Quote: (07-20-2016 09:57 AM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:
Quote: (07-20-2016 04:01 AM)kikuyu1 Wrote:
Without getting lost in too much detail,todays Jews have much African heritage including personal names.
Actually, when making a statement of such large significance, I'd appreciate it if you'd go into detail.
The link you posted makes some rather bold claims without supporting them. I see this kind of theme in a lot of content which is critical of deep state power structures. I think the purpose of this is to discredit those who seriously research hidden power structures, or to distract people from attempting to understand the big picture.
I'm not accusing you of doing this or anything, and I understand the desire to seek out alternative sources. It's demonstrated to us on a daily basis that our politicians and official academians lie to us so thoroughly, so persistently, that we can safely discard anything they tell us. One of the dangers of this is to latch on to sources that are critical of the historical narrative we've been taught, and ease our demand for evidence for sources that seem to be "on our side". It's through this process that those who wish to throw us off their trail will insert disinformation.
As an example in the link above, it makes the claim that Jews originated in southeast Africa by tying Nimrod to a Cushitic lineage. While it's true that there are supporting details to the idea that some Jewish lineage has Cushitic roots, I think it's rather reckless to use this loose mythological description (Nimrod being the grandson of Ham, where Ham represents the Hamitic (African) language groups) to confidently conclude that the origin of ancient Judeans were southeast African. Cushites are actually east African in origin, not southeast, but that's a minor detail.
There are indeed signs that point to a cultural overlap between areas that the early Jews historically traveled through, though the artifacts seem to point towards a cultural origin further east. There are pyramids deeper into Africa than Egypt, though they appear later: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubian_pyramids
The theory of Egyptian origin for what we collectively label freemasonry actually appears to be the most well researched, and well supported theory that I've seen. There is architecture and symbolism that is absolutely bursting with Egyptian imagery nearly everywhere you look. Just by taking a look at any $1 bill will reveal a seal showing an Egyptian pyramid capped by the eye of Horus, and even a $ sign that represents the Egyptian cadeucus. The Washington monument is a near identical depiction of an Egyptian monolith (representative of a phallus), such as Cleopatra's needle, and it sits within a path depicting a vesica pisces. There are similar links to ancient Egyptian culture in London, Paris, Brussels, Vatican city, and nearly all of them are commissioned by Freemasons or similar esoteric groups.
The links are simply too numerous to list, but for those that are interested, I would highly recommend the following video. It is rather long, so watch it a few parts at a time:
Based on the above, it's well supported that the current power structures of the media, state, and military/intelligence regard ancient Egyptian culture with great significance.
The ancient Egyptian priestly class possessed very ancient knowledge, which they only shared with initiates into their order. They believed in monotheism while preaching polytheism to the rest of the populace, which they despised. In order to undergo initiation into their order, (which many influential Greeks such as Plato, Pythagorus, and Solon underwent) one had to become circumcised to be considered one of them. In short, they were an esoteric system of power which practiced a hidden religion, something which modern Freemasonry could be perfectly described as.
Based on my research though, I believe their origin is of much greater antiquity. Esoteric priestly groups have been associated with the building of ancient monolithic architecture (such as stone henge, the Pyramids, and so on) which are aligned to astronomical phenomena that span many thousands of years. This demonstrates a knowledge of the precession of the equinox (a 25,920 year cycle) that would have required thousands upon thousands of years of observation, extremely advanced technology, or both.
I believe that many aspects of Judaism originate from the influence of the Levite priestly class, which was passed to them during their period of Syrian rule, and further back, from the influences of Zoroastrianism and early Hinduism.
Prior to the 10th century BC, there was no Jewish state, though there was the kingdom of Israel, which was a vassal kingdom of the Persian empire. Judea was a small territory of a minor tribe, and in fact waged conflicts with the kingdom of Israel often. Around the same time period, there's little historical mention of Jews, as we know them today. It is my belief that much of ancient Jewish history was borrowed from the Persians, who were the rulers of the kingdom of Israel for hundreds of years. Only later did Israelites flee to Judea, where they may have created a historical narrative that would create greater cohesion between Judeans and Israelites. There are many similarities in the Torah with historical figures, such as king Solomon most likely describing Syrian king Shalmane-sar, whose name in semetic would have been spelled SLMN.
The Syrians were influenced by the Magi, which were said to have arrived with the Chaldeans in the 2nd millenium BC. The Magi practiced Zoroastrianism, which was a monotheistic religion which shares many similarities and religious accounts with early Judaism. It is here I'd like to suggest that the early Jews likely traced their history from the Syrian, and further back, the Magiaen/Iranian traditions. The Brahmins, whose haplogroup is R1a, is the same as the priestly classes of the Levite Jews, showing a shared DNA lineage.
All of these factors point towards the priestly tradition of the region originating further to the East. The Torah says that Abraham came from Ur of the Chaldees. Note that there are some close similarities between the story of Abraham and the story of Brahma. Abraham had a sister/consort named Sarai, whereas Brahma had a sister/consort named Saraisvati.
Also, in Zoroastrianism and the in the Vedas, they describe a conflict between the Asuras/Ahuras and the Devas. It seems to suggest that the Asuras were the early Israeli Levites which later settled further west. The overemphasis on materialism, and as described in the Vedas, their practice of black magick ultimately created a schism between the Asuras (proto Jews/Magi) and Devas (Brahmin). As Abraham rejected the Brahmin faith, he would have been regarded as A-brahma (not a Brahma), which could have morphed into the name of Abraham over time.
There is additional support for this theory in the link below:
http://www.hyksos.org/index.html?title=Who_Was_Abraham
I'd rather not since I'm still new;we're not supposed to discuss politics and this issue has very deep political significance but since you ask...
Todays Ashkenazi uses African names;specifically the Ga Adangbe people of the Akan confederation.
Quote:Quote:
Ga-Dangmes Names Hebrew Names
1. Aryeh Aryeh
2 Afra Ofra
3. Otto Yishai
4. Aryelle Aryelle
5. Ofei Ofer
6 Ada Ada
7 Tema Tema
8 Nunu Nun
9 Dodoo Dodo
10 Ashi Ashi
11 Dangme Dan
12. Anan Anan
13. Ga Gad
14. Abe Avraham (Abraham)
15 Sachar (Saka) Sachar
16. Dode (Dodi) Dodi
17. Kadi Kadi
18. Nerle Nerli
19 Ayah Ayah (female)
20 Ayaa Aya (male)
21. Adama Adam
22. Nete Natanel
23. Achimota Achimot
http://www.ghanadot.com/Review.mensah.ga...32111.html
There are over 40 names and many other similarities:
A Ga priest with unleavened flour.
The Assyrians who enslaved them were actually the Fulani of todays W Africa.