[Nomad77]

@Rudeboy Sure, going to another country where the amount of work you have to put in is always nice and I have done this. BUT, I am not concerned about me, whatever happens I have already done very well for myself when it comes to women. I am concerned about my friends here who will never be able to move to another country. My focus is what, if anything, can be done to make the situation here better. Besides, it's only a matter of a less than five years before the whole world becomes pretty much like here. Our culture and attitudes is our biggest export.

[The Lizard of Oz]

What to do if you're like "99%" of other guys?

How about this:

-- Enjoy the fuck out of your life
-- Count your blessings daily and twice on Sundays
-- Realize that your life is more interesting various and enjoyable than that of kings and emperors of former times, with access to vastly more health, knowledge, art, entertainment, pleasure, instruction, you name it
-- Don't whine, don't be an ingrate and don't try to demoralize others

That's a good start.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-05-2014 10:35 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

@Rudeboy Sure, going to another country where the amount of work you have to put in is always nice and I have done this. BUT, I am not concerned about me, whatever happens I have already done very well for myself when it comes to women. I am concerned about my friends here who will never be able to move to another country. My focus is what, if anything, can be done to make the situation here better. Besides, it's only a matter of a less than five years before the whole world becomes pretty much like here. Our culture and attitudes is our biggest export.

Done? The global agenda is set by the plutocracy (recommend Carroll Quigley's works for instant de-plugging from the matrix).

On a micro-level a strong Alpha male can find a decent girl, not get married, keep seperate places, keep finances apart even when having a child, basically live together.

Life has always been hard for the lower 95% of humanity - a few decades might have been better and we only recognize them to have been superior after they are gone already. Now is the time of financial collapse before the One World Government and the Brave New World society of mindless fornication and no emotional attachment. That is the agenda. We will see if their plans come to fruition - so far they succeed.

On a micro-level everyone of us can have a grand life of travel, adventure, women, relationships, even wealth accumulation - we still have the freedoms to do those things for some time to come!

[Nomad77]

@Lizard Every great achievement man has ever made was the product of a deep dissatisfaction with the status quo. If we all sat around praising and counting our blessings every day we would still be shitting on the ground and sleeping in caves right now. Did you think Steve Jobs and Elon Musk sat around saying how great their lives where. If they did, the iPhone and Tesla would never have been created. I am all for being positive but I am under no illusion that that will get you nowhere or achieve anything. We don't change ourselves or the world when we are happy and satisfied, we do it when we are deeply unhappy and dissatisfied.

[Deluge]

(05-05-2014 08:06 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(05-05-2014 07:49 PM)Deluge Wrote:  

This discussion raises the question: what kind of society do we actually personally want?

A highly religious, family oriented one where most men will only ever sleep with one women for life? Traditional societies are good for children and most men, but bad for women and alpha men.

Or a secular, individual oriented one where the average men will sleep with maybe 10 women in their lifetimes, but it is possible for some men to sleep with far more? These societies are good for alpha men and women, but bad for the everyday man and children.

I'm in the later category, partly because I'm young and that's all that there really is around me, even though I do think that option is worse for society over all. Après moi, le déluge - After me, the flood. It's going to come one day, but by that time I'll either dead or elderly. In the meantime however

Regardless of what "we" want, the cats not going back in the bag. I don't see a return to religious, family-oriented society where everyone is a virgin at marriage and has a nuclear family with no divorce. There's just no reversing that. Religious belief is generally on the decline as a larger share of each generation becomes secular humanist. Religion is really the only cultural mold powerful enough to create that type of society. I don't see anything else to replace it that would have the same effect. Without religious shaming, there is no reason anyone will shy away from lots of casual sex, or homosexual experimentation, or not having kids, easy divorce, abortion and a free-wheeling lifestyle.

If you guys want to see people have more kids in the West then maybe the
government will have start paying women to have them or giving even more incentive through further tax credits and other goodies like government-funded day care. Religion is not going to do it and there aren't enough Mormans in Utah to reverse the trend. And Catholic Hispanics that immigrate within a generation will be indistinguishable in behavior from their American peers.

