rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Los Angeles vs everywhere else
#51

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Speakeasy, those reasons are true, but I wonder if only superficially so. In other words, if women truly wanted a solid honest relationship, they would drive the distance, set aside the time, etc.

Yeah, don't come here expecting cute Latinas on every corner. To this native, 'hot Latina' is almost an oxymoron, like a 'real unicorn.'

If anyone is a pro at day game, I'd love to meet up, even pay you something for your time. I've done some daygame, and gotten some lays from it, but not with much regularity. Natural, are you in LA? I'm working on some data sheets.

lol @ Pico-Robertson - that's hymietown! There are a lot of low key cuties living in Miracle Mile- tar pits area, but I don't know what the scene is like.
Reply
#52

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-02-2012 05:30 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

Speakeasy, those reasons are true, but I wonder if only superficially so. In other words, if women truly wanted a solid honest relationship, they would drive the distance, set aside the time, etc.

Yeah, don't come here expecting cute Latinas on every corner. To this native, 'hot Latina' is almost an oxymoron, like a 'real unicorn.'

If anyone is a pro at day game, I'd love to meet up, even pay you something for your time. I've done some daygame, and gotten some lays from it, but not with much regularity. Natural, are you in LA? I'm working on some data sheets.

lol @ Pico-Robertson - that's hymietown! There are a lot of low key cuties living in Miracle Mile- tar pits area, but I don't know what the scene is like.

Yes I'm in LA, I decidedly have a slight advantage over some guys because of my night job as a DJ and living in NoHo which happens to be one of the more walkable area in all of L.A. and always has a ton on new imports mostly from the dancer community (Smoking bodies) and a few actresses

The Latinas in LA don't compare to Miami or even NYC but there are a ton of bangable 7s to get your rocks off in LA. From my experience Downtown and Pasadena nightlife has a slightly higher quality latinas than the rest of LA.

I wouldn't say I'm a pro at Day Game, my expertise lies more in the bar and lounge scene, but I have a buddy that is pretty much a Jedi Master when it comes to Day Game he sets up shop at Starbucks and absolutely kills it. Mind you this a guy with NO CAR and lives in a tiny studio apartment but he consistently has a parade of 7s and 8s.

Farmers Markets and Art Walks are good spots for Day Game though

http://www.laweekly.com is a useful tool I find spots that I would otherwise not know about
Reply
#53

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-02-2012 04:25 PM)Rurik Wrote:  

Quote: (06-02-2012 03:22 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Quote: (06-02-2012 12:42 PM)Lemmo Wrote:  

I've lived in both the Midwest and LA. Moving to a US city for the purpose of women doesn't make sense. You'd be better off in any large city in another developed, semi-developed and even some third world countries. LA, like many US cities, is largely a Mexican/migrant slum with a tiny minority of attractive women. Your budget will not work in your favor in accessing these women. Unless you have a taste for slum dwellers, you will find higher average quality in Des Moines and Chicago than LA.

^^^ This is nonsense.

The "slum dwellers" part is a little over the top, but I pretty much agree that average attractiveness of LA is not that great, and is drastically overrated due to media garbage. The truth is that LA city is 50 percent hispanic, many of them being squat, rotund looking lower class mexican women, though there are some hot latinas. East of LA is almost 100 percent hispanic. Even Compton is 65 percent hispanic now. Bear in mind, most of these bitches aren't long legged columbians or venezuelans, but round shaped guatemalans and mexicans. Don't say you weren't warned.

LA itself is also 10 percent asian, 10 percent black, and 30 percent NH white (which includes many middle easterners, armenians, and jews of all types).

The irony is that the stereotype of the blonde LA girl is just not a true representation of the average, or random sample woman. A lot of the hot blondes blue eyed girls are actually part jewish, fyi.

The advantage in LA is I would say women are generally more open than say a place like the pacific northwest, yet at the same time LA kind of feels like a big club, so they are very conscious of status.

