Quote: (06-23-2015 03:22 PM)Checkmat Wrote:
The difference though, is the old school method of BJJ in a fight is to close the distance, clinch, and fall to the ground with the guy in any way. Just get him in your world/out of his world. It doesn't require a large amount of finesse. Assuming we're talking about a street fight not a pro MMA fight.
If you're a boxer, fighting a grappler, you'd better knock him out with your first punch. Because if the grappler gets his hands on you, it's going to be like swimming with a shark.
A boxer is going to knock the crap out of most new school BJJ guys before he even gets close because he probably has never went live on his feet with a striking opponent, and his takedowns are non existent.
I'll take a boxer who has trained for 2 years over a BJJ guy who has trained for 2 years, unless that BJJ guy has a wrestling base, or trained at a school that legitimately practices live standup on a regular basis.
As far as my 180 on BJJ
I'm not a BJJ hater 100%. I love the old school Carlson Gracie Jiu Jitsu. Taekdowns and a heavy top game, not playing off your back unless you have to. I just hate the new school sport Jiu Jitsu, and the mentality of the people who follow it.
New school BJJ promotes passivity with butt schooting/pulling guard, huge lack of standup ability and a emphasis on guard work. The culture really frowns upon people using strength. You constantly hear people bitching about guys using too much strength while they train. I can't count the number of times I've read/heard guys say they don't care about the practicality of BJJ in a real fight, they just do it for fun. To me, that's a pussified and watered down version of Jiu Jitsu. If you don't care about the practicality of BJJ in a real fight, go play chess. Most of the guys who say this are limp wrist-ed, SJW types, which infest the BJJ community.
So, my main problems with BJJ are:
- Lack of takedowns
- Overall pussified culture within the sport
- Buttschooting/pulling guard nonsense
- Emphasis on playing off of your back
- Passive nature BJJ promotes (don't use strength, no takedowns, people bitching about hard crossface, etc.)
- Popularity of bullshit like 50/50, berimbolo and fancy guards with zero practicality outside of sport BJJ
- Spending 4:50 seconds on your back, hitting a sweep, and "winning", when in reality you'd have your face smashed beyond recognition in nearly 5 minutes of playing off your back in a real situation.
There's an army of blue and purple belts out there with weak takedowns who spend the majority of their BJJ time playing off of their backs. These guys will get their shit pushed in by a decently tough guy in a fight. BJJ players by blue belt should have solid takedowns and know that you only play off of your back if you get put there.
This sums up a lot of thoughts fairly well:
Anyways, I'm rambling. I could probably have worded everything better, but you get the idea. I still love BJJ, I just hate the current state of it. I think it's been pussified and watered down into something that is significantly less effective than what it should be.