While the religious population in the West is currently declining in proportion (the world as a whole is actually getting more religious though due to higher fertility in developing countries) they still have more children and towards the end of the century their higher fertility is going to start reversing secularization in the U.S. America has a large religious population (by Western standards) to begin with, so when the reversal in the West comes it'll be most apparent there first. The rest of the West is barely religious at all at the moment anyway, but 1/4 of Western Europe is predicted to be Muslim by 2100, and the majority of the world's Jews will be Orthodox before then (enter the Hasidic enclave in my city and you'll notice some families literally have enough kids to fill a fucking football team). Who know's what effect future scientific advances will have though. The majority of Americans will one day favour overturning Roe v Wade (support for it is already stagnating amongst Millennials) but you can't just make the pill go away. It's unlikely a Western society (except maybe Israel) will ever be religious enough to overturn no-fault divorce laws because even religious Christians support that. Demographics is destiny, but maybe in 100 years (even) more Americans will be religious then today but still have casual sex hypocritically, we just don't know, we'll probably be dead by then, but you can't deny that religion isn't going to make some form of come back.

[Samseau]

(05-06-2014 01:56 AM)Deluge Wrote:  

(05-05-2014 08:06 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(05-05-2014 07:49 PM)Deluge Wrote:  

This discussion raises the question: what kind of society do we actually personally want?

A highly religious, family oriented one where most men will only ever sleep with one women for life? Traditional societies are good for children and most men, but bad for women and alpha men.

Or a secular, individual oriented one where the average men will sleep with maybe 10 women in their lifetimes, but it is possible for some men to sleep with far more? These societies are good for alpha men and women, but bad for the everyday man and children.

I'm in the later category, partly because I'm young and that's all that there really is around me, even though I do think that option is worse for society over all. Après moi, le déluge - After me, the flood. It's going to come one day, but by that time I'll either dead or elderly. In the meantime however

Regardless of what "we" want, the cats not going back in the bag. I don't see a return to religious, family-oriented society where everyone is a virgin at marriage and has a nuclear family with no divorce. There's just no reversing that. Religious belief is generally on the decline as a larger share of each generation becomes secular humanist. Religion is really the only cultural mold powerful enough to create that type of society. I don't see anything else to replace it that would have the same effect. Without religious shaming, there is no reason anyone will shy away from lots of casual sex, or homosexual experimentation, or not having kids, easy divorce, abortion and a free-wheeling lifestyle.

If you guys want to see people have more kids in the West then maybe the
government will have start paying women to have them or giving even more incentive through further tax credits and other goodies like government-funded day care. Religion is not going to do it and there aren't enough Mormans in Utah to reverse the trend. And Catholic Hispanics that immigrate within a generation will be indistinguishable in behavior from their American peers.

While the religious population in the West is currently declining in proportion (the world as a whole is actually getting more religious though due to higher fertility in developing countries) they still have more children and towards the end of the century their higher fertility is going to start reversing secularization in the U.S. America has a large religious population (by Western standards) to begin with, so when the reversal in the West comes it'll be most apparent there first. The rest of the West is barely religious at all at the moment anyway, but 1/4 of Western Europe is predicted to be Muslim by 2100, and the majority of the world's Jews will be Orthodox before then (enter the Hasidic enclave in my city and you'll notice some families literally have enough kids to fill a fucking football team). Who know's what effect future scientific advances will have though. The majority of Americans will one day favour overturning Roe v Wade (support for it is already stagnating amongst Millennials) but you can't just make the pill go away. It's unlikely a Western society (except maybe Israel) will ever be religious enough to overturn no-fault divorce laws because even religious Christians support that. Demographics is destiny, but maybe in 100 years (even) more Americans will be religious then today but still have casual sex hypocritically, we just don't know, we'll probably be dead by then, but you can't deny that religion isn't going to make some form of come back.

