Quote: (09-24-2014 12:37 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:
This is Amber Rose with long hair. Which would you rather bang?
That's a easy answer but lets broaden this up a bit.
Its to easy to say "short hair vs long" when there is more layers to it all and more things to take into account.
Is some fattie with blonde glowing locks a upgrade over a hottie with a prime face and body but short hair?
Of course not. Also you have to take into account heritage differences. I always give props to nature, it knows what its doing and there is this funny thing that happens with groups of women whom are more prone to have longer hair
naturally, versus short.
The "vantage points" you talk about Tuth are taken care of by nature. Trust me if a black girl has good rack, fat ass, and damn hot face, you really don't notice the hair (If it did bug me I wouldn't even be at that stage) . Maybe I don't have something to grab onto but grabbing a black woman's hair during sex is a
M.A.D. proposition to begin with and even trolling that will open up a floodgates of bitchy attitude that will kill any boner.
Let me explain my position...
I don't get how one can make blanket judgments on pussy? Pussy is case by case with me, and a girl can have different things that work in favor or against. Only automatic garbage bin things are:
busted faces, tattoos, fatness, and terrible teeth. So minus all that I can only judge a broad for what she is displaying to me, in that present moment in time. Next, I have to refer in a joint session committee with my boner to get the sign off as he ultimately has the last say.
Its like politics but with pussy.
This is why I cant do blanket statements on especially things such as hair: Most black girls can't grow their hair long, I've posted in this matter before;
its just a reality that if a woman can't necessarily grow her hair long then nature is going to help them out with giving them more feminine features such as a fatter ass and tits, or more defined feminine facial features.
So its impossible for me to toss out short hair 100%. If a girl literally can't grow it long and is still pretty what is a man to do? Emma Watson with short hair, her 12 year old boy face, and body isn't the same as as Keri Hilson:
Nature knew what it was doing. Emma Watson can hide behind long hair, but for women whom can't grow it naturally many will over compensate on other levels.
This is a extreme example: This black girl has a overly feminine face and symmetry, she is likely packing nice hips and a nice booty too:
How can I shame that above broad if she literally can't grow her hair out? She is still very pretty and feminine and I view as more attractive hard vs Emma Watson short hair OR long (personal preference of course. Jihad on Emma Watson due to millions of men who get geeky and thirst over a marginal looking broad).
Again, many substandard broads can grow long hair and make it blonde and have legions of men thirst. Many women can hide behind it all but when you remove their cape you get weak sex appeal and overall oatmeal vibe and bland features that don't scream out 'fuck me'. Yeah Amber Rose looks better with long hair (any girl whom can grow it out will) but I can't ignore that she doesn't look bad without it either as I still have 99 other points on her body that make my wood hard.
Hardly trying to rationalize short hair, but you can't just say that and then ignore black women. If you don't like black girls state that, because if you have been with enough of them then you know the "weave" is a shitty bootleg alternative and ends up damaging their hair more in the end. Also, of you value long hair then you have to understand the extremes; so no defense for South Asian women who have the best hair quality on the planet? I actually do like long, rich, and flowy hair; so hot South Asian broad with hair down to her ass is going to get me each time as that shit shines and flows like mink fur:
Another extreme example. Again in speaking towards nature and how it didn't fuck up women for legion of us men from each corner of the globe. South Asian women can literally grow lush amazing hair like nothing, hair down to their ass can be achieved in short time while it would take a black woman a lifetime to achieve the same thing. But how did nature balance this? South Asian women (IMO) will have more slender features, little curves, and at many times boyish body frames like a Emma Watson. So nature hooked them up by giving them long fucking hair, extremely large, sultry, and aggressive eyes, large lips, petite facial structures to balance it all out.
To put it bluntly I can't think of a worse crime then a South Asian women whom cuts her hair short. In all my years I have never seen a South Asian girl look good with short hair... ever.. not even once.
The example: Priyanka Chopra.
^ Hot little South Asian actress. Boner inducing and would rail many times over at first glance. She is hot as hell but she foolishly committed feminine South Asian suicide by chopping off her hair.
She went from a hottie, to looking like John Stamos from Full House overnight.
Yuk.
But this is what I am getting at in how its all balanced. A black women if she is honest about her self and has the right symmetry and proportions can get away with short hair. A regular girl whom has good symmetry and feminine proportions such as Amber Rose can get away with it also. But this is a small minority of women whom are not black, Amber Rose is in a small percentage. Because at the end of the day what is your dick responding to the feminine vibe the female is putting out or some fucking hair? Its all part of the package but lets not be naive her to think that is the only thing that moves the wood.
Emma Watson, her long hair, it makes her bangable (barley) but it doesn't help the fact that she has zero sex appeal and looks like she plays for a grade school men's basketball team. Its propaganda as well to how she is some type of sex symbol as she is as sexy as a bag of breadcrumbs. I have always stated that affect that propaganda and influences can shape the idea of what dudes like, she is a prime example of this (she is a "10" for many men, sad but true).
The idea of symmetry and proportions is real, a girl like Keri Hilson or Amber Rose (minus the trashy tats) is way more feminine and sexy in pure body composition then Emma Watson or a long list of other cardboard women (maybe you don't like curves, that's cool... but its hard to deny that statement).
My biggest beef with Amber Rose is that she is low rent and trashy all around. She talks like she's worth a dollar bill with that nasty South Philly accent and is mad trashy, that's way more of a turn off for me. She's low class all the way. Her tattoos piss me of way more because in her prime before her kid, her body was basically flawless, Aside from her crappy hair, her body was almost perfect and she fucked up that all up with ugly tattoos.
So in short: Nature knows what is good, each group of women will be given a feminine advantage over others, in specific reference to hair the lack of natural ability to grow it out will be helped in another area. Next, Amber Rose is in the aesthetic minority her Italian side gave her ideal bone structure, mouth, and eyes, her Cape Verde side give her her curves and the soften up her over all structure, her look even with her regular hair is very unique. She is a outlier.