DaysOfBrokenArrows, really now? I need to explain this? Alright... here goes:

I didn't speak out against Rooshs handling of his interaction. I wouldn't have handled it differently, light-hearted deflection. Actually, I simply trust Roosh can handle his own interactions. Just like I can handle my own. Which is why I fail to see why others feel the urge to get involved. I simply questioned the sense of getting involved. Purely commenting is a different matter.

The point I made on the other thread you quoted, I could make here all over again. Sifting through someone's online identify is akin to sifting through their trash. Sure, it's public - it's been place at the curb after all. But sifting through trash I consider low. Think about it? Aren't there more productive and positive things to do with your own time?

I welcome the mindset debate. You're free to question and scrutinise mine. My point after all pertained to exactly that - by the look of it - some of you have a long way to go yet. Some of this stuff just screams angry, retaliatory, nice guy.

Notice her immigrant name - a sign of how Canadian culture is so rotten that it devastates even formerly nice and feminine girls from other countries.

That said, of course I'd bang. But would I commit myself to her? Heh.

Quote: (02-13-2013 03:54 AM)MorphineBliss Wrote:  

Googling and speculating about some person you'll never meet ... what kind of pastime is that now?

Some people watch sports, some reality tv, some flame on USENET^W forums. It's not realistic to be 100% focused on your goals and perfectly efficient every waking hour of the day.

Gonna get in early - Thread of the year.

I'm with MorphineBliss to a degree, we shouldn't give this girl more of our time than a hearty laugh at her pretentious attitude. But the way he goes about it to highlight this is all wrong.

7 day ban for MorphineBliss.

I wish this would happen more often

What you're saying goes against nature. You're saying men should suppress their natural curiosity because of some undefined "greater good." This sounds an awful lot like the BS put forth by both feminism and the Catholic church, both of which "punish" their minions when they dare question the "faith" because they went looking and found some alternate point of view.

From a behavioral psychology POV, here is what happened.

1). Woman writes to Roosh.

2). Roosh puts their dialogue on here.

3). Men say "What the hell is this all about?" and do some research.

What you have just witnessed is the same thing that happens when men decide they want to further analyze anything from sports teams to scientific ideas. They go searching. They dig deep. The head down blind alleys sometimes. They seek to figure out why things are the way they are.

And this is what really irks me about both feminism and religion: they would suppress the very quality -- curiosity -- that defines man.

If you don't want men curious about something or someone, don't put it in public at all, because curiosity is the nature of man.

Quote: (02-13-2013 05:18 AM)MorphineBliss Wrote:  

DaysOfBrokenArrows, really now? I need to explain this? Alright... here goes:

I didn't speak out against Rooshs handling of his interaction. I wouldn't have handled it differently, light-hearted deflection. Actually, I simply trust Roosh can handle his own interactions. Just like I can handle my own. Which is why I fail to see why others feel the urge to get involved. I simply questioned the sense of getting involved. Purely commenting is a different matter.

The point I made on the other thread you quoted, I could make here all over again. Sifting through someone's online identify is akin to sifting through their trash. Sure, it's public - it's been place at the curb after all. But sifting through trash I consider low. Think about it? Aren't there more productive and positive things to do with your own time?

I welcome the mindset debate. You're free to question and scrutinise mine. My point after all pertained to exactly that - by the look of it - some of you have a long way to go yet. Some of this stuff just screams angry, retaliatory, nice guy.

haha that was fucking fun, man I'm annoyed i missed this yesterday

The chick is undeniably cute, so why does she want to be a fucking lawyer? With a makeover, some intermittent fasting and gym work, she could be a middle-range escort. Perfect her BJ skills and she can snag a rich guy within a couple of years, tops. No need for all that wasted learnin'.

Someone send her Kwisatz's contact details.

I woke up today with a soft heart. I felt a little bad that I may have ruined this girl's life. So I extended an olive branch to her and decided that, if her response was pleasing, I would black out her name on the initial screenshots. Here is our most recent dialogue:



What say you?

That's a non-apology if anything.

Insert gif of Caesar giving thumb down here.
(that one should be made a forum gif btw)

Law enforcement, eh? What exactly has transpired? People found info she voluntarily posted online. How is this a threat to her security? Wait - INFORMATION RAPE. If someone is involuntarily harassed it is us! She is reading a men-only forum! Funny how this keyboard "warrior" feels free to sling accusations, judgment and crap but then whines about being called out.