Both of you guys forget that post-bankruptcy America, which is coming quite soon (depends on how many more welfare/warfare programs get instituted), is going to be hell on earth for America's poor.

First they will turn to violence, then the survivors will turn to religion once the welfare checks stop coming.

Religion is not merely a by-product of birthrates, although that is significant. Right now people worship the government. When that fails they'll go back to their old God.

[Deluge]

^Haha well forever-impending economic apocalypse aside, I did say that anything can happen over the coming years. People talk so much about the effect smartphones have on game, now imagine the effect Google Glass and new Virtual Reality technology such as the company Facebook recently bought will have. Seems like in a few years we'll all have smartphones on steroids around our heads and virtual reality sex on demand... Life feels more and more like science fiction every day. The rate of technological change is so rapid now it's hard to imagine what life will be like at all over the coming decades. It's almost scary just to think about.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-06-2014 12:27 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-06-2014 01:56 AM)Deluge Wrote:  

(05-05-2014 08:06 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(05-05-2014 07:49 PM)Deluge Wrote:  

This discussion raises the question: what kind of society do we actually personally want?

A highly religious, family oriented one where most men will only ever sleep with one women for life? Traditional societies are good for children and most men, but bad for women and alpha men.

Or a secular, individual oriented one where the average men will sleep with maybe 10 women in their lifetimes, but it is possible for some men to sleep with far more? These societies are good for alpha men and women, but bad for the everyday man and children.

I'm in the later category, partly because I'm young and that's all that there really is around me, even though I do think that option is worse for society over all. Après moi, le déluge - After me, the flood. It's going to come one day, but by that time I'll either dead or elderly. In the meantime however

Regardless of what "we" want, the cats not going back in the bag. I don't see a return to religious, family-oriented society where everyone is a virgin at marriage and has a nuclear family with no divorce. There's just no reversing that. Religious belief is generally on the decline as a larger share of each generation becomes secular humanist. Religion is really the only cultural mold powerful enough to create that type of society. I don't see anything else to replace it that would have the same effect. Without religious shaming, there is no reason anyone will shy away from lots of casual sex, or homosexual experimentation, or not having kids, easy divorce, abortion and a free-wheeling lifestyle.

If you guys want to see people have more kids in the West then maybe the
government will have start paying women to have them or giving even more incentive through further tax credits and other goodies like government-funded day care. Religion is not going to do it and there aren't enough Mormans in Utah to reverse the trend. And Catholic Hispanics that immigrate within a generation will be indistinguishable in behavior from their American peers.

While the religious population in the West is currently declining in proportion (the world as a whole is actually getting more religious though due to higher fertility in developing countries) they still have more children and towards the end of the century their higher fertility is going to start reversing secularization in the U.S. America has a large religious population (by Western standards) to begin with, so when the reversal in the West comes it'll be most apparent there first. The rest of the West is barely religious at all at the moment anyway, but 1/4 of Western Europe is predicted to be Muslim by 2100, and the majority of the world's Jews will be Orthodox before then (enter the Hasidic enclave in my city and you'll notice some families literally have enough kids to fill a fucking football team). Who know's what effect future scientific advances will have though. The majority of Americans will one day favour overturning Roe v Wade (support for it is already stagnating amongst Millennials) but you can't just make the pill go away. It's unlikely a Western society (except maybe Israel) will ever be religious enough to overturn no-fault divorce laws because even religious Christians support that. Demographics is destiny, but maybe in 100 years (even) more Americans will be religious then today but still have casual sex hypocritically, we just don't know, we'll probably be dead by then, but you can't deny that religion isn't going to make some form of come back.

Both of you guys forget that post-bankruptcy America, which is coming quite soon (depends on how many more welfare/warfare programs get instituted), is going to be hell on earth for America's poor.

First they will turn to violence, then the survivors will turn to religion once the welfare checks stop coming.

Religion is not merely a by-product of birthrates, although that is significant. Right now people worship the government. When that fails they'll go back to their old God.

