jpg]](http://i0.wp.com/joedubs.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/19-Saros.jpg)
![[Image: 4-Moons-and-Sun.jpg]](http://i0.wp.com/joedubs.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/4-Moons-and-Sun.jpg)
![[Image: Jupiter-Sun-Moon-and-Time.jpg]](http://i1.wp.com/joedubs.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Jupiter-Sun-Moon-and-Time.jpg)
(From Joedubs)
Quote: (08-07-2016 07:27 PM)Fortis Wrote:
^ I love seeing stuff like this but I always wonder one thing:
What exactly is the significance of this sort of thing? Like the 1/81 = 0123456789......
Is fucking mind blowing but couldn't we just write it off to mere coincidence?
I didn't mean to write this as some sort detractor but sometimes I find that information overload is real, especially when it comes to theoretical and deep threads like this.
Quote: (08-07-2016 07:41 PM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
...The foot, mile, and kilometer seem to match up precisely with the geometry of the Earth and bodies within our solar system...
Quote: (07-13-2016 10:22 PM)Tailgunner Wrote:
You can't even take a girl out without every guy trying - not asking - trying - to shoot cum on her from across the room in the restaurant or movie theater or side walk you are on.
Lol!
Quote: (07-13-2016 11:08 PM)911 Wrote:
The topic of UFOs is thorny enough by itself, it's not very helpful to slap that on top of this already loaded one.
For the record, I seriously doubt the validity of UFO theories. Crop circles for one are totally ludicrous, when you stop and think about it. If you're an alien species with advanced technology and wanted to leave your print or communicate with us feeble humanoids, crops would be the last medium you'd use. I mean why not instead carve up a 5-mile long 500ft deep message like "Xotwyx wuz here!" on a granite plateau with your awesome quark plasma ray cannons?
In any case bro no discouragement meant, this is just a bit of constructive criticism.
Quote: (08-08-2016 06:39 PM)HonantheBarbarian Wrote:
For the more informed guys on this topic,
Whats the deal with Ancient Egypt in all this? Why does every one of these narratives all tie back to the egyptians? Why is luciferian doctrine so closely tied to egyptian symbolism and idolatry? What is the exact correlation between Satanism/Lucifarianism and the Egyptians?
Quote: (07-15-2016 02:09 PM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
Georgia guidestones:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
Quote: (07-31-2016 08:20 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
Do you notice any interlocking triangles (Male and Female) in the image below?
Is there any thinly veiled message in naming a building the One World building?
Quote: (08-11-2016 09:08 PM)polar Wrote:
Is there any symbolism in the giant $4 billion building next door called the Oculus?
Quote:Quote:
The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast.
Quote: (08-12-2016 07:58 PM)etwsake Wrote:
That video is fake as shit.
I can't believe how gullible and superstitious so many posters are.
Quote: (08-12-2016 08:27 PM)scorpion Wrote:
Quote: (08-12-2016 07:58 PM)etwsake Wrote:
That video is fake as shit.
I can't believe how gullible and superstitious so many posters are.
Yes, it's pretty clearly "fake" in the sense of being a mock human sacrifice, meaning the woman was not actually killed. But the video itself is not fake. That's clearly the CERN courtyard with the statue of Shiva. Google it yourself and see. Even assuming the woman in the video was not actually harmed, it's still incredibly bizarre. Why was a ritual mock human sacrifice performed at CERN? Why would people with access to a highly secured scientific research facility be engaging in this sort of behavior? What do they have to gain? Wouldn't they be fearful of professional repercussions? Organizing and participating in mock human sacrifices is not exactly normal behavior among scientists, or at least so I thought.
The most harmless explanation for this video is that there's a bunch of weird fuckers at CERN running around LARPing as Satanists by engaging in mock human sacrifices just for the lulz. Which is bizarre enough. And the possibilities only get stranger and more sinister from there.
Quote: (08-13-2016 07:17 AM)Enigma Wrote:
It's not a mock human sacrifice. It's just a hoax video, made for the same reason that people make hoax videos on all kinds of other things: attention, mental disorders, lulz, etc.
The person recording is standing in a brightly lit room, at night, in a window with no curtains or blinds, maybe 20 yards away and a single story above where the "sacrifice" is taking place.
They would have clearly seen him recording. If it were real, he would have either been standing somewhere else (they wanted him to record) or hiding what he was doing (they didn't want him to record).
Not to mention the multitude of other things wrong with the video.
I have no problem believing that human sacrifices actually do take place, but this is just some autistic Redditors or 4chaners fucking around.
Quote: (08-13-2016 07:02 AM)Bury Zenek Wrote:
It's definitely a cult of some sort but remember, it's still man-made bullshit, not some paranormal force. It doesn't surprise me that there may be sick people on this world who overdosed on power and who like to indulge in such degenerated drivel. 9/11 was a planned operation so don't read films and cartoons like a prophecy. It simply looks that the people behind it deliberately give hints of their plans to get an additional kick.