With tight game, you can do damage, but I wouldn't come unless you know how to mack well already, or have some decent connections.

Exactly. If you have to come to LA for a great job opportunity or have some other valid reason, you can use the information posted here and try to make the best of it. But traveling a couple of thousand mile to come to LA without a job for the women?! This just sounds crazy. It is like being hungry and driving to the next town to scour a dumpster for food. So many more places that are cheaper and better (including where you are now). It isn't the 1950's any more. Demographics have changed.
Reply
#54

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Basil, once I get some time off from work we should hit up 3rd st. promenade. i've always felt that was probably the best day game spot just for sheer numbers.

"...so I gave her an STD, and she STILL wanted to bang me."

TEAM NO APPS

TEAM PINK
Reply
#55

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Speaking of guys not approaching, I've found this to be consistent in L.A. all over. The only guys I see approaching aggressively are wealthy Persian douchebags in nightclubs, and I suspect they rarely close because they come off as incredibly sleazy and basically offer money for sex.

I'd say 80% of the time I approach, the girl acts incredibly surprised or starts asking me questions like, "Who ARE you?" or "Where did you come from?" I never see guys approach out at bars, unless it's to talk to the girl next to them or some other serendipitous aligning of factors.

I've only been to Harvard and Stone like 3 times. I just have a hard time with hipsters, but maybe the scene's changed a little, I haven't been in about 6 months.

The bar owners just opened a place called Pour Vous. Check it out, pretty beautiful little spot and I'm sure it'll be a chick magnet for the next 3-6 months.

"...so I gave her an STD, and she STILL wanted to bang me."

TEAM NO APPS

TEAM PINK
Reply
#56

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

LA is kind of a mindfuck, honestly. It's not easy. I mean, sit and think for a second. We all know that women are extremely attracted to men of high status, many of these men bang the majority of the women.

So why would a regular male relocate to the place with the highest concentration of high status men in the world, and try to compete?

Doing the inverse is much smarter, and is generally the aim of this forum, particularly the travel section.

Not saying you can't get laid in LA, just keep in mind the above ^^^^^ when thinking about banging the super hotties especially.

In LA tourist chicks/foreign students/recent transplants are a saving grace.
Reply
#57

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-03-2012 02:30 AM)thedude3737 Wrote:  

Speaking of guys not approaching, I've found this to be consistent in L.A. all over. The only guys I see approaching aggressively are wealthy Persian douchebags in nightclubs, and I suspect they rarely close because they come off as incredibly sleazy and basically offer money for sex.

I'd say 80% of the time I approach, the girl acts incredibly surprised or starts asking me questions like, "Who ARE you?" or "Where did you come from?" I never see guys approach out at bars, unless it's to talk to the girl next to them or some other serendipitous aligning of factors.

I've only been to Harvard and Stone like 3 times. I just have a hard time with hipsters, but maybe the scene's changed a little, I haven't been in about 6 months.

The bar owners just opened a place called Pour Vous. Check it out, pretty beautiful little spot and I'm sure it'll be a chick magnet for the next 3-6 months.

Really - you don't see guys approaching at night? Girls never show me any surprise that I've approached.

I went to Harvard and Stone again, and it was a bust tonight. Had a real bridge and tunnel feel, uglier girls with higher bitch shields. The crowd was annoying. Had girls right and left showing interest in me one second, then deliberately ignoring me and making an obvious move of talking to their male eunuch friends. Other chicks ignored me while I insulted them in the line outside, and then scream at me when they see me inside. One shoves her crotch on me, but repeated caveman attempts met with no kiss. The same lines that opened well earlier failed tonight.

3rd Street Promenade is cool, high energy and crowded though. Century City Mall and Rodeo Drive are nice too. Century City is cool because it's outdoors, secure and relaxed, the girls seem more comfortable and less rushed. 3rd Street has so many people milling about it's a little nerve wracking. I macked a little there, a little at 3rd Street, but my biggest sticking point is approaching girls who are walking, or lingering in the girl's section of the store.