Other significant factors that contribute to the lower birth rates are the rising cancer rates among the young ones, the dropping sperm count (80% the last 20 years - most likely due to ever more crappy food, GMOs etc.), the postponement of pregnancies, the drinking habits of women ! (every drop of alcohol impacts eggs - men regenerate sperm within 30 days - females already have all eggs they will ever have - alcohol permeates many tissues) etc.

In fact in some Western countries 10-20% of couples cannot conceive without any medical assistance, which is why fertility clinics will continue to boom!

The Western contries only increase population via immigration or first generation immigrants who reproduce at higher rates. The few Amish or highly devout traditional Christians won't make a dent in that statistic.

[Giovonny]

I have met Nomad77.

He is a really cool guy with a unique perspective.

However, I think Miami is a terrible place for him..

Why?

Because his "look" is not what most Miami girls are looking for. I'm sure Nomad will agree with me..

Miami girls want a man who looks like the picture of "American" success. They want a tall, rich, fair skinned man. (Or, a muscular man)

They don't want a man who reminds them of the home country. (unless, he is rich or extremely good looking)

Nomad is a great guy but he doesn't have "the look" that these girls are seeking.

That is why Miami is tough for him, in my opinion.

*****

Also, the only way to get out of the 99% is to work hard and work smart.

Nomad admits that he is not willing to put in the necessary work.

(05-05-2014 01:18 AM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

While I would like to be a Roosh or Krauser deep down inside I know I will never be willing to put in the work necessary.

I respect that honesty and I don't blame him.

Miami is a tough "fishbowl".

I would like to see Nomad move to Minneapolis or Seattle or some other city where his look is more desired.

Location is very important in terms of game. We have to "get in where we fit in"

[Samseau]

(05-06-2014 12:42 PM)Deluge Wrote:  

^Haha well forever-impending economic apocalypse aside, I did say that anything can happen over the coming years. People talk so much about the effect smartphones have on game, now imagine the effect Google Glass and new Virtual Reality technology such as the company Facebook recently bought will have. Seems like in a few years we'll all have smartphones on steroids around our heads and virtual reality sex on demand... Life feels more and more like science fiction every day. The rate of technological change is so rapid now it's hard to imagine what life will be like at all over the coming decades. It's almost scary just to think about.

Will they be able to eat virtual food and live in virtual houses? How about virtual kevlar or virtual muscles for protection?

[Foolsgo1d]

(05-05-2014 08:54 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(05-05-2014 08:36 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

In all honesty, I am glad I am not the top 1%, possible in the top 10% looks and body/heightwise. Being tall and muscular has its advantages but you still have to put effort in to get women who are in your league rather than the thirsty girls or overly slutty 7.5s/8s.

Poor guys, stuck banging all those 7s and 8s.

Let me clarify.

I was in a club on friday, pulled a girl "way too easily" with a simple wave and within 10 seconds its heavy kissing.

5 mins later she says "I gotta go" and not 10 seconds afterwards she is snogging another stranger. And another. And another.

She did this for 2-3 hours straight and I was counting my luck that I saw this before thinking about getting my dick wet. What she has in her panties I dont know but this is what I mean.

Pretty girls who are too easy are red flags for me.

[Nomad77]

Thanks Gio. You have got it exactly right. Latin girls are not into my look. The moment I move outside of Miami things get a lot better.

[cocoballs]

I disagree with game being location dependent. I think you are looking for an easy way out and that actually makes you less of an Alpha. Don't move to an "easy" city, move to the city you really wanna live in. I don't care if it's Miami, LA or NYC. Don't let the city defeat you just because there's too much competition. You don't run from it, you embrace it.

[Giovonny]

(05-06-2014 07:43 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

Thanks Gio. You have got it exactly right. Latin girls are not into my look.

That is the first thing I thought when I met you!

When you said you live in Miami, I got a bad feeling.. I know what Latin girls like, I know what they don't like..

