Posts: 5,822
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
72
Filed for divorce, starting over at age 35
10-26-2015, 07:39 AM
Quote: (10-25-2015 10:00 PM)Teutatis Wrote:
Quote: (05-04-2015 07:40 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:
I hope the other two were your ex's mom and best friend.
Old but still good
In 2015, with online dating apps, cell phone video and the knowledge that 25-40% of households are single mother households this type of revenge is very feasible.
Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
Posts: 11,892
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
212
Filed for divorce, starting over at age 35
10-26-2015, 03:20 PM
Jesus Christ CS through our PM's I never thought this shit had happened to you, so glad you bumped this thread !
Posts: 1,143
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
10
Filed for divorce, starting over at age 35
10-27-2015, 04:09 PM
Pussy pass revoked. Cha ching !
Posts: 1,329
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2014
Filed for divorce, starting over at age 35
11-26-2015, 01:13 PM
Quote: (01-27-2015 03:46 PM)Travesty Wrote:
Quote: (01-27-2015 03:44 PM)The Father Wrote:
Quote: (01-27-2015 03:39 PM)Travesty444 Wrote:
No there is shame he was a member here and knew the routine. His actions are the primary reason why bitches act like they do. He's not a victim. He is the perpetrator.
Hardly. Our family court laws are the primary reason women act like they do, that and affirmative action and other hand-outs that take money from men and literally GIVE it to women. I suppose if you really wanted to find a cause, you could go back to women getting the vote. THAT was the mistake from which all other mistakes proceed!
If he got married to a low N count girl that was 5 years younger, never married, never had a kid, and was family oriented with a great relationship with her parents I would feel sympathy and be more angry at the courts.
Even if the laws were entirely in favor of men she is still a horrific pick for a dating option any way you spin it. Older, divorced, kid.
Yes he certainly did himself no favors there. But that is secondary or tertiary to the harm caused by our anti-male family court system. Without that, she's just a desperate aging woman with a fatherless kid. Hardly an attractive proposition - but not dangerous in and of itself. It's only when the heavy hand of the state comes down on a woman's side - any woman, young, old, divorced, never married, with kids, childless - and compels you to pay her or go to jail...THAT'S when it gets dangerous. Our unnatural state of affairs is enforced at the point of a gun. And they will not only put you in jail - they will garnish your pay and seize your property and give it her, anyway!! It's like we left earth and went to the Planet of the Apes, all in a generation or two. MADNESS!
So let's not equate the harm this guy caused himself with the harm society caused him, however poor his choice may have been. It would be like if I lit a guy on fire with a flame thrower, while he was smoking a cigarette, and someone said "Well he started the fire first, so he has no one to blame but himself!"