Oh, a chance to use deductive reasoning. This should be good.
Right, considering Roosh's controversy among the militant arms of the leftist progression and feminist movements and recent escalating coverage it's logical to assume that he isn't appearing to discuss his views on botany or zoology.
Standard format for this things in an interview-type arrangement. Whether or not there's an audience is a 50/50 wager and if there is then considering that the deck is heavily stacked then there'll inevitably be a wide variety of plants to discredit and boo on cue.
Most likely it'll be pre-recorded to edit out anything that might make people think for themselves or reconsider their position or to call into question the values of the network it's being hosted on.
I can't imagine it'll be given significant airtime because that would open the door to discussion so I'll wager it'll be around the 15 minute mark, if that.
Also it's extremely unlikely the host will have any kind of sympathy or understanding. If they do it'll be behind a papier-maché façade or impartiality. Though that doesn't really narrow it down considering how many talk shows you folks have over in the Coloni-sorry, States.
Either way I'll be paying rapt attention. It's a rest day so I'll monitor what I can online.
Roosh, there's nothing I can say that you probably haven't thought of or been told already.
So I'll just go with "Godspeed you magnificent bastard."