You look like their cousin from back in South America! They want a more "American" looking guy. They want a guy with a modern, North American vibe.. I feel this is weird for you because you grew up in South America and Europe.

I know you understand what I'm saying and I hope you are not mad a time for saying this.

I feel you would do much better in a place where your "look" is more of a novelty!

[StrikeBack]

(05-06-2014 08:45 PM)cocoballs Wrote:  

I disagree with game being location dependent. I think you are looking for an easy way out and that actually makes you less of an Alpha. Don't move to an "easy" city, move to the city you really wanna live in. I don't care if it's Miami, LA or NYC. Don't let the city defeat you just because there's too much competition. You don't run from it, you embrace it.

There are quite a few guys in the Game who have your mindset which treats the Game as a video game: the more challenging, the more satisfying.

Others might have a different one. Personally I don't want to work too hard for girls who are essentially entertainment, not investment.

[Nascimento]

Nomad, do you find your difficulties with latinas is because of the location (miami) more than latinas themselves?

I imagine you could kill it in south america. Having grown up there, but also lived many years abroad, have the American experience and such.

[Nomad77]

Nah Gio, don't worry about it.

I didn't do well in South America either but been "American" helped. Without question the Latin girls in Miami are the worse out of any place I have been to. Latin girls in other parts of the country are lot easier than the ones in Miami. The girls that are most attracted to me are European girls and then white American girls. This is how bad it is, 90% of the girls I have been with in Miami where white American/European even though they are less than 10% of population here. As women become more looks oriented your "look" becomes a bigger factor. ALL of the guys from this forum I know who do well in Miami are white American guys who came here from other parts of the country.

[CaP7]

I've been thinking a lot about how the existing culture is affecting the levels of happiness in other people, including myself. We find ourselves in a very odd space where everyone is told to "shoot for the stars", "follow your passion", and "you can do anything if you put your mind to it".

I think people overall, including myself, have expectations that are far ahead of what is possible and what is healthy.

Gone are the themes such as "be content with what you have", "humility', and "know your role". When ~60% of the population thinks that they are on their way to the top ~10%, there unhappiness levels increase.

I wrote about it last week a little more in a response to CMQ below...

"RE: Back to the USA for one month
(04-21-2014 03:48 PM)Christian McQueen Wrote: I think a valid question for our generation is:
Why are men so thirsty current day, when women are sluttier than ever?
It's easier to get laid now then ever before (in theory), but yet 'men' are falling over themselves, backstabbing each other and doing everything in their power to get pussy, when women are literally giving their pussy away."

You've posed this question before I believe. Here is my hypothesis.

Marriage, or even consistent relationships, are no longer the main goal of urban men in their 20's. Hell, a girlfriend isn't even something that guys want, unless she's "really hot". If there is anything on her that's not on point for an 8, a relationship is not pursued. It's not worth the hassle of putting up with an average American woman. Also, men are severely judged by their peers for claiming a girlfriend that is average, or worse, below average.

The rules have changed from "sex within dating" to "sex with strangers".

If men no longer pursue sex within the boundaries of a relationship, then they are constantly pursuing during maximum free time, which is Friday/Saturday night. Competition is high. Thus, standards are lowered. After all, it's just a 'piece of ass'. 'Not going to introduce her to my friends anyways'.

I don't think girls are the only ones that only want top shelf options.

I consistently hear from girls in their mid 20's that guys in their 20's suck. It's not because the guys don't have game, money, cool shit to do. I think it's because guys won't become exclusive after she puts out, unless she's a solid 8.

A lot of what is being described in this thread is a general breakdown of traditional societal structure. You can blame it on women making more money, urbanization, wealth effect, or what have you.

BOTH sides want to 'bat above their average'. Media is constantly reinforcing that this is possible, when in fact it is not. If you are a 7, and you want an 8, as a man, you have to do work. The average man is not willing, or does not know how, to do the work.

The massive amount of thirsty guys is the result of everyone holding out for something better. Or, for someone that is more attractive than what they deserve or can get.

