Quote: (04-14-2014 03:26 PM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  

My mom, who is 60, is a white supremacist and an active poster on the stormfront forums. She also makes it a hobby of trolling various forums on the net to make racist comments, and she has been banned from so many forums she lost count somewhere near one hundred.

Quote: (04-14-2014 05:07 PM)Excelsior Wrote:  

Quote: (04-14-2014 03:26 PM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  

And while Excelsior is partying with his homies, here's an actual photo I took of me swooping his girlfriend...

You mixed it up mate. That one's the side-piece. Here's an actual photo of me and my woman:

Typical white woman, she seems more interested in her cupcake than her guy.

Black women have still been largely exposed to the classic elements of the feminine upbringing, and/or they were raised in a strict immigrant household where the classic traits were re-enforced, or they grew up with just a single mother and seen HOW HARD she had to bust her ass and realized that "independent" women shit is BS.

The only knock for Black women is the drink the education kool-aid too much. To many are obssesd with degree stacking and will lock themselves in school until they are 27 and then moan that they can't get dudes when they have to compete with younger women, for a already small pool of successful black men if they aren't entertaining to be open to the idea of dating outside of their kind.

The only 'Black' women I see whom drink the feminst kool-aid are largely mixed and bi-racial and had thier white mothers whispering patriarchy non-sense into their ears at a young age. I don't think I could count on more then one hand how many card carrying femenists I have met whom are full black. Their parents would of smacked that none-sense out of them if they tried to speak up on it at home. Plus if your a Black women whom is trying to excel at education you get more value in networking in the sorority scene, volunteering, hustling grades, etc, you don't have time to sit in feminist circle talk in your underwear to talk about your clits and how all men are rapists (femenists do this).

Both my sisters were soft femensits. They both took a few classes and took some of it in but quickly dumped it when my aunts and cousins told them that stuff was bullshit and to go find a man and get married.

My Aunt:

Quote:Quote:

"You women over there are blind, go and find a husband, why are you wasting time dating men, go find the men ready to take care of you, silly women waste time with men whom don't love them, go find men whom will love you and not just like you"

^^^ Africa stays red piil...

Its hard to sell Black women on feminism. They see its just a some whiny white girl thing, since white girls whom all are spoon fed, and are easily the most spoiled and well taken care of group of mammals on planet earth just sound like whiny brats. They try to take it in and realize its all flawed. This is why there is so much backlash coming from "Woc" with feminism because its just some whiny white girl shit.

I tip my hat when I see my white brothers with the black felines. When I was young and naive to it all, it used to bug me I admit. but now its hard for me to give zero fucks, and really care any more. Because at the core of it: I like fucking girls of other shades, so why can't the next man? Fuck cares. With the band of brothers mentality I can't slight the next man on something I enjoy myself, the tension largely comes from butt-hurt, blue pill haters. I think white dudes are the last ones to hold out on fucking outside of their races though IMO (aside from extreme polarized ethnic groups). Largely its ignorance and a lot of social pressure, dudes only know what they have been with at time and sometimes breaking habits is tough. White girls are safe, and consistent for the most part. For a dude whom grew up exclusively on a diet of western white pussy I know full well about this. I have had my fair share of them and they are basically the Rice Crispies of women, simple, and consistent. But I have seen with my own eyes that any dude will fuck any girl if she looks good to him and he is horny. In the swinging scene I've seen a dude from each corner of the globe go after a black girl. When the heat is on and a dude is horny if he sees something he likes he will go for it, she can be purple, dudes don't give a shit when it comes down to it if shes fuckable and willing. Losers whom say otherwise are full of it and don't get laid much. You get some hot Tamil girl or hot girl from Senegal on your shit you will want to fuck her. Period.

So getting back to it all. My white brothers game on.



I'll add this.

This will be expanded into another post since I'm still doing research on it. This "mixed future" stuff is all bullshit. I live in the test-tube of this liberal fantasy. Toronto. As it is the 2nd most multi-cultural city on earth aside from London, and we don't have the ultra-nationalist aspects that exsist in London and Britain as a whole. Toronto is the Liberal wet dream and evrey dominate agenda they have though up is heavily prevalent in this city. Its basically a blank canvas here and immigrants can operate how they want while just taking some phony values of Canadian culture to adopt if they want (Whats good all my Persian Hockey players in Richmond Hill).

