[iknowexactly]

(10-14-2012 03:38 AM)Katatonic Wrote:  

I'm going to use the fuck out of this quote or variations of it:

Quote:

Women say old men are pervs for wanting to fuck young girls.
Fuck I would think it is perverted to fuck old women. It is natural as a motherfucker to want to fuck young women.

I'm 33 and have friends who take exception to me fucking 18-22 year olds.

The urge to fuck fertile women--no, maximally fertile women-- is quite literally the most natural thing in the world.

It is the reason life exists. Life is the reason it exists.

DISCLAIMER: Under no circumstances do I condone illegal activity of any kind. Thos post is purely for entertainment purposes and is not a true description of any true intent or condoning of content. I agree I am not in a police state. I love Big Brother.

[Tengen]

I'm surprised no one has posted this yet:

https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/...m-failure/

Some choice quotes:

Quote:

The reason Obama won this election and why the Republicans were not able to gain any ground in the legislature was women. Pure and Simply. This election was about women. And the men lost.

Quote:

Now, I am going to tell you in no uncertain terms, if you have a dick then you are on your own and the forces of the world are arrayed against you. You can expect no political support, no social support, no support in the workplace, no support in the courts, with the police. Whether you realize it or not, women are a bigger enemy to you than any Arab, any Iranian, any Chinese.

A prediction:

Quote:

It is my opinion that Elizabeth Warren will run for president in 2016 and will become the nominee. And more and more women will move into elected office and those women will push issues favorable to women as their primary agenda masking those issues as “for children”, “for education”, “for families”.

Quote:

You all need to understand in no uncertain terms, women despise you, they think little of you. They believe you brutish and violent, bull headed, and fundamentally stupid. They see you as big children that must be controlled and disciplined in order make you useful to them. And if you are not useful to them, if you do not provide those things that they wish from you, actually, more correct to say, those things they need from you, then you will not be a part of their lives.

And they are earnest and driven in structuring society and the law in such a manner that you are no longer needed.

Some words to live by:

Quote:

Start with this statement right here and make it the first declaration in who you are, what you will be, and will do, what you won’t be and what you won’t do, and how you judge and think about the world

“I will be nobody’s fucking slave and nobody’s fool”.

Our last hope:

Quote:

Re-evaluate everything.

Revolt.

You cannot change where the world and society is going. But you have the power to change your life so that you live it on your own terms. There will be no “macro” solution to the angst that you are feeling. There will be no grand social movement to correct the wrongs that you experience in your dealings with women and in how society views and what it expects from men.

But you have the solution in your hands.

Game.

Not just “Game” as pick-up lines, but “Game” as a way of viewing women, as a way of viewing life, as a way of reconstructing what is right and what is wrong, as a way of reacting to the changes that are beyond your control, as a way of dealing with the structural and social changes that already have come and inevitably are coming.

EDIT - Just did a deeper search and found his whole piece posted here: http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-17549-...#pid303041

Still, I feel justified reposting here, since it was getting no comments

[aphelion]

Behold your new prophet. The man is a legitimate gangster and the realest talker.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I can't help but agree with Rational Male and Mark Minter on most points, yet it offers no balm for my proverbial wounds. Honestly, I'd love to revolt against the feminist bullshit being pushed as part of Democratic/Left agenda, both in USA and in Europe. Yet there are so many thing about Republicans that strike me as just plain uncivilized, just plain disgusting, with blatant disregard for human compassion or restraint. It's a whole another extreme that I cold never vote for. While I view the Democratic platform as mostly good and positive, although tainted by unfortunate bits of cancerous, feminist bullshit mixed in, literally not a single item on the Republican agenda appeals to me. I just can't.

And on top of all that, it's not even certain that Republicans don't support that same bullshit. They're simply a bit milder and choose to go the "man up" route in their attempts to protect the family, but I don't think any of them would ban alimony, institute mandatory paternity testing, crack down on false rape allegations, shame slutty behaviour, balance the treatment of divorce, and so on.

I can't force myself to choose a huge pile of things that disgust me for just a slim hope that a single thing that disgusts me will be marginally better.

Maybe in the future, a political option will emerge that will combine general values that can attract the majority of support, while mixing in some red pill views (Tuthmosis for president? ). But I won't hold my breath. While I disagree that Republicans are the solution, I definitely agree with Rollo/Minter that things are only going to get worse, requiring men to be ever more careful.

p.s. I probably should have posted this comment in the election thread, but I'm not sure where it really belongs since I did miss the original quote in that thread (along with everyone else) and now it's buried 3-4 pages deep.
p.p.s. 1000th post. Heh.