BTW, there's a famous hostel right near the Promenade, and it has a bus tour that meets right there. I'm thinking about taking the tour for kicks and macking any Europeans that show up, plus figure out if the hostel has any events I can exploit. And weirdly enough, I was hanging out on a little quiet residential street today, and I started talking to two Kazakh girls who looked lost. One was an ethnic Russian, had a very Russian habit of going from cold to warm and back in a split second. The ethnic Kazakh was sweet and decent-looking, but not the cutest. Got a number but they seemed ambivalent about hanging out.
Reply
#58

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Basil, have you been to the Townhouse in Venice? I just got back from there. Pretty jumping spot. Never been before. Mostly white girls, kinda hot and crowded and loud. Good music. Me and my wing struck out. Just couldn't get any conversations going for long. But the place is pretty good.

http://townhousevenice.com/
Reply
#59

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

After 2 years of stay in LA I can say nightgaming / nightlife in LA sucks. Reasons being:
1- Nightlife is shut down at 2 am.
2 - Girls are extremely flaky. Transportation problems, real bad traffic, long-distances (i stay in hills and dated a persian girl from irvine..), lack of casual contact with people (you have to schedule dates every time you meet a new girl) makes them even more flaky (esp. against the guys they meet during night)..
3 - Girls have quite a bitchy and unpredictable attitude no matter which venue they are between 10pm - 3am.
4 - Most of the good clubs (tier 1-2) have a lot of drama at the door to get in and girls have even more attitudes once you are inside. Unless you are a wealthy persian guy it's hard to find and land a 7+ girl from club IMO.
5 - Girls ratio is %30 at best in most bars (half of them being fat/ugly) and around %50 in decent clubs (again, half of them being fat/ugly)

Also LA crowd is kind of racist.. It's almost always whites, asians, blacks, hispanics etc. all having their own circles / hanging out together.. Actually this racism leads lots of people do some crazy shit like wearing colored contacts, indian/arab people bleaching their skin, asians having eye surgery (wtf)... People are racially segregated and I don't like it..

That's why I always stick to day-game when girls' guards are low. My ideal places being coffee shops, stores like Forever21 etc. and UCLA.. For day game, best neighborhoods would be Beverly Hills, Brentwood and Santa Monica.. Coffee shops in Brentwood are my gold mine..

It is true that girls in LA go for looks a lot, they are interested more in what they see from you than what they hear. If you are a quite good looking guy, given you don't any mental disorder, you can land a lot of 7+ girls, no matter your status or money. Girls in LA kind of remind me of guys..

I have been in 5 cities in US: NYC , Minneapolis, Miami, LA, Boston (excluding cities I briefly visited) and I would say Minneapolis and Miami are by far the most convenient cities for gaming and has the most quality crowd of girls.. Boston and NYC has more mediocre crowd but still no transportation and distance problems and LA is by far the worst I have ever been to..
Reply
#60

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-03-2012 02:22 AM)thedude3737 Wrote:  

3rd st. promenade. i've always felt that was probably the best day game spot just for sheer numbers.

Third Street promenade seemed legit when I was last in LA. I had some time to kill and did a few laps up and down it talking to girls on the street and in stores. Got two numbers but wasn't able to close because I was leaving later that day. Lots of tourists in the general area because of the pier, etc.

Santa Monica College seemed to have some cute girls. There's a sizable foreign student presence there as well. I have some classes there in the fall so expect a more detailed report then.
Reply
#61

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-02-2012 04:09 AM)houston Wrote:  

Damn LA is expensive. Do the prices drop down once you leave the "hip" areas? I thought Echo Park was a gang area? My boy keeps on telling me to go visit him out there. He's born and raised in LA and lives somewhere on the eastside. He's a rocker dude with tattoos and could hopefully get me in the circle [Image: wink.gif] I've seen the talent on Facebook.

