Quote: (12-28-2012 07:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:
It's not an ugly woman's fault she's ugly. In fact, it's a tragedy that women are born ugly in the first place, but there's nothing anyone can do about it.
I know if I was an ugly ass woman, I'd be a feminist too. It would be totally in my self-interest.
Thus, what can our response for ugly women be? How can we argue against them? How could we ever offer them the vision of a better world?
This is mother nature working her way. We need to be aware of the above that Samseau has noted and the trends that are in action in relation to it.
For most of recorded history society has revolved around providing value and people getting ahead based on merit. Times were too tough to give slack to people who couldn't support themselves. Now we live in times of debt powered excesses, billed into the future and that will never be paid off. This fake wealth has allowed people to cut loose from meritocracy and the need to provide value. People have had time to sit on the sidelines and ponder the evils of some people doing better than others.
As Samseau points out these people tend to be those who are less gifted in terms of physical, mental and social prowess. While many of our survival strategy may be merit and providing value to others, these people believe they can't survive in this system. Their survival strategy is using often hysterical emotional manipulation to make you feel guilty and to deconstruct yourself down to their level, or ideally below. It's a system based on weakness, rather than strength, and can only collapse if their society is ever realised. Particularly as they will eternally turn on themselves in their self-devouring crusade to make everything equal.
The sort of people with the genetic and social makeup to produce such anti-merit philosophies have been lurking around throughout all of history, but only recently has a space existed in which they can assert their desire for complete equality of outcome. Just as gays were forced underground and have spent centuries pretending to be straight, likely passing on genes that make you more likely to be gay, the social strata of past societies has forced social injustice warrior types to deal with it and find a space in the society. The very nature of past societies has likely meant both groups progenitor genes are less common, but not enough for them to completely disappear.
There is in particular one fatal flaw to equality authoritarians, feminists and other grief culture groups - they have really low fertility rates. In the US, if you look at fertility rates by state, the fertility rate is higher in all the more masculine-individualist states like the Dakotas, Texas, Utah, Alaska; and lowest in feminist-collectivist states like DC, Massachusetts, Oregon and so on. If you drill down further and look at the county level, for example in Maryland, the most Democrat leaning county has a fertility rate of barely half replacement, about 1.2 and the most Republican county is above replacement at about 2.2. Maryland is currently a quite heavy Democrat state, but there are already more children born to registered Republicans than there are to registered Democrats. When you look at the individual level, the further you go towards masculinity, gun ownership, individualism the higher the fertility rate and the further you go towards feminism, big government, redistribution the lower the fertility rate.
The whole paradigm of the left is oriented towards having fewer children, but it's only them who've swallowed that idea. A Gallup survey shows that about 75% of Americans adopt the political ideas of their parents and of those that adopt their parents leftist views, 40% will end up identifying as conservative in latter life.
The whole leftist system is designed to tear down aspects of society, but their own methods are destroying themselves the quickest. One of their big pushes is the "woman's right" of abortion. But abortion mainly kills future Democrats, SJWs and blacks. If they do succeed in tearing down society, we will be left with few resources and have no choice to go back to civilised human nature and the reality of living in a physical world, meritocracy.
To answer the OP's question - what to do?
I would say distance yourself from SJWs, collectivists, feminists etc. Don't let them take any of your value or waste any time on trying to save them from extinction. Focus on yourself, making yourself better, finding the best woman you can, out-breeding them and making strong and independent children who are better than you.
I think the next 100 years or so is going to get really rocky, partly due to the destablisation of a society that has evolved over 10,000s of years. SJWs aren't going to make it. They've been milling around for millenia, slowly growing as society became softer. But after this century, their genes will be like the dinosaurs, gone.