[TheBulldozer]

I usually don't post stuff like this, but this article, everything about it, left me wanting to smash my head into the hardest wall I could find.

Have at it.

http://elitedaily.com/women/21-look-forw...er/653551/

Even other women are suggesting she go get psychological help in the comments.

[samsamsam]

She doesn't look totally insane, I don't see crazy eyes. But ya, she is crazy for wanting to be a single mom.

WB with condom. And morning after pill.

And she doesn't seem like a fatty.

[Vroom]

Quote:

The opportunity for raising a child while knowing that he or she will never have to come from a broken home, to me, seems like one of the best gifts I could ever give.

Hmm...maybe the second best. First being a father.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Feminism - selling shit as steak:

   

On a side note - of course she can get pregnant like this Tinderella:

Quote:

Tinderfessions @tinderfessions · 10h
I poke holes in my condoms when I fuck NFL players I meet on tinder - Kelly

[Mage]

The girl is not crazy. She understands that traditional family model is completely destroyed and and decides that she would do without it the farce that is marriage v2.0.

Of course the thought that she should revive old type of marriage and submit to a husband in order to have a functioning family never crossed her mind, so she decided to be a single mother. And how could such a thought have crossed her mind. neither TV, nor Cosmopolitain and not even Church teaches that, only a bunch of ugly mysgonist sexists with short dicks on some obscure fringes of internet do that.

[bojangles]

some 60 year old feminist saying in the comments that she did exactly that in the 80s through a sperm donor. Someone comments "you need a dick, that's all"

[Vaun]

She is the sad result of feminism. I have heard many young women romanticize about this as well. Before you make one know who you're dealing with is all I can say.

[iamdegaussed]

shit like this is why I want a vasectomy.

[Dr. Howard]

Well, thats the thing. In a world of independent women its more feasible to a 'single mom' than a 'married mom'...thats because a single mom 'job' pays cash like any other job via child support. For a woman that has zero education or even a liberal arts degree what is going to pay better...40 hours a week at starbucks or 'working from home' as a single mom part time and then zero time once the kid is in school.

Lets use two examples in the state of Tennessee.
1. Starbucks, 40hrs/week, 7.25/hr = $1160/month before tax. She won't pay any income tax because she's only making $12k/year and gets ETIC
2. Single Mom, ?hrs/week, maybe 25hrs/week when child is in school. Father of the child that makes $72k/year. $1260/month. $120k/year...$2100/month

Why NOT be a single mom if she can fuck a guy with a professional job! Especially because many places do not factor in child support for support or tax calculations, if she works for something like $3k/year she gets into a tax subsidy sweet spot.

I had never done this math before, its unnerving. If you have a moderately good income and are banging girls that work in the service sector there are some perverse incentives for her to get pregnant.

[Dismal Operator]

WB, with condom, pull out anyway and flush the condom

'I never want to have to sit my own children down and look at them in the eyes and explain that for the rest of their lives, they are going to come from a broken home.'

In fairness, she'll never have to do that. But it's only because the entirety of their lives will be spent in a broken home, so they won't know any different.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(07-29-2014 06:31 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

Well, thats the thing. In a world of independent women its more feasible to a 'single mom' than a 'married mom'...thats because a single mom 'job' pays cash like any other job via child support. For a woman that has zero education or even a liberal arts degree what is going to pay better...40 hours a week at starbucks or 'working from home' as a single mom part time and then zero time once the kid is in school.

Lets use two examples in the state of Tennessee.
1. Starbucks, 40hrs/week, 7.25/hr = $1160/month before tax. She won't pay any income tax because she's only making $12k/year and gets ETIC
2. Single Mom, ?hrs/week, maybe 25hrs/week when child is in school. Father of the child that makes $72k/year. $1260/month. $120k/year...$2100/month

Why NOT be a single mom if she can fuck a guy with a professional job! Especially because many places do not factor in child support for support or tax calculations, if she works for something like $3k/year she gets into a tax subsidy sweet spot.

I had never done this math before, its unnerving. If you have a moderately good income and are banging girls that work in the service sector there are some perverse incentives for her to get pregnant.

I once read a story in the NY Times where the author interviewed women who were doing exactly that. Only they were aggressively targeting Wallstreet guys and telling them they were on the pill. Even if you came inside her mouth or in the condom, you had to make sure she swallowed every last drop or flushed the condom - otherwise you get the catch-22 situation again. It is actually not a bad career plan. 18 years of child support by a guy making 250.000$+ or much more can set you up for life. Paternity tests are really fun for women - work perfectly for them, while for a husband who proves his wife had cuckolded him it does not do jack-shit.

