Quote: (05-05-2014 02:32 PM)speakeasy Wrote:
Quote: (05-05-2014 02:17 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Quote: (05-05-2014 02:13 PM)speakeasy Wrote:
Republicans support conservative morality, no abortion, religious dogma, everyone getting married,
What are the downsides to Republicans? They would create a high birthrate culture with some crazy religious freaks, but overall it would be a very good place for masculine men.
Namely their economics suck. I don't think they give a shit about the average income person or working class. Their main loyalty goes to the wealthy and reducing their taxes. Both parties are big spenders, but at least the Democrats actually want to raise taxes to support their spending.
Yeah but they only raise taxes on the working class. They don't actually propose a net worth tax that would take from the real rich who have never worked a day in their life.
Quote:Quote:
The republicans keep spending the same while lowering taxes and just add it to the nation's credit card. Reaganomics are sacrosanct to them and and Reagan himself has an unwavering cult-of-personality status reminiscent of Kim Il Sung. You cannot criticize anything Reagan did, his economic policies, his foreign policies or anything that came from the Reagan era. These are the golden years to Republicans. If you believe in all that Reaganism then vote Republican. The Republican part is no longer the party of Lincoln, it's the party of Reagan.
Okay, these are legitimate objections but your original point was that republicans create a religious culture and lots of marriages.
Now you're saying they just milk from the poor and give to the rich, which I might add has occurred the most under the Democrats since Obama was elected.
But this is just a digression. I don't care about Republicans or Democrats. I just want a high birthrate culture with strong families because I know that's the best culture for masculine men.
I don't care who does it, as long as someone does it.
Quote:Quote:
Also, I don't think Republicans are anti-feminist in any way. What was Sarah Palin if not an affirmative action choice to please women? There's no way in hell that John McCain couldn't find a man to run as his VP that was more qualified than her.
Republicans are definitely hardcore white knights, but they weren't always this way.
It does seem like as long as women have the vote though, both parties must pander to the female vote. So calling either party feminist is kinda moot, since it is suicide not to.
That said, if I had to choose between a feminist culture with high birthrates and lots of marriages versus a feminist culture with low birthrates and broken families, I'll take the former.
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can
follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.