[deepcov3r]

(11-08-2012 06:15 AM)aphelion Wrote:  

Behold your new prophet. The man is a legitimate gangster and the realest talker.

Is a gangster a criminal who bullies people in league with other criminals? That's a prophet? I think I'm confusing what people call a gangster nowadays is really an adventurer. I hope.

[bojangles]

Thanks hah, i did post it in the election thread as i thought it was a powerful message.

Creepy Eel - there is no distinction between the parties when it comes to promoting the rights of men. We have this problem in the UK, everything is about pandering to the weak gender as though there is something wrong with men. In the EU there is even talk of positive gender discrimination, they use word's like 'positive' when discrimination is what it is and there's no positive about it.

Fuck it, fuck them all.

[Samseau]

Mark Minter Wrote:

Pity the poor boy born in 2007 when there was a birth rate of 4.32 babies born per 1000 people to the birth rate in 2011 of 1.9. There will be no girls for 50% of those boys, given that men tend to pair with younger women. If you wish to see the impact of demographic discrepancy on female behavior, study the history of Wyoming. Men literally had to pay women to have relationships and she shopped for the best offer. She would go to a dance with one man and leave with another because she received the better offer.

Says it all.

The sexual revolution killed birth rates > makes men more desperate for vagina > makes men more beta and supplicative to women > allows women to act more free sexually > women don't marry as young > kills birth rates > makes men more desperate for vagina...

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I agree with the general sentiment, but this graph that I have found shows the birth rate to be 14.2 births per 1000 people in 2002, dropping to 13.7 births per 1000 people in 2012. Where is this 4.32 and 1.9 coming from? Am I reading the wrong graph?

http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=us&v=25
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Birth_Rates.svg

[Samseau]

Yeah, you're right. I took his stats at face value but they actually make no sense. I'm not sure what the hell those numbers are.

[Menace]

There is one missing element from Minter's rants. He seems to think that each red-pill guy should just be living on his own terms and do this own thing. I think that's wrong. I think like minded guys should be getting together to do things. Just like in The Way of Men. That's what this forum is all about, but it should happen to a much larger extent in real life. That's the way forward. To form like minded "gangs."

[chochemonger1]

(10-14-2012 03:38 AM)Katatonic Wrote:  

I'm going to use the fuck out of this quote or variations of it:

Quote:

Women say old men are pervs for wanting to fuck young girls.
Fuck I would think it is perverted to fuck old women. It is natural as a motherfucker to want to fuck young women.

I'm 33 and have friends who take exception to me fucking 18-22 year olds.

You are only doing God´s work my friend. Keep doing it as long as you can.

[Tengen]

Another piece of the Minter Manifesto, in reply to Rollo's latest posting.

https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2012/...ment-12229

Some choice quotes:

Quote:

...you can find The Middle Way. And I use that Buddhist term for a reason. Buddhism isn’t a religion. Buddha wasn’t a god or a prophet. He was a dude with an idea that came to him after living life as a rich prince then rejecting that, he lived as a poor beggar monk.

And these are the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism:
-Life is suffering
-We suffer because of our desire and craving
-There can be a cessation of suffering: it is the remainderless fading away and cessation of that same craving, the giving up and relinquishing of it, freedom from it, nonreliance on it.
-There is the way leading to the cessation of suffering: it is the Eightfold Path; that is, right view, right intention, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration.

Now substitute the word “suffering” with “suffering because of women” and there you have the end to your suffering.

And the Eightfold Path is Game.

Quote:

It all starts when you are boy and it carries on your whole life. You are herded like cattle into male situations that you believe are what you should do. Both the carrot and stick are used against you to push you and keep you into those situations. It is point of pride for men that most STEM university degrees are earned by men. And those degrees require greater effort, dedication, thought, and capability than others. And I would argue that many of those men are pushed into those degree programs and they complete them because they feel they have no other option. While I was going to engineering school and I would get fed up with the work, the pressure, the not seeing the ground on the way to take a final because my head was scooping from studying and staying in the highest level of abstractions possible, I knew I had no other choice. If I ever left then the money pressure from women would push me right back into it. There would always be that ubiquitous question from them, “What do you do?” I never had another alternative; at least I was conditioned to believe that. The thought of not finishing would make me sick to my stomach with fear. And everything I did from what I ate, to how I dressed, the music I listened to, to the cars I drove was all based and driven by some Femcentric notion that I would be judged worthy or not by women.

And fuck you. Don’t you fucking “beta ass motherfucker” me. Every one of you has to admit the same fucking thing.

You don’t have to go there. You don’t have to do it. Follow Game Buddhism.