Everyone I know, including him, says its like a bigger version of Houston. Big, dirty, spread out, traffic, ugly, all kinds of people. I wouldn't mind living there for a year or 2 just to soak it in if that's true. I love big, dirty cities that are spread out like a maze.

I meant to reply to this earlier but forgot. I've heard the Houston/L.A. comparison before. I think in some ways it's probably true and in others ways not. I think if you moved L.A. into the middle of country where there were no beaches, mountains and nice weather, it would probably be very similar-looking to Houston. I've never actually been to Houston, but flown in a few times and seen what it looks like from the plane and I do think it's kinda similar because of the small skyline(compared with places like Chicago and NYC), freeways and massive suburban sprawl. Part of the big draw of L.A. isn't even the city itself, but the location being close to the beaches and mountains and having perfect weather. And no offense, but California is just a much cooler state than Texas, there's no comparison.

Where I would say there is a major difference in cities is that Houston doesn't really seem to be known for anything. L.A. is just more of an iconic city than Houston will every be. For example there's tons of world-famous bands, rappers and musicians that hail from L.A. But Houston? I can't think of one well-known band from there. And we have neighborhoods that are known all over the world, Bel Aire, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, The LBC(thanks to Snoop), Venice Beach, etc. Nobody knows of any neighborhoods in Houston unless they are from Houston. And I'm sure there's just much more of a "soul" to L.A. than Houston, because there's a large creative population and lots of trend-setters in music, arts, fashion, film and such.

If you like Houston, then I'm sure you'd love it here way more.

Now a question for you...what up with the girls down in Texas? I hear a lot of mixed things. Some say Texas has a ton of hotties, then I've heard there are lots of fatties too. When I think of Texas girls I always have the image of the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders, though I know that's not representative. But I can't help but associate Texas girls with sexy chics wearing daisy dukes and cowboy hats and boots.
Reply
#62

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-03-2012 05:24 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Now a question for you...what up with the girls down in Texas? I hear a lot of mixed things. Some say Texas has a ton of hotties, then I've heard there are lots of fatties too. When I think of Texas girls I always have the image of the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders, though I know that's not representative. But I can't help but associate Texas girls with sexy chics wearing daisy dukes and cowboy hats and boots.

I live in Texas but I travel a lot to visit relatives in California, and I can say this:

LA, and SoCal in general, definately has a better high end than Houston, Dallas, or Austin. The good looking chicks on the Westside of LA are amazing. I think a lot of dudes should go at least once to Hollywood on a Fri/Sat night just to check out the talent. Pretty good, if you like the club scene.

So on that end, Cali dominates since there are a lot barbie doll type girls living in SoCal.

However, once you get out of the very top end, the girls in Texas are pretty good. Dallas and Austin are both pretty good for picking up cute white chicks and Houston has some pretty good looking Latinas. In fact, I would venture to guess that Houston has better looking latinas on average than LA does.

The main problem with Texas is that chicks get married younger here, so there isn't as an established club scene as in LA since there aren't tons of 20-something party girls. There also isn't a big singles scene for 30-somethings, since again chicks get married early here. And as Roosh has pointed out on his blog, once a chick gets married and has kids, she pretty much loses any interest in staying thin.

So that contributes to a bit of a whale problem in Texas. Well, that and there is big emphasis on eating BBQ and other fatty crap. Also, the people don't work out as much in Texas as they do in SoCal, so they tend to get fat.
Reply
#63

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-03-2012 12:02 PM)cCcincisikercCc Wrote:  

It is true that girls in LA go for looks a lot, they are interested more in what they see from you than what they hear. If you are a quite good looking guy, given you don't any mental disorder, you can land a lot of 7+ girls, no matter your status or money. Girls in LA kind of remind me of guys..