In theory it should be some fuck fest of Bolivian dudes fucking Japanese broads and any other corner and mix you can think of. You don't know diversity until you see a group of random ass broads with dark skin and green fuking eyes from Bangaldesh looking good and shit. Bangledesh? Who knew?

Macedonian broads got fat hips & bootys, who knew?

Baskir broads? Who knew?

Metropolitan France...DAMN... Who Knew?



I came from a place that was 85% white so this was all new to me. I've seen every shade of broad here in this place, evrey country has female present in the city. Still. Even with all this diversity. Toronto interracial marriages only account for 7-10% of all marriages and we lead the nation and likely most other western nations in this metric. And its not like we have a large stock of White folks that suppress numbers. In Toronto White people only account for 40% and if you remove delusional Argentine and Lebanese people whom think they are white the numbers are likely lower (Some Lebanese girl I met a month ago told me she was white, I forget how it even came up, and she looked more brown then some of Palestinian friends with green fuking eyes and slender noses whom identify fully as Arab and brown). Plus the market is still tilted. Newcomers pick and choose what they want from Canadian culture and that includes what they want in a Man. A white man in Toronto is put on a pedastool and fetishized by ethnic women. This is largely what the Left propaganda leaves out as its still largely white guys going around and swooping ethnic girls since the white women in Toronto are smelly circus performers whom are ragged out and covered in tattoos....Gross:


My white brothers see that in the context prospects, sees his sisters like that, his sisters friends, sees his girls he grew up with like that, and runs off screaming. I would too. Those bitches are wack.

The White guy and Ethnic girl dynamic....its not a even playing field but I ain't complaining. Toronto is hard enough as it is for all men here, nobody has a ideal game situation. Plus Toronto is a big place, if said female ain't down with a brother, the next one will be. I have no qualms in approaching any type of women here for most part, as its usually the dudes whitin that ethnic circle whom cockblock and white knight, not necessarily the women whom aren't down. You learn girls play games all over, and it does not matter what corner of the globe she is from. You start to learn its a waste of energy to protect them like that.

Spend that energy and go protect/grow your culture, grow yourself up as a man, give back to your roots, that will do more then expending energy cockblocking dudes from fuking your women. Breeding whiten your circle, isn't a promise that protects your circle. Its more then that. Its deeper than that.

In Toronto, Left propaganda spews out the same thing that Toronto will be the first Post-Racial city on earth but a lot has to happen for that to become true. First you have to get at least a quarter of these marriages happening to the point that their children will equal a sizable minority in the city. This is still far from happening even though we have high numbers relative to every where else. As many have touched on, people still want to mate with their own kind. In highly diverse places you get more polarization between ethnic groups. For the 7% of multiracial marriages in Toronto I am sure if you profile each ethnic group their rates are all still 90% of course. The other side of that 7-10% still tells that polarization among group whom prefer to stick with their own is still prevalent, by large margins, and it isn't changing any time soon.

Koskos stance:
Even for me and my free wheeling color blind dick, whom has dipped his stick in pink from each corner of the globe, I still would like to breed with West African girl from my tribe. Its a long shot, but that's my desire. Now I have other factors I hold up such as class which I value more then race (because it is more important, class matters more then any fuking shade of your skin, period). If some girl catches my eye and shes got that pedigree on deck I really won't care what color she is. I have to do the heavy lifting for my bloodline and I need every advantage I can get to make sure I get upward mobility. I am aggressive on my views on class for this very reason. I simply don't view breeding and marriage as simply two people coming together, it is a transaction between families and it has deeper ramifications for me as a patriarch then simply a ring and a wedding license. If I chose to go down that path I have a lot more to account for, and as Patriarch I give zero fucks what my people back home will say or think. If I bring pedigree to the table and do the shit I am supposed to do for my people nobody can say shit.