Hell, this is what I do personally. I've seen all my friends from smaller towns wife-up average, or below average, women that I wouldn't even think about being friends with, let alone approach at a bar. They have beautiful children and successful lives. However, I now view them as having a lower value in society because their wives are now fat/ugly,nags. My friends are now giving their wives their 'best years' and if they were single, would be slaying it. Neither of them can remember the last time they received oral sex.

I have experience in small-town America. In smaller high schools, the most attractive people date each other. The average people date each other, and the rejects. People figured out their social hierarchies and stuck to it. If you couldn't hang at the top, you were shot down to the next lower level real fast. The next generation was told that you don't have to adhere to the social hierarchy. Everyone deserves to be special. Everyone is attractive. You can no longer shoot people down to the lower level (bullying).

My translation: Everyone is on the market > You hook up with strangers, or 5's, because it doesn't matter > Relationship only if you hit the lottery > Higher amount of guys bowing down to anything with a vag because they aren't getting consistent ass like they would have if they knew and accepted their social hierarchy.


Sound about right?

[Nomad77]

I have never met McQueen but I am pretty damn sure he's a good looking white guy. If you are a good looking guy, regardless of race, it's fairly easy to get laid especially if you are willing to drop your standards to the 4 - 6 range. If you are a good looking white guy, you would have to be social fuckup if you were having a tough time. If you are a good looking white guy, with some decent social skills and some game, you will be raking it in. I have a good looking black friend that does well in Miami too BUT it's with the older Latin women not the hot young girls. I would say height and looks are two of the biggest plus factors to getting laid these days. If you have both, regardless of race, and some social skills and game, forget it. It's these guys that are sitting around scratching their heads going: what is this fool talking about? I don't even have enough time to screw all of these girls that are throwing themselves at me

[Akula]

I'd say it's not so much a 99% versus 1% thing, at least in the sexual marketplace.

Sure its a lot tougher and more stratified now than it used to be (and women expect a hell of a lot more), but there are many different levels one can aspire to, so you don't just have to break into the 1% to get 'er done. You can be be a master of your own little universe (big fish in a little pond), a smaller player in a bigger pond like NYC, or just a slightly above average player abroad and still get good results and be happy with the notches you get. Or you can use the internet and Seeking Arrangement type game to go another direction if you find your live game isn't as good as you'd like it to be and need other avenues to get your foot in the door & make it happen.

IMO, very few guys are going to elevate themselves to the level of McQueen, Krauser, Roosh etc. but the good news is you don't have to. As long as you have abundance mentality and keep improving your game it just gets easier and easier and you'll eventually never find yourself without options.

[Nomad77]

It's my position and belief that the rate of inflation (cost per bang) is raising a lot faster than the "average" guy can compensate with Game for. AND unless this inflation is checked somehow pretty soon no amount of game is going to make much of difference. As others have pointed out, all of the women now feel they are entitled to a Bratt Pitt.

[Samseau]

(05-06-2014 11:33 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

It's my position and belief that the rate of inflation (cost per bang) is raising a lot faster than the "average" guy can compensate with Game for. AND unless this inflation is checked somehow pretty soon no amount of game is going to make much of difference. As others have pointed out, all of the women now feel they are entitled to a Bratt Pitt.

But inflation is generally limited to the sphere of the Market.

For example, prices could be rising in China, yet still stay low in Vietnam.

Likewise, America is a big fucking place, and just because you find yourself priced out of one pussy market doesn't mean there isn't another.

Practically speaking, Nomad, you should remember that there are tons of lily-white areas left in the USA with women more amicable to your look and vibe.

But more importantly, FIND A FUCKING NICHE, and stop bitchin already...

[Samseau]

(05-06-2014 08:53 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

(05-06-2014 07:43 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

Thanks Gio. You have got it exactly right. Latin girls are not into my look.

That is the first thing I thought when I met you!

When you said you live in Miami, I got a bad feeling.. I know what Latin girls like, I know what they don't like..

