[chochemonger1]

(12-27-2012 05:52 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

The 90's were GREAT for me dude.

No idea if you are speaking from experience, and really don't care.

They werent bad for me either DUDE and even in the 50´s or any decade, for that matter, Im sure there were some guys who were loving it. So that was not my argument.

But what I was trying to convey is that in America, in general (for a greater percentage of men), the 70s and 80s were a golden age of easy pussy relative to the 90s. I think most players who hunted in all 3 decades would acknowledge that.

[Hotwheels]

Did you hunt in all three decades?

[chochemonger1]

(12-29-2012 01:56 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

Did you hunt in all three decades?

I wish I could have lol. There is enough evidence from many sources and info from older friends that leads me to that conclusion.

In the mid 90s, when I went to college, many girls were still brainwashed by the AIDS scare and you started to see fatties on campus on a regular basis (though way less than now).

That doesnt mean you couldnt get laid regularly in college then, but it wasnt a fuckfest like the 70s, 80s or now.

Though, as I said some guys always have experiences different than the norm in every decade.

[Therapsid]

(12-29-2012 03:12 AM)chochemonger1 Wrote:  

(12-29-2012 01:56 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

Did you hunt in all three decades?

I wish I could have lol. There is enough evidence from many sources and info from older friends that leads me to that conclusion.

In the mid 90s, when I went to college, many girls were still brainwashed by the AIDS scare and you started to see fatties on campus on a regular basis (though way less than now).

That doesnt mean you couldnt get laid regularly in college then, but it wasnt a fuckfest like the 70s, 80s or now.

Though, as I said some guys always have experiences different than the norm in every decade.

The 90's were definitely better. This despite the fact that some have argued they represented the high tide of feminism.

Girls were still slimmer then than today on average. And more feminine as well.

Beyond any cultural shift, the fact that girls then lived before cell phones or at least smart phones by itself ensures that it was a fuckfest compared to today.

[zombiejimmorrison]

70s girls are my favourite, here's another video and this time they're shaking their toned buttocks

[Hotwheels]

(12-29-2012 03:12 AM)chochemonger1 Wrote:  

(12-29-2012 01:56 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

Did you hunt in all three decades?

I wish I could have lol. There is enough evidence from many sources and info from older friends that leads me to that conclusion.

In the mid 90s, when I went to college, many girls were still brainwashed by the AIDS scare and you started to see fatties on campus on a regular basis (though way less than now).

That doesnt mean you couldnt get laid regularly in college then, but it wasnt a fuckfest like the 70s, 80s or now.

Though, as I said some guys always have experiences different than the norm in every decade.

So essentially you are going off what other people have told you.

ok

[Samseau]

(06-06-2015 05:52 AM)zombiejimmorrison Wrote:  

70s girls are my favourite, here's another video and this time they're shaking their toned buttocks

I dunno. By the 70's you could already see the women devolving into cheap tarts. Still way better than what we have today though.

[El Chinito loco]

(06-06-2015 05:55 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

(12-29-2012 03:12 AM)chochemonger1 Wrote:  

(12-29-2012 01:56 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

Did you hunt in all three decades?

I wish I could have lol. There is enough evidence from many sources and info from older friends that leads me to that conclusion.

In the mid 90s, when I went to college, many girls were still brainwashed by the AIDS scare and you started to see fatties on campus on a regular basis (though way less than now).

That doesnt mean you couldnt get laid regularly in college then, but it wasnt a fuckfest like the 70s, 80s or now.

Though, as I said some guys always have experiences different than the norm in every decade.

So essentially you are going off what other people have told you.

ok

Damn dude, 3 year old conversation?

Anyways, I have to agree the 90's were better. I was in high school then and girls still had a natural curiosity/interest about them that's turned into jaded disinterest and entitlement with the millenial set.

It's very noticeable to those of us who grew up during the 90's and were in college in the '00's and see how badly the U.S. has deteriorated in the current era.

It's really shit now. If guys can make things work now hats off to you. I think if I was a kid growing up in this overly sensitive neurotic environment i'd be planning my escape from the U.S. even sooner.

[MrLemon]

(12-13-2012 02:07 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

Earlier today, Roosh posted the video below in his Twitter feed....

Let's discuss.

I grew up with girls like this. No shit. They weren't all this good looking obviously, but otherwise, they *all* were like this.

When I was in high school, none of the girls were sluts in public. Being a fat ugly slut was simply unheard of, rather like smearing yourself in dog shit and running around with no clothes on. Nobody did it because...well, why would they? They were too busy just having a good life and going on dates and finding boyfriends and going to college.

There were plenty of shitty things back then, but quality of women wasn't one of those.

[N°6]

Although they are probably hand-picked for the TV, these women represent the 'girl next door' that most men married. OKC found that most men still aspire to the girl next door as they get more messages than the hotties.

Unfortunately, the fake barbie look, female 'bi-sexuality' and female obesity has destroyed the girl next door demographic.

[ColSpanker]

Thirty-five years ago I knew one, and only one, woman who had a tattoo and it was on her wrist. Everyone thought she some kind of hell-raiser for getting it.

[N°6]

(06-07-2015 10:21 AM)ColSpanker Wrote:  

Thirty-five years ago I knew one, and only one, woman who had a tattoo and it was on her wrist. Everyone thought she some kind of hell-raiser for getting it.

I remember going to the beach with my parents and they were shocked when they saw a man with one tattoo on his leg!

