----------------------------------------

Quote: (11-09-2015 02:37 PM)Menace Wrote:  

Saw it, and was not impressed. There is not a single emotion in the movie. It's like everyone is going through the motions. No chemistry between any of the characters. Aston Martin badly underused. I almost fell asleep. Save your money.

That´s exactly how I felt. There was something off. The movie looks great, visually. It´s very well shot by Sam Mendes (a very talented director). But something was missing. It just went going from one set piece to the next. But I was never able to connect to the movie the way I did in Casino Royal for example.

Quote: (12-14-2015 10:30 AM)freeuser Wrote:  

That´s exactly how I felt. There was something off. The movie looks great, visually. It´s very well shot by Sam Mendes (a very talented director). But something was missing. It just went going from one set piece to the next. But I was never able to connect to the movie the way I did in Casino Royal for example.

Interesting - that's how I feel about most movies these days. Maybe I'm getting old. It's exactly as you guys say and the general feeling is that they decided on a list of major plot points and then just filled up the gaps in between. No soul in recent movies, they are mired by their own arrogance of wanting to be the next big blogbuster. Because to make inspiring movies, to tell stories that really affect people, takes risk and creativity and finesse beyond a laundry list of special effects and obligatory fight/action scenes.

Quote: (11-20-2015 02:51 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

I would have preferred the other girl from "Blue is the Warmest Color":

Not hot in my book but something about that mouth is lighting up my brain with naught thoughts. Yes, I really should seek help...

The Movie destroyed the continuity. It didn't bring back an already dead Blofield from the previous era and completely destroyed the tension. Worst yet they were step brothers. What the hell...... Without context you wouldn't even know Blofield was an important villain in Bond history.

Boring movie that didn't live up to the Bond name. Waste of time 5/10.

That pretty much sums it up:

   

Albeit the young girl claims she is heterosexual any young actress must say that or the public stops caring for any romantic parts she may get in the future. Even women simply stop caring if they find out a male or female cast member is homosexual.

Quote:Quote:

She told ES magazine: “I never believed in marriage, but now I’m in love, I think maybe.

Yup - sounds like it's true love. Maybe.

http://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/l-a-se...95696.html

Next Bond movies along the Bond slipping slope:

1. James Bond fucks 300 pound monster.
2. James Bond fucks 500 pound girl power blob.
3. James Bond fucks post-op trannie.
4. James Bond sucks dick of pre-op trannie.
5. James Bond gets fucked by pre-op trannie.
6. James Bond is a trannie.
7. James Bond is a woman.
8. James Bond is a black woman.
9. James Bond is a fat Asian woman.
10. James Bond is a fat ugly mentally disabled woman.

And finally James Bond can die, because the boxoffice results would not merit even 20 mio. $ in Tumblerista-turnover:



But what can one expect really? The franchise is based on a real agent and the actual real secret service agents are utter servants to the very elite. The same elite who has decided to promote the gender crap and feminism - James Bond has become the change agent after the cold war ended. The reality of that assassin profession is much more mundane and way more dirty.

It was fun as the illusion lasted - RIP Bond.



Better eject before we see continuation of those scenes here....

Quote: (12-15-2015 04:13 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

But what can one expect really? The franchise is based on a real agent and the actual real secret service agents are utter servants to the very elite. The same elite who has decided to promote the gender crap and feminism - James Bond has become the change agent after the cold war ended. The reality of that assassin profession is much more mundane and way more dirty.

To me it was just hilarious to have M and Bond on the side of privacy advocates in this latest movie, with M uttering phrases such as ''George Orwell's worst nightmare.'', while in reality we all know these would be the guys most likely wanking to the thought of 24/7/365 everywhere-allthetime-ineveryway -surveillance complex .

Quote: (12-14-2015 11:19 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

Quote: (12-14-2015 10:30 AM)freeuser Wrote:  

That´s exactly how I felt. There was something off. The movie looks great, visually. It´s very well shot by Sam Mendes (a very talented director). But something was missing. It just went going from one set piece to the next. But I was never able to connect to the movie the way I did in Casino Royal for example.

Interesting - that's how I feel about most movies these days. Maybe I'm getting old. It's exactly as you guys say and the general feeling is that they decided on a list of major plot points and then just filled up the gaps in between. No soul in recent movies, they are mired by their own arrogance of wanting to be the next big blogbuster. Because to make inspiring movies, to tell stories that really affect people, takes risk and creativity and finesse beyond a laundry list of special effects and obligatory fight/action scenes.

Exactly! It's a sad state of affairs. I recently saw some movies from the 80s like First Blood and Road House and was surprised how well made and crafted they were (yeah even Road House) compared to the dreck we see at the cinema theses days. Even the Patrick Swayze vehicle has, under all the cheesiness, a soul and is incredibly entertaining.

Today I saw the new Star Trek Beyond Trailer and it looks so generic, boring and unoriginal that it pissed me off.

Well, they've announced the new Bond girls. This one gets my vote;





That's Ana de Armas. Seen her in a few films. Made to be a Bond-girl.

Not at all keen on the others;



And I'm even less keen on the news that 'James Bond will be turned into a '#metoo feminist icon';

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/89...er-bridge/

Quote:Quote:

The feisty new stars could spell the end of Bond’s famous womanising ways as he’s set to be turned into a #MeToo feminist hero.

Fleabag writer Phoebe Waller-Bridge has been drafted into the writing team after it was reported that 007 star Daniel Craig demanded bosses bring her on board.

Producer Barbara Broccoli said Bond’s attitudes to women would move with the times.

She said: “The Me Too movement has had a huge impact – rightfully, thankfully – on society, and these films should reflect that, as everything we do should.”

Daniel added: “Bond has always adapted for the times.”