I understand if you black out her name. I too have a soft spot for girls, even though Western ones don't deserve it. But that wasn't a sincere apology and think about how not once has a feminist thrown you an olive branch. And consider she was the "bully". No where has anyone done anything close to harassment. No one is under any threat from Canadian law enforcement. Her apology was more of an attack also. I say if she can actually come around and give a sincere apology and realize why she was out of her element to attack you, go soft on her. But she doesn't seem like she's learned her lesson in the slightest regarding the double standard going on here. She thinks because she holds the "correct" views that there are no repercussions for her actions. Only repercussions for those bad, evil, men.

Why on Earth do we care what she thinks?

That said, I'd say any forum member who harasses someone based on information gleaned from this forum should be banned.

"I was simply trying to understand how someone could possibly see the world as you do....by telling you unprovoked, out of the blue and having not been effected directly by anything that you've done, that you have mummy issues, poor self esteem and labelling you a pathetic excuse for a human being".

If she asks you to take it down again give it to her in a language your typical mouthy facebook whore understands..
[attachment=9977]

Passive-aggressive non-apology.

1. The arrogance that you get from the way this self righteous egotist writes is sickening. Do. Not. Remove. Her details. Trash like this needs to be taught for society's sake.

2. This dumb Arab broad is obviously attracted to you.

3. What a delusional moron. Only a sick, decaying, society could support such a creature. Her father needs to beat the shit out of her.

good post, but I think saying her father needs to beat the shit out of her goes a little too far.

"before I go to law enforcement"? What exactly would she go to law enforcement for? Anybody enlighten me?

1). It's not a threat to her security. If anything, it makes her safer because after seeing this, no guy is going to want to go NEAR her, esp. from here.

2). It's not "harassment" because no one threatened her. If criticizing someone and their ideas is "harassment" then goodbye America and goodbye freedom of speech. If she didn't put a note on her email to you saying "not for publication" then that goes double.

3). I am SO TIRED of feminists who dismiss ideas men have by saying they have "issues to resolve" or "mommy issues." First off, that's no arguing the point, that's "arguing the person." She he also be dismissed because she doesn't like his hair? But also...if feminists were in charge EVERY GREAT WRITER AND THINKER FROM PLATO TO ORWELL TO FRANK ZAPPA WOULD HAVE BEEN SILENCED OR PUT ON RITALIN BECAUSE OF ALLEGED "ISSUES."

4). This goes beyond petty bullshit and is now edging towards a freedom of speech issue if she does attempt to bring in law enforcement. And you know what? I'll be sure to bring in the media if she does and it'll become like Beyonce's photo, where it will blow up ten times as big because she tried to censor it.

The irony will be that once this goes beyond the manosphere (who know better than to go near her) THEN she will have a problem with the wackos.

Quote: (02-13-2013 09:04 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

I woke up today with a soft heart. I felt a little bad that I may have ruined this girl's life. So I extended an olive branch to her and decided that, if her response was pleasing, I would black out her name on the initial screenshots. Here is our most recent dialogue:



What say you?

If somebody snipes some nekkid pics off her we can get Roosh an appearance on Anderson Cooper.

I love those "if you saw it that way" passive-aggressive apologies.

Quote: (02-13-2013 09:51 AM)TheSlayer Wrote:  

"before I go to law enforcement"? What exactly would she go to law enforcement for? Anybody enlighten me?

I'm afraid you don't understand how feminist's abuse the legal system. Even though she committed the first crime, she has the pussy pass and will be treated as the victim.

Next Roosh will be charged with harassment, even though he's not a Canadian citizen and even though he never harassed anyone.

Even though Roosh cannot be convicted of his charge, his name will then forever carry the stigma of being "accused of harassment".

In a feminist world, accusations are as good as convictions. Being accused of a false rape is just as good as being convicted. Being accused of domestic abuse is enough to get you tossed out of your home. Being accused of harassment is enough to get you put on a hate list.



That said, Roosh, I think this will be a good publicity stunt. Let this bitch go for legal action. It will invariably make it's way to Jeezebel and then your shit will get another 100K views, and you'll probably sell another 50 books or so.

Plus, she didn't apologize. She needs to learn some humility.