Quote:Quote:
In this connection the observation that world wide the sacred sacrifice is contextually linked with food and eating, is of some interest. It is necessary to kill plants and animals in order to nourish oneself. The things killed are subsequently consumed and thus appear as a necessary condition for the maintenance and propagation of life. Eating increases strength, therefore it was important to literally incorporate the enemy. In cannibalism, the eater integrates the energies of those he has slaughtered. Since ancient humans made no basic distinction between physical, mental or spiritual processes, the same logic applied to the “eating” of nonbodily forces. One also ate souls, or prana, or the élan vital.
In the Vedas, this general “devouring logic” led to the conception that the gods nourished themselves from the life fluids of ritually slaughtered humans, just as mortals consume the bodies of animals for energy and nourishment. Thus, a critical-rational section of the Upanishads advises against such human sacrifices, since they do not advance individual enlightenment, but rather benefit only the blood-hungry supernatural beings.
Sacred cannibalism was always communion, holy union with the Spirit and the souls of the dead. It becomes Eucharistic communion when the sacrifice is a slaughtered god, whose followers eat of him at a supper. God and man are first one when the man or woman has eaten of the holy body and drunk the holy blood of his or her god. The same applies in the relation to the goddess. The tantric yogi unites with her not just in the sexual act, but above all through consuming her holy gynergy, the magical force of maya. Sometimes, as we shall see, he therefore drinks his partner’s menstrual blood. Only when the feminine blood also pulses in his own veins will he be complete, an androgyne, a lord of both sexes.
To gain the “gynergy” for himself, the yogi must “kill” the possessor of the vital feminine substances and then “incorporate” her. Such an act of violence does not necessarily imply the real murder of his mudra, it can also be performed symbolically. But a real ritual murder of a woman is by like measure not precluded, and it is not surprising that occasional references can be found in the Vajrayana texts which blatantly and unscrupulously demand the actual killing of a woman. In a commentary on the Hevajra Tantra, at a point where a lower-caste wisdom consort (dombi) is being addressed, stands bluntly, “I kill you, o Dombi, I take your life!” (Snellgrove, 1987, vol. 1, p. 159).
Quote:Quote:
In the mythical past, Sati was the consort of the god Shiva. When her father Daksa was planning a great sacrificial feast, he failed to invite his daughter and son-in-law. Unbidden, Sati nonetheless attended the feast and was deeply insulted by Daksa. Filled with shame and anger she threw herself upon the burning sacrificial altar and died. (In another version of the story she alone was invited and cremated herself when she heard that her spouse was barred from the feast.) Shiva, informed of the death of his wife, hurried at once to the scene of the tragedy and decapitated Daksa. He then took the body of his beloved Sati, laid her across his shoulders and began a funeral procession across all India. The other gods wanted to free him from the corpse and set about dismembering it, piece by piece, without Shiva noticing what they were doing.
The places where the fragments fell were destined to become holy sites known as Shakta pithas. There where Sati’s vulva came to land the most sacred location was established. In some texts there is talk of 24, in others of 108 pithas, the latter being the holy number of Buddhism. At Sati’s numerous graves cemeteries were set up forthwith, at which the people cremated their dead. Around these locations developed a many-sided, and as we shall see, extremely macabre death culture, which was nurtured by Tantrics of all schools (including the Buddhist variety).
In yet another version of the Sati legend, the corpse of Shiva’s wife contained a “small cog — a symbol of manifest time -, [which] destroyed the body of the goddess from the inside out. ... [It] was then dismembered into 84 fragments which fell to earth at the various holy sites of India” (Hutin, 1971, p. 67). This is indeed a remarkable variant on the story, since the number of famous Maha Siddhas (Grand Sorcerers), who in both the Buddhist and Hindu tradition introduced Tantrism to India as a new religious practice, is 84. These first Tantrics chose the Shakta pithas as the central locations for their rituals. Some of them, the Nath Siddhas, claimed Sati had sacrificed herself for them and had given them her blood. For this reason they clothed themselves in red robes (White, 1996, p. 195). Likewise, one of the many Indian cemetery legends tells how five of the Maha Siddhas emerged from the cremated corpse of a goddess named Adinatha (White, 1996, p. 296). It can be assumed that this is also a further variation on the Sati legend.
It is not clear from the tale whether the goddess committed a sacrificial suicide or whether she was the victim of a cruel murder. Sati’s voluntary leap into the flames seems to indicate the former; her systematic dismemberment the latter. A “criminological” investigation of the case on the basis of the story alone, i.e., without reference to other considerations, is impossible, since the Sati legend must itself be regarded as an expression of the mystifying ambivalence which, according to René Girard, veils every inaugural sacrifice. All that is certain is that all of the originally Buddhist (!) Vajrayana’s significant cult locations were dedicated to the dismembered Hindu Sati.