This is what I was getting at...if this is more true in LA than in other cities.
Reply
#64

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-03-2012 05:24 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Quote: (06-02-2012 04:09 AM)houston Wrote:  

Damn LA is expensive. Do the prices drop down once you leave the "hip" areas? I thought Echo Park was a gang area? My boy keeps on telling me to go visit him out there. He's born and raised in LA and lives somewhere on the eastside. He's a rocker dude with tattoos and could hopefully get me in the circle [Image: wink.gif] I've seen the talent on Facebook.

Everyone I know, including him, says its like a bigger version of Houston. Big, dirty, spread out, traffic, ugly, all kinds of people. I wouldn't mind living there for a year or 2 just to soak it in if that's true. I love big, dirty cities that are spread out like a maze.

I meant to reply to this earlier but forgot. I've heard the Houston/L.A. comparison before. I think in some ways it's probably true and in others ways not. I think if you moved L.A. into the middle of country where there were no beaches, mountains and nice weather, it would probably be very similar-looking to Houston. I've never actually been to Houston, but flown in a few times and seen what it looks like from the plane and I do think it's kinda similar because of the small skyline(compared with places like Chicago and NYC), freeways and massive suburban sprawl. Part of the big draw of L.A. isn't even the city itself, but the location being close to the beaches and mountains and having perfect weather. And no offense, but California is just a much cooler state than Texas, there's no comparison.

Where I would say there is a major difference in cities is that Houston doesn't really seem to be known for anything. L.A. is just more of an iconic city than Houston will every be. For example there's tons of world-famous bands, rappers and musicians that hail from L.A. But Houston? I can't think of one well-known band from there. And we have neighborhoods that are known all over the world, Bel Aire, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, The LBC(thanks to Snoop), Venice Beach, etc. Nobody knows of any neighborhoods in Houston unless they are from Houston. And I'm sure there's just much more of a "soul" to L.A. than Houston, because there's a large creative population and lots of trend-setters in music, arts, fashion, film and such.

If you like Houston, then I'm sure you'd love it here way more.
about:blank
Now a question for you...what up with the girls down in Texas? I hear a lot of mixed things. Some say Texas has a ton of hotties, then I've heard there are lots of fatties too. When I think of Texas girls I always have the image of the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders, though I know that's not representative. But I can't help but associate Texas girls with sexy chics wearing daisy dukes and cowboy hats and boots.
LA and California just got really lucky with the entertainment industry. I don't think it would be such a cool state if the hype was never there and the industry never set up shop there. That's the only reason the neighborhoods and everything else is well known. Hell, I know all about the state from music and movies and never even been there. Don't forget about the high ass cost of living you need to pay to enjoy that pretty state though. I'm living very comfortable for someone my age but would be struggling out there with a hoopty and apartment with roommates.

"And I'm sure there's just much more of a "soul" to L.A. than Houston, because there's a large creative population and lots of trend-setters in music, arts, fashion, film and such."
This ties into the entertainment industry being there. I don't really think ANY city can be on that level except New York. Houston will NEVER have a huge population full of those people aka liberals and hipsters which I'm kind of happy about. It's a blue collar, dirty city where someone riding a bike would probably get run over by a drunk driver who flees the scene. Houston rap scene is better than LA's though...most of the west coast rappers I like ain't even from there.

All in all though, I would bet that California and Texas are the best states out there. Maybe Florida (excluding Miami and New York City but that's just a city) can be added to the list. Ain't no one else coming close to what we have. I can't wait to actually see LA for myself and maybe some other California cities. Give them a taste of this big Texas dick [Image: tard.gif]