[Sombro]

A woman who considers a father unnecessary in raising a child is unfit to be a mother.

[Vicious]

Would bang raw, jizz til her cup runneth over and go back to my nation that does not have a paternity agreement with the US. Would then send cute smileys in whatsapp and a "best of luck, make sure you do a good job with my seed"!

[scorpion]

The thing you have to understand about female psychology relating to reproduction and provision for her child is that women are designed to be completely amoral during this process. This is literally the most important thing women do in their lives. The same way that men can be very cutthroat in their professional lives, women employ the same mechanism in their personal lives. It's not because women consciously try to exploit men, this is simply how they're programmed: 1) Get impregnated by best man they can who will produce the highest quality sperm, and 2) Procure as many resources as possible, by any means necessary, with which to raise the child.

Women do not care where the resources they need will come from, all morality is out the window on this question, the only issue is one of practicality. Ideally, and as is usually the case in a traditional society, the woman will marry a man while young and bear several of his children in exchange for his financial support for life. But this has largely been lost these days. If that option is not practical or attractive for whatever reason, there are others available. If the woman feels her best bet is to trap a man with a pregnancy and rely on his child support, she will do that. If she thinks that paternity fraud and cuckolding a beta provider with an alpha's child is a better option, she will do that. If her options are even more limited she will not hesitate to find alpha sperm then raise the child alone with government support.

Women do not do this because they are consciously trying to do evil. They do it because they are biologically programmed to ensure the survival of the species by any means necessary. This is the reason that women are obsessed by men, romance, weddings and children their entire lives. It's all a function of their relentless focus (obsession, really) on getting impregnated and raising children. Reproduction is far too important a mechanism to leave up to a conscious, logical decision. There are always many reasons not to have children. Men, who are focused on mastering the external world, can especially always come up with reasons to put off or renounce fatherhood entirely. The majority of men only become fathers because some woman decides, one way or another, that it's time for him to be a father. This is simply the way of the world.

A man is an organism that proves its worth by demonstrating some mastery over the world.

A woman is an organism that proves its worth by securing sperm from a man that has demonstrated mastery.

And so it goes, generation after generation.

[samsamsam]

(07-29-2014 09:54 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

The thing you have to understand about female psychology relating to reproduction and provision for her child is that women are designed to be completely amoral during this process. This is literally the most important thing women do in their lives. The same way that men can be very cutthroat in their professional lives, women employ the same mechanism in their personal lives. It's not because women consciously try to exploit men, this is simply how they're programmed: 1) Get impregnated by best man they can who will produce the highest quality sperm, and 2) Procure as many resources as possible, by any means necessary, with which to raise the child.

Women do not care where the resources they need will come from, all morality is out the window on this question, the only issue is one of practicality. Ideally, and as is usually the case in a traditional society, the woman will marry a man while young and bear several of his children in exchange for his financial support for life. But this has largely been lost these days. If that option is not practical or attractive for whatever reason, there are others available. If the woman feels her best bet is to trap a man with a pregnancy and rely on his child support, she will do that. If she thinks that paternity fraud and cuckolding a beta provider with an alpha's child is a better option, she will do that. If her options are even more limited she will not hesitate to find alpha sperm then raise the child alone with government support.

Women do not do this because they are consciously trying to do evil. They do it because they are biologically programmed to ensure the survival of the species by any means necessary. This is the reason that women are obsessed by men, romance, weddings and children their entire lives. It's all a function of their relentless focus (obsession, really) on getting impregnated and raising children. Reproduction is far too important a mechanism to leave up to a conscious, logical decision. There are always many reasons not to have children. Men, who are focused on mastering the external world, can especially always come up with reasons to put off or renounce fatherhood entirely. The majority of men only become fathers because some woman decides, one way or another, that it's time for him to be a father. This is simply the way of the world.

A man is an organism that proves its worth by demonstrating some mastery over the world.

A woman is an organism that proves its worth by securing sperm from a man that has demonstrated mastery.

And so it goes, generation after generation.

Though the day is young, I think this is the...

[Samseau]

Exactly Scorpian. I don't think any guy here should judge her. At least she is having kids. I value the single-mom's more than the spinster career bitches.

[TheFinalEpic]

I've stopped reading that site due to the fact it is clearly headed by manginas and feminist propaganda. Some of the articles made me want to jump off a bridge 6 months ago, I can't imagine how much worse it's gotten.

[germanico]

Wait, so she want to free one man from the burden of forced parenthood and you guys are slamming her?