In the end the trap that happens when ethnic people become fully assimilated and adopt the norms. They just mimic the dominant cultures that are prevalent along their class lines. So if Western White girls are fat, mouthy, feminists, smelly, and covered in tattoos it does not take long for Suzie from Seoul to adopt that shit too if she is immersed long enough in the toxic cultural stew. First-Generation parents try hard to keep that shit away from their daughters, but once the second generation hits its hard, and its usually out the window by the third-generation 100%. Liberal fairy tales on emerging multicultural model robots, ain't happening. But what is happening is the destruction of all people regardless of what shade and ethic lines they come from. If class and culture is what prevents one from diving into the Western waste waters then that should be the reasons it is upheld, but the specifics on race won't change. Nobody's culture is a threat to vanish from the shades of skin dispersing, but it is vanishing from people not upholding the values and traits that made them unique and different to begin with.


Typical assimilated Toronto diversity. I view these circus queens as no different, as both are low class hipster trash, I could care less what shade of skin they are:


The importance of effort put towards culture:
The future isn't mixed babies (red-herring IMO), its ugly, fat, and smelly women of all shades and stripes. Be weary of that more. Toronto is your future here in the west. Class and culture are what is important, and that is what has always been the choice of cultural-Marxists AND Capitalists to marginalize while using minimal factors such as skin tone to divide. People on wholesale levels only view the skin things as it has consumed the western mindset. Traditions and cultures have lose weight and value, when they are the most important things. You look at America long standing white and black cultures are dead. What are you saving aside from fake corporate cultural norms? Apple Pie America has been in a comma for decades. You gotta re-build that. Saving skin shades isn't enough. Look at Black America for insight as they are father along to the cliffs edge. Even majority of race exclusive mating can't save your culture if its already in the toilet. For Black America is far down the hole they can't even re-produce. The collective culture, that defines your ethnic roots and base is far grater then whom you simply nutt inside. Culture takes work and effort to build and preserve. Men willingly died for it on all levels to protect it, not simply for the women and pussy, but for the stability, prestige, honor, and all other tangibles it provided. When your culture is on deaths door, its a dead cat bounce to think that simply nutting in a white or black women will keep it going, that is the easiest thing to do. The hard lifting comes from sacrificing effort to maintain and build that culture.

If you hold deep the desire to protect your roots its more then simply nutting in your kind. Its a lot of effort, especially here in the west to keep and make sure your culture prospers, and as patriarchs that dynamic is more deep then simply whom our brides, are and the shade of their skin. If I wanted it easy, I would fly back home to Africa, to my base, find some 18 year old broad from my Tribe, nutt in her, and marry her up. Simple. Done. Its that easy when the ground work is laid for you but I want more then that in life and I am willing to put in the extra effort to make things happen and progress on my own terms. Many of my relatives have done it, they took the easy route but I don't want that. The first son of the oldest patriarch has more on the line, and I don't want to sub-verse myself to a life that won't me happy, I can do things how I see fit but I have to something. I have no option. If I don't success my line from my fathers end dies. Simple as that.

I hope that more of us men in the West gain that mindset also. It has been lost. Understand that the shade of pink is universal but if culture is indeed important you preserving there is more on the line then simply whom you impregnate. I view myself as a explorer whom has been set out to conquest the globe and set up satellites for my people to have links to. I bring the bounty back while preserving whom I am, and making sure the next in line live better then me. Its a taxing burden mentally to have but I feel its how most men operated back in the day and its classic to how men, all over have operated. The burden is great but the rewards will be even greater. Great effort placed can make you immortal. That is rewarding shit. Become the great man your future line reads about and aspires to be.

@ Kosko, What do you think of black women who call them selves womanist's?

Quote: (04-14-2014 06:30 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

Quote: (04-14-2014 05:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote: (04-14-2014 05:07 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

@Samseau

Reading about a country is NO substitute for being there. I'd rather travel to ten countries than read about those countries any day. It's like the difference between being book smart and life smart.

They are qualitatively different. Going to a country gives pleasure while reading gives knowledge.

People who claim that merely traveling is enough probably don't read much, or aren't very good at reading.

I have been Europe before, Iceland/London/Many Cities in France, the DR, Canada (but who cares), and all over the USA's east coast.

And I can say unequivocally reading about these places taught me far more than traveling there.