"Now a question for you...what up with the girls down in Texas? I hear a lot of mixed things. Some say Texas has a ton of hotties, then I've heard there are lots of fatties too. When I think of Texas girls I always have the image of the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders, though I know that's not representative. But I can't help but associate Texas girls with sexy chics wearing daisy dukes and cowboy hats and boots."
Dallas and Austin have better white girls than Houston. Houston, SA and the higher Hispanic populated cities will have better Latinas. There's sexy black girls all over the state. Yeah, there's some of those cowboy boots and hats girls but you will have to act extremely white (token black guy) or be an actual black cowboy type of guy if they're serious about it and not just faking the funk. There's a lot of "wannabe cowgirls" if that makes sense. I see good looking girls all the time but also a good amount of fatties. like Texas Prophet said, you have to catch them when they're young because a lot of them get fat as they get older.
Reply
#65

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

The Houston and LA connection is interesting because those are the two cities I grew in and probably know best. They are similar in a few areas both are very spread out, Freeway Dominated cities, both are pretty segregated when it come to the club/bar scene and both have a ton of Latinas (Mexicanas to be exact).

The Latinas in LA have more swag than the one's in Texas but I give the top end to Houston you catch a few more bangers in H-Town, although Texas has a 'marriage culture' that LA doesn't have so there are more available women.

The main differences are the weather in Houston is the worst, it actually rains more in Houston than it does in Seattle. Los Angeles probably has the best weather in America besides San Diego which is only a couple hours drive south. LA gets alot of flack because Downtown is not actually the center of the city I actually see that as a positive because LA has many different downtowns.

When moving to LA you want to 'keep it local' 75% of the time and the other 25% venture to different areas to keep yourself fresh so make sure if you come here you move to a decent area.

From reading these comments it seems like out of towners have a rough time gaming in LA but the players that live here clean up. The reason being I think is out towners hit up touristy spots that locals would absolutely never go to because they know better.

BTW I look at sprawl as a good thing because it's nice every once in awhile to drive down to Long Beach or Orange County and spend a a day or two with a chick that you met somewhere, it feels like a mini-vacation to me.
Reply
#66

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

LA guys, you have been offered a promotion at your job which would require that you move to NYC. Would you do it?
Reply
#67

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

I think a better question...how hard is it to game women online in LA? Provided they find you attractive.

Also, given it's a liberated culture...maybe letting them know up front isn't as big a deal.

You read some dating profiles and women basically want you to take them to the most expensive restaurant and make it clear you aren't getting any on the first date. The whole 6's behaving like 10's theory comes into play.

In LA, a true 6 or 7 knows her place. How does this affect the overall state of affairs?
Reply
#68

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 03:46 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

LA guys, you have been offered a promotion at your job which would require that you move to NYC. Would you do it?

LA and NYC are often compared and debated as equals.

They are not.

LA has better weather and beaches.

Other than that, NYC defeats LA in every single other category.

And trust me, after years on the West Coast, you realize that the East Coast is far better situated geographically for International Travel.
Reply
#69

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 03:46 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

LA guys, you have been offered a promotion at your job which would require that you move to NYC. Would you do it?

As long as the pay allowed me to live comfortably in Manhattan and I didn't have to commute way in from Jersey I would do it. Not necessarily because I think NYC is superior(which it very well may be), but rather because I wouldn't mind a change of scenery.
Reply
#70

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 03:46 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

LA guys, you have been offered a promotion at your job which would require that you move to NYC. Would you do it?

Not possible for the career I'm in, but yes in a heartbeat I would.

Quote: (06-05-2012 05:27 AM)modernaire Wrote:  

I think a better question...how hard is it to game women online in LA? Provided they find you attractive.

Also, given it's a liberated culture...maybe letting them know up front isn't as big a deal.

You read some dating profiles and women basically want you to take them to the most expensive restaurant and make it clear you aren't getting any on the first date. The whole 6's behaving like 10's theory comes into play.

In LA, a true 6 or 7 knows her place. How does this affect the overall state of affairs?

I find it very easy as long as you get them out to meet you. Just realize you'll barely ever get anything above a 7 on these online sites. Lots of 6-7s and if you wanted to drop your standards to below 6, you could probably have sex every night of the week.