[samsamsam]

College girl in 1968. I bet she was a typical one and yet so bangable.

[The Lizard of Oz]

(11-01-2015 04:14 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

College girl in 1968. I bet she was a typical one and yet so bangable.

This girl is not typical in any context or environment. She has movie star looks, very nice clothing, an expensive haircut, professionally done nails and serious makeup. In addition, the photograph looks professionally done and staged. I wouldn't be surprised if she was a model or an actress, even though I can't identify her.

(EDIT: and indeed a little searching shows her to be Britt Fredriksen, Playboy's Miss June 1968).

This picture (from 1973) is closer to what you would call "typical":

[samsamsam]

^^^ doh!

[RIslander]

(11-01-2015 04:28 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

Those girls are at similar levels of attractiveness as to what I see among average women in areas with normal BMI levels, such as Japan, SEA, LA and EE.

Those women are now in the top 5% of American women. I would consider them, relatively speaking: 8, 10, 9. Outside the west: 5.5, 7, 6.

The new average:

[AnonymousBosch]

(06-06-2015 09:15 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(06-06-2015 05:52 AM)zombiejimmorrison Wrote:  

70s girls are my favourite, here's another video and this time they're shaking their toned buttocks

I dunno. By the 70's you could already see the women devolving into cheap tarts. Still way better than what we have today though.

It was the appearance of being slutty for the teens, not the actuality. It was far more playful and innocent than it looks. Girls wanted to look bad, but not bad enough to be branded a slut. I mean, the teen girls in Oz would furiously-debate over if wearing CFM Boots ('Come Fuck Me' Boots) was going too far.



I remember seeing a matinee of 'Xanadu' as a kid, and the older girls audibly-gasped and started furiously-chatting when Olivia Newton John appeared wearing those. Was it acceptable now? Or was she being slutty?

I imagine the 20-something disco culture at the same time was where the real decadence was. Still, from what I observed from the people of my parents age at the time, it was it was a far more human sexuality than now - designed at landing a boyfriend - instead of this alien, affected porn star sexiness.

Thinking about it, I don't Australian Girls devolved by becoming sluts, but more that they devolved into masculine rather than feminine behaviour.

[samsamsam]

(11-01-2015 04:39 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

Shower curtains have so many uses.

[StrikeBack]

That is like a scene from Pacific Rim: Category 4 Kaijus emerging from the ocean. Our Jaegers must be pissing their robot pants.

[Dr. Howard]

The only thing that I would be worried about going back in time would be the smoking...and the teeth, related to the smoking circa the 60s and 70s. Going up to some hot bitch and then closing for the kiss and feeling like I'm kissing an english zombie ashtray would be a boner killer, especially coming from 'the future' of smoke free everywhere and teeth bleaching.

[Dusty]

(11-01-2015 06:37 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

The only thing that I would be worried about going back in time would be the smoking...and the teeth, related to the smoking circa the 60s and 70s. Going up to some hot bitch and then closing for the kiss and feeling like I'm kissing an english zombie ashtray would be a boner killer, especially coming from 'the future' of smoke free everywhere and teeth bleaching.

And the big hairy bushes.

[philosophical_recovery]

(11-02-2015 11:23 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(11-01-2015 06:37 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

The only thing that I would be worried about going back in time would be the smoking...and the teeth, related to the smoking circa the 60s and 70s. Going up to some hot bitch and then closing for the kiss and feeling like I'm kissing an english zombie ashtray would be a boner killer, especially coming from 'the future' of smoke free everywhere and teeth bleaching.

And the big hairy bushes.

[Scorpio Rising]

(11-01-2015 06:37 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

The only thing that I would be worried about going back in time would be the smoking...and the teeth, related to the smoking circa the 60s and 70s. Going up to some hot bitch and then closing for the kiss and feeling like I'm kissing an english zombie ashtray would be a boner killer, especially coming from 'the future' of smoke free everywhere and teeth bleaching.

It wasn't nearly as bad as you make it out to be. Mints, gum, booze all mitigated the effects of tobacco. Plus believe me if you isolated some hottie that happened to smoke say a half a pack a day you'd forget all about her habit and concentrate on the moment.

[Passive Menis]

(11-01-2015 04:39 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

Those girls are at similar levels of attractiveness as to what I see among average women in areas with normal BMI levels, such as Japan, SEA, LA and EE.

Those women are now in the top 5% of American women. I would consider them, relatively speaking: 8, 10, 9. Outside the west: 5.5, 7, 6.

That's ridiculous. The two on the left and right are straight-up busted. If you genuinely consider those girls to be in the top 5% of American females I can only assume that you've never visited a major city, or really anywhere outside of Rhode Island.

[Merenguero]

(11-03-2015 11:03 AM)Passive Menis Wrote:  

(11-01-2015 04:39 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

Those girls are at similar levels of attractiveness as to what I see among average women in areas with normal BMI levels, such as Japan, SEA, LA and EE.

Those women are now in the top 5% of American women. I would consider them, relatively speaking: 8, 10, 9. Outside the west: 5.5, 7, 6.

That's ridiculous. The two on the left and right are straight-up busted. If you genuinely consider those girls to be in the top 5% of American females I can only assume that you've never visited a major city, or really anywhere outside of Rhode Island.

The girls in the picture aren't a fair and accurate representation of anything. They have great genetics as far as their faces, but are complete fat slobs. Overall, they are nowhere near top 5% anywhere. Some troll basically found four girls with pretty faces and horrible bodies and took a picture of them.