I'd say that they're equally important. I've read several books on India's political and religious history; I've spent hours talking to my family members about Indian culture, and I'd say that, by Western standards, I have a fairly solid knowledge of India's general characteristics.

Agree on the equal importance.

Quote:Quote:

Is that any substitute at all for actually going there? Not in the slightest.

You know, often times it is. Many times I know more about a foreigner's country than the foreigner does, even though I've never been to his country.

That's why people say education is important. Gives you the knowledge that has been collectively amassed by millions of men through time.

Reading history gives big picture context, which is far more powerful than the small picture.

Quote:Quote:

You may learn arcane facts by reading about a country; you may develop a sense of how certain members of that country(authors like Marjane Satrapi) perceive national events or trends. You won't, however, actually know what the country is like. You won't truly know how the people look, how they talk, what's popular in their country, what their musical tastes are, anything. You won't know how they express kindness, nor will you know what makes them laugh. A tome on the history of the UAE might teach me a bunch of facts, but only a real visit to Dubai or Abu Dhabi would give me any real understanding of a place.

When you visit a place, you're only getting a snapshot in time. The real story of a country or people occurs across thousands of years. I find the more history I learn about a place, my understanding of it radically changes. Try to learn at least the prior 1000 years of a place, but ideally go for 2000. A country never looks the same after you learn it's past.

Quote: (04-14-2014 07:08 PM)Deluge Wrote:  

no ones denying what you quoted, except that ALL estimates for where he lived are traced back to East or Central Africa.

That's not true, and the articles on wikipedia admitted as much. You need to provide links for your evidence because I'm getting tired of researching your claims only to find out you were wrong from the start.

Quote:Quote:

One more quote from a scientist member.

Quote:Quote:

X and Y chromosomes are not the only way to prove patrilineal or matrilineal heritage.

Anybody with exposure to genetics or molecular biochemisty will know this. X and Y chromosomes are just one out of 23 other chromosomes. There are restriction enzyme sites on these other chromosomes you can use to prove lineage.

You literally just ignore all of the facts being presented to you instead of even bothering to refute them, because you know you can't. It's obvious to anybody reading this thread that you have some racial complex, going on and on about how white Middle Eastern people are because you're half Middle Eastern and refusing to come to terms with the fact you're ancestors ultimately came to Africa despite all the evidence of that fact which you refuse to address.

You sound like one of those guys from puahate with the conspiracy theory about my identity being some crazy guy in Thailand.

I'm actually part of the KKK of Boston and I lead the local chapter here. Yesterday we had IRT persecution day and for next month I'm planning on rounding up some Muslims.

Now, time for some real talk:

If you actually had any proof or evidence for your claims you'd post them. But instead you try to rely on the authority of men who claim to be scientists (he said it on the internet, must be true) and so far you haven't been able to explain shit to anyone. And anytime I've looked into your claims about the Africa theory being infallible, all I find are major gaps in logic which is par for the course because our information about the past is garbage.

Until you post something that resembles evidence, no one is going to take you seriously.

Quote:Quote:

I should've known not to get involved in a scientific debate with somebody ignorant enough to believe this.

Quote: (04-10-2014 06:41 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

DNA studies can only trace the women and not the men.

I'm out.

In fact, my original statement stands undisturbed. And all you've done is post childish insults with nothing to defend the Africa thesis.

Is that the best you can do?

Quote: (04-14-2014 08:13 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Vast majority of traditional Lebanese were white

Traditional Lebanese people were white???

Are you sure? That sounds weird to me?

White people come from Northern Europe?!

Middle Eastern whites are usually much more diverse genetically.

Much different genetically compared to the Whites in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Germany, Poland, etc..

Although they were different from Northern Europeans, the "Mediterranean Man" was still a breed of white man. They were the Romans and Greeks and they owned the Mediterranean Sea for at least one thousand years.

As the area became less white due to invasions, pockets of Romans and Greeks remained. The part called Lebanon was one of them. The city of Beirut used to be called the Paris of the Middle East for a reason.

Lebanon used to be much bigger, culturally, than it's small country status today. Much of what is present day Syria was also White Christian Lebanese. As it changed to Islam, it became Syrian.

Quote:Quote:

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

until the Muslims came along.

