[HiFlo]

I see most other posts talking about, "the truth of women" or "being jaded by the game" or "having taken the red pill and seen what women really are"

How about being a bit more specific?

Here's one for starters: "Sweet, cute and innocent until they're not."

Back-story to this one:
Was seeing this girl for about 3 months (actually I picked her up and was seeing her for that long pretty much only because of this board). All of a sudden out of the blue (this last weekend) I see her out with another guy. Wow.

Of course the whole time, she was sweet, cute and innocent. After awhile there was something that said, "Damnit man, I want to save this little cutie, she act's like I'm the only one in the world for her, and it's getting to me." Then, poof, I lose contact with her for a few days then see her on a Sat night with some other dude.

Anyway, I had to get that off my chest, but would be curious to how others could summarize women in one short, simple sentence directly related to their experiences.

Another one that seems a bit clunky but could be something: "Intentionally cause drama to entangle you in their web."

I was hoping to be a little bit more specific with reference to flings/seeing somebody because ONS's don't mean shit in the grand scheme of things. Or maybe they do, what do I know.

[Samseau]

All women are the same

[esperar]

Manipulative.

I want to use more, but I can only say one.

What can I say, my opinion of them is very low.

[Mujeriego]

When it comes to ho's, anything goes.

[durangotang]

I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.

[R Smoov]

If she ain't tweaking we ain't speaking!

Translation: If she's not DTF then thats on her.

[UgSlayer]

It is what it is

[Tengen]

She needs my cock

[joehoya]

Predictable.

That's it in a nutshell. Women no longer surprise me at all.

[Cincinnatus]

(07-13-2012 05:44 PM)esperar Wrote:  

What can I say, my opinion of them is very low.

Same here.

I've been dating the same girl for a while now, and after spending a few years in the game, I find that I'll never be able to trust her, even though she's excessively sweet to me, and I took her virginity. I'm always suspicious. I also am not falling in love with her, the way I used to fall for a girl.

[Downunder]

They love the cock!!!

[esperar]

(07-13-2012 09:30 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(07-13-2012 05:44 PM)esperar Wrote:  

What can I say, my opinion of them is very low.

Same here.

I've been dating the same girl for a while now, and after spending a few years in the game, I find that I'll never be able to trust her, even though she's excessively sweet to me, and I took her virginity. I'm always suspicious. I also am not falling in love with her, the way I used to fall for a girl.

Same. My opinion of women is at a consistant low level.

[Architekt]

Women worth getting to know usually aren't women worth fucking, and vice-versa.

[WanderingSoul]

Sexy.

I'm not jaded by game at all. I've never been one to want to find that "special someone" or anything like that, so the fact that you can never trust a woman 100% really doesn't bother me.

[Kitsune]

"What a misogynistic screed of verbal diarrhea… from a man who looks like a mouse. Mr. Yang, you are an idiot. I wish that the most beautiful woman you ever saw and desired could read your worthless piece of writing. You would be deleted from the gene pool immediately.

Referring to women as pussy, is pathetic, worm. And for your information, a man has to keep competing to keep his wife’s interest and respect. A man who does not treat his wife as his queen and mistress goddess, may be shocked and humiliated to learn that she is the mistress of someone else! As to your simpering words that women are ‘not creative’, you betray your ignorance and tiny mind, Mr. Yang.

I assume you are familiar with Google. See if you can match your creativity against women like Artemesia Gentileschi, Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun, Leonor Fini, Tamara de Lempicka, George Sand, and Collette, to name a few. I laugh to think of you matching wits with the likes of philosopher Simone de Beauvoir… but then, it is hardly fair to call a battle of wits with an obviously unarmed male.

If men create to be sexually viable, per your assertion and if all women have to do is dress their hair, how do you explain the prodigious work of women artist, writers and thinkers through the ages, who have worked despite massive obstacles from men who have sought to deny them education, admittance to respected academies of arts, letters and sciences, etc. I will tell you, little grasshopper. It was to protect the sacred myth that women are not creative or intelligent, certainly not as much or even more so than ‘any’ man. I am so sorry to pop your little bubble Mr. Yang, but male intellectual and creative superiority is just a myth, like Santa Claus. And you still cannot bear children, where we are the gateway of life, the womb and the tomb. Patriarchy is a rickety structure built on lies and maintained by violence. In matriarchy, there were no ‘female talibans’.

Per your contempt for marriage, you have nothing to worry about. As long as you refer to women as ‘pussy’ in the collective, no one will want to marry you. Any woman who reads your screed will despise you. If she gets whiff of your disrespect, she will discount and despise you. There are lots of older white males who lust after pretty Asian boys like yourself, though, whose misogyny might even match yours, so don’t give up hope. Women can afford to choose, it’s true, and muscles are not enough. There is no deodorant to disguise the stench of your misogyny, and you wish to put your worm in our bodies. Unbelievable. Yuck. If you are a gym rat, you cannot give proper attention and service to a woman, and she will replace you with a more attentive suitor.

I invite you to investigate the concept of ‘the marriage premium’, the fact that men who are married make more money and are marked for promotion more than unmarried stags, especially, as they push thirty. Such men are seen as vaguely irresponsible drones, who are not worth giving the reins of power to. I also encourage you to ponder on the little ditty that ‘behind every great man is a woman’. It is when men marry and have the wise and calculating strategic mind of an intelligent wife to guide them that they are able to most focus on climbing the ladder of achievement and achieving ‘alpha male status’.

Such women do not come cheap. We are jealous goddesses who demand all your love, worship and devotion. We have expectations. We are slave-drivers. We can be bloody cruel and enjoy it. We take men body, soul, and bank account. We are making a calculated investment, which we expect to pay off for us. You work for us and serve us. You are our knights, and our drones. We are the queen bees. This is the order of the universe, in virtually every culture, even under the outward veils of patriarchy. When a man serves his wife like a knight who continually wishes to do better, he becomes more of a man. He becomes refined. You, Mr. Yang cannot approach this in the gym, nor in the locker room. It is the provenance of women.

Per your own argument, women are superior, because they do not create ‘to get dick’. They create because it is the calling of their souls, even when they have to deal with obstacles, lack of encouragement, and the petty misogyny of weak ignorant males such as yourself."

[Architekt]

I had to stop reading that halfway through. It was making me nauseous.

[No Habit]

Quote:

I had to stop reading that halfway through. It was making me nauseous.

Must have been coded by a pussy-parser or something.

Women in one word:
Hypocritical

To the superiority:
I think with women it's like with all human beings, there are cool ones and there are idiots and if either man or woman would be superior I think evolution would be smart enough to throw one of them out.

[Icarus]

(07-14-2012 04:30 AM)Architekt Wrote:  

Women worth getting to know usually aren't women worth fucking, and vice-versa.

Patrick Bateman agrees:

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Tits or GTFO

[TennisPlayer]

(07-14-2012 09:21 AM)Icarus Wrote:  

(07-14-2012 04:30 AM)Architekt Wrote:  

Women worth getting to know usually aren't women worth fucking, and vice-versa.

Patrick Bateman agrees:

wierd question but what hair product gives that wet look

[SpiderKing]

"Don't worry, I only spank bad girls."

-"How do you know which girls are good or bad?"









"They're all bad."

[King Solomon]

sloots gon' sloot.

[HiFlo]

(07-13-2012 05:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

All women are the same

LOL, & what is that?

[Architekt]

(07-14-2012 02:37 PM)SpiderKing Wrote:  

"They're all bad."

Need to use this some time.

[velkrum]

Pretty cool, just a bit insecure and irrational at times.