Yeah, yeah, whatever Daniel. I'll no doubt watch it just so I can complain about it. At least we still have the old (good) movies to watch. I just feel so sorry for young boys and men these days having to grow up without a proper Bond of their own.

I swear to God, not making Jon Hamm the next Bond (a few years ago) should go down as one of the biggest missed opportunities in movie history.

bond a metoo feminist icon, eh?

is this new bond movie a comedy?

Bond never adapted to the times insofar as changing his core personality and modus operandi. He just wavered in how much comedy he'd deliver, with Moore delivering the most.

Note the body language in that cast photo.

Quote: (04-26-2019 08:42 AM)Alsos Wrote:  

Note the body language in that cast photo.

Good call. That's horrific now that you mention it. Craig is shit-scared of even touching a woman .... I mean, what sort of a Bond have we created for ourselves! They've succeeded in making themselves so toxic that not even James Bond dares put a foot wrong in their company.

Sir Roger looked more at ease;



and;

I failed to notice Craig's (post-#metoo) body language, but I sure noticed that the De Armas chick has a nice see-through, barely above getting arrested for public exposure. Nice cute broad, WB, but not enough to convince me to go see the movie.

SJW movies won't have my money, and anyway, the last Bonds make no sense. Convoluted scenarios all over the place, Bond being shot by a Black snipering Moneypenny, castrated by a jovial and plump Spaniard, humiliated in every possible way... Leftists have gotten their revenge on Bond, so let's not give them our money.

From Casino Royale to this....

Quote: (04-26-2019 10:46 AM)Going strong Wrote:  

I failed to notice Craig's (post-#metoo) body language, but I sure noticed that the De Armas chick has a nice see-through, barely above getting arrested for public exposure. Nice cute broad, WB, but not enough to convince me to go see the movie.

SJW movies won't have my money, and anyway, the last Bonds make no sense. Convoluted scenarios all over the place, Bond being shot by a Black snipering Moneypenny, castrated by a jovial and plump Spaniard, humiliated in every possible way... Leftists have gotten their revenge on Bond, so let's not give them our money.

See De Armas in Blade Runner 2049. Yum.

We got plot:

Quote:Quote:

Bond has left active service. His peace is short-lived when his old friend Felix Leiter from the CIA turns up asking for help, leading Bond onto the trail of a mysterious villain armed with dangerous new technology.

Rami Malek plays the villain. Interested how that will turn out.

The next Bond film should revolve around a plot line of all these sluts hiring Gloria Allred and chasing settlements.

Ana de Armas is fucking hot, could use some bigger cans though.

Rami Malek is too much of a pussy to be a decent villain.

It pisses me off because Casino Royal is the ULTIMATE feminist bond movie. It features very strong/intelligent women, actual romance, a man getting his manhood destroyed (figuratively and literally) A man losing hope, women being the saviors (as in giving the correct knowledge) and lastly it shows a man being a weapon, a protector, a tool down to the coldest point. AND I LOVE THE MOVIE because they did all this very well, it didn't seem like a feminist movie because they made it a bond movie first.

Spectre came off rapey to me, maybe that's the reason they went this way.

I found Judi dench very believable as M, I dont feel shes a feminist character. Some old women become very redpilled with age and see things for what they are. My grandma is like that. The job also requires sending men to their death she showed the coldness to do that. She was unemotional and didnt get in to petty bickering. I liked her better than ralph fiennes.

Quote: (04-26-2019 06:25 PM)Donfitz007 Wrote:  

It pisses me off because Casino Royal is the ULTIMATE feminist bond movie. It features...a man getting his manhood destroyed

That scene also made me think it was feminist bullshit, but it was actually part of the original book written by Ian Fleming in 1953.

Overall, I thought Casino Royale was probably one of the best Bond films.

Eva Green (who played Vespa, the only girl Bond truly loved) was very understated. The ending was truly tragic.

Regarding Ana de Armas - the smoking hot femholobot from Blade Runner - she had to agree to bang Daniel Craig to get the role. Despite the MeToo movement, Hollywood works the same old way.

Quote:Quote:

It might be his last installment, but this foreign born A+ list (only with his franchise) mostly movie actor still made sure his co-star would be willing to sleep with him before agreeing on her casting. Last time was such an issue when the co-star wouldn't and they had to have separate travel schedules and appearances.

New Costar: Ana de Armas
Old Costar (who wouldn't bang him): Monica Bellucci

Readers outside the UK may not know who the Fleabag actress and writer Phoebe Waller-Bridge is. Her being appointed as political commissar for the film script is significant.

Fleabag is about a jaded, indebted, perverted 30 something woman who in SE1 has three lovers, the alpha who buggers her, the nice guy who bores her by making soft and tender love to her and a weird guy.

Phoebe Waller-Bridge has great feminist credentials: grand-daughter of a baronet and daughter of parents with successful careers in the City. Part of the cosmopolitan bourgeoisie and with all the entitlement that comes with it.

Quote: (04-27-2019 12:49 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

Regarding Ana de Armas - the smoking hot femholobot from Blade Runner - she had to agree to bang Daniel Craig to get the role. Despite the MeToo movement, Hollywood works the same old way.

Quote:Quote:

It might be his last installment, but this foreign born A+ list (only with his franchise) mostly movie actor still made sure his co-star would be willing to sleep with him before agreeing on her casting. Last time was such an issue when the co-star wouldn't and they had to have separate travel schedules and appearances.

New Costar: Ana de Armas
Old Costar (who wouldn't bang him): Monica Bellucci

What is the source? Doesn't "willing to sleep with" actually means in this context their movie sex scene and if the actress would be ok with that scene or if they would just skip forward after the initial kissing part?