Is it possible that you have muslim blood in you?

Wait?!!

"Muslim" is a religion. It's not genetic!?

Right?

Maybe, I mean "Arab"?

Is it possible that you have any Arab blood in you?

Of course there must be Arab blood in me. Chances are one of my ancestors got raped and had a bastard offspring that continued my family line. I believe this because around 10% of my family has a mixed color.

However, sexual selection won out. Most of my family mated with other whites, as basically they preferred whites as sexual partners. So even a bit of rapings here and there did not matter in the long run.

Interestingly enough, my cousin is darker compared to me but recently got knocked up by a white guy. Her baby has white skin and blue eyes, despite the fact she is light brown skin, with brown hair, and brown eyes. So right here we have yet another case of my family members preferring white genes.

Sexual selection trumps everything in the long run. Wars can alter the genepool in the short term but in the long run the heart wants what the heart wants.

Quote:Quote:

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I still have the "roman nose."google it"

I googled it, it said..

An Aquiline nose (also called Roman nose) is a human nose with a prominent bridge, giving it the appearance of being curved or slightly bent. The word aquiline comes from the Latin word aquilinus ("eagle-like"), a reference to the curved beak of an eagle.

The wikipedia page quoted some old author saying..

"this type of nose is primarily found among Mediterraneans, Middle Easterners, and North Africans."

I meant google image search it, lol.

Quote:Quote:

But, honestly, I see a lot of different people with this type of nose. Whites, Arabs, Jews, Italians, Greeks, Spaniards, etc. etc..

You ever think of doing one of those DNA tests?

Yeah I thought about that DNA test 23andme or whatever. Definitely seems interesting.

Quote:Quote:

In Toronto White people only account for 40% and if you remove delusional Argentine and Lebanese people whom think they are white the numbers are likely lower (Some Lebanese girl I met a month ago told me she was white, I forget how it even came up, and she looked more brown then some of Palestinian friends with green fuking eyes and slender noses whom identify fully as Arab and brown).

Let me tell you an excellent neg to use on Lebanese girls who don't look white.

Just ask her, "Are you sure you're not Syrian?" Major insult, but if you ask it with a tone of ignorance (like you don't know any better) then she won't be able to assume you have bad intentions towards her. Instead she will only be able to take it as a neg, even though most Lebanese think of themselves far superior to Syrians.

If you don't get laid, then at the very least you will have a hearty laugh when her jaw hits the floor. I also think she'll be impressed you even have enough insider knowledge to ask such a question.

Quote: (04-14-2014 05:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

They are qualitatively different. Going to a country gives pleasure while reading gives knowledge.

People who claim that merely traveling is enough probably don't read much, or aren't very good at reading.

I have been Europe before, Iceland/London/Many Cities in France, the DR, Canada (but who cares), and all over the USA's east coast.

And I can say unequivocally reading about these places taught me far more than traveling there.

Learning is a multi sense experience. You learn through touch, smell, taste, sight and doing.

By travelling to other countries, you engage all those senses and you involve a total learning experience than reading about it.

When you read, you are limited to the bias and intent of the person writing it. When you experience it personally, you get exposed to the most honest bias of all, reality.

I say travel relating to a person who actually goes into the country and interacts with the people and their way of doing things, not to some glorified Western resort.

Having historical knowledge gives you a baseline to fill in some of the gaps..but those gaps would be gaping if you only had book knowledge to go by vs actual experience.

Quote: (04-13-2014 01:08 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

I'm a white dude, but I'd rather have intercourse with Latina and Asian chicks that white ones. White ones tend to have more surly dispositions, and so many are overweight. My natural biological urge is to spread my seed into other races that have more pleasing personalities and tighter bodies.

If there's one thing that could cause a "post-racial" America is the bitchiness and fatness of white women driving white men to fuck foreign bitches of all colors.

Wald

@Samseu you eventually run into a trap and carrot - tail situation simply relying on books. Many times your stances are dated because it's easy to see where your sources come from...

The majority of historical sources are written and projected from a Euro-Centric perspective. Europeans have flawed views of history (heavy bias) 100%. But they hold the advantage as they valued the copying of texts, versus simply archiving. In Africa it was common practice to have vast archives of knowledge, we viewed the institution as being important, and would house books, teaching house, worship complexes, governance buildings, etc in vast and lavish buildings.