[AnonymousBosch]

(07-29-2014 12:37 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Exactly Scorpian. I don't think any guy here should judge her. At least she is having kids. I value the single-mom's more than the spinster career bitches.

^ Fuck that. The question to ask is what is the quality of the child she's breeding, and who really pays for her luxury to decide she can't be bothered with a husband?

Single mothers raise rotten, fucked-up children, especially as they won't discipline them in case they lose peer approval, rather than being their child's parent. Every decent kid I've ever known has a strong father figure, ever fucked up slut and violent thug I've known has a strong, empowered single mother.

My mate's 13-year-old son says "Please" and "Thank you" and helps with the washing up.

His neighbour's 12-year-old son stands on the fence and pisses on our parked cars, and gleefully tells his mommy's new 'provider' that "you can't take your car back from her because she got you to put her name on the paperwork."

Another mate's son works hard in school, is always friendly, mow's the lawn without being asked and plays in the school football team.

Their neighbour's son? He's a 10-year-old obese video game addict who rarely sees the sun, tells his mother to 'fuck off' to her face, and often still sleeps in her bed at night.

Can you guess which children have 'strong, empowered single mothers' raising them?

It's the pattern I see over and over again. I believe the current dating market is like it is because of the lack of men raising their children.

The typist is a moron, and looks like a 29-year-old hitting the wall pretending she's 21 with soft-focus lighting and makeup.

EDIT:

One of many studies measuring both physical and mental health of children:

http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/26/2/549.full

Quote:

Children in step, single-mother, or grandparent-only families had poorer health than children living with two biological parents. Adjusting for demographic differences reduced observed disparities, although children living in single-mother or grandparent-only families still had poorer health than children living with two biological parents. Adjusted estimates showed that children in single-father families generally did as well as (for mental health) or better than (for physical health) children living with two biological parents.

There's also research that suggests that single mothers are the most at risk of mental health issues, (16% vs 6% married women).

Women (especially authors and social workers) will deny this and do everything they can to obscure the facts, but they hold true.

[Samseau]

(07-29-2014 04:22 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:37 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Exactly Scorpian. I don't think any guy here should judge her. At least she is having kids. I value the single-mom's more than the spinster career bitches.

^ Fuck that. The question to ask is what is the quality of the child she's breeding, and who really pays for her luxury to decide she can't be bothered with a husband?

Single mothers raise rotten, fucked-up children, especially as they won't discipline them in case they lose peer approval, rather than being their child's parent. Every decent kid I've ever known has a strong father figure, ever fucked up slut and violent thug I've known has a strong, empowered single mother.

My mate's 13-year-old son says "Please" and "Thank you" and helps with the washing up.

His neighbour's 12-year-old son stands on the fence and pisses on our parked cars, and gleefully tells his mommy's new 'provider' that "you can't take your car back from her because she got you to put her name on the paperwork."

Another mate's son works hard in school, is always friendly, mow's the lawn without being asked and plays in the school football team.

Their neighbour's son? He's a 10-year-old obese video game addict who rarely sees the sun, tells his mother to 'fuck off' to her face, and often still sleeps in her bed at night.

Can you guess which children have 'strong, empowered single mothers' raising them?

It's the pattern I see over and over again. I believe the current dating market is like it is because of the lack of men raising their children.

The typist is a moron, and looks like a 29-year-old hitting the wall pretending she's 21 with soft-focus lighting and makeup.

EDIT:

One of many studies measuring both physical and mental health of children:

http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/26/2/549.full

Quote:

Children in step, single-mother, or grandparent-only families had poorer health than children living with two biological parents. Adjusting for demographic differences reduced observed disparities, although children living in single-mother or grandparent-only families still had poorer health than children living with two biological parents. Adjusted estimates showed that children in single-father families generally did as well as (for mental health) or better than (for physical health) children living with two biological parents.

There's also research that suggests that single mothers are the most at risk of mental health issues, (16% vs 6% married women).

Women (especially authors and social workers) will deny this and do everything they can to obscure the facts, but they hold true.

Although everything you say is true, the simple fact is that reproduction is superior to extinction and therefore single mothers are superior to spinster career bitches (at least from an evolutionary view).

[samsamsam]

(07-29-2014 04:22 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

His neighbour's 12-year-old son stands on the fence and pisses on our parked cars, and gleefully tells his mommy's new 'provider' that "you can't take your car back from her because she got you to put her name on the paperwork."

Their neighbour's son? He's a 10-year-old obese video game addict who rarely sees the sun, tells his mother to 'fuck off' to her face, and often still sleeps in her bed at night.

HOLY SHIT! My kids wouldn't have teeth if they acted like that.