Quote: (06-05-2012 09:07 AM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Quote: (06-05-2012 03:46 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

LA guys, you have been offered a promotion at your job which would require that you move to NYC. Would you do it?

LA and NYC are often compared and debated as equals.

They are not.

LA has better weather and beaches.

Other than that, NYC defeats LA in every single other category.

And trust me, after years on the West Coast, you realize that the East Coast is far better situated geographically for International Travel.

Truth. It would be fantastic to be that much closer to South America and Europe. And my guess is that NYC has more international girls too vs. LA.
Reply
#71

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 05:27 AM)modernaire Wrote:  

I think a better question...how hard is it to game women online in LA? Provided they find you attractive.

Also, given it's a liberated culture...maybe letting them know up front isn't as big a deal.

You read some dating profiles and women basically want you to take them to the most expensive restaurant and make it clear you aren't getting any on the first date. The whole 6's behaving like 10's theory comes into play.

In LA, a true 6 or 7 knows her place. How does this affect the overall state of affairs?

The 6s acting like 10s is not just an LA thing that's an American thing, ignore her shit tests, escalate and close. You shouldn't be going to dinner on your first date anyway, drinks and appetizers from a nice spot will suffice.


If I send out 10 messages I will get 3 responses and 1 'date' out of it. I have the same program every single time. I meet them at a bar around the corner from my place, feel out the vibe if she's down invite her back to my place conveniently located around the corner have a bottle of Pinot Noir waiting, put on the movie 'Vicky Christina Barcelona' and bang.
Reply
#72

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

I prefer SF to LA and NYC.

Choosing between those three is "what you call one of those good problems."
Reply
#73

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 02:33 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

I prefer SF to LA and NYC.

Choosing between those three is "what you call one of those good problems."

Really? SF girls, besides being uglier, are often the type to idolize Tina Fey, and shriek if you say anything un-PC. I couldn't open my mouth without getting shouted down. There's an awesome blog ragging on SF girls called Why There Are No Girls In San Francisco.

I would probably not move to NYC. Too frenetic and dense. Boston or Minneapolis, maybe. I would move to the right European or Latin city.

I've only known LA, so don't know where it stands compared to other spots. It's easy to get disenchanted here, if you're doing it wrong.
Reply
#74

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 02:58 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

Really? SF girls, besides being uglier, are often the type to idolize Tina Fey, and shriek if you say anything un-PC. I couldn't open my mouth without getting shouted down. There's an awesome blog ragging on SF girls called Why There Are No Girls In San Francisco.

That's the most beta blog ever.

Plenty of local talent. Cute girls in the Marina, lots of Latinas.

Lots of tourists come through the city, especially around the holidays.
Reply
#75

Los Angeles vs everywhere else

Quote: (06-05-2012 03:08 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

Quote: (06-05-2012 02:58 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

Really? SF girls, besides being uglier, are often the type to idolize Tina Fey, and shriek if you say anything un-PC. I couldn't open my mouth without getting shouted down. There's an awesome blog ragging on SF girls called Why There Are No Girls In San Francisco.

That's the most beta blog ever.

Plenty of local talent. Cute girls in the Marina, lots of Latinas.

Lots of tourists come through the city, especially around the holidays.

Yeah, I think SF is not anywhere near as bad as people make it out to be for girls.

I think you have to hit up the Hotel bars, lounges and restaurants though. I sometimes feel like I am one of the few people on this forum where that scene is their bread and butter.

I remember even a playboy the caliber of Mixx said, "he never ever went to restaurants".

That is absolutely out of this world for me. I hit anywhere from 1-3 restaurant/lounges per night. Minimum.

This is the kind of Game you need to make SF pay dividends.

Also, keep in mind, when people (ie hot girls) visit California, SF is usually #1 on their list of places to visit.

If not, it is #2 on their list behind LA.

San Diego is a distant third.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)