Many of the largest historical and ancient archives were on the continent. By this fcked ud over when the continued back and forth conquests went down. Europeans looooved burning shit to the ground, and they largely burned down many of a large and important archives. Important texts Europeans take for granted were destroyed. Because of this a large vacuum of record is missing from large parts of the continent. Don't put your eggs in one basket.

To hammer this in you have to look at Aborginals here in Canada whom did not archive materials, but used word of mouth trough it's high status elders. Stories of important events and people were told as stories to each generation but people of merit. It was imperative they internalized these stories and broadcasted them to their people. Word was bond to them and spreading false words was the quickest way to get killed back in the ancient days. Europeans came with archival contracts and fucked up natives wholesale with land and resource grabs. Was it fair ? Fuck no. But it happened.

But because of that cultural approach to history your really not going to get the full story from reading books on their people. You gain more from sitting with their elders and listing to their stories and facts as it is presented in a way with clear parallels to tech you lessons while still teaching you history. The books can never duplicate that. Ever.

Vast historical texts come from the dominate area whom made efforts to copy them. The Europeans and Chinese did this and this "History" is largely an overdose of European and Chinese cultural accounts. The abundance of materials from these regions does not simply signal importance but simply that more records were present.

Quote: (04-15-2014 05:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Although they were different from Northern Europeans, the "Mediterranean Man" was still a breed of white man.

Yes, a "breed" of white man.

They have been "bred" with other races.

Mediterraneans of are mixed with Arab, North African, etc.

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Of course there must be Arab blood in me.

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I believe this because around 10% of my family has a mixed color.

It sounds like you are quite a mix if races and cultures..

You should do one of those DNA tests and get the exact percentages..

So, basically in the far far future, if mixing multiculturalism continues, all Americans will be blue eyed and blonde haired. Not sure which skin type is recessive, but whichever is, will be the main one.

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:28 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 05:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Although they were different from Northern Europeans, the "Mediterranean Man" was still a breed of white man.

Yes, a "breed" of white man.

They have been "bred" with other races.

Mediterraneans of are mixed with Arab, North African, etc.

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Of course there must be Arab blood in me.

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I believe this because around 10% of my family has a mixed color.

It sounds like you are quite a mix if races and cultures..

You should do one of those DNA tests and get the exact percentages..

If Samseau has Arab blood in him, then he very likely has some black in him too. Though I'm sure he'll be quite disturbed to hear that. The further south in Europe and toward Africa, the more black DNA. Interesting post on this topic:

https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009...all-of-us/

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:40 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  

So, basically in the far far future, if mixing multiculturalism continues, all Americans will be blue eyed and blonde haired. Not sure which skin type is recessive, but whichever is, will be the main one.

Recessive gene types get wiped out. Blue eyed and blonde hair get crossed out, bro.

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:49 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:28 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 05:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Although they were different from Northern Europeans, the "Mediterranean Man" was still a breed of white man.

Yes, a "breed" of white man.

They have been "bred" with other races.

Mediterraneans of are mixed with Arab, North African, etc.

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Of course there must be Arab blood in me.

Quote: (04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I believe this because around 10% of my family has a mixed color.

It sounds like you are quite a mix if races and cultures..

You should do one of those DNA tests and get the exact percentages..

If Samseau has Arab blood in him, then he very likely has some black in him too. Though I'm sure he'll be quite disturbed to hear that. The further south in Europe and toward Africa, the more black DNA. Interesting post on this topic:

https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009...all-of-us/

Reminds me of this Tarantino clip (features non-PC and NSFW language):






(skip to 6:30)

Quote: (04-15-2014 02:23 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

(features non-PC language)

We don't tolerate that kind of shit around here.

   

Quote: (04-15-2014 05:41 PM)Collide Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 02:23 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

(features non-PC language)

We don't tolerate that kind of shit around here.

I'm glad you said that, but people do seem to get so sensitive in these race threads.

Ive had fun with half black and white girls. Big ass, bright eyes and thin frames. Yummy. Tore those girls up from behind. I think yella bones usually look better. Half white and half Mexicans are alright but I prefer them un mixed. I can spot that half breed a mile away.