You look like their cousin from back in South America! They want a more "American" looking guy. They want a guy with a modern, North American vibe.. I feel this is weird for you because you grew up in South America and Europe.

I know you understand what I'm saying and I hope you are not mad a time for saying this.

I feel you would do much better in a place where your "look" is more of a novelty!

Thank you for stating a red pill truth a lot of guys on this board refuse to accept.

"Whiteness" is extremely sexually attractive to almost all other races on the planet. Both white women and white men are universally desirable.

Thus with the worldwide white population declining, it stands to reason that

1. Whites will become even more valuable.
2. Whites will almost certainly stick together more.

It's the same principle as rich people who only live with other rich people: value attracts value. As whites are perceived as more valuable by other races, whites themselves will also prefer to date strictly other whites as well.

Thus the takeaway for non-white men is very simple: Get the white pussy now if you want it because its price is only going up in the future.

[Dalaran1991]

(05-07-2014 10:04 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-06-2014 08:53 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

(05-06-2014 07:43 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

Thanks Gio. You have got it exactly right. Latin girls are not into my look.

That is the first thing I thought when I met you!

When you said you live in Miami, I got a bad feeling.. I know what Latin girls like, I know what they don't like..

You look like their cousin from back in South America! They want a more "American" looking guy. They want a guy with a modern, North American vibe.. I feel this is weird for you because you grew up in South America and Europe.

I know you understand what I'm saying and I hope you are not mad a time for saying this.

I feel you would do much better in a place where your "look" is more of a novelty!

Thank you for stating a red pill truth a lot of guys on this board refuse to accept.

"Whiteness" is extremely sexually attractive to almost all other races on the planet. Both white women and white men are universally desirable.

Thus with the worldwide white population declining, it stands to reason that

1. Whites will become even more valuable.
2. Whites will almost certainly stick together more.

It's the same principle as rich people who only live with other rich people: value attracts value. As whites are perceived as more valuable by other races, whites themselves will also prefer to date strictly other whites as well.

Thus the takeaway for non-white men is very simple: Get the white pussy now if you want it because its price is only going up in the future.

It's already happening. I'm Asian with some game, and I have no problem pulling Asian or mixed girl, but the amount of work you have to do to get a white 6 compare to an Asian 7 is just un-fucking-imaginable. In fact, most of my lays and dates come from mixed girls. The closest I ever got with white girls are is a makeout. And this given that I only hang out with white people, and make conscious effort to game white girls.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(05-06-2014 10:56 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

I have never met McQueen but I am pretty damn sure he's a good looking white guy. If you are a good looking guy, regardless of race, it's fairly easy to get laid especially if you are willing to drop your standards to the 4 - 6 range. If you are a good looking white guy, you would have to be social fuckup if you were having a tough time. If you are a good looking white guy, with some decent social skills and some game, you will be raking it in. I have a good looking black friend that does well in Miami too BUT it's with the older Latin women not the hot young girls. I would say height and looks are two of the biggest plus factors to getting laid these days. If you have both, regardless of race, and some social skills and game, forget it. It's these guys that are sitting around scratching their heads going: what is this fool talking about? I don't even have enough time to screw all of these girls that are throwing themselves at me

Looks and race have not been properly addressed by many PUAs. They count a lot especially with girls in the prime.

By the sound of it Nomad you would make an easy killing in Poland where girls are especially into Latin looks. I have seen 5'5" guys pulling 7s who were 5'7"!! Recently I was sitting at a Cafe in Warsaw and this short Spanic guy sits down beaming from ear to ear with the tall blonde 7. I was happy for the guy, but still amazed because I know what the market looks like in other parts of the world. Black guys also do extremely good in Poland, since there are so few of them here - many girls want to at least taste some dark sugar once.

Either way Samseau is right - finding a niche is the most time-effective way to get laid. In some cities even Master PUAs are having a tough time getting laid if they rely only on night-game in crazy sausage-fest cities like London or Washington.