Minter's guidelines to dating

Quote:

So I say this over and over. Until you gain the right consciousness, to understand which values in your head are conditioning from the Femcentric Female Imperative, then rely on Game, the fundamental and basic rules of game. Learn to approach. Learn to give yourself options other than the LTR. Walk on relationships readily and promptly. Never submit.

Never marry. Never be afraid to leave and do leave. Set a 90 day limit. Then get the fuck out.

[deepcov3r]

(11-08-2012 04:42 AM)Tengen Wrote:  

I'm surprised no one has posted this yet:

Quote:

You all need to understand in no uncertain terms, women despise you, they think little of you. They believe you brutish and violent, bull headed, and fundamentally stupid. They see you as big children that must be controlled and disciplined in order make you useful to them. And if you are not useful to them, if you do not provide those things that they wish from you, actually, more correct to say, those things they need from you, then you will not be a part of their lives.

And they are earnest and driven in structuring society and the law in such a manner that you are no longer needed.

At times women are disgusted with us. To argue this is constant and universal is simply paranoid. LIke the musings of, well, of a guy who got divorce raped good.

Don't forget there's justification for seeing us as brutal. Who murders who? Guys murder women much more. Assault may be different, but trying to gloss over the thousands of dead women guys have killed is a little disingenuous. I had a friend whose mother was just gunned down in the street by her asshole boyfriend. Was that "alpha"?

How can you simply make believe all the couples that are quite happy together most of the time -- my parents were one of them -- are just lying or putting on an act?

[deepcov3r]

(10-09-2012 02:38 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(10-08-2012 08:53 PM)xsplat Wrote:  

Mark is a good writer with deep and frequent insights, but the punchline to all his stories is fundamentally anti-game.

Well, it is for me, as I consider successful intimacy to be the height of game. Developing enough initial attraction to bed a girl is only 1/10th of the game of dealing with women.

I don't think he's saying to avoid relationships, but marriage and children.

Isn't there a slight logic problem there- who will exist to live his idealized existence if no one has children? Also I think he says systematically bail after 90 days... pretty limited intimacy in that case.

[deepcov3r]

(11-08-2012 03:23 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Yeah, you're right. I took his stats at face value but they actually make no sense. I'm not sure what the hell those numbers are.

It's sort of like the logic of a pissed-off woman. Pick whatever you feel like believing and believe it. In fact, that's what he sounds like. a pissed off woman on a rant.

Women are really getting to him. Very Beta.

[Menace]

I totally sympathize with Mark, but this writing is a second kind of porn for some guys. It's anger porn. Just can't get enough of it. I admit it's appealing to read and let the hate flow, but I wouldn't want to live my life this way. I also got divorced, but it sounds like he was really really screwed. Takes a long time to get over (took me 1 year and mine was not contentious although very painful), so maybe he simply needs to write like this until he can be at peace. The main point is just not to get married.

[bojangles]

(11-20-2012 08:15 AM)deepcov3r Wrote:  

(10-09-2012 02:38 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(10-08-2012 08:53 PM)xsplat Wrote:  

Mark is a good writer with deep and frequent insights, but the punchline to all his stories is fundamentally anti-game.

Well, it is for me, as I consider successful intimacy to be the height of game. Developing enough initial attraction to bed a girl is only 1/10th of the game of dealing with women.

I don't think he's saying to avoid relationships, but marriage and children.

Isn't there a slight logic problem there- who will exist to live his idealized existence if no one has children? Also I think he says systematically bail after 90 days... pretty limited intimacy in that case.

90 days is plenty of time for intimacy. Dropping birds before 90 days is fine as long as you keep spinning plates.

[Samseau]

(11-20-2012 07:41 AM)deepcov3r Wrote:  

Don't forget there's justification for seeing us as brutal. Who murders who? Guys murder women much more. Assault may be different, but trying to gloss over the thousands of dead women guys have killed is a little disingenuous. I had a friend whose mother was just gunned down in the street by her asshole boyfriend. Was that "alpha"?

So why was your friend's mom fucking that "brutal" man in the first place?

[reaper23]

his rants are solipsism personified.

[reaper23]

deleted

[reaper23]

(10-09-2012 05:43 PM)reaper23 Wrote:  

he really sounds angry. he sounds like a guy that still hasn't come out the other side yet. things will temper down and his own solipsism will subside.

he made a series of horrible choices that lead to a horrible outcome. he did absolutely everything wrong. his life sucked because he made it suck.

the burr that got under his wife's saddle was put there by him being the most supplicating beta bitch ever

-snip-

he is the piece of shit.

hate to quote myself, sorta, but this guy's bullshit was clear as day when he started with his rants

[Roosh]

No need to bump an old thread if we have a new one going: http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-26293.html