That girl Big Nila posted, good lord

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:49 PM)Moma Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:40 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  

So, basically in the far far future, if mixing multiculturalism continues, all Americans will be blue eyed and blonde haired. Not sure which skin type is recessive, but whichever is, will be the main one.

Recessive gene types get wiped out. Blue eyed and blonde hair get crossed out, bro.

You can't destroy recessive genes through race mixing, that's just not how genes work. Light hair and eyes usually won't pop up in a half white person (although I have seen a bit of it in Indian-White and Asian-White people), but in a 3/4 white person they easily can.

Quote: (04-16-2014 12:01 AM)Deluge Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:49 PM)Moma Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:40 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  

So, basically in the far far future, if mixing multiculturalism continues, all Americans will be blue eyed and blonde haired. Not sure which skin type is recessive, but whichever is, will be the main one.

Recessive gene types get wiped out. Blue eyed and blonde hair get crossed out, bro.

You can't destroy recessive genes through race mixing, that's just not how genes work. Light hair and eyes usually won't pop up in a half white person (although I have seen a bit of it in Indian-White and Asian-White people), but in a 3/4 white person they easily can.

Yes. Those traits can also pop up in someone who is less than 3/4s European if they exist on both sides of the family:

Quote: (02-26-2014 01:07 AM)Excelsior Wrote:  

Quote: (02-26-2014 12:22 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

She's half black? I'd never have known. People tend to think that any time there's a mixed black and white kid the kid will look more black, but that isn't always the case. And probably a lot less than we think. There are probably tons of Jennifer Beals and Derik Jeters who we assume are white but are actually half and half.

What makes it really complicated in the USA is the history of racial mixing within the black population. The average African-American is more than a fifth European by blood (up to a quarter by some estimates). That shared heritage means that when African-Americans mix with Europeans, the appearance of the children can vary widely. They're carrying European DNA that often contains a lot of recessive European traits, and those can surprisingly show up in the children.

This also means that the kids are not quite half-and-half in many cases. Take this guy for example:



The mother and father are to the right. She's probably 100% northwestern European - very low chance of any significant non-European admixture.
He looks like what many would consider "pure black". But look at their kids:







Naturally light eye color and blonde hair, both recessive traits. How did that happen? The "pure black" dad is actually mixed - he's got multiple European ancestors, and is well under 100% west african by blood. Like many other African Americans, these Europeans are probably not much more than 4 or 5 generations back and can probably be found on both sides of his family tree.

Since he's not 100% west african (probably more like 65-75% if I had to guess), his daughter is actually not half and half. The majority of her heritage is actually European.
The products of these unions can vary significantly in appearance depending on which ones pick up recessive traits:



This is the girl above's full sister. She doesn't express any of her mother's recessive traits the way her sister does and probably looks a bit more like what you'd expect a "half and half" to look like. Like her sister, though, she's not exactly half and half - a slight majority of her heritage is probably European. Her brother, conversely, got a lot of the recessive traits too:





When you start combining highly admixed populations with largely "pure" ones, you can get a lot of unpredictable (and often racially ambiguous) results. Beals, Jeter and many others are just evidence of this.

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:49 PM)Moma Wrote:  

Quote: (04-15-2014 01:40 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  

So, basically in the far far future, if mixing multiculturalism continues, all Americans will be blue eyed and blonde haired. Not sure which skin type is recessive, but whichever is, will be the main one.

Recessive gene types get wiped out. Blue eyed and blonde hair get crossed out, bro.

No, they're still there.
Because someone with recessive traits does not have dominant traits, then that is what they pass on.
Someone with dominant traits, still has recessive traits that they can pass on.
So,
recessive+recessive=recessive
dominant+dominant= dominant or recessive
dominant+recessive=high probability of recessive

Since recessive traits only equal recessive, eventually dominant breeds out, but this will take forever and probably never happen. We will have either wiped ourselves out or voyaged to the stars by then.

Within a hundred years you will be able to pick your kid's , skin color, nose shape, IQ, athletic ability, eye shape, facial beauty, etc etc.

All this talk will then become moot.