Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 04:22 AM
New poster here, have been reading this forum for quite some time now and always found it informative.
In the midwest right now..considering Los Angeles. Have visited before, but didn't get to spend enough time there.
I've been told by people that in LA, you can be living in a small studio apt and still pull women easily - if they like your look and find you attractive. Basically how women there will bang guys more based on looks opposed to how most cities hot women are looking for the "safe bet" or doing their husband shopping...the guy in khakis and a tucked in button-down working at a bank or middle-management for an insurance company. I do remember seeing guys with "crazy" style (pink mohawk/skinny jeans/tattoos) with porn star looking women. You really wouldn't see that elsewhere, and if you did, it wouldn't be nearly as prevalent.
To those of you who have spend time or lived in LA...is there any truth to this?
Considering the culture there is more liberated (not in tourist sense like Vegas), it has made me wonder how true this is.
Posts: 686
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
3
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 10:13 AM
Most guys will get eaten alive in Los Angeles to the point of insanity. One nice thing about the place is that the girls wont leave you wondering why they aren't interested in you, they're pretty frank about it.
If you're game is down tight and you have your shit together, it might be worth a shot.
Posts: 21
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
0
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 12:31 PM
I have lived in L.A. for the past 15 years. The size of your crib and car has no bearing on the amount of bangs you will get but it will affect the quality, i.e. 9s and 10s know they can find some chump to support them 7s and 8s know they can't compete with them so they are easy to bang.
In my experience women here are not looking to get married but rather to have a good time and explore especially the ones 'fresh off the boat' from various Midwest and Southern towns.
The key with chicks in L.A. is to get them in the first few months of moving here before they are totally corrupted.
In my experience the chicks here value ambition as much as they do money because at the end of the day L.A. most of the single people here are living in apartments and barely making it by.
Posts: 9,099
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
102
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 12:46 PM
I tend to associate women here(well, the Westside and Hollywood anyway) with being status whores. But you know this is just too large a city with way too many variables and types of people to really cast such a wide net. I've not lived in another city long-term in my adult life so I just can't compare the ease of being a bachelor here to anywhere else, I just wouldn't know any different. But from what I've heard of people who have lived in other places and then moved here, it's tough as hell according to them. Was recently talking to this dude who lived all over Europe as well as the east coast and he said L.A. is the toughest place he's been in so far.
If you find your niche and strategically choose a neighborhood that makes things easier(living close to nightlife, no long commute) and are willing to put up with a flakey population(girls and guys), I'm sure you can do ok here. Expect ratios to typically be about 60-65% guys when you go out.
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 02:39 PM
The reason I ask, is because a lot of time, "high-status" men are not that attractive. I think there are women who in the short-term would rather be with a good-looking low status man opposed to a guy who is already above average status but fat and unattractive (like so many in the midwest are), or only very average in looks department. I've never been one to run "game" in the PUA sense. Haven't needed to. Still, my apartment doesn't correspond to the image I project, and this has affected me with some women who are looking for security when I tell them I'm a waiter.
In most places, a man in his mid-to-late 20s living in a studio apartment is viewed as a loser. Living in Des Moines, IA (medium sized midwestern city) and Chicago (the king of the midwest) I can tell you for a fact in both these places you will be considered a joke among the majority of the hot single women in their 20s.
In LA, it can be argued he's trying to live the dream and this could be somewhat mitigating. It's also so common in LA to live in a small apartment, people go there with different ambitions in mind compared to what you'd hear in Chicago....hedge funds...finance...investment banking, etc. I get the impression it's almost acceptable in LA to live as a waiter and devote all your time to the gym, style, and meeting women in the short-term. If more comes from it, great.
The other cities you simply have to have more together and the amount of hot single available 20-something is low (this put me in a cougar phase at one point). You start to realize the better looking women in the midwest after a certain age are probably divorcees who did marry right after college.
I've heard the ratios are male-heavy in LA, but one would think with all the gays/crossdressers/ and tranny chasers there this would possibly even things out.
I do appreciate the input so far.
Posts: 1,096
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 02:46 PM
I think anyone who would move to LA alone is foolish. There are hot women everywhere. If you're going to move to LA, please have a better reason than only to chase women.
That said, LA is huge. Hollyweird, Hermosa, Long Beach, Palisades, Hills, every place is completely different and even though they're all within 20 miles of one another they still take 2 hrs to get to each other because of traffic.
Posts: 4,116
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
176
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 02:50 PM
L.A. is expensive. A studio on the West Side will run you $1200-1400 a month.
Having roommates in your early 30s is common.
L.A. is car obsessed, but having a crappy car never once cost me a lay. DUI laws are tough, so you shouldn't be driving to bars, anyway.
The girl won't see your car until after the bang.
While you don't need a nice crib or car to pull, you will need very tight game.
Posts: 549
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
8
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 03:37 PM
Modernaire I'm moving to LA in about a month. I'll start a thread and let you know how it goes as the new kid in town.
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 03:59 PM
I considered San Francisco, and also Las Vegas (know people in both cities). The truth is, I want to be in LA. At this point in my life, late 20's, my main regret is not doing it sooner.
I would like to try some sort of acting as well (even low-budget films, lifetime movies, straight-to-video are fine with me). I know the chances of getting into it are very low and I don't expect it by any means...but I would like to know I tried. After that, I could probably be at peace with myself. You only live once, I could just stay in the midwest and never have chased what I wanted.
I also have a very flashy style which really isn't understood too well in the midwest, people will just assume you're gay. I should mention, my appeal would be like that of a modern day Rudolph Valentino, could be considered somewhat androgynous, and the midwest is a place for purely masculine lumberjacks in my opinion. In interesting in the way that my mentality is very alpha, I'm in great shape, but I'm also very into European fashion and bespoke suits which don't fit the American alpha paradigm of being a "regular confident guy who isn't too into fashion and other girl stuff".
I read a lot of complaints on this forum about how men are more feminine now...move to the midwest if you really think this has become a problem.
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 05:09 PM
I liked Hollywood a lot...although I've heard mixed reviews on it. Not as expensive as West LA, and has nightlife nearby.
I noticed LA didn't seem to have massive apartment complexes like most places do. It seems like most rentals are a unit in one standalone building.
Most cities literally have "apartment campuses", Vegas has so many of them for example.
Posts: 21
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
0
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 05:45 PM
Do some research on these areas, If I was moving from out of town this is where I would check out...
Santa Monica (Surfer/Westsider Types
Venice (See Above)
North Hollywood (Artists/Dancers etc...)
Hermosa Beach (Beach Bum vibe)
West Hollywood (Very ummm Gay-Friendly)
Downtown L.A.(People who have grown out of the Hollywood scene)
Hollywood (Artistic many people from out of town move here so plenty of talent)
Echo Park/Los Feliz (Hipsters)
Posts: 2,153
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
23
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 06:03 PM
Brentwood is the place to be IMO. Women there are outstanding and just hang out in the stores/coffee shops along San Vicenente ever day of the week during the day. Lots of nightlife within cab distance in West LA, Santa Monica, etc. Great weather.
Also a fan of mid-city (Park LaBrea area, Beverly Blvd, 3rd street) and venice.
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 06:08 PM
Brentwood is probably too expensive, same with Santa Monica. Both great parts of town though.
Posts: 2,153
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
23
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 06:28 PM
you can probably find something under $1200 for a studio or 1 bedroom. or live south of wilshire and walk to san vicente or something, there are a TON of apartments in that area....its not as bad as you would think.
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 06:50 PM
Quote: (06-01-2012 06:28 PM)PartyonBro Wrote:
you can probably find something under $1200 for a studio or 1 bedroom. or live south of wilshire and walk to san vicente or something, there are a TON of apartments in that area....its not as bad as you would think.
I'd probably have to stay under $1,000, closer to $800. Only Hollywood seems to have rentals for that price.
Posts: 549
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
8
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 07:10 PM
Get a membership to westsiderentals.com and see what you find. It's $60 for two months which was nominal considering how much easier it made finding a place.
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Los Angeles vs everywhere else
06-01-2012, 07:11 PM
Quote: (06-01-2012 06:59 PM)speakeasy Wrote:
Quote: (06-01-2012 06:50 PM)modernaire Wrote:
Quote: (06-01-2012 06:28 PM)PartyonBro Wrote:
you can probably find something under $1200 for a studio or 1 bedroom. or live south of wilshire and walk to san vicente or something, there are a TON of apartments in that area....its not as bad as you would think.
I'd probably have to stay under $1,000, closer to $800. Only Hollywood seems to have rentals for that price.
If your budget is $800 might wanna consider a roommate. Unfortunately $800 won't get you much. Or you'll be sharing a building with section 8ers.
I've always wondered how people make it there. I'